From Jeff.Cai@sun.com Thu Feb 4 11:54:05 2010 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o149kvUW022302 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 01:46:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.4) with ESMTP id o149kuS3009688 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:LSARC-ext@sun.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 02:46:57 -0700 (MST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KXB00F059U9QO00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for LSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT LSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:46:57 -0700 (MST) Received: from sineb-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.19.6]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KXB00FLU9U6XPC0@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for LSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT LSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:46:55 -0700 (MST) Received: from fe-apac-05.sun.com (fe-apac-05.sun.com [192.18.19.176] (may be forged)) by sineb-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id o149ksVE029336 for ; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 09:46:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-apac.sun.com by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) id <0KXB004009OQR200@mail-apac.sun.com> for LSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT LSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:46:54 +0800 (SGT) Received: from [129.158.217.59] ([unknown] [129.158.217.59]) by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KXB00D7Y9U4QAH0@mail-apac.sun.com> for LSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT LSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:46:53 +0800 (SGT) Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:47:03 +0800 From: Jeff Cai Subject: gnome-gedit-plugins [LSARC/2010/040 FastTrack timeout /02/17/2010] Sender: Jeff.Cai@sun.com To: LSARC-ext@sun.com Cc: Yuntong.Jin@sun.com Message-id: <1265276823.1361.3.camel@marathon.Prc.Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Boundary_(ID_YzPr/5mI9hCxqhiOnDOaDw)" X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 Status: RO Content-Length: 4007 --Boundary_(ID_YzPr/5mI9hCxqhiOnDOaDw) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Hi, I'm sponsoring this case for Simon Jin of Desktop group. The timer is set to Feb 17, 2010. Jeff --Boundary_(ID_YzPr/5mI9hCxqhiOnDOaDw) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; name=geditpluginsARC Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: attachment; filename=geditpluginsARC 1. Introduction 1.1. Project/Component Working Name: gnome-gedit-plugins 1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier: Simon Jin 1.3. Date of This Document: 02/1/2010 2. Project Summary 2.1. Project Description: Gnome-gedit-plugins is a collection of plugins for gedit (gnome-text-editor) including: bracketcompletion, charmap, codecomment, colorpicker, drawspaces, joinlines, sessionsaver, etc. (Refer to section 4.1 for a complete list of plugins.) 4. Technical Description: 4.1. Details: This package includes following plugins: bookmarks Easy document navigation with bookmarks. bracketcompletion Automatically adds a closing bracket when you insert one. charmap Select characters from a charactermap. codecomment Comment and uncomment blocks of code. colorpicker Pick a color from a dialog and insert its hexadecimal representation (for html, css, php). drawspaces Show spaces and tabs. joinlines Join several lines or split long ones through Ctrl+J and Ctrl+Shift+J. sessionsaver Save and restore your working sessions. showtabbar Add a menu entry to show/hide the tabbar. smartspaces Allow to unindent as if you were using tabs while you're using spaces for python programming terminal Embed a terminal in the bottom pane. This proposal adds gnome-gedit-plugins to OpenSolaris. This proposal seeks Minor release binding. 4.2. Interfaces: Exported Interfaces Stability Comments ----------------------- ------------ ------------- /usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/libbookmarks.so Volatile bookmarks plugin /usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/bracketcompletion.py Volatile bracketcompletion plugin /usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/libcharmap.so Volatile charmap plugin /usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/codecomment.py Volatile codecomment plugin /usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/colorpicker.py Volatile colorpicker plugin /usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/libdrawspaces.so Volatile drawspaces plugin /usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/joinlines.py Volatile joinlines plugin /usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/sessionsaver Volatile sessionsaver plugin /usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/libshowtabbar.so Volatile showtabbar plugin /usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/smartspaces.py Volatile smartspaces plugin /usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/terminal.py Volatile terminal plugin SUNWgnome-gedit-plugins Uncommitted package which contains gedit pluginsy Imported Interfaces Stability Comments -------------------- --------------- ----------------------- SUNWgnome-gtksourceview Volatile SUNWgnome-text-editor Volatile LSARC/2002/446/ SUNWpython26 Uncommitted PSARC/2009/043/ 4.3. Doc Impact: N/A 4.4. Packaging & Delivery: SUNWgnome-gedit-plugins 4.5. Dependencies: SUNWgnome-gtksourceview SUNWgnome-text-editor SUNWpython26 4.6. L10N Impact: N/A 4.7. Security Impact: N/A 4.8. Bug/RFE Number(s): 6920085 5. Reference Documents: Libchamplain webpage: http://live.gnome.org/GeditPlugins --Boundary_(ID_YzPr/5mI9hCxqhiOnDOaDw)-- From John.Fischer@Sun.COM Thu Feb 4 16:50:20 2010 Received: from sunmail6brm.central.sun.com (sunmail6brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.169]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o150oJtu006491 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:50:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail6brm.central.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.4) with ESMTP id o150oJ1W028133 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:LSARC-ext@sun.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 18:50:19 -0600 (CST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KXC00J01FNVH100@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for LSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT LSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:50:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from brmea-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.98.43]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KXC00D1VFNUDA50@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for LSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT LSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:50:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from fe-amer-09.sun.com ([192.18.109.79]) by brmea-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id o150oIVm001453 for ; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:50:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) id <0KXC00500FMKVK00@mail-amer.sun.com> for LSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT LSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:50:18 -0700 (MST) Received: from [192.168.10.7] ([unknown] [76.20.56.122]) by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KXC002IJFNT0O10@mail-amer.sun.com> for LSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT LSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:50:18 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:49:57 -0800 From: John Fischer Subject: Re: gnome-gedit-plugins [LSARC/2010/040 FastTrack timeout /02/17/2010] In-reply-to: <1265276823.1361.3.camel@marathon.Prc.Sun.COM> Sender: John.Fischer@Sun.COM To: Jeff Cai Cc: LSARC-ext@Sun.COM, Yuntong.Jin@Sun.COM Reply-to: John.Fischer@Sun.COM Message-id: <4B6B6B35.5090607@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <1265276823.1361.3.camel@marathon.Prc.Sun.COM> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS i86pc; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20100117 Thunderbird/3.0 Status: RO Content-Length: 513 Simon, So you do not have to return for another round of reviews... Do you have an IPS schema that you will be using instead of the SVr4 packages for Open Solaris? Perhaps something like: image/viewer/eog/plugins Or something similar. By defining this now the project team will not have to come back to update us with the new schema. Thanks, John On 02/ 4/10 01:47 AM, Jeff Cai wrote: > Hi, > > I'm sponsoring this case for Simon Jin of Desktop group. The timer is > set to Feb 17, 2010. > > Jeff > > From danek.duvall@sun.com Thu Feb 4 18:47:23 2010 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o152lNfK008044 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 18:47:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.4) with ESMTP id o152lNad049008 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:LSARC-ext@sun.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 19:47:23 -0700 (MST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KXC00G01L2ZF300@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for LSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT LSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:47:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from dm-sfbay-01.sfbay.sun.com ([129.145.155.118]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KXC006TZL2YV680@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for LSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT LSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:47:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from smelly.sfbay.sun.com (smelly.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.228.142]) by dm-sfbay-01.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.4) with ESMTP id o152lKHU007014; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:47:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from smelly.sfbay.sun.com (smelly [127.0.0.1]) by smelly.sfbay.sun.com (8.14.3+Sun/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o152lKnt014699; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:47:20 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dduvall@localhost) by smelly.sfbay.sun.com (8.14.3+Sun/8.14.3/Submit) id o152lKwo014698; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:47:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:47:20 -0800 From: Danek Duvall Subject: Re: gnome-gedit-plugins [LSARC/2010/040 FastTrack timeout /02/17/2010] In-reply-to: <4B6B6B35.5090607@sun.com> To: John Fischer Cc: Jeff Cai , LSARC-ext@sun.com, Yuntong.Jin@sun.com Message-id: <20100205024720.GB10280@smelly.SFBay.Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <1265276823.1361.3.camel@marathon.Prc.Sun.COM> <4B6B6B35.5090607@sun.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-23) Status: RO Content-Length: 786 John Fischer wrote: > Simon, > > So you do not have to return for another round of reviews... > Do you have an IPS schema that you will be using instead of > the SVr4 packages for Open Solaris? Perhaps something like: > > image/viewer/eog/plugins > > Or something similar. By defining this now the project team > will not have to come back to update us with the new schema. I don't think there's any use in requiring project teams to make up a pkg(5) package name just yet -- we don't have the schema defined for the existing packages yet, and they might very well have to come back anyway. If the project team would like to take a swing at it, though, they should make the suggestion to David Comay and Stephen Hahn, or propose it on pkg-discuss with those two copied. Danek From John.Fischer@sun.com Fri Feb 5 08:44:55 2010 Received: from sunmail6brm.central.sun.com (sunmail6brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.169]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o15Git01004389 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 08:44:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail6brm.central.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.4) with ESMTP id o15Girlw026442 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:LSARC-ext@sun.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:44:55 -0600 (CST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KXD00D1PNUUGS00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for LSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT LSARC-ext@sun.com); Fri, 05 Feb 2010 08:44:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from brmea-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.98.31]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KXD007NJNUTJY30@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for LSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT LSARC-ext@sun.com); Fri, 05 Feb 2010 08:44:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from fe-amer-10.sun.com ([192.18.109.80]) by brmea-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id o15Gir4O001002 for ; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:44:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) id <0KXD00500NKW9400@mail-amer.sun.com> for LSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT LSARC-ext@sun.com); Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:44:53 -0700 (MST) Received: from [192.168.10.7] ([unknown] [76.20.56.122]) by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KXD00FYMNUKFIC0@mail-amer.sun.com>; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:44:45 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 08:44:24 -0800 From: John Fischer Subject: Re: gnome-gedit-plugins [LSARC/2010/040 FastTrack timeout /02/17/2010] In-reply-to: <20100205024720.GB10280@smelly.SFBay.Sun.COM> Sender: John.Fischer@sun.com To: Danek Duvall Cc: Jeff Cai , LSARC-ext@sun.com, Yuntong.Jin@sun.com Reply-to: John.Fischer@sun.com Message-id: <4B6C4AE8.8070709@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <1265276823.1361.3.camel@marathon.Prc.Sun.COM> <4B6B6B35.5090607@sun.com> <20100205024720.GB10280@smelly.SFBay.Sun.COM> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS i86pc; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20100117 Thunderbird/3.0 Status: RO Content-Length: 896 Danek, I am fine with that too. John On 02/ 4/10 06:47 PM, Danek Duvall wrote: > John Fischer wrote: > >> Simon, >> >> So you do not have to return for another round of reviews... >> Do you have an IPS schema that you will be using instead of >> the SVr4 packages for Open Solaris? Perhaps something like: >> >> image/viewer/eog/plugins >> >> Or something similar. By defining this now the project team >> will not have to come back to update us with the new schema. > > I don't think there's any use in requiring project teams to make up a > pkg(5) package name just yet -- we don't have the schema defined for the > existing packages yet, and they might very well have to come back anyway. > > If the project team would like to take a swing at it, though, they should > make the suggestion to David Comay and Stephen Hahn, or propose it on > pkg-discuss with those two copied. > > Danek From Jeff.Cai@sun.com Sun Feb 7 19:40:13 2010 Received: from sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail3mpk.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.52]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o183eDO3018375 for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2010 19:40:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.4) with ESMTP id o183eC0w021582 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:LSARC-ext@sun.com>; Sun, 7 Feb 2010 19:40:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KXI00F097J0HF00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for LSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT LSARC-ext@sun.com); Sun, 07 Feb 2010 20:40:12 -0700 (MST) Received: from sineb-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.19.6]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KXI008EL7IZMT20@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for LSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT LSARC-ext@sun.com); Sun, 07 Feb 2010 20:40:12 -0700 (MST) Received: from fe-apac-06.sun.com (fe-apac-06.sun.com [192.18.19.177] (may be forged)) by sineb-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id o183eBlm008628 for ; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 03:40:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-apac.sun.com by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) id <0KXI00K0076F5W00@mail-apac.sun.com> for LSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT LSARC-ext@sun.com); Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:40:11 +0800 (SGT) Received: from [129.158.217.59] ([unknown] [129.158.217.59]) by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KXI00G177IXDO90@mail-apac.sun.com>; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:40:11 +0800 (SGT) Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:40:22 +0800 From: Jeff Cai Subject: Re: gnome-gedit-plugins [LSARC/2010/040 FastTrack timeout /02/17/2010] In-reply-to: <4B6C4AE8.8070709@sun.com> Sender: Jeff.Cai@sun.com To: John.Fischer@sun.com Cc: Danek Duvall , LSARC-ext@sun.com, Yuntong.Jin@sun.com Message-id: <1265600422.2684.3.camel@marathon.Prc.Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <1265276823.1361.3.camel@marathon.Prc.Sun.COM> <4B6B6B35.5090607@sun.com> <20100205024720.GB10280@smelly.SFBay.Sun.COM> <4B6C4AE8.8070709@sun.com> Status: RO Content-Length: 1144 If the final scheme is out, we will change the proposal with the new IPS names. John, Will you +1 for this case? Thanks Jeff On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 08:44 -0800, John Fischer wrote: > Danek, > > I am fine with that too. > > John > > > On 02/ 4/10 06:47 PM, Danek Duvall wrote: > > John Fischer wrote: > > > >> Simon, > >> > >> So you do not have to return for another round of reviews... > >> Do you have an IPS schema that you will be using instead of > >> the SVr4 packages for Open Solaris? Perhaps something like: > >> > >> image/viewer/eog/plugins > >> > >> Or something similar. By defining this now the project team > >> will not have to come back to update us with the new schema. > > > > I don't think there's any use in requiring project teams to make up a > > pkg(5) package name just yet -- we don't have the schema defined for the > > existing packages yet, and they might very well have to come back anyway. > > > > If the project team would like to take a swing at it, though, they should > > make the suggestion to David Comay and Stephen Hahn, or propose it on > > pkg-discuss with those two copied. > > > > Danek From John.Fischer@Sun.COM Wed Feb 10 08:53:14 2010 Received: from sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail3mpk.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.52]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1AGrEkX006803 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:53:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.4) with ESMTP id o1AGrEoF020337 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:LSARC-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:53:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KXM00701XKQKM00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for LSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT LSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:53:14 -0700 (MST) Received: from brmea-mail-4.sun.com ([192.18.98.36]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KXM007K8XKP2R00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for LSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT LSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:53:13 -0700 (MST) Received: from fe-amer-10.sun.com ([192.18.109.80]) by brmea-mail-4.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id o1AGrDNk026523 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:53:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) id <0KXM00600WM15K00@mail-amer.sun.com> for LSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT LSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:53:13 -0700 (MST) Received: from [192.168.10.7] ([unknown] [76.20.56.122]) by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KXM00B4OXKH1E90@mail-amer.sun.com>; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:53:06 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:52:43 -0800 From: John Fischer Subject: Re: gnome-gedit-plugins [LSARC/2010/040 FastTrack timeout /02/17/2010] In-reply-to: <1265600422.2684.3.camel@marathon.Prc.Sun.COM> Sender: John.Fischer@Sun.COM To: Jeff Cai Cc: Danek Duvall , LSARC-ext@Sun.COM, Yuntong.Jin@Sun.COM Reply-to: John.Fischer@Sun.COM Message-id: <4B72E45B.7030102@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <1265276823.1361.3.camel@marathon.Prc.Sun.COM> <4B6B6B35.5090607@sun.com> <20100205024720.GB10280@smelly.SFBay.Sun.COM> <4B6C4AE8.8070709@sun.com> <1265600422.2684.3.camel@marathon.Prc.Sun.COM> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091124) Status: RO Content-Length: 1199 +1. John Jeff Cai wrote: > If the final scheme is out, we will change the proposal with the new IPS > names. > > John, > > Will you +1 for this case? > > Thanks > > Jeff > > On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 08:44 -0800, John Fischer wrote: >> Danek, >> >> I am fine with that too. >> >> John >> >> >> On 02/ 4/10 06:47 PM, Danek Duvall wrote: >>> John Fischer wrote: >>> >>>> Simon, >>>> >>>> So you do not have to return for another round of reviews... >>>> Do you have an IPS schema that you will be using instead of >>>> the SVr4 packages for Open Solaris? Perhaps something like: >>>> >>>> image/viewer/eog/plugins >>>> >>>> Or something similar. By defining this now the project team >>>> will not have to come back to update us with the new schema. >>> I don't think there's any use in requiring project teams to make up a >>> pkg(5) package name just yet -- we don't have the schema defined for the >>> existing packages yet, and they might very well have to come back anyway. >>> >>> If the project team would like to take a swing at it, though, they should >>> make the suggestion to David Comay and Stephen Hahn, or propose it on >>> pkg-discuss with those two copied. >>> >>> Danek > > From Brian.Cameron@Sun.COM Tue Feb 16 11:50:29 2010 Received: from sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail3mpk.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.52]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1GJoTHl001049 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:50:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.4) with ESMTP id o1GJoTHl015508 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:LSARC-ext@sun.com>; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:50:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KXY00B519S5OX00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for LSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT LSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:50:29 -0700 (MST) Received: from brmea-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.98.43]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KXY0020H9S3BQ80@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for LSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT LSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:50:28 -0700 (MST) Received: from fe-amer-09.sun.com ([192.18.109.79]) by brmea-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id o1GJoR40019953 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:50:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) id <0KXY00H0098U7E00@mail-amer.sun.com> for LSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT LSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:50:27 -0700 (MST) Received: from [192.168.1.64] ([unknown] [99.96.161.128]) by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KXY000Y29RXKU90@mail-amer.sun.com>; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:50:22 -0700 (MST) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 13:49:56 -0600 From: Brian Cameron Subject: Re: gnome-gedit-plugins [LSARC/2010/040 FastTrack timeout /02/17/2010] In-reply-to: <4B72E45B.7030102@sun.com> Sender: Brian.Cameron@Sun.COM To: John.Fischer@Sun.COM Cc: Jeff Cai , Danek Duvall , LSARC-ext@Sun.COM, Yuntong.Jin@Sun.COM Message-id: <4B7AF6E4.3020605@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <1265276823.1361.3.camel@marathon.Prc.Sun.COM> <4B6B6B35.5090607@sun.com> <20100205024720.GB10280@smelly.SFBay.Sun.COM> <4B6C4AE8.8070709@sun.com> <1265600422.2684.3.camel@marathon.Prc.Sun.COM> <4B72E45B.7030102@sun.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS i86pc; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091206 Thunderbird/3.0 Status: RO Content-Length: 1728 This case was approved at the LSARC meeting today. However, I was unable to mark the IAM file "closed approved fast-track 02/16/2010" because the IAM file is write-only by Jeff Cai. Can this be corrected so the IAM file can be updated? Or, Jeff, can you update the IAM file? Jeff, note that you should make sure that the files in case directories have 644 permissions so other ARC members can modify these files. Thanks, Brian On 02/10/10 10:52, John Fischer wrote: > +1. > > John > > Jeff Cai wrote: >> If the final scheme is out, we will change the proposal with the new IPS >> names. >> >> John, >> Will you +1 for this case? >> >> Thanks >> >> Jeff >> >> On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 08:44 -0800, John Fischer wrote: >>> Danek, >>> >>> I am fine with that too. >>> >>> John >>> >>> >>> On 02/ 4/10 06:47 PM, Danek Duvall wrote: >>>> John Fischer wrote: >>>> >>>>> Simon, >>>>> >>>>> So you do not have to return for another round of reviews... >>>>> Do you have an IPS schema that you will be using instead of >>>>> the SVr4 packages for Open Solaris? Perhaps something like: >>>>> >>>>> image/viewer/eog/plugins >>>>> >>>>> Or something similar. By defining this now the project team >>>>> will not have to come back to update us with the new schema. >>>> I don't think there's any use in requiring project teams to make up a >>>> pkg(5) package name just yet -- we don't have the schema defined for >>>> the >>>> existing packages yet, and they might very well have to come back >>>> anyway. >>>> >>>> If the project team would like to take a swing at it, though, they >>>> should >>>> make the suggestion to David Comay and Stephen Hahn, or propose it on >>>> pkg-discuss with those two copied. >>>> >>>> Danek >> >> From Jeff.Cai@Sun.COM Sun Feb 21 17:53:18 2010 Received: from sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail2sca.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.234]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1M1rII1001675 for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 17:53:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.4) with ESMTP id o1M1rI4J019074 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:LSARC-ext@sun.com>; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 17:53:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KY700C01ZWUVJ00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for LSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT LSARC-ext@sun.com); Sun, 21 Feb 2010 17:53:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from sineb-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.19.7]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KY70018MZWTKH90@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for LSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT LSARC-ext@sun.com); Sun, 21 Feb 2010 17:53:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from fe-apac-06.sun.com (fe-apac-06.sun.com [192.18.19.177] (may be forged)) by sineb-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id o1M1rGc6017920 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 01:53:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-apac.sun.com by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) id <0KY700300ZPY6H00@mail-apac.sun.com> for LSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT LSARC-ext@sun.com); Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:53:16 +0800 (SGT) Received: from [129.158.217.59] ([unknown] [129.158.217.59]) by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KY7004AKZWRIR50@mail-apac.sun.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:53:16 +0800 (SGT) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:53:28 +0800 From: Jeff Cai Subject: Re: gnome-gedit-plugins [LSARC/2010/040 FastTrack timeout /02/17/2010] In-reply-to: <4B7AF6E4.3020605@sun.com> Sender: Jeff.Cai@Sun.COM To: Brian Cameron Cc: John.Fischer@Sun.COM, Danek Duvall , LSARC-ext@Sun.COM, Yuntong.Jin@Sun.COM Message-id: <1266803608.16930.1.camel@marathon.Prc.Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <1265276823.1361.3.camel@marathon.Prc.Sun.COM> <4B6B6B35.5090607@sun.com> <20100205024720.GB10280@smelly.SFBay.Sun.COM> <4B6C4AE8.8070709@sun.com> <1265600422.2684.3.camel@marathon.Prc.Sun.COM> <4B72E45B.7030102@sun.com> <4B7AF6E4.3020605@sun.com> Status: RO Content-Length: 1971 Closed this case as 'closed approved'. On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 13:49 -0600, Brian Cameron wrote: > This case was approved at the LSARC meeting today. > > However, I was unable to mark the IAM file "closed approved fast-track > 02/16/2010" because the IAM file is write-only by Jeff Cai. Can this > be corrected so the IAM file can be updated? Or, Jeff, can you update > the IAM file? > > Jeff, note that you should make sure that the files in case directories > have 644 permissions so other ARC members can modify these files. ok. Jeff > > Thanks, > > Brian > > > On 02/10/10 10:52, John Fischer wrote: > > +1. > > > > John > > > > Jeff Cai wrote: > >> If the final scheme is out, we will change the proposal with the new IPS > >> names. > >> > >> John, > >> Will you +1 for this case? > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> Jeff > >> > >> On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 08:44 -0800, John Fischer wrote: > >>> Danek, > >>> > >>> I am fine with that too. > >>> > >>> John > >>> > >>> > >>> On 02/ 4/10 06:47 PM, Danek Duvall wrote: > >>>> John Fischer wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Simon, > >>>>> > >>>>> So you do not have to return for another round of reviews... > >>>>> Do you have an IPS schema that you will be using instead of > >>>>> the SVr4 packages for Open Solaris? Perhaps something like: > >>>>> > >>>>> image/viewer/eog/plugins > >>>>> > >>>>> Or something similar. By defining this now the project team > >>>>> will not have to come back to update us with the new schema. > >>>> I don't think there's any use in requiring project teams to make up a > >>>> pkg(5) package name just yet -- we don't have the schema defined for > >>>> the > >>>> existing packages yet, and they might very well have to come back > >>>> anyway. > >>>> > >>>> If the project team would like to take a swing at it, though, they > >>>> should > >>>> make the suggestion to David Comay and Stephen Hahn, or propose it on > >>>> pkg-discuss with those two copied. > >>>> > >>>> Danek > >> > >> >