From sacadmin Mon Jul 18 14:52:25 2005 Received: from sac.sfbay.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.12.9+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j6ILqPEu015585; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 14:52:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from darrenm@localhost) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.12.9+Sun/8.12.9/Submit) id j6ILqPdG015581; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 14:52:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 14:52:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Darren J Moffat Message-Id: <200507182152.j6ILqPdG015581@sac.sfbay.sun.com> To: PSARC@sac.sfbay.sun.com Subject: EOF /usr/ucb/cc & /usr/ucb/lint [PSARC/2005/425 Timeout: 08/05/2005] Status: RO Content-Length: 1383 Subject: PSARC FastTrack [08/05/2005]: EOF /usr/ucb/cc & /usr/ucb/lint I'm submitting this case for myself. The timer is set longer than normal due to my personal availability not because I expect this case to actually need a timer that long. Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.55 08/11/04 SMI 1. Introduction 1.1. Project/Component Working Name: EOF /usr/ucb/cc & /usr/ucb/lint 1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier: Author: Darren Moffat 1.3 Date of This Document: 18 July, 2005 4. Technical Description This case is requesting EOF notification and actual EOL of the /usr/ucb/cc and /usr/ucb/lint commands. These commands are legacy from the SunOS 4.x to SunOS 5.x transition and almost never provide the correct behaviour. The EOF will be announced in Solaris 10 Update 1 with actuall removal in Solaris 11. Related cases are: LSARC/2005/352, PSARC/2005/420 Draft EOF notice: The /usr/ucb/cc and /usr/ucb/lint commands may not be present in a future release of Solaris. For users that must build with the /usr/ucb environment the following flags can be used for compile and link respectively: -I/usr/ucb/include, -R/usr/ucblib -L/usr/ucblib 6. Resources and Schedule 6.4. Steering Committee requested information 6.4.1. Consolidation C-team Name: ON 6.5. ARC review type: FastTrack From sacadmin Mon Jul 18 15:08:05 2005 Received: from jurassic.eng.sun.com (jurassic [129.146.224.31] (may be forged)) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.12.9+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j6IM84Eu017271; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 15:08:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jeckle (vpn-129-150-25-105.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.150.25.105]) by jurassic.eng.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.4) with SMTP id j6IM7kbJ981772; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 15:07:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200507182207.j6IM7kbJ981772@jurassic.eng.sun.com> Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 12:13:30 -1000 (HST) From: "Joseph E. Kowalski III" Reply-To: "Joseph E. Kowalski III" Subject: Re: EOF /usr/ucb/cc & /usr/ucb/lint [PSARC/2005/425 Timeout: 08/05/2005] To: PSARC@sac.sfbay.sun.com, darrenm@sac.sfbay.sun.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: 5oepv3nXT4PM6EKqQFJV6A== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.6_73 SunOS 5.10 sun4u sparc Status: RO Content-Length: 462 Nit time: > Draft EOF notice: > > The /usr/ucb/cc and /usr/ucb/lint commands may not be present in a > future release of Solaris. > > For users that must build with the /usr/ucb environment the following > flags can be used for compile and link respectively: > -I/usr/ucb/include, -R/usr/ucblib -L/usr/ucblib The script does a whole lot more than this, but one significant oversight here is -Xs, which is the compiler SunOS compatibility mode. - jek3 From sacadmin Mon Jul 18 15:33:07 2005 Received: from jurassic.eng.sun.com (jurassic [129.146.56.36] (may be forged)) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.12.9+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j6IMX6Eu018170; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 15:33:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 129.146.108.198 (braveheart.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.108.198]) by jurassic.eng.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6IMX6g4994702; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 15:33:06 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: EOF /usr/ucb/cc & /usr/ucb/lint [PSARC/2005/425 Timeout: 08/05/2005] From: Darren J Moffat To: "Joseph E. Kowalski III" Cc: PSARC@sac.sfbay.sun.com, darrenm@sac.sfbay.sun.com In-Reply-To: <200507182207.j6IM7kbJ981772@jurassic.eng.sun.com> References: <200507182207.j6IM7kbJ981772@jurassic.eng.sun.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc. Message-Id: <1121725981.23977.259.camel@braveheart.sfbay.sun.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6.316 Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 15:33:01 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Status: RO Content-Length: 888 On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 15:13, Joseph E. Kowalski III wrote: > Nit time: > > > Draft EOF notice: > > > > The /usr/ucb/cc and /usr/ucb/lint commands may not be present in a > > future release of Solaris. > > > > For users that must build with the /usr/ucb environment the following > > flags can be used for compile and link respectively: > > -I/usr/ucb/include, -R/usr/ucblib -L/usr/ucblib > > The script does a whole lot more than this, but one significant oversight > here is -Xs, which is the compiler SunOS compatibility mode. I know the script does a lot more than this but much of what the script does is not really what people wanted. Maybe we just shouldn't tell people how to build against stuff in /usr/ucblib at all - that would be my preference but I added that text because I expected someone to ask what the workaround or new recommendation was. -- Darren J Moffat From sacadmin Mon Jul 18 15:41:08 2005 Received: from sfbaymail1sca.SFBay.Sun.COM (sfbaymail1sca.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.154.35]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.12.9+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j6IMf8Eu018840; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 15:41:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brmea-mail-4.sun.com (brmea-mail-4.Sun.COM [192.18.98.36]) by sfbaymail1sca.SFBay.Sun.COM (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id j6IMf8f8029819; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 15:41:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe2.sun.com ([192.18.108.79]) by brmea-mail-4.sun.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j6IMf7r3016573; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:41:07 -0600 (MDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe2.sun.com by fe2.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.02 (built Aug 25 2004)) id <0IJU00501GK8S900@fe2.sun.com> (original mail from Torrey.McMahon@Sun.COM) ; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:41:07 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [129.154.13.127] by fe2.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.02 (built Aug 25 2004)) with ESMTPSA id <0IJU006P5HOIWK00@fe2.sun.com>; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:41:07 -0600 (MDT) Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 18:41:06 -0400 From: Torrey McMahon Subject: Re: EOF /usr/ucb/cc & /usr/ucb/lint [PSARC/2005/425 Timeout: 08/05/2005] In-reply-to: <1121725981.23977.259.camel@braveheart.sfbay.sun.com> To: Darren J Moffat Cc: "Joseph E. Kowalski III" , PSARC@sac.sfbay.sun.com, darrenm@sac.sfbay.sun.com Message-id: <42DC3002.6000504@sun.com> Organization: Sun Microsystems Inc. MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en References: <200507182207.j6IM7kbJ981772@jurassic.eng.sun.com> <1121725981.23977.259.camel@braveheart.sfbay.sun.com> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050325) Status: RO Content-Length: 439 Darren J Moffat wrote: > >Maybe we just shouldn't tell people how to build against stuff >in /usr/ucblib at all - that would be my preference but I added >that text because I expected someone to ask what the workaround >or new recommendation was. > Maybe it's time to get rid of /usr/ucblib? What depends on it these days? I don't know but figured it was the next obvious question to make. :) -- Torrey McMahon Sun Microsystems Inc. From sacadmin Mon Jul 18 20:27:22 2005 Received: from norton.sfbay.sun.com (norton [129.146.228.124]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.12.9+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j6J3RMEu004015; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:27:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from norton.sfbay.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by norton.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6J3RLQw185035; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:27:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jwadams@localhost) by norton.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.4/Submit) id j6J3RL4U185034; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:27:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:27:21 -0700 From: Jonathan Adams To: Torrey McMahon Cc: Darren J Moffat , "Joseph E. Kowalski III" , PSARC@sac.sfbay.sun.com, darrenm@sac.sfbay.sun.com Subject: Re: EOF /usr/ucb/cc & /usr/ucb/lint [PSARC/2005/425 Timeout: 08/05/2005] Message-ID: <20050719032721.GA184989@eng.sun.com> References: <200507182207.j6IM7kbJ981772@jurassic.eng.sun.com> <1121725981.23977.259.camel@braveheart.sfbay.sun.com> <42DC3002.6000504@sun.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42DC3002.6000504@sun.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Status: RO Content-Length: 784 On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 06:41:06PM -0400, Torrey McMahon wrote: > Darren J Moffat wrote: > > > > >Maybe we just shouldn't tell people how to build against stuff > >in /usr/ucblib at all - that would be my preference but I added > >that text because I expected someone to ask what the workaround > >or new recommendation was. > > > > Maybe it's time to get rid of /usr/ucblib? What depends on it these > days? I don't know but figured it was the next obvious question to make. :) Or perhaps just EOF compiling and linking new compatibility stuff? Then, old broken stuff can still run against it, but no new stuff can be built? That would get rid of /usr/ucbinclude, /usr/ucblib/lib*.so, and /usr/ucblib/llib-*. Cheers, - jonathan -- Jonathan Adams, Solaris Kernel Development From sacadmin Tue Jul 19 05:16:49 2005 Received: from phorcys.East.Sun.COM (phorcys.East.Sun.COM [129.148.174.143]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.12.9+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j6JCGnEu026271; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 05:16:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phorcys.East.Sun.COM (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phorcys.East.Sun.COM (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6JCGi4Y026526; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 08:16:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from carlsonj@localhost) by phorcys.East.Sun.COM (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.4/Submit) id j6JCGiIs026523; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 08:16:44 -0400 (EDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17116.61228.154322.483050@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 08:16:44 -0400 From: James Carlson To: Jonathan Adams Cc: Torrey McMahon , Darren J Moffat , "Joseph E. Kowalski III" , PSARC@sac.sfbay.sun.com, darrenm@sac.sfbay.sun.com Subject: Re: EOF /usr/ucb/cc & /usr/ucb/lint [PSARC/2005/425 Timeout: 08/05/2005] In-Reply-To: Jonathan Adams's message of 18 July 2005 20:27:21 References: <200507182207.j6IM7kbJ981772@jurassic.eng.sun.com> <1121725981.23977.259.camel@braveheart.sfbay.sun.com> <42DC3002.6000504@sun.com> <20050719032721.GA184989@eng.sun.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.01 under Emacs 21.3.1 Status: RO Content-Length: 835 Jonathan Adams writes: > Or perhaps just EOF compiling and linking new compatibility stuff? Then, > old broken stuff can still run against it, but no new stuff can be built? That > would get rid of /usr/ucbinclude, /usr/ucblib/lib*.so, and /usr/ucblib/llib-*. I agree with that. Re-compiling and linking ancient SunOS sources is of at best dubious benefit when we already promise binary support. (Actually removing these things won't help _us_ too much in the baggage department, as we'll still need much that cruft to build the compatibility libraries, but at least we can spare customers the disk space.) -- James Carlson, KISS Network Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 From sacadmin Tue Jun 30 17:26:46 2009 Received: from dm-sfbay-02.sfbay.sun.com (dm-sfbay-02.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.31]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n610QkKa019583 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:26:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sca-es-mail-1.sun.com (sca-es-mail-1.Sun.COM [192.18.43.132]) by dm-sfbay-02.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n610Qkvn004215 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:26:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-sfbay-10.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n610Qfbr027914 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:26:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-10.sun.com by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 64bit (built Apr 16 2009)) id <0KM200I00UK3KL00@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com> for PSARC@sac.sfbay.sun.com; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:26:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.251.11] ([unknown] [76.93.15.33]) by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 64bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KM200BHDUKG8C20@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com> for PSARC@sac.sfbay.sun.com; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:26:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:26:40 -0700 From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: PSARC 2005/425 EOF /usr/ucb/cc and /usr/ucb/lint Sender: Garrett.Damore@sun.com To: PSARC@sac.sfbay.sun.com Message-id: <4A4AAD40.9070200@sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081201) Status: RO Content-Length: 760 This was Darren's case. I think we should just drive it to completion. The case is currently waiting needs spec. I believe a simple specification is as follows: * the /usr/ucb/cc and /usr/ucb/lint wrappers will be removed. * the EOF announcement should read Building new applications against the /usr/ucb environment is no longer supported. Application binaries built on earlier releases will continue to function, however. Additionally, but not as part of this case, perhaps its time to eliminate binary support for legacy /usr/ucb/ applicaitons altogether as part of OpenSolaris? Again, that question can be asked later in another case. Any objections to restarting the case timer with the above specification? -- Garrett From sacadmin Wed Jul 1 02:27:46 2009 Received: from dm-sfbay-01.sfbay.sun.com (dm-sfbay-01.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.118]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n619Rk77001827 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 02:27:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com (gmp-eb-inf-1.EU.Sun.COM [192.18.6.21]) by dm-sfbay-01.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n619RjJt044404 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 02:27:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-emea-09.sun.com (gmp-eb-lb-1-fe3.eu.sun.com [192.18.6.10]) by gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n619ReU7011737 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 09:27:40 GMT MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-emea-09.sun.com by fe-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 64bit (built Apr 16 2009)) id <0KM300000JAUOL00@fe-emea-09.sun.com> for PSARC@sac.sfbay.sun.com; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:27:40 +0100 (BST) Received: from [129.156.173.199] ([unknown] [129.156.173.199]) by fe-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 64bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KM300AGKJM2NE30@fe-emea-09.sun.com> for PSARC@sac.sfbay.sun.com; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:27:38 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:27:38 +0100 From: Darren J Moffat Subject: Re: PSARC 2005/425 EOF /usr/ucb/cc and /usr/ucb/lint In-reply-to: <4A4AAD40.9070200@sun.com> Sender: Darren.Moffat@Sun.COM To: "Garrett D'Amore" Cc: PSARC@sac.sfbay.sun.com Message-id: <4A4B2C0A.2030706@Sun.COM> References: <4A4AAD40.9070200@sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20090127) Status: RO Content-Length: 837 Garrett D'Amore wrote: > This was Darren's case. I think we should just drive it to completion. > The case is currently waiting needs spec. > > I believe a simple specification is as follows: > > * the /usr/ucb/cc and /usr/ucb/lint wrappers will be removed. > * the EOF announcement should read > > Building new applications against the /usr/ucb environment is no > longer supported. Application binaries built on earlier releases will > continue to function, however. > > Additionally, but not as part of this case, perhaps its time to > eliminate binary support for legacy /usr/ucb/ applicaitons altogether as > part of OpenSolaris? Again, that question can be asked later in another > case. > > Any objections to restarting the case timer with the above specification? Sounds fine to me. -- Darren J Moffat From sacadmin Wed Jul 1 07:05:11 2009 Received: from dm-sfbay-01.sfbay.sun.com (dm-sfbay-01.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.118]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n61E5BhQ007058 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 07:05:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (sca-es-mail-2.Sun.COM [192.18.43.133]) by dm-sfbay-01.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n61E5A2d049228 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 07:05:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-sfbay-10.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n61E55eb022709 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 07:05:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-10.sun.com by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 64bit (built Apr 16 2009)) id <0KM300H00W4VTG00@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com> for PSARC@sac.sfbay.sun.com; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:05:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.251.11] ([unknown] [76.93.15.33]) by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 64bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KM3007J1WGHOM50@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com> for PSARC@sac.sfbay.sun.com; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:05:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:05:04 -0700 From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: Re: PSARC 2005/425 EOF /usr/ucb/cc and /usr/ucb/lint In-reply-to: <4A4B2C0A.2030706@Sun.COM> Sender: Garrett.Damore@sun.com To: Darren J Moffat Cc: PSARC@sac.sfbay.sun.com Message-id: <4A4B6D10.70708@sun.com> References: <4A4AAD40.9070200@sun.com> <4A4B2C0A.2030706@Sun.COM> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081201) Status: RO Content-Length: 995 Darren J Moffat wrote: > Garrett D'Amore wrote: >> This was Darren's case. I think we should just drive it to >> completion. The case is currently waiting needs spec. >> >> I believe a simple specification is as follows: >> >> * the /usr/ucb/cc and /usr/ucb/lint wrappers will be removed. >> * the EOF announcement should read >> >> Building new applications against the /usr/ucb environment is no >> longer supported. Application binaries built on earlier releases >> will continue to function, however. >> >> Additionally, but not as part of this case, perhaps its time to >> eliminate binary support for legacy /usr/ucb/ applicaitons altogether >> as part of OpenSolaris? Again, that question can be asked later in >> another case. >> >> Any objections to restarting the case timer with the above >> specification? > > Sounds fine to me. > Okay, I've restarted the timer on this one. It expires 07/08/2009. (Which is also the date of our next meeting.) - Garrett From Darren.Moffat@sun.com Wed Jul 8 10:04:29 2009 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n68H4SJC006352 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 10:04:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n68H4N1Z018711 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-EXT@sun.com>; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 01:04:27 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KMH00M053FDS800@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-EXT@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-EXT@sun.com); Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:04:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com ([192.18.6.21]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KMH00GP83FB98D0@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-EXT@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-EXT@sun.com); Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:04:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-emea-10.sun.com (gmp-eb-lb-1-fe3.eu.sun.com [192.18.6.10]) by gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n68H4NaS027062 for ; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 17:04:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-emea-10.sun.com by fe-emea-10.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 64bit (built Apr 16 2009)) id <0KMH00G003A98800@fe-emea-10.sun.com> for PSARC-EXT@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-EXT@sun.com); Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:04:23 +0100 (BST) Received: from [129.156.173.199] ([unknown] [129.156.173.199]) by fe-emea-10.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 64bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KMH000SE3FAWND0@fe-emea-10.sun.com> for PSARC-EXT@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-EXT@sun.com); Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:04:22 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:04:22 +0100 From: Darren J Moffat Subject: PSARC/2005/425 EOF /usr/ucb/cc & /usr/ucb/lint [closed-approved] Sender: Darren.Moffat@sun.com To: PSARC-EXT@sun.com Message-id: <4A54D196.4090204@Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20090127) Status: RO Content-Length: 60 This case was approved in PSARC today. -- Darren J Moffat