From sacadmin Sun Mar 23 21:02:41 2008 Received: from zruty.sfbay.sun.com (zruty.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.168.40]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2O42fSV012553; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 21:02:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zruty.sfbay.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zruty.sfbay.sun.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2O42f2I012018; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 21:02:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dduvall@localhost) by zruty.sfbay.sun.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.2/Submit) id m2O42fcd012014; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 21:02:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 21:02:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Danek Duvall Message-Id: <200803240402.m2O42fcd012014@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> To: LSARC-record@sac.sfbay.sun.com Subject: Erlang/OTP R12B1 [LSARC/2008/210 FastTrack timeout 03/31/2008] Status: RO Content-Length: 552 Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.64 07/13/07 SMI This information is Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems 1. Introduction 1.1. Project/Component Working Name: Erlang/OTP R12B1 1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier: Author: Raymond Xiong 1.3 Date of This Document: 23 March, 2008 4. Technical Description See the case directory for more detail 6. Resources and Schedule 6.4. Steering Committee requested information 6.4.1. Consolidation C-team Name: SFW 6.5. ARC review type: FastTrack 6.6. ARC Exposure: open From danek.duvall@sun.com Sun Mar 23 21:08:14 2008 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2O48Ep5012571 for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 21:08:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m2O47x6P012412; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 04:08:12 GMT Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JY700I03VHMEB00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 21:08:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dm-sfbay-02.sfbay.sun.com ([129.146.11.31]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JY700A4WVHL2W50@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 21:08:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zruty.sfbay.sun.com (zruty.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.168.40]) by dm-sfbay-02.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m2O487f6039774; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 21:08:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zruty.sfbay.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zruty.sfbay.sun.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2O4879I012065; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 21:08:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dduvall@localhost) by zruty.sfbay.sun.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.2/Submit) id m2O487Uh012064; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 21:08:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 21:08:07 -0700 From: Danek Duvall Subject: Erlang/OTP R12B1 [LSARC/2008/210 FastTrack timeout 03/31/2008] To: lsarc-ext@sun.com Cc: Huan Xiong , James.Walker@sun.com, solaris-qe-pkgproj@sun.com Message-id: <20080324040807.GT26870@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-27) Status: RO Content-Length: 4875 I'm sponsoring this fasttrack for Raymond Xiong. The release binding is Minor, and the interfaces are Uncommitted. There are man pages in the materials directory. Danek ====================================================================== Summary ======= This fast-track introduces Erlang/OTP R12B1 into SFW consolidation. Micro release binding is requested. Discussion ========== Erlang is a general purpose programming language and runtime environment that has support for concurrency, distribution and fault tolerance. One of the fundamental properties and main strengths of Erlang is its built-in support for lightweight processes and message-passing style concurrency. Erlang is suitable for distributed, reliable, concurrent applications. OTP is a large collection of general libraries for Erlang. (OTP stands for Open Telecom Platform. The name was due to the fact that Erlang/OTP was originally designed for Telecom system). The latest version is R12B1, released on Feb 6, 2008. R12B1 means "Release 12B, patchlevel 1". All objects will be contained in /usr/erlang/$RELEASE, which has the following layout: /usr/erlang/$RELEASE |- bin |- lib |- man +- doc Note Erlang executables are actually in subdirs of /usr/erlang/$RELEASE/lib, and they will be linked symbolically from /usr/erlang/$RELEASE/bin and from /usr/bin. The latter links will always point to the highest $RELEASE of Erlang installed on the system. Because Erlang has large amount of man pages and html docs, a separated documentation package is proposed. So there will be two packages for a single Erlang release: SUNWerlang-$RELEASE SUNWerlang-$RELEASE-doc Take Erlang R12B1 for example, the package name will be SUNWerlang-r12b and SUNWerlang-r12b-doc. Files in these two packages will be installed under /usr/erlang/R12B, and symbol links will be created under /usr/bin to point to executables in /usr/erlang/R12B(since this is the the latest version for now). Dependencies ============ SUNWopenssl-commands OpenSSL Commands (Usr) SUNWopenssl-include OpenSSL Header Files SUNWopenssl-libraries OpenSSL Libraries (Usr) SUNWopensslr OpenSSL (Root) SUNWj6dev JDK 6.0 Dev. Tools SUNWj6rt JDK 6.0 Runtime Env SUNWgd2 The Graphics Draw Library Interfaces ========== Imported Interfaces ------------------- NAME STABILITY NOTES OpenSSL External/Volatile PSARC/2003/500 Java SE 6 Committed PSARC/2006/430 X Window System Standard/Committed PSARC/1998/299 Graphics Draw Library Uncommitted PSARC/2007/166 Exported Interfaces ------------------- NAME STABILITY NOTES SUNWerlang-r12b Uncommitted Package Name SUNWerlang-r12b-doc Uncommitted Package Name /usr/erlang/R12B/lib Uncommitted Erlang Language Library /usr/erlang/R12B/bin Uncommitted Erlang Commands dialyzer Uncommitted Symbolic Link epmd Uncommitted Symbolic Link erl Uncommitted Symbolic Link erlc Uncommitted Symbolic Link escript Uncommitted Symbolic Link run_erl Uncommitted Symbolic Link to_erl Uncommitted Symbolic Link typer Uncommitted Symbolic Link /usr/bin dialyzer Uncommitted Symbolic Link epmd Uncommitted Symbolic Link erl Uncommitted Symbolic Link erlc Uncommitted Symbolic Link escript Uncommitted Symbolic Link run_erl Uncommitted Symbolic Link to_erl Uncommitted Symbolic Link typer Uncommitted Symbolic Link See attached tar file for man pages. References ========== [1] http://www.erlang.org [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erlang [3] http://www.ericsson.com/technology/opensource/erlang/news/archive/erlang_goes_multi_core.shtml RFE ID# 6670247 From gww@eng.sun.com Sun Mar 23 23:35:31 2008 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2O6ZUrV015111 for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:35:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m2O6ZLii007109; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 14:35:29 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JY8002032B4D900@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:35:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dm-eng-02.sfbay.sun.com ([129.146.11.32]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JY800ADJ2B42P90@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:35:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from marduk.eng.sun.com (marduk.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.108.224]) by dm-eng-02.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m2O6ZQKi019765; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:35:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from marduk.eng.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by marduk.eng.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m2O7ZkUX010152; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:35:46 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gww@localhost) by marduk.eng.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.11/Submit) id m2O7ZkY5010151; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:35:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:35:46 -0800 (PST) From: Gary Winiger Subject: Re: Erlang/OTP R12B1 [LSARC/2008/210 FastTrack timeout 03/31/2008] To: danek.duvall@sun.com, lsarc-ext@sun.com Cc: James.Walker@sun.com, raymond.xiong@sun.com, solaris-qe-pkgproj@sun.com Message-id: <200803240735.m2O7ZkY5010151@marduk.eng.sun.com> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 Status: RO Content-Length: 315 > Interfaces > ========== > > Imported Interfaces > ------------------- > NAME STABILITY NOTES > > OpenSSL External/Volatile PSARC/2003/500 Doesn't this require a contract? Did I miss seeing that in the materials? Gary.. From James.Walker@sun.com Mon Mar 24 02:17:47 2008 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2O9Hkh8020289 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 02:17:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m2O9HdL8023779; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 09:17:42 GMT Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JY8008099TG7500@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 03:17:40 -0600 (MDT) Received: from brmea-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.98.43]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JY8005GE9TG2B60@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 03:17:40 -0600 (MDT) Received: from fe-amer-09.sun.com ([192.18.109.79]) by brmea-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m2O9HeZ1029470; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 09:17:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JY800F019RSXP00@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from James.Walker@Sun.COM); Mon, 24 Mar 2008 03:17:40 -0600 (MDT) Received: from c-67-166-23-56.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([129.150.32.152]) by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JY800BLJ9TEOA20@mail-amer.sun.com>; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 03:17:39 -0600 (MDT) Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 03:17:38 -0600 From: Jim Walker Subject: Re: Erlang/OTP R12B1 [LSARC/2008/210 FastTrack timeout 03/31/2008] In-reply-to: <20080324040807.GT26870@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> Sender: James.Walker@sun.com To: Danek Duvall , Huan Xiong Cc: lsarc-ext@sun.com, solaris-qe-pkgproj@sun.com Reply-to: James.Walker@sun.com Message-id: <47E771B2.1030703@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <20080324040807.GT26870@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) Status: RO Content-Length: 378 > Interfaces > ========== > > SUNWerlang-r12b Uncommitted Package Name > SUNWerlang-r12b-doc Uncommitted Package Name Would more general SUNWerlang and SUNWerlang-doc package names be better? I don't see a need to track the version in the package names. It looks like around four new versions of erlang are released each year. -jim From Raymond.Xiong@sun.com Mon Mar 24 02:58:51 2008 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2O9woT9021105 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 02:58:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m2O9wfGj006965; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 09:58:49 GMT Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JY800A07BQ0H100@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 02:58:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dm-singapore-01.singapore.sun.com ([129.158.71.101]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JY8006O3BPY4MC0@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 02:58:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sineb-smtp-1.singapore.sun.com (sineb-smtp-1.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.123.4]) by dm-singapore-01.singapore.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m2O9wkFj018957; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:58:46 +0800 (SGT) Received: from phys-sedge2-1.singapore.sun.com (phys-sedge2-1.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.123.14]) by sineb-smtp-1.singapore.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m2OACFAs005070; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:12:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([129.158.219.118]) by sedge2-mail1.singapore.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JY8002TOBPS5R90@sedge2-mail1.singapore.sun.com>; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:58:41 +0800 (SGT) Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:58:59 +0800 From: Raymond Xiong Subject: Re: Erlang/OTP R12B1 [LSARC/2008/210 FastTrack timeout 03/31/2008] In-reply-to: <47E771B2.1030703@sun.com> To: Jim Walker Cc: Danek Duvall , lsarc-ext@sun.com, solaris-qe-pkgproj@sun.com Message-id: <20080324095858.GA15929@Sun.Com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <20080324040807.GT26870@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> <47E771B2.1030703@sun.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Status: RO Content-Length: 1050 On 03/24/08, Jim Walker wrote: > >Interfaces > >========== > > > > SUNWerlang-r12b Uncommitted Package Name > > SUNWerlang-r12b-doc Uncommitted Package Name > > Would more general SUNWerlang and SUNWerlang-doc package names > be better? > > I don't see a need to track the version in the package names. > It looks like around four new versions of erlang are released > each year. Jim, Major new Erlang release came out every 1-2 years in the past. I guess those versions you mentioned were patch releases. Take R12B release as an example, it was first released on Dec 2007 as R12B-0. On Feb 2008, a new patch release R12B-1 was released. What I propose is to support multiple releases(ie., R11B, R12B) and use the latest patch releases of them(ie., R11B-5, R12B-1). For the purpose, separated package name and installation directory is needed for each release. A brief introduction to Erlang/OTP versioning scheme can be found here: http://www.erlang.org/faq/faq.html#AEN235 -- Regards, Raymond From James.Walker@sun.com Mon Mar 24 03:17:03 2008 Received: from sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail3mpk.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.52]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2OAH3w3021461 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 03:17:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m2OAH2hT004750; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 03:17:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JY800C03CKDQT00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 04:17:01 -0600 (MDT) Received: from brmea-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.98.43]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JY800CPBCKCAM00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 04:17:00 -0600 (MDT) Received: from fe-amer-10.sun.com ([192.18.109.80]) by brmea-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m2OAH0p8014455; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:17:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JY800M01CBP1200@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from James.Walker@Sun.COM); Mon, 24 Mar 2008 04:17:00 -0600 (MDT) Received: from c-67-166-23-56.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([129.150.32.152]) by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JY8002OECKBP680@mail-amer.sun.com>; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 04:17:00 -0600 (MDT) Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 04:16:59 -0600 From: Jim Walker Subject: Re: Erlang/OTP R12B1 [LSARC/2008/210 FastTrack timeout 03/31/2008] In-reply-to: <20080324095858.GA15929@Sun.Com> Sender: James.Walker@sun.com To: Raymond Xiong Cc: Danek Duvall , lsarc-ext@sun.com, solaris-qe-pkgproj@sun.com Reply-to: James.Walker@sun.com Message-id: <47E77F9B.3090702@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <20080324040807.GT26870@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> <47E771B2.1030703@sun.com> <20080324095858.GA15929@Sun.Com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) Status: RO Content-Length: 1051 Raymond Xiong wrote: > On 03/24/08, Jim Walker wrote: >>> Interfaces >>> ========== >>> >>> SUNWerlang-r12b Uncommitted Package Name >>> SUNWerlang-r12b-doc Uncommitted Package Name >> Would more general SUNWerlang and SUNWerlang-doc package names >> be better? >> >> I don't see a need to track the version in the package names. >> It looks like around four new versions of erlang are released >> each year. > > Jim, > > Major new Erlang release came out every 1-2 years in the > past. I guess those versions you mentioned were patch releases. > Right. I was thinking of patch releases. > > What I propose is to support multiple releases(ie., R11B, R12B) > and use the latest patch releases of them(ie., R11B-5, R12B-1). > For the purpose, separated package name and installation directory > is needed for each release. > This may be ok, to maintain backwards compatibility. Do you see a specific need to have older versions of erlang on a system instead of just having the most recent version? -jim From Raymond.Xiong@Sun.COM Mon Mar 24 03:59:59 2008 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2OAxwoG022378 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 03:59:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m2OAxv27000804; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:59:57 GMT Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JY800E01EJWW100@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 03:59:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dm-singapore-02.singapore.sun.com ([129.158.71.102]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JY80091KEJVCV40@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 03:59:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sineb-smtp-1.singapore.sun.com (sineb-smtp-1.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.123.4]) by dm-singapore-02.singapore.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m2OAxs0b007919; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:59:54 +0800 (SGT) Received: from phys-sedge2-1.singapore.sun.com (phys-sedge2-1.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.123.14]) by sineb-smtp-1.singapore.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m2OBDN9B006378; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 11:13:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([129.158.219.118]) by sedge2-mail1.singapore.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JY8002APEJO5RD0@sedge2-mail1.singapore.sun.com>; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:59:49 +0800 (SGT) Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:00:08 +0800 From: Raymond Xiong Subject: Re: Erlang/OTP R12B1 [LSARC/2008/210 FastTrack timeout 03/31/2008] In-reply-to: <47E77F9B.3090702@sun.com> To: Jim Walker Cc: Danek Duvall , lsarc-ext@Sun.COM, solaris-qe-pkgproj@Sun.COM Message-id: <20080324110007.GA16009@Sun.Com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <20080324040807.GT26870@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> <47E771B2.1030703@sun.com> <20080324095858.GA15929@Sun.Com> <47E77F9B.3090702@sun.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Status: RO Content-Length: 1641 On 03/24/08, Jim Walker wrote: > Raymond Xiong wrote: > >On 03/24/08, Jim Walker wrote: > >>>Interfaces > >>>========== > >>> > >>> SUNWerlang-r12b Uncommitted Package Name > >>> SUNWerlang-r12b-doc Uncommitted Package Name > >>Would more general SUNWerlang and SUNWerlang-doc package names > >>be better? > >> > >>I don't see a need to track the version in the package names. > >>It looks like around four new versions of erlang are released > >>each year. > > > >Jim, > > > >Major new Erlang release came out every 1-2 years in the > >past. I guess those versions you mentioned were patch releases. > > > > Right. I was thinking of patch releases. > > > > >What I propose is to support multiple releases(ie., R11B, R12B) > >and use the latest patch releases of them(ie., R11B-5, R12B-1). > >For the purpose, separated package name and installation directory > >is needed for each release. > > > > This may be ok, to maintain backwards compatibility. Do you see > a specific need to have older versions of erlang on a system > instead of just having the most recent version? I don't have specific reason, but I observed other language(ie., Ruby, Java, Perl, etc.) were all packaged in this way. I think it's good to have this flexibility? Because Erlang/OTP R12B release is rather new, it is probably not well tested and supported for some applications. For example, below is from ejabberd README on which Erlang version to use: "Erlang/OTP R10B-9 up to R11B-5. Erlang R12 releases are not yet officially supported, and are not recommended for production servers" -- Regards, Raymond From James.Walker@sun.com Mon Mar 24 09:02:25 2008 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2OG2OP1001398 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 09:02:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m2OG2FDS005057; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:02:23 GMT Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JY800323SJXFG00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 09:02:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brmea-mail-4.sun.com ([192.18.98.36]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JY800K8VSJOGX70@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 09:02:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-amer-10.sun.com ([192.18.109.80]) by brmea-mail-4.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m2OG2Cbg028226; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:02:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JY800H01SCBDN00@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from James.Walker@Sun.COM); Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:02:12 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [172.20.24.217] by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JY8004SZSJDR060@mail-amer.sun.com>; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:02:09 -0600 (MDT) Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:10:18 -0600 From: Jim Walker Subject: Re: Erlang/OTP R12B1 [LSARC/2008/210 FastTrack timeout 03/31/2008] In-reply-to: <20080324110007.GA16009@Sun.Com> Sender: James.Walker@sun.com To: Raymond Xiong Cc: Danek Duvall , lsarc-ext@sun.com, solaris-qe-pkgproj@sun.com Reply-to: James.Walker@sun.com Message-id: <47E7D26A.5020102@sun.com> Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc. MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <20080324040807.GT26870@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> <47E771B2.1030703@sun.com> <20080324095858.GA15929@Sun.Com> <47E77F9B.3090702@sun.com> <20080324110007.GA16009@Sun.Com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080213) Status: RO Content-Length: 931 Raymond Xiong wrote: > On 03/24/08, Jim Walker wrote: >> Raymond Xiong wrote: >>> On 03/24/08, Jim Walker wrote: >>>>> Interfaces >>>>> ========== >>>>> >>>>> SUNWerlang-r12b Uncommitted Package Name >>>>> SUNWerlang-r12b-doc Uncommitted Package Name >>>> Would more general SUNWerlang and SUNWerlang-doc package names >>>> be better? > > I don't have specific reason, but I observed other language(ie., > Ruby, Java, Perl, etc.) were all packaged in this way. I think > it's good to have this flexibility? > > Because Erlang/OTP R12B release is rather new, it is probably > not well tested and supported for some applications. For example, > below is from ejabberd README on which Erlang version to use: > > "Erlang/OTP R10B-9 up to R11B-5. Erlang R12 releases are not yet > officially supported, and are not recommended for production > servers" > Thanks for clarifying. -jim From danek.duvall@Sun.COM Mon Mar 24 10:01:28 2008 Received: from sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail3mpk.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.52]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2OH1RbY004001 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:01:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m2OH1QpC013138; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:01:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JY800K03VAE8Q00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 11:01:26 -0600 (MDT) Received: from dm-sfbay-01.sfbay.sun.com ([129.145.155.118]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JY800D37VACZUA0@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 11:01:24 -0600 (MDT) Received: from zruty.sfbay.sun.com (zruty.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.168.40]) by dm-sfbay-01.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m2OH1M0J009241; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:01:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zruty.sfbay.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zruty.sfbay.sun.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2OH1MDx014147; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:01:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dduvall@localhost) by zruty.sfbay.sun.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.2/Submit) id m2OH1M9O014146; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:01:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:01:22 -0700 From: Danek Duvall Subject: Re: Erlang/OTP R12B1 [LSARC/2008/210 FastTrack timeout 03/31/2008] In-reply-to: <20080324110007.GA16009@Sun.Com> To: Raymond Xiong Cc: Jim Walker , lsarc-ext@Sun.COM, solaris-qe-pkgproj@Sun.COM Message-id: <20080324170122.GQ29238@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <20080324040807.GT26870@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> <47E771B2.1030703@sun.com> <20080324095858.GA15929@Sun.Com> <47E77F9B.3090702@sun.com> <20080324110007.GA16009@Sun.Com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-27) Status: RO Content-Length: 1083 On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 07:00:08PM +0800, Raymond Xiong wrote: > I don't have specific reason, but I observed other language(ie., > Ruby, Java, Perl, etc.) were all packaged in this way. I think > it's good to have this flexibility? There is such a thing as "too much rope". There are significant incompatibilities between versions of Java, and reasonable ones between the two versions of Perl. I can't speak for Ruby. There are minor ones between 2.3 and 2.4 of Python. If released versions of Erlang are expected to be incompatible, and flag-days aren't suitable for the customer base, then two versions may be kept on the system. > Because Erlang/OTP R12B release is rather new, it is probably > not well tested and supported for some applications. For example, > below is from ejabberd README on which Erlang version to use: > > "Erlang/OTP R10B-9 up to R11B-5. Erlang R12 releases are not yet > officially supported, and are not recommended for production > servers" Erm, perhaps this means that we shouldn't be delivering it, and using R11 for a while? Danek From James.Walker@Sun.COM Mon Mar 24 13:34:10 2008 Received: from sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail3mpk.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.52]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2OKYA3A012188 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:34:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m2OKY9Aq010514; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JY900D0554XWR00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brmea-mail-4.sun.com ([192.18.98.36]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JY9007NH54XYL80@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-amer-09.sun.com ([192.18.109.79]) by brmea-mail-4.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m2OKY9u3018082; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:34:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JY900L013L6SM00@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from James.Walker@Sun.COM); Mon, 24 Mar 2008 14:34:08 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [172.20.24.217] by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JY900EVG547I2D0@mail-amer.sun.com>; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 14:33:44 -0600 (MDT) Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 14:42:02 -0600 From: Jim Walker Subject: Re: Erlang/OTP R12B1 [LSARC/2008/210 FastTrack timeout 03/31/2008] In-reply-to: <20080324170122.GQ29238@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> Sender: James.Walker@Sun.COM To: Danek Duvall , Raymond Xiong Cc: lsarc-ext@Sun.COM, solaris-qe-pkgproj@Sun.COM Reply-to: James.Walker@Sun.COM Message-id: <47E8121A.1090100@sun.com> Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc. MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <20080324040807.GT26870@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> <47E771B2.1030703@sun.com> <20080324095858.GA15929@Sun.Com> <47E77F9B.3090702@sun.com> <20080324110007.GA16009@Sun.Com> <20080324170122.GQ29238@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080213) Status: RO Content-Length: 939 >> Because Erlang/OTP R12B release is rather new, it is probably >> not well tested and supported for some applications. For example, >> below is from ejabberd README on which Erlang version to use: >> >> "Erlang/OTP R10B-9 up to R11B-5. Erlang R12 releases are not yet >> officially supported, and are not recommended for production >> servers" > I think this is more of a timing thing. The ejabberd 2.0.0 release was made 2/20/08 and the first Erlang R12 release was made 12/5/07, and the second was made on 2/6/08. Depending on how they qualify ejabberd releases, Erlang R12 probably wasn't an option in terms of inclusion into their final test cycle. Erlang R11B-5 was released 1/13/07. The ejabberd development version is now at 2.3.0, and is moving faster than erlang. I don't see any major issues in the bugs or logs with R12. Raymond has the best experience to decide what versions of Erlang and Ejabberd to use. -jim From danek.duvall@sun.com Mon Apr 7 10:10:25 2008 Received: from sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail2sca.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.234]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m37HAPpa021835 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 10:10:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m37HAKHZ015541; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 10:10:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JYY00B25T1C7900@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 11:10:24 -0600 (MDT) Received: from dm-sfbay-01.sfbay.sun.com ([129.145.155.118]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JYY0031AT19H380@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 11:10:21 -0600 (MDT) Received: from zruty.sfbay.sun.com (zruty.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.168.40]) by dm-sfbay-01.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m37HAJIS040269; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 10:10:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zruty.sfbay.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zruty.sfbay.sun.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m37HAJJ3004763; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 10:10:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dduvall@localhost) by zruty.sfbay.sun.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.2/Submit) id m37HAJsx004762; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 10:10:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 10:10:19 -0700 From: Danek Duvall Subject: Re: Erlang/OTP R12B1 [LSARC/2008/210 FastTrack timeout 03/31/2008] In-reply-to: <47E8121A.1090100@sun.com> To: Jim Walker Cc: Raymond Xiong , lsarc-ext@sun.com, solaris-qe-pkgproj@sun.com Message-id: <20080407171019.GN21079@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <20080324040807.GT26870@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> <47E771B2.1030703@sun.com> <20080324095858.GA15929@Sun.Com> <47E77F9B.3090702@sun.com> <20080324110007.GA16009@Sun.Com> <20080324170122.GQ29238@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> <47E8121A.1090100@sun.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-27) Status: RO Content-Length: 1152 On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 02:42:02PM -0600, Jim Walker wrote: >>> Because Erlang/OTP R12B release is rather new, it is probably >>> not well tested and supported for some applications. For example, >>> below is from ejabberd README on which Erlang version to use: >>> >>> "Erlang/OTP R10B-9 up to R11B-5. Erlang R12 releases are not yet >>> officially supported, and are not recommended for production >>> servers" >> > > I think this is more of a timing thing. The ejabberd 2.0.0 release > was made 2/20/08 and the first Erlang R12 release was made 12/5/07, > and the second was made on 2/6/08. Depending on how they qualify > ejabberd releases, Erlang R12 probably wasn't an option in terms > of inclusion into their final test cycle. Erlang R11B-5 was released > 1/13/07. > > The ejabberd development version is now at 2.3.0, and is moving > faster than erlang. I don't see any major issues in the bugs or > logs with R12. > > Raymond has the best experience to decide what versions of Erlang > and Ejabberd to use. Are we sticking with the originally proposed versions? I think this is the only open question at the moment. Thanks, Danek From James.Walker@sun.com Mon Apr 7 12:57:11 2008 Received: from sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail3mpk.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.52]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m37JvBsC028203 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 12:57:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m37Jv8Fn002792; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 12:57:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JYZ0001B0R97100@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 12:57:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brmea-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.98.43]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JYZ00MJ10R8EX20@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 12:57:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-amer-10.sun.com ([192.18.109.80]) by brmea-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m37Jv83K020667; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 19:57:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JYY00F01ZPUNZ00@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from James.Walker@Sun.COM); Mon, 07 Apr 2008 13:57:08 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [172.20.24.224] by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JYZ00BGT0Q88100@mail-amer.sun.com>; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 13:56:33 -0600 (MDT) Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 14:06:43 -0600 From: Jim Walker Subject: Re: Erlang/OTP R12B1 [LSARC/2008/210 FastTrack timeout 03/31/2008] In-reply-to: <20080407171019.GN21079@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> Sender: James.Walker@sun.com To: Danek Duvall Cc: Raymond Xiong , lsarc-ext@sun.com, solaris-qe-pkgproj@sun.com Reply-to: James.Walker@sun.com Message-id: <47FA7ED3.6020503@sun.com> Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc. MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <20080324040807.GT26870@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> <47E771B2.1030703@sun.com> <20080324095858.GA15929@Sun.Com> <47E77F9B.3090702@sun.com> <20080324110007.GA16009@Sun.Com> <20080324170122.GQ29238@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> <47E8121A.1090100@sun.com> <20080407171019.GN21079@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080213) Status: RO Content-Length: 1306 Danek Duvall wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 02:42:02PM -0600, Jim Walker wrote: > >>>> Because Erlang/OTP R12B release is rather new, it is probably >>>> not well tested and supported for some applications. For example, >>>> below is from ejabberd README on which Erlang version to use: >>>> >>>> "Erlang/OTP R10B-9 up to R11B-5. Erlang R12 releases are not yet >>>> officially supported, and are not recommended for production >>>> servers" >> I think this is more of a timing thing. The ejabberd 2.0.0 release >> was made 2/20/08 and the first Erlang R12 release was made 12/5/07, >> and the second was made on 2/6/08. Depending on how they qualify >> ejabberd releases, Erlang R12 probably wasn't an option in terms >> of inclusion into their final test cycle. Erlang R11B-5 was released >> 1/13/07. >> >> The ejabberd development version is now at 2.3.0, and is moving >> faster than erlang. I don't see any major issues in the bugs or >> logs with R12. >> >> Raymond has the best experience to decide what versions of Erlang >> and Ejabberd to use. > > Are we sticking with the originally proposed versions? I think this is the > only open question at the moment. Yes. Raymond determined that Erlang/OTP R12B1 was the best version to use, which was in the initial proposal. Cheers, Jim From danek.duvall@sun.com Mon Apr 7 13:01:17 2008 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m37K1H9s028473 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 13:01:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m37K1FGB011292; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 14:01:16 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JYZ00M0R0Y38100@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 14:01:15 -0600 (MDT) Received: from dm-sfbay-02.sfbay.sun.com ([129.146.11.31]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JYZ00II10Y0BZ30@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 14:01:12 -0600 (MDT) Received: from zruty.sfbay.sun.com (zruty.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.168.40]) by dm-sfbay-02.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m37K1A6N063627; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 13:01:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zruty.sfbay.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zruty.sfbay.sun.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m37K1A1U006563; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 13:01:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dduvall@localhost) by zruty.sfbay.sun.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.2/Submit) id m37K1Aas006562; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 13:01:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 13:01:09 -0700 From: Danek Duvall Subject: Re: Erlang/OTP R12B1 [LSARC/2008/210 FastTrack timeout 03/31/2008] In-reply-to: <47FA7ED3.6020503@sun.com> To: Jim Walker Cc: Raymond Xiong , lsarc-ext@sun.com, solaris-qe-pkgproj@sun.com Message-id: <20080407200109.GS21079@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <20080324040807.GT26870@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> <47E771B2.1030703@sun.com> <20080324095858.GA15929@Sun.Com> <47E77F9B.3090702@sun.com> <20080324110007.GA16009@Sun.Com> <20080324170122.GQ29238@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> <47E8121A.1090100@sun.com> <20080407171019.GN21079@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> <47FA7ED3.6020503@sun.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-27) Status: RO Content-Length: 246 On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 02:06:43PM -0600, Jim Walker wrote: > Yes. Raymond determined that Erlang/OTP R12B1 was the > best version to use, which was in the initial proposal. Okay. I'm marking this case as closed/approved, then. Thanks, Danek From Yong.Sun@sun.com Mon Apr 7 18:28:05 2008 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m381S4bT009527 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 18:28:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m381Rtfr012688; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 09:28:03 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JYZ00D01G2PTH00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 18:28:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sineb-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.19.7]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JYZ008OPG2N4280@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 18:28:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-apac-06.sun.com (fe-apac-06.sun.com [192.18.19.177] (may be forged)) by sineb-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m381SRLM006317; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 01:28:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-apac.sun.com by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) id <0JYZ00E01FZG7Y00@mail-apac.sun.com> (original mail from Yong.Sun@Sun.COM) ; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 09:27:28 +0800 (SGT) Received: from yongmac.local ([123.116.97.236]) by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPSA id <0JYZ00BA3G1QRE51@mail-apac.sun.com>; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 09:27:27 +0800 (SGT) Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 09:27:55 +0800 From: Yong Sun Subject: Re: Erlang/OTP R12B1 [LSARC/2008/210 FastTrack timeout 03/31/2008] In-reply-to: <20080407200109.GS21079@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> Sender: Yong.Sun@sun.com To: Danek Duvall Cc: Jim Walker , Raymond Xiong , lsarc-ext@sun.com, solaris-qe-pkgproj@sun.com Message-id: <47FACA1B.9090101@Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <20080324040807.GT26870@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> <47E771B2.1030703@sun.com> <20080324095858.GA15929@Sun.Com> <47E77F9B.3090702@sun.com> <20080324110007.GA16009@Sun.Com> <20080324170122.GQ29238@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> <47E8121A.1090100@sun.com> <20080407171019.GN21079@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> <47FA7ED3.6020503@sun.com> <20080407200109.GS21079@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) Status: RO Content-Length: 494 Hi, Raymond, I'm just interested are you using gcc/g++ or SunStudio compiler to build Erlang? If only gcc/g++ is able to build it, at least, GCC4SS could be used on SPARC platform. Regards, Danek Duvall 写道: > On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 02:06:43PM -0600, Jim Walker wrote: > > >> Yes. Raymond determined that Erlang/OTP R12B1 was the >> best version to use, which was in the initial proposal. >> > > Okay. I'm marking this case as closed/approved, then. > > Thanks, > Danek > From Raymond.Xiong@sun.com Mon Apr 7 20:20:08 2008 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m383K89b012352 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 20:20:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m383K7T6051406; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 21:20:08 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JYZ00G05L9J4N00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 20:20:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dm-singapore-01.singapore.sun.com ([129.158.71.101]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JYZ007IFL9I4X50@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 20:20:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sineb-smtp-1.singapore.sun.com (sineb-smtp-1.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.123.4]) by dm-singapore-01.singapore.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m383K6eb015317; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 11:20:06 +0800 (SGT) Received: from phys-sedge2-1.singapore.sun.com (phys-sedge2-1.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.123.14]) by sineb-smtp-1.singapore.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m383Xexf001204; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 03:33:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([129.158.219.118]) by sedge2-mail1.singapore.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JYZ00FE8L9BDV40@sedge2-mail1.singapore.sun.com>; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 11:20:00 +0800 (SGT) Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 11:20:18 +0800 From: Raymond Xiong Subject: Re: Erlang/OTP R12B1 [LSARC/2008/210 FastTrack timeout 03/31/2008] In-reply-to: <47FACA1B.9090101@Sun.COM> To: Yong Sun Cc: Danek Duvall , Jim Walker , lsarc-ext@sun.com, solaris-qe-pkgproj@sun.com Message-id: <20080408032018.GB10010@Sun.Com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <47E771B2.1030703@sun.com> <20080324095858.GA15929@Sun.Com> <47E77F9B.3090702@sun.com> <20080324110007.GA16009@Sun.Com> <20080324170122.GQ29238@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> <47E8121A.1090100@sun.com> <20080407171019.GN21079@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> <47FA7ED3.6020503@sun.com> <20080407200109.GS21079@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> <47FACA1B.9090101@Sun.COM> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Status: RO Content-Length: 511 On 04/08/08, Yong Sun wrote: > Hi, Raymond, > > I'm just interested are you using gcc/g++ or SunStudio compiler to build > Erlang? Yes, gcc/g++ only. The code cannot be compiled with SunStudio. > If only gcc/g++ is able to build it, at least, GCC4SS could be > used on SPARC platform. I think this is something that should be controled on sfw-gate wide? # dmake -p | grep GCC GCC= /usr/sfw/bin/gcc If GCC4SS is believed stable and better on SPARC, I doubt why not integrate it first? Thanks, Raymond From Yong.Sun@Sun.COM Mon Apr 7 20:54:39 2008 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m383scA1012813 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 20:54:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m383sbiU026615; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 04:54:37 +0100 (BST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JYZ00J0HMV0HN00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 20:54:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sineb-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.19.6]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JYZ007P9MUT5270@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 20:54:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-apac-05.sun.com (fe-apac-05.sun.com [192.18.19.176] (may be forged)) by sineb-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m383sgbD019975; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 03:54:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-apac.sun.com by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) id <0JYZ00M01MPI5100@mail-apac.sun.com> (original mail from Yong.Sun@Sun.COM) ; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 11:54:24 +0800 (SGT) Received: from yongmini.local ([129.150.144.44]) by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPSA id <0JYZ0041TMULPGP3@mail-apac.sun.com>; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 11:54:23 +0800 (SGT) Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 11:54:25 +0800 From: Yong Sun Subject: Re: Erlang/OTP R12B1 [LSARC/2008/210 FastTrack timeout 03/31/2008] In-reply-to: <20080408032018.GB10010@Sun.Com> Sender: Yong.Sun@Sun.COM To: Raymond Xiong Cc: Danek Duvall , Jim Walker , lsarc-ext@Sun.COM, solaris-qe-pkgproj@Sun.COM Message-id: <47FAEC71.3030107@Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <47E771B2.1030703@sun.com> <20080324095858.GA15929@Sun.Com> <47E77F9B.3090702@sun.com> <20080324110007.GA16009@Sun.Com> <20080324170122.GQ29238@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> <47E8121A.1090100@sun.com> <20080407171019.GN21079@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> <47FA7ED3.6020503@sun.com> <20080407200109.GS21079@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> <47FACA1B.9090101@Sun.COM> <20080408032018.GB10010@Sun.Com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) Status: RO Content-Length: 1077 Hi, Raymond, As far as I know, GCC4SS is much better than gcc/g++ (3.4.x) bundled in Solaris sfw. It uses SunStudio as the back-end to do the code generation. You may refer to the blog by alexey for the benchmark of gcc/gcc4ss/sunstudio, http://blogs.sun.com/alexey/entry/gcc_vs_gccfss_vs_studio. PS., I assume that the code generator of gcc/g++ on x86 has comparable performance (or even better) with sunstudio. Maybe this the reason why there is no gcc4xs :) Regards, Raymond Xiong 写道: > On 04/08/08, Yong Sun wrote: > >> Hi, Raymond, >> >> I'm just interested are you using gcc/g++ or SunStudio compiler to build >> Erlang? >> > > Yes, gcc/g++ only. The code cannot be compiled with SunStudio. > > >> If only gcc/g++ is able to build it, at least, GCC4SS could be >> used on SPARC platform. >> > > I think this is something that should be controled on sfw-gate > wide? > > # dmake -p | grep GCC > GCC= /usr/sfw/bin/gcc > > If GCC4SS is believed stable and better on SPARC, I doubt why > not integrate it first? > > Thanks, > Raymond > From Raymond.Xiong@Sun.COM Mon Apr 7 21:27:17 2008 Received: from sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail2sca.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.234]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m384RH1u014062 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 21:27:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m384RHL2020333; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 21:27:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JYZ00M01ODHLU00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 21:27:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dm-singapore-02.singapore.sun.com ([129.158.71.102]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JYZ00JJAODF1030@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 21:27:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sineb-smtp-1.singapore.sun.com (sineb-smtp-1.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.123.4]) by dm-singapore-02.singapore.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m384RF31027685; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 12:27:15 +0800 (SGT) Received: from phys-sedge2-1.singapore.sun.com (phys-sedge2-1.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.123.14]) by sineb-smtp-1.singapore.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m384enIB002789; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 04:40:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([129.158.219.118]) by sedge2-mail1.singapore.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JYZ00F45OD9E070@sedge2-mail1.singapore.sun.com>; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 12:27:09 +0800 (SGT) Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 12:27:27 +0800 From: Raymond Xiong Subject: Re: Erlang/OTP R12B1 [LSARC/2008/210 FastTrack timeout 03/31/2008] In-reply-to: <47FAEC71.3030107@Sun.COM> To: Yong Sun Cc: Danek Duvall , Jim Walker , lsarc-ext@Sun.COM, solaris-qe-pkgproj@Sun.COM Message-id: <20080408042727.GA10237@Sun.Com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <47E77F9B.3090702@sun.com> <20080324110007.GA16009@Sun.Com> <20080324170122.GQ29238@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> <47E8121A.1090100@sun.com> <20080407171019.GN21079@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> <47FA7ED3.6020503@sun.com> <20080407200109.GS21079@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> <47FACA1B.9090101@Sun.COM> <20080408032018.GB10010@Sun.Com> <47FAEC71.3030107@Sun.COM> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Status: RO Content-Length: 1587 On 04/08/08, Yong Sun wrote: > Hi, Raymond, > > As far as I know, GCC4SS is much better than gcc/g++ (3.4.x) bundled in > Solaris sfw. It uses SunStudio as the back-end to do the code > generation. You may refer to the blog by alexey for the benchmark of > gcc/gcc4ss/sunstudio, > http://blogs.sun.com/alexey/entry/gcc_vs_gccfss_vs_studio. Thanks for the information(I didn't know the wrapper before :)). What I meant is that this is unrelated to Erlang/OTP integration. SFW packages should be compiled with integrated tools, but is gccfss available on default Solaris installation now? I don't think so. If it is integrated in the future to replace the current one, then it will be used automatically to compile Erlang. Thanks, Raymond > PS., I assume that the code generator of gcc/g++ on x86 has comparable > performance (or even better) with sunstudio. Maybe this the reason why > there is no gcc4xs :) > > Regards, > > Raymond Xiong ??: > >On 04/08/08, Yong Sun wrote: > > > >>Hi, Raymond, > >> > >>I'm just interested are you using gcc/g++ or SunStudio compiler to build > >>Erlang? > >> > > > >Yes, gcc/g++ only. The code cannot be compiled with SunStudio. > > > > > >>If only gcc/g++ is able to build it, at least, GCC4SS could be > >>used on SPARC platform. > >> > > > >I think this is something that should be controled on sfw-gate > >wide? > > > ># dmake -p | grep GCC > >GCC= /usr/sfw/bin/gcc > > > >If GCC4SS is believed stable and better on SPARC, I doubt why > >not integrate it first? > > > >Thanks, > >Raymond > > > -- Regards, Raymond From danek.duvall@Sun.COM Mon Apr 7 21:28:13 2008 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m384SCV7014081 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 21:28:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m384S2ek064869; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 22:28:12 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JYZ00M03OEYN400@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 21:28:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dm-sfbay-01.sfbay.sun.com ([129.145.155.118]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JYZ00J3ZOEX1240@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 21:28:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zruty.sfbay.sun.com (zruty.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.168.40]) by dm-sfbay-01.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m384S8h1026926; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 21:28:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zruty.sfbay.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zruty.sfbay.sun.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m384S77g010882; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 21:28:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dduvall@localhost) by zruty.sfbay.sun.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.2/Submit) id m384S7Ll010881; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 21:28:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 21:28:07 -0700 From: Danek Duvall Subject: Re: Erlang/OTP R12B1 [LSARC/2008/210 FastTrack timeout 03/31/2008] In-reply-to: <47FAEC71.3030107@Sun.COM> To: Yong Sun Cc: Raymond Xiong , Jim Walker , lsarc-ext@Sun.COM, solaris-qe-pkgproj@Sun.COM Message-id: <20080408042807.GG21079@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <47E77F9B.3090702@sun.com> <20080324110007.GA16009@Sun.Com> <20080324170122.GQ29238@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> <47E8121A.1090100@sun.com> <20080407171019.GN21079@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> <47FA7ED3.6020503@sun.com> <20080407200109.GS21079@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> <47FACA1B.9090101@Sun.COM> <20080408032018.GB10010@Sun.Com> <47FAEC71.3030107@Sun.COM> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-27) Status: RO Content-Length: 114 Folks, this isn't appropriate for the ARC case. Please take it offline, or move to sfwnv-discuss. Thanks, Danek From Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de Tue Apr 8 01:44:35 2008 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m388iYAa019948 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 01:44:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m388iV4P001070; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 02:44:31 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JZ0003030A7PO00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 01:44:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sca-ea-mail-3.sun.com ([192.18.43.21]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JZ0006ML0A6WR60@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 01:44:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay43i.sun.com ([192.5.209.74]) by sca-ea-mail-3.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m388eBBr012794; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 08:44:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mms48es.sun.com ([160.41.221.231] [160.41.221.231]) by relay43i.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-355314; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 08:44:29 +0000 (Z) Received: from relay43i.sun.com (relay43i.sun.com [192.5.209.74]) by mms48es.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-3338027; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 08:44:29 +0000 (Z) Received: from mailgw1.fraunhofer.de ([153.96.1.17] [153.96.1.17]) by relay4i.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-14099914; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 08:44:29 +0000 (Z) Received: from mailgw1.fraunhofer.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw1.fraunhofer.de[host mailgw24] (8.14.2+/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m388iS5f015797; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 10:44:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pluto.fokus.fraunhofer.de (pluto.fokus.fraunhofer.de [195.37.77.164]) by mailgw1.fraunhofer.de (8.14.2+/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m388iSxY015792 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 08 Apr 2008 10:44:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from EXCHSRV.fokus.fraunhofer.de (bohr [10.147.9.231]) by pluto.fokus.fraunhofer.de (8.13.7/8.13.7) with SMTP id m388iRJn027525; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 10:44:28 +0200 (MEST) Received: from rigel ([10.147.65.195]) by EXCHSRV.fokus.fraunhofer.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 08 Apr 2008 10:44:27 +0200 Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 10:44:27 +0200 From: Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling) Subject: Re: Erlang/OTP R12B1 [LSARC/2008/210 FastTrack timeout 03/31/2008] In-reply-to: <47FAEC71.3030107@Sun.COM> To: Yong.Sun@sun.com, Raymond.Xiong@sun.com Cc: solaris-qe-pkgproj@sun.com, lsarc-ext@sun.com, James.Walker@sun.com, Danek.Duvall@sun.com Message-id: <47fb306b.RxppGEm53rIiYn7v%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Fraunhofer-Email-Policy: accepted X-Antispam: No, score=-1.1/5.0, scanned in 0.128sec at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smf-spamd v1.3.1 - http://smfs.sf.net/ References: <47E771B2.1030703@sun.com> <20080324095858.GA15929@Sun.Com> <47E77F9B.3090702@sun.com> <20080324110007.GA16009@Sun.Com> <20080324170122.GQ29238@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> <47E8121A.1090100@sun.com> <20080407171019.GN21079@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> <47FA7ED3.6020503@sun.com> <20080407200109.GS21079@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> <47FACA1B.9090101@Sun.COM> <20080408032018.GB10010@Sun.Com> <47FAEC71.3030107@Sun.COM> User-Agent: nail 11.22 3/20/05 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Apr 2008 08:44:27.0811 (UTC) FILETIME=[C1392730:01C89954] Status: RO Content-Length: 921 Yong Sun wrote: > Hi, Raymond, > > As far as I know, GCC4SS is much better than gcc/g++ (3.4.x) bundled in > Solaris sfw. It uses SunStudio as the back-end to do the code > generation. You may refer to the blog by alexey for the benchmark of > gcc/gcc4ss/sunstudio, > http://blogs.sun.com/alexey/entry/gcc_vs_gccfss_vs_studio. > > PS., I assume that the code generator of gcc/g++ on x86 has comparable > performance (or even better) with sunstudio. Maybe this the reason why > there is no gcc4xs :) It depends, a lot of my code runs faster if compiled with Sun Studio. This is why I prefer SS. Jrg -- EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jrg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily From Raymond.Xiong@sun.com Wed May 7 01:48:00 2008 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m478lxd1023653 for ; Wed, 7 May 2008 01:47:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m478lnWw010017 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:lsarc-ext@Sun.COM>; Wed, 7 May 2008 09:47:58 +0100 (BST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K0H00A07PRWAP00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for lsarc-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT lsarc-ext@sun.com); Wed, 07 May 2008 02:47:56 -0600 (MDT) Received: from dm-singapore-02.singapore.sun.com ([129.158.71.102]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K0H005ZWPRUBF20@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for lsarc-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT lsarc-ext@sun.com); Wed, 07 May 2008 02:47:55 -0600 (MDT) Received: from sineb-smtp-1.singapore.sun.com (sineb-smtp-1.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.123.4]) by dm-singapore-02.singapore.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m478lsEd027594 for ; Wed, 07 May 2008 16:47:54 +0800 (SGT) Received: from phys-sedge2-1.singapore.sun.com (phys-sedge2-1.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.123.14]) by sineb-smtp-1.singapore.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m4791hUP010439 for <@smarthost.sun.com:lsarc-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 07 May 2008 09:01:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([129.158.219.118]) by sedge2-mail1.singapore.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0K0H00GI5PRONND0@sedge2-mail1.singapore.sun.com> for lsarc-ext@sun.com (ORCPT lsarc-ext@sun.com); Wed, 07 May 2008 16:47:49 +0800 (SGT) Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 16:48:00 +0800 From: Raymond Xiong Subject: update on LSARC/2008/210(Erlang/OTP R12B1) To: lsarc-ext@sun.com Message-id: <20080507084800.GA10434@Sun.Com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Boundary_(ID_NQpS9XokbWS4S9mBz+pq7g)" Content-disposition: inline X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Status: RO Content-Length: 4499 --Boundary_(ID_NQpS9XokbWS4S9mBz+pq7g) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline Just FYI that the FastTrack for Erlang/OTP will be updated to include 64bit executables and libraries. The change was suggested during code review on sfw-discuss alias. The new version is attached. The only change I made is that I added the following new 64bit interfaces: /usr/bin/${MACH64} dialyzer Uncommitted Symbolic Link epmd Uncommitted Symbolic Link erl Uncommitted Symbolic Link erlc Uncommitted Symbolic Link escript Uncommitted Symbolic Link run_erl Uncommitted Symbolic Link to_erl Uncommitted Symbolic Link typer Uncommitted Symbolic Link /usr/lib/${MACH64}/erlang/ Project Private Libraries and Binaries Let me know if you have any concern or question. -- Regards, Raymond --Boundary_(ID_NQpS9XokbWS4S9mBz+pq7g) Content-type: text/plain; NAME=updated-spec.txt; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: attachment; filename=updated-spec.txt Summary ======= Erlang[1] is a programming language and runtime environment designed for large-scale, fault-tolerant, distributed applications. One of its fundamental properties is its built-in support for lightweight processes and message-passing style concurrency. Erlang was originally designed for Telecom systems, but is also found very useful for network, database, and other concurrent applications. OTP is a large collection of Erlang libraries to help people build applications. This fasttrack introduces Erlang/OTP R12B1 into SFW consolidation. Micro release binding is requested. Dependencies ============ OpenSSL 0.9.7+ (snv_84 version 0.9.8a) jdk-1.2.2+ (snv_84 version 1.6.0) libgd (snv_84 version 2.0.34) Interfaces ========== Exported Interfaces ------------------- NAME STABILITY NOTES SUNWerlang Uncommitted Package Name /usr/bin dialyzer Uncommitted Symbolic Link epmd Uncommitted Symbolic Link erl Uncommitted Symbolic Link erlc Uncommitted Symbolic Link escript Uncommitted Symbolic Link run_erl Uncommitted Symbolic Link to_erl Uncommitted Symbolic Link typer Uncommitted Symbolic Link /usr/lib/erlang/ Project Private Libraries and Binaries /usr/bin/${MACH64} dialyzer Uncommitted Symbolic Link epmd Uncommitted Symbolic Link erl Uncommitted Symbolic Link erlc Uncommitted Symbolic Link escript Uncommitted Symbolic Link run_erl Uncommitted Symbolic Link to_erl Uncommitted Symbolic Link typer Uncommitted Symbolic Link /usr/lib/${MACH64}/erlang/ Project Private Libraries and Binaries SUNWerlang-doc Uncommitted Package Name /usr/share/doc/erlang/ Uncommitted HTML Docs /usr/share/man/man1erl/ Uncommitted Man Pages for OTP Applications /usr/share/man/man3erl/ Uncommitted Man Pages for Modules /usr/share/man/man4erl/ Uncommitted Man Pages for File Formats Imported Interfaces ------------------- NAME STABILITY NOTES OpenSSL External/Volatile PSARC/2003/500 Java SE 6 Committed PSARC/2006/430 X Window System Standard/Committed PSARC/1998/299 Graphics Draw Library Uncommitted PSARC/2007/166 References ========== [1] http://www.erlang.org http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erlang http://www.ericsson.com/technology/opensource/erlang/news/archive/erlang_goes_multi_core.shtml RFE ID# 6670247 --Boundary_(ID_NQpS9XokbWS4S9mBz+pq7g)-- From Raymond.Xiong@sun.com Wed May 7 01:58:52 2008 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m478wpwp023946 for ; Wed, 7 May 2008 01:58:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m478waBB012840 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:lsarc-ext@Sun.COM>; Wed, 7 May 2008 16:58:50 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K0H00B01QA23Y00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for lsarc-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT lsarc-ext@sun.com); Wed, 07 May 2008 02:58:50 -0600 (MDT) Received: from dm-singapore-02.singapore.sun.com ([129.158.71.102]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K0H005QHQA0BR30@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for lsarc-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT lsarc-ext@sun.com); Wed, 07 May 2008 02:58:49 -0600 (MDT) Received: from sineb-smtp-1.singapore.sun.com (sineb-smtp-1.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.123.4]) by dm-singapore-02.singapore.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m478wmrT003508 for ; Wed, 07 May 2008 16:58:48 +0800 (SGT) Received: from phys-sedge2-1.singapore.sun.com (phys-sedge2-1.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.123.14]) by sineb-smtp-1.singapore.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m479CbYE010761 for <@smarthost.sun.com:lsarc-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 07 May 2008 09:12:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([129.158.219.118]) by sedge2-mail1.singapore.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0K0H000XKQ9UU800@sedge2-mail1.singapore.sun.com> for lsarc-ext@sun.com (ORCPT lsarc-ext@sun.com); Wed, 07 May 2008 16:58:43 +0800 (SGT) Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 16:58:55 +0800 From: Raymond Xiong Subject: Re: update on LSARC/2008/210(Erlang/OTP R12B1) In-reply-to: <20080507084800.GA10434@Sun.Com> To: lsarc-ext@sun.com Cc: Danek.Duvall@sun.com Message-id: <20080507085854.GA10512@Sun.Com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <20080507084800.GA10434@Sun.Com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Status: RO Content-Length: 4556 Sorry, forgot to copy to Danek, who is sponsor for this case. On 05/07/08, Raymond Xiong wrote: > Just FYI that the FastTrack for Erlang/OTP will be updated to > include 64bit executables and libraries. The change was > suggested during code review on sfw-discuss alias. > > The new version is attached. The only change I made is that I > added the following new 64bit interfaces: > > /usr/bin/${MACH64} > dialyzer Uncommitted Symbolic Link > epmd Uncommitted Symbolic Link > erl Uncommitted Symbolic Link > erlc Uncommitted Symbolic Link > escript Uncommitted Symbolic Link > run_erl Uncommitted Symbolic Link > to_erl Uncommitted Symbolic Link > typer Uncommitted Symbolic Link > /usr/lib/${MACH64}/erlang/ Project Private Libraries and Binaries > > Let me know if you have any concern or question. > > -- > Regards, > Raymond > Summary > ======= > > Erlang[1] is a programming language and runtime > environment designed for large-scale, fault-tolerant, > distributed applications. One of its fundamental > properties is its built-in support for lightweight > processes and message-passing style concurrency. > Erlang was originally designed for Telecom systems, > but is also found very useful for network, database, > and other concurrent applications. > > OTP is a large collection of Erlang libraries to > help people build applications. > > This fasttrack introduces Erlang/OTP R12B1 into SFW > consolidation. > > Micro release binding is requested. > > Dependencies > ============ > > OpenSSL 0.9.7+ (snv_84 version 0.9.8a) > jdk-1.2.2+ (snv_84 version 1.6.0) > libgd (snv_84 version 2.0.34) > > Interfaces > ========== > > Exported Interfaces > ------------------- > NAME STABILITY NOTES > > SUNWerlang Uncommitted Package Name > /usr/bin > dialyzer Uncommitted Symbolic Link > epmd Uncommitted Symbolic Link > erl Uncommitted Symbolic Link > erlc Uncommitted Symbolic Link > escript Uncommitted Symbolic Link > run_erl Uncommitted Symbolic Link > to_erl Uncommitted Symbolic Link > typer Uncommitted Symbolic Link > /usr/lib/erlang/ Project Private Libraries and Binaries > /usr/bin/${MACH64} > dialyzer Uncommitted Symbolic Link > epmd Uncommitted Symbolic Link > erl Uncommitted Symbolic Link > erlc Uncommitted Symbolic Link > escript Uncommitted Symbolic Link > run_erl Uncommitted Symbolic Link > to_erl Uncommitted Symbolic Link > typer Uncommitted Symbolic Link > /usr/lib/${MACH64}/erlang/ Project Private Libraries and Binaries > SUNWerlang-doc Uncommitted Package Name > /usr/share/doc/erlang/ Uncommitted HTML Docs > /usr/share/man/man1erl/ Uncommitted Man Pages for OTP Applications > /usr/share/man/man3erl/ Uncommitted Man Pages for Modules > /usr/share/man/man4erl/ Uncommitted Man Pages for File Formats > > Imported Interfaces > ------------------- > NAME STABILITY NOTES > > OpenSSL External/Volatile PSARC/2003/500 > Java SE 6 Committed PSARC/2006/430 > X Window System Standard/Committed PSARC/1998/299 > Graphics Draw Library Uncommitted PSARC/2007/166 > > > References > ========== > > [1] http://www.erlang.org > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erlang > http://www.ericsson.com/technology/opensource/erlang/news/archive/erlang_goes_multi_core.shtml > > RFE ID# 6670247 > _______________________________________________ > opensolaris-arc mailing list > opensolaris-arc@opensolaris.org -- Regards, Raymond From danek.duvall@sun.com Wed May 7 08:04:57 2008 Received: from sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail2sca.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.234]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m47F4vEV001786 for ; Wed, 7 May 2008 08:04:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m47F4u2p023409 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:lsarc-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 7 May 2008 08:04:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K0I00D0H7884700@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for lsarc-ext@sun.com (ORCPT lsarc-ext@sun.com); Wed, 07 May 2008 09:04:56 -0600 (MDT) Received: from dm-sfbay-02.sfbay.sun.com ([129.146.11.31]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K0I0096A787WW90@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for lsarc-ext@sun.com (ORCPT lsarc-ext@sun.com); Wed, 07 May 2008 09:04:55 -0600 (MDT) Received: from zruty.sfbay.sun.com (zruty.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.168.40]) by dm-sfbay-02.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m47F4s7s054429; Wed, 07 May 2008 08:04:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zruty.sfbay.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zruty.sfbay.sun.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m47F4s2w006417; Wed, 07 May 2008 08:04:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dduvall@localhost) by zruty.sfbay.sun.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.2/Submit) id m47F4rRa006416; Wed, 07 May 2008 08:04:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 08:04:53 -0700 From: Danek Duvall Subject: Re: update on LSARC/2008/210(Erlang/OTP R12B1) In-reply-to: <20080507084800.GA10434@Sun.Com> To: Raymond Xiong Cc: lsarc-ext@sun.com Message-id: <20080507150453.GF4079@zruty.sfbay.sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <20080507084800.GA10434@Sun.Com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-27) Status: RO Content-Length: 254 On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 04:48:00PM +0800, Raymond Xiong wrote: > The new version is attached. The only change I made is that I > added the following new 64bit interfaces: I've put the updated spec into the materials directory as final-spec.txt. Danek