From psarc-member-list-request@sun.com Wed Mar 7 17:39:57 2007 Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:38:37 -0800 (PST) From: Gary Winiger Subject: PSARC/2007/132 Network Auto-Magic (NWAM) To: psarc@sac.sfbay.sun.com Cc: jbeck@eng.sun.com, james.d.carlson@east.sun.com, psarc-agenda@sun.com, psarc-materials@sun.com, john.plocher@sun.com Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 Content-Length: 3295 X-Lines: 73 Status: RO Jbeck owes us all a beer, or whisky, or ... . A NWAM fast track for phase 0 is under time pressure and soon to be submitted. John really felt it needed more context than could be provided without a discussion, so he filed a one pager today. It seems none of the SAC staff were available so I hand assigned it to the 3rd time slot on 14 March as an Inception review. John got Jim to own the case. John writes: > From jbeck@eng.sun.com Wed Mar 7 16:51:46 2007 > To: Gary Winiger > Cc: John Beck > Subject: what we're doing > X-Image-URL: http://playground.sun.com/~jbeck/gif/Misc/john-face.jpg > Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:52:36 -0800 > From: John Beck > > We're planning to putback our phase 0 (our productized prototype) > to build 62. To this end, I will be submitting a fast-track later > today. But for y'all to review this in context, we need to have > our overall case inception, which you just graciously scheduled > for next Wednesday (March 14). The idea is that at the conclusion > of the inception review, we'll go over the fast-track, by which > time it should be clear how it is a step in the right direction. > I have materials for the overall case ready, and will put them in > the incept.materials (or whatever) directory of 2007/132 once you > create it. Then when I submit the fast-track, I'll put the man > page for it in its own materials directory, and will include this > explanation. > > -- John > > http://blogs.sun.com/jbeck > Materials are available: > From jbeck@eng.sun.com Wed Mar 7 17:07:50 2007 > To: Gary Winiger > Cc: John Beck > Subject: populated > X-Image-URL: http://playground.sun.com/~jbeck/gif/Misc/john-face.jpg > Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:08:34 -0800 > From: John Beck > > I have created 2007/132/inception.materials and populated it with: > > -rw-r--r-- 1 jbeck sac 42048 Mar 7 17:06 apis-1.0.html > -rw-r--r-- 1 jbeck sac 40999 Mar 7 17:06 apis-1.0.pdf > -rw-r--r-- 1 jbeck sac 152453 Mar 7 17:06 apis-1.0.ps > -rw-r--r-- 1 jbeck sac 26511 Mar 7 17:06 apis-1.0.txt > -rw-r--r-- 1 jbeck sac 28678 Mar 7 17:06 cli-1.0.1.html > -rw-r--r-- 1 jbeck sac 23027 Mar 7 17:06 cli-1.0.1.pdf > -rw-r--r-- 1 jbeck sac 85967 Mar 7 17:06 cli-1.0.1.ps > -rw-r--r-- 1 jbeck sac 10951 Mar 7 17:06 cli-1.0.1.txt > -rw-r--r-- 1 jbeck sac 132222 Mar 7 17:06 design-1.0.5.html > -rw-r--r-- 1 jbeck sac 129184 Mar 7 17:06 design-1.0.5.pdf > -rw-r--r-- 1 jbeck sac 1707296 Mar 7 17:06 design-1.0.5.ps > -rw-r--r-- 1 jbeck sac 113241 Mar 7 17:06 design-1.0.5.txt > > The idea is that our design doc is > http://opensolaris.org/os/project/nwam/design/a > and its sections for CLI & APIs are on separate pages, and I have taken > a snapshot of all three and saved them here in {text, HTML, PostScript, > PDF} formats. Thanks again! > > -- John > > http://blogs.sun.com/jbeck Blame me for any syntactic screw ups. For safety I set the exposure to closed, though I suspect this is actually an open case. Thanks for your consideration and send the bill to jbeck@eng ;-) Gary.. From gdamore@sun.com Tue Jun 30 16:33:07 2009 Received: from sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail2sca.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.234]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5UNX7Om018359 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:33:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n5UNX4AD007355 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:33:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KM20000VS34CR00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:33:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sca-es-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.43.133]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KM200AKLS34ZAA0@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:33:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n5UNX42J021527 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:33:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-09.sun.com by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 64bit (built Apr 16 2009)) id <0KM200A00RZ9SC00@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:33:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.251.11] ([unknown] [76.93.15.33]) by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 64bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KM2002KRS2Y2X30@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:32:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:32:57 -0700 From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: PSARC 2007/132 Network Auto-Magic (NWAM) Sender: Garrett.Damore@sun.com To: PSARC-ext Message-id: <4A4AA0A9.8060407@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081201) Status: RO Content-Length: 438 This case had an inception review 3/14/2007, and has not been back for commitment. Can someone clarify the relationship of this case with 2008/532? Is this case (2007/132) just an umbrella? Or is it superseded by 2008/532? Or will the project team at some point be coming back for a commitment on 2007/132? I apologize for rehashing old history, but I'm just trying to clean up the PSARC case backlog. Thanks! - Garrett From carlsonj@workingcode.com Tue Jun 30 19:07:08 2009 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n61277Lp022441 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:07:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n61272QY011990; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:07:04 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KM200B0LZ7RP100@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:07:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brmea-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.98.31]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KM2006PJZ7RO380@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:07:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay13i.sun.com (ip123.net129179-4.block1.us.syntegra.com [129.179.4.123]) by brmea-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n611xDnf013723; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 02:07:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mmp11es.mmp.us.syntegra.com ([160.41.208.11] [160.41.208.11]) by relay13i.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-3528429; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 02:07:02 +0000 (Z) Received: from relay11i.sun.com (relay11i.sun.com [129.179.4.121]) by mmp11es.mmp.us.syntegra.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-125228763; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 02:07:01 +0000 (Z) Received: from carlson.workingcode.com ([75.150.68.97] [75.150.68.97]) by relay1i.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-11223030; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 02:07:01 +0000 (Z) Received: from dhcp-160.workingcode.com (dhcp-160 [192.168.254.160]) (authenticated bits=0) by carlson.workingcode.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n61270Hp018602 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:07:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:06:37 -0400 From: James Carlson Subject: Re: PSARC 2007/132 Network Auto-Magic (NWAM) In-reply-to: <4A4AA0A9.8060407@sun.com> To: "Garrett D'Amore" Cc: PSARC-ext Message-id: <4A4AC4AD.6020403@workingcode.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-DCC-wuwien-Metrics: carlson 1290; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Antispam: No, score=0.0/5.0, scanned in 0.246sec at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smf-spamd v1.3.1 - http://smfs.sf.net/ References: <4A4AA0A9.8060407@sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605) Status: RO Content-Length: 464 Garrett D'Amore wrote: > This case had an inception review 3/14/2007, and has not been back for > commitment. Can someone clarify the relationship of this case with > 2008/532? Is this case (2007/132) just an umbrella? Or is it > superseded by 2008/532? Or will the project team at some point be > coming back for a commitment on 2007/132? I seem to recall that we handled this one during ARC business. Scan through /shared/sac/PSARC/Minutes/200[78]/. From gdamore@sun.com Tue Jun 30 20:05:24 2009 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6135NgA006489 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:05:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n6135KP7007666 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 04:05:22 +0100 (BST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KM3001071WW7900@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:05:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sca-es-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.43.133]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KM300L951WURW60@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:05:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n6135HxW002173 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:05:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-09.sun.com by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 64bit (built Apr 16 2009)) id <0KM3001001U4SV00@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:05:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.251.11] ([unknown] [76.93.15.33]) by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 64bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KM3009H61WTNXE0@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:05:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:05:17 -0700 From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: Re: PSARC 2007/132 Network Auto-Magic (NWAM) In-reply-to: <4A4AC4AD.6020403@workingcode.com> Sender: Garrett.Damore@sun.com To: James Carlson Cc: PSARC-ext Message-id: <4A4AD26D.2090109@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <4A4AA0A9.8060407@sun.com> <4A4AC4AD.6020403@workingcode.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081201) Status: RO Content-Length: 598 James Carlson wrote: > Garrett D'Amore wrote: >> This case had an inception review 3/14/2007, and has not been back >> for commitment. Can someone clarify the relationship of this case >> with 2008/532? Is this case (2007/132) just an umbrella? Or is it >> superseded by 2008/532? Or will the project team at some point be >> coming back for a commitment on 2007/132? > > I seem to recall that we handled this one during ARC business. Scan > through /shared/sac/PSARC/Minutes/200[78]/. I didn't see anything in the archives, except for the notes during the commitment. -- Garrett From gdamore@sun.com Tue Jun 30 20:09:53 2009 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6139rIt012192 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:09:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n6139kaa010075 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 04:09:52 +0100 (BST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KM300G0324FGB00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:09:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sca-es-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.43.132]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KM300G5824C6600@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:09:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-sfbay-10.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n6139m2d006133 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:09:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-10.sun.com by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 64bit (built Apr 16 2009)) id <0KM300B001X25S00@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:09:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.251.11] ([unknown] [76.93.15.33]) by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 64bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KM300FDI24C1JF0@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:09:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:09:48 -0700 From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: Re: PSARC 2007/132 Network Auto-Magic (NWAM) In-reply-to: <4A4AD26D.2090109@sun.com> Sender: Garrett.Damore@sun.com To: James Carlson Cc: PSARC-ext Message-id: <4A4AD37C.5040607@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <4A4AA0A9.8060407@sun.com> <4A4AC4AD.6020403@workingcode.com> <4A4AD26D.2090109@sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081201) Status: RO Content-Length: 700 Garrett D'Amore wrote: > James Carlson wrote: >> Garrett D'Amore wrote: >>> This case had an inception review 3/14/2007, and has not been back >>> for commitment. Can someone clarify the relationship of this case >>> with 2008/532? Is this case (2007/132) just an umbrella? Or is it >>> superseded by 2008/532? Or will the project team at some point be >>> coming back for a commitment on 2007/132? >> >> I seem to recall that we handled this one during ARC business. Scan >> through /shared/sac/PSARC/Minutes/200[78]/. > I didn't see anything in the archives, except for the notes during the > commitment. I meant during the *inception*, not the commitment, obviously. -- Garrett From carlsonj@workingcode.com Tue Jun 30 20:36:58 2009 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n613avjO024389 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:36:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n613argm024561; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 04:36:55 +0100 (BST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KM3002033DICH00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:36:54 -0600 (MDT) Received: from brmea-mail-4.sun.com ([192.18.98.36]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KM3007GH3DIC5B0@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:36:54 -0600 (MDT) Received: from relay41i.sun.com ([192.5.209.70]) by brmea-mail-4.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n613asYr009713; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 03:36:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mms49es.mms.us.syntegra.com ([160.41.221.232] [160.41.221.232]) by relay41i.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-1367777; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 03:36:54 +0000 (Z) Received: from relay44i.sun.com (relay44i.sun.com [192.5.209.118]) by mms49es.mms.us.syntegra.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-59768016; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 03:36:53 +0000 (Z) Received: from carlson.workingcode.com ([75.150.68.97] [75.150.68.97]) by relay4i.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-7765839; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 03:36:53 +0000 (Z) Received: from dhcp-160.workingcode.com (dhcp-160 [192.168.254.160]) (authenticated bits=0) by carlson.workingcode.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n613aoX6019084 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:36:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:36:29 -0400 From: James Carlson Subject: Re: PSARC 2007/132 Network Auto-Magic (NWAM) In-reply-to: <4A4AD26D.2090109@sun.com> To: "Garrett D'Amore" Cc: PSARC-ext Message-id: <4A4AD9BD.7040601@workingcode.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-DCC-wuwien-Metrics: carlson 1290; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Antispam: No, score=0.0/5.0, scanned in 0.056sec at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smf-spamd v1.3.1 - http://smfs.sf.net/ References: <4A4AA0A9.8060407@sun.com> <4A4AC4AD.6020403@workingcode.com> <4A4AD26D.2090109@sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605) Status: RO Content-Length: 1197 Garrett D'Amore wrote: > James Carlson wrote: >> Garrett D'Amore wrote: >>> This case had an inception review 3/14/2007, and has not been back >>> for commitment. Can someone clarify the relationship of this case >>> with 2008/532? Is this case (2007/132) just an umbrella? Or is it >>> superseded by 2008/532? Or will the project team at some point be >>> coming back for a commitment on 2007/132? >> >> I seem to recall that we handled this one during ARC business. Scan >> through /shared/sac/PSARC/Minutes/200[78]/. > I didn't see anything in the archives, except for the notes during the > commitment. OK. A quick discussion during ARC business is all that I recall for this one. I think there was some confusion over it, as it was filed as a one-pager, intended to be a fast-track, but then seen to be too large to be a fast-track. In any event, it's mostly dead. The original NWAM design was just a prototype. It was updated quite a bit (in architectural detail) by Phase 0.5. And then much of that design was later junked in the Phase 1 project. I think that's getting closer to integration, so the value of the original Phase 0 work is quickly approaching nil. From gdamore@sun.com Tue Jun 30 21:36:59 2009 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n614awoR025400 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:36:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n614aq6x025009 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:36:58 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KM30090365K9H00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:36:56 -0600 (MDT) Received: from sca-es-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.43.132]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KM30062J65KZZ60@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:36:56 -0600 (MDT) Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n614aueg009660 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:36:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-09.sun.com by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 64bit (built Apr 16 2009)) id <0KM300F0064SW700@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:36:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.251.11] ([unknown] [76.93.15.33]) by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 64bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KM30062A65I34D0@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:36:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:36:54 -0700 From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: Re: PSARC 2007/132 Network Auto-Magic (NWAM) In-reply-to: <4A4AD9BD.7040601@workingcode.com> Sender: Garrett.Damore@sun.com To: James Carlson Cc: PSARC-ext Message-id: <4A4AE7E6.6060209@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <4A4AA0A9.8060407@sun.com> <4A4AC4AD.6020403@workingcode.com> <4A4AD26D.2090109@sun.com> <4A4AD9BD.7040601@workingcode.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081201) Status: RO Content-Length: 1322 James Carlson wrote: > Garrett D'Amore wrote: >> James Carlson wrote: >>> Garrett D'Amore wrote: >>>> This case had an inception review 3/14/2007, and has not been back >>>> for commitment. Can someone clarify the relationship of this case >>>> with 2008/532? Is this case (2007/132) just an umbrella? Or is it >>>> superseded by 2008/532? Or will the project team at some point be >>>> coming back for a commitment on 2007/132? >>> >>> I seem to recall that we handled this one during ARC business. Scan >>> through /shared/sac/PSARC/Minutes/200[78]/. >> I didn't see anything in the archives, except for the notes during >> the commitment. > > OK. A quick discussion during ARC business is all that I recall for > this one. I think there was some confusion over it, as it was filed > as a one-pager, intended to be a fast-track, but then seen to be too > large to be a fast-track. > > In any event, it's mostly dead. The original NWAM design was just a > prototype. It was updated quite a bit (in architectural detail) by > Phase 0.5. And then much of that design was later junked in the Phase > 1 project. I think that's getting closer to integration, so the value > of the original Phase 0 work is quickly approaching nil. So maybe we should just declare this one superseded? - Garrett From Alan.Maguire@sun.com Wed Jul 1 00:17:09 2009 Received: from sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail3mpk.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.52]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n617H8f8029264 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 00:17:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n617H7hf002947 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 00:17:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KM30041FDKK5D00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 01 Jul 2009 01:17:08 -0600 (MDT) Received: from gmp-eb-inf-2.sun.com ([192.18.6.24]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KM300L83DKDLZ40@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 01 Jul 2009 01:17:07 -0600 (MDT) Received: from fe-emea-09.sun.com (gmp-eb-lb-1-fe3.eu.sun.com [192.18.6.10]) by gmp-eb-inf-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n617H0Zf010405 for ; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:17:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-emea-09.sun.com by fe-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 64bit (built Apr 16 2009)) id <0KM300500CWTYE00@fe-emea-09.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:17:00 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.1.8] ([unknown] [86.44.124.20]) by fe-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 64bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KM30001XDJW5010@fe-emea-09.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:16:44 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:16:52 +0100 From: Alan Maguire Subject: Re: PSARC 2007/132 Network Auto-Magic (NWAM) In-reply-to: <4A4AE7E6.6060209@sun.com> Sender: Alan.Maguire@sun.com To: "Garrett D'Amore" Cc: James Carlson , PSARC-ext Message-id: <4A4B0D64.1090402@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <4A4AA0A9.8060407@sun.com> <4A4AC4AD.6020403@workingcode.com> <4A4AD26D.2090109@sun.com> <4A4AD9BD.7040601@workingcode.com> <4A4AE7E6.6060209@sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090323) Status: RO Content-Length: 181 Garrett D'Amore wrote: > > So maybe we should just declare this one superseded? > yep - as Jim mentioned, the design is obselete and was superseded by PSARC 2008/532. Thanks! Alan