From carlsonj@phorcys.east.sun.com Fri Apr 27 12:30:58 2007 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3RJUwuR000820 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:30:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id l3RJU2aS016929; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:30:02 +0100 (BST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JH600I038U1VI00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:30:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phorcys.east.sun.com ([129.148.174.143]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JH600B938U0NJ80@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:30:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phorcys.east.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phorcys.east.sun.com (8.14.1+Sun/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l3RJU0vc008379; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:30:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from carlsonj@localhost) by phorcys.east.sun.com (8.14.1+Sun/8.14.1/Submit) id l3RJU02I008376; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:30:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:29:59 -0400 From: James Carlson Subject: 2007/243 Eri Conversion To GLDv3 To: Garrett.Damore@Sun.COM Cc: psarc-ext@Sun.COM Message-id: <17970.20279.853879.382930@gargle.gargle.HOWL> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: VM 7.01 under Emacs 21.3.1 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 Status: RO Content-Length: 3522 I'm sponsoring this open fast-track request for Garrett D'Amore. The timer is set for 05/04/2007. It would be an "automatic" case, except for the incompatible change in the undocumented (but likely used) ndd configuration interface. Requested Binding : Minor Problem ------- Solaris Nevada has introduced a new API for NIC driver writers, known as GLDv3 (code named "Nemo"). This framework offers a lot of advantages to drivers, without the limitations that the prevented adoption of GLDv2 by various Sun drivers. See PSARC cases 2004/471, 2005/365, 2006/248, and 2006/249 for more detail. One of the popular drivers is "eri", which is a 10/100 driver found on later generations of US-II systems (such as SunBlade 100/150) and early generations of US-III hardware (such as SunBlade 1000/1500.) It is only provided on the motherboards of these systems, where it is part of the Sun RIO ASIC (which also provides other functionality, such as USB host controller functionality, etc.) This driver contains a lot of code related to DLPI functionality that is redundant with code provided by Nemo (around 3,000 lines). Additionally, Nemo offers some features that may be useful for systems based on eri, such as full support for VLANs and 802.3 link aggregation. Finally, we believe that by moving eri to the common, preferred GLDv3 framework, we can reduce long term support costs associaed with eri. Therefore it would be advantageous to convert the eri DLPI driver to GLDv3. Proposed Solution ----------------- We propose to convert the eri driver to GLDv3. This is also a perfect case model for how to convert an old DLPI driver to GLDv3. Eri is very similar to other Sun drivers such as hme, qfe, and gem, so this process can be a template for converting those drivers as well. NDD Change ---------- Part of changing this driver to GLDv3 means that the device can support DLPI style 1 as well as style 2. And, as a consequence, ndd(1m) commands will only work when used with the style 1 node. For example instead of doing the following to advertise autonegotiation: ndd /dev/eri -set instance 0 ndd /dev/eri -set adv_cap_autoneg 1 The following would be used: ndd /dev/eri0 -set adv_cap_autoneg 1 One side effect of this change is that on systems with more than a single eri device, multiple administrators can be updating eri parameters at the same time without the race condition that is implicit in DLPI style 2 handling. Kstat Changes ------------- Some of the kstats that were formerly part of the "eri0" kstat block will be moved to a new kstat block called "driver_info". This is because the DLS module which sits above Nemo provides an "eri0" kstat block for most of the usual kstats. (Kstats provided by DLS will not be replicated in the driver_info kstat block.) Note that we also rely on PSARC 2007/220, which addresses the need for some other kstats in Nemo, to avoid further impact upon the kstats. A new kstat named "link_state" will also be added, since it is provided by Nemo by default. We do not believe that these kstat changes will have any impact on consumers, as the kstats that are being moved are not part of any ARC'd interface. Other Interfaces ---------------- Nemo supplies both style 1 and style 2 DLPI nodes. Existing consumers will continue to function, even if they are not prepared to deal with style 1 nodes. (One such consumer is SunVTS.) Additionally, except as noted above, all ndd and driver.conf tunables are retained in this conversion. From Garrett.Damore@sun.com Tue May 1 11:10:58 2007 Received: from sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l41IAujR017358 for ; Tue, 1 May 2007 11:10:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id l41I9pqe024926 for <@newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com:PSARC-EXT@sun.com>; Wed, 2 May 2007 02:10:00 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JHD0060FJSNUC00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-EXT@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-EXT@sun.com); Tue, 01 May 2007 12:09:59 -0600 (MDT) Received: from nwk-ea-fw-1.sun.com ([10.4.134.6]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JHD003PNJSMLX60@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-EXT@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-EXT@sun.com); Tue, 01 May 2007 12:09:58 -0600 (MDT) Received: from d1-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.39.119]) by nwk-ea-fw-1.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l41I9wCl001895 for ; Tue, 01 May 2007 11:09:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.d1-sfbay-09.sun.com by d1-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) id <0JHD00G01HXQEZ00@d1-sfbay-09.sun.com> (original mail from Garrett.Damore@Sun.COM) for PSARC-EXT@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-EXT@sun.com); Tue, 01 May 2007 11:09:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [129.150.48.109] by d1-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPSA id <0JHD004J0JSEJMDK@d1-sfbay-09.sun.com> for PSARC-EXT@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-EXT@sun.com); Tue, 01 May 2007 11:09:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 11:10:00 -0700 From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: PSARC 2007/243 Porting Eri to Nemo (Updates) Sender: Garrett.Damore@sun.com To: PSARC-EXT Cc: James Carlson , Ray Han Message-id: <46378278.3020606@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b2 (X11/20070227) Status: RO Content-Length: 2046 A few thoughts I want to add to this case. 1) In addition to removing the -instance feature from eri, it will cause eri to begin supporting VLANs, whch is something "new". 2) The kstats exported by eri were formerly writeable (allowing for the old feature of netstat -kc to clear them, a feature designed at one point to facilitate failover with Alternate Pathing in the face of Dynamic Reconfiguration, but also a feature which was never so implemented. AP instead always kept its own snapshots and did the work to adjust totals on failover. In any case, AP was last supported on Solaris 8, and was replaced in functionality by IP multipathing.) 3) The kstats were formerly persistent. This meant that after a driver had been detached (e.g. due to DR), the kstats were kept around in kernel memory. This creates all kind of problems for updating the kstats in new revisions of the driver (even just to add a new statistic)... a full reboot is required to clear persistent kstats. As a result, GLDv3 does not support them, and I've removed the persistent flag from the driver-specific kstats that are exported in addition to those exported by GLDv3. 4) This case will fix several bugs in eri(7D), among them: 6262084 (eri) the eri_dlcap_enable function should check the dl_sub_offset. 4891285 (eri) RFE to add debug kstat counter for promiscuous mode 6490162 (eri) eri passes packets upstream before the stream is in the DL_IDLE state 5033725 (eri) recursive mutex enter in eri_start, invoked indirectly by eri_check_link As a consequence of this, I wonder if it would not be a good idea to consider this for a backport to Solaris 10 (Patch Binding). Such a backport would break the semantics of ndd (which, is not a documented interface for eri!) somewhat (see the -instance issue pointed out above), but it would benefit S10update5 by reducing some key bugs. I am therefore asking PSARC to consider this as a possibility, without committing to doing such a backport at this time. -- Garrett D'Amore From carlsonj@phorcys.east.sun.com Tue May 1 11:42:57 2007 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l41Igv1B018356 for ; Tue, 1 May 2007 11:42:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id l41IfrWK010122; Tue, 1 May 2007 19:41:57 +0100 (BST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JHD00M0JL9UY400@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Tue, 01 May 2007 11:41:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phorcys.east.sun.com ([129.148.174.143]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JHD00M9CL9PAB40@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Tue, 01 May 2007 11:41:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phorcys.east.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phorcys.east.sun.com (8.14.1+Sun/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l41Ifnaf018622; Tue, 01 May 2007 14:41:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from carlsonj@localhost) by phorcys.east.sun.com (8.14.1+Sun/8.14.1/Submit) id l41IfnaX018619; Tue, 01 May 2007 14:41:49 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 14:41:49 -0400 From: James Carlson Subject: Re: PSARC 2007/243 Porting Eri to Nemo (Updates) In-reply-to: <46378278.3020606@sun.com> To: "Garrett D'Amore" Cc: PSARC-EXT , Ray Han Message-id: <17975.35309.249630.10663@gargle.gargle.HOWL> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: VM 7.01 under Emacs 21.3.1 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 References: <46378278.3020606@sun.com> Status: RO Content-Length: 1367 Garrett D'Amore writes: > 5033725 (eri) recursive mutex enter in eri_start, invoked indirectly by > eri_check_link I'm pretty sure I fixed that one back in Nevada build 47 and Solaris 10 update 4. > As a consequence of this, I wonder if it would not be a good idea to > consider this for a backport to Solaris 10 (Patch Binding). Such a > backport would break the semantics of ndd (which, is not a documented > interface for eri!) somewhat (see the -instance issue pointed out > above), but it would benefit S10update5 by reducing some key bugs. I am > therefore asking PSARC to consider this as a possibility, without > committing to doing such a backport at this time. Without that bug, which is already fixed, the remainder look less interesting to me: 6262084 (eri) the eri_dlcap_enable function should check the dl_sub_offset. 4891285 (eri) RFE to add debug kstat counter for promiscuous mode 6490162 (eri) eri passes packets upstream before the stream is in the DL_IDLE state I'm not sure that the backport is worth the ndd breakage, particularly given that customers are known to hack around with forced duplex settings. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 From Garrett.Damore@sun.com Tue May 1 11:49:22 2007 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l41InMgH018956 for ; Tue, 1 May 2007 11:49:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id l41ImNKx004703 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-EXT@sun.com>; Tue, 1 May 2007 12:48:27 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JHD0002DLKQ7A00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-EXT@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-EXT@sun.com); Tue, 01 May 2007 11:48:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-ea-fw-1.sun.com ([10.4.134.5]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JHD00MPLLKPAB60@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-EXT@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-EXT@sun.com); Tue, 01 May 2007 11:48:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from d1-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.39.119]) by nwk-ea-fw-1.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l41ImPJi019428 for ; Tue, 01 May 2007 11:48:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.d1-sfbay-09.sun.com by d1-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) id <0JHD00G01LC52100@d1-sfbay-09.sun.com> (original mail from Garrett.Damore@Sun.COM) for PSARC-EXT@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-EXT@sun.com); Tue, 01 May 2007 11:48:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [129.150.48.109] by d1-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPSA id <0JHD004KXLKOJM9L@d1-sfbay-09.sun.com> for PSARC-EXT@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-EXT@sun.com); Tue, 01 May 2007 11:48:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 11:48:34 -0700 From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: Re: PSARC 2007/243 Porting Eri to Nemo (Updates) In-reply-to: <17975.35309.249630.10663@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Sender: Garrett.Damore@sun.com To: James Carlson Cc: PSARC-EXT , Ray Han Message-id: <46378B82.60306@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 References: <46378278.3020606@sun.com> <17975.35309.249630.10663@gargle.gargle.HOWL> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b2 (X11/20070227) Status: RO Content-Length: 1596 James Carlson wrote: > Garrett D'Amore writes: > >> 5033725 (eri) recursive mutex enter in eri_start, invoked indirectly by >> eri_check_link >> > > I'm pretty sure I fixed that one back in Nevada build 47 and Solaris > 10 update 4. > Sure enough. I wonder why it came up in my query, since it is Fix Delivered stated, it shouldn't have. > >> As a consequence of this, I wonder if it would not be a good idea to >> consider this for a backport to Solaris 10 (Patch Binding). Such a >> backport would break the semantics of ndd (which, is not a documented >> interface for eri!) somewhat (see the -instance issue pointed out >> above), but it would benefit S10update5 by reducing some key bugs. I am >> therefore asking PSARC to consider this as a possibility, without >> committing to doing such a backport at this time. >> > > Without that bug, which is already fixed, the remainder look less > interesting to me: > > 6262084 (eri) the eri_dlcap_enable function should check the dl_sub_offset. > 4891285 (eri) RFE to add debug kstat counter for promiscuous mode > 6490162 (eri) eri passes packets upstream before the stream is in the > DL_IDLE state > > I'm not sure that the backport is worth the ndd breakage, particularly > given that customers are known to hack around with forced duplex > settings. > I agree with that assessment. Btw, I have the same changes coming for HME, and it has a larger set of open bugs and fixes, but the same ndd -instance impact. So even if we defer this for eri, PSARC may want to consider it for hme. -- Garrett From carlsonj@phorcys.east.sun.com Wed May 9 10:19:39 2007 Received: from sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l49HJc5k021853 for ; Wed, 9 May 2007 10:19:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id l49HHDgZ009753; Thu, 10 May 2007 01:17:20 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JHS00A0FAOWVD00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Wed, 09 May 2007 11:17:20 -0600 (MDT) Received: from phorcys.east.sun.com ([129.148.174.143]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JHS00HJ5AOVZ4D0@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Wed, 09 May 2007 11:17:19 -0600 (MDT) Received: from phorcys.east.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phorcys.east.sun.com (8.14.1+Sun/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l49HHJjQ016556; Wed, 09 May 2007 13:17:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from carlsonj@localhost) by phorcys.east.sun.com (8.14.1+Sun/8.14.1/Submit) id l49HHJIe016553; Wed, 09 May 2007 13:17:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 13:17:18 -0400 From: James Carlson Subject: Re: 2007/243 Eri Conversion To GLDv3 In-reply-to: <17970.20279.853879.382930@gargle.gargle.HOWL> To: psarc-ext@sun.com Cc: Garrett.Damore@sun.com Message-id: <17986.542.906788.232572@gargle.gargle.HOWL> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: VM 7.01 under Emacs 21.3.1 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 References: <17970.20279.853879.382930@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Status: RO Content-Length: 301 This fast-track request was approved during ARC business at today's meeting. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 From Garrett.Damore@sun.com Wed May 9 10:37:39 2007 Received: from sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l49Hbcic023229 for ; Wed, 9 May 2007 10:37:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id l49HaJbp015163 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:psarc-ext@sun.com>; Thu, 10 May 2007 01:36:34 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JHS0022FBKTOL00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for psarc-ext@sun.com (ORCPT psarc-ext@sun.com); Wed, 09 May 2007 10:36:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-ea-fw-1.sun.com ([10.4.134.5]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JHS00H49BKRFLD0@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for psarc-ext@sun.com (ORCPT psarc-ext@sun.com); Wed, 09 May 2007 10:36:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from d1-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.39.119]) by nwk-ea-fw-1.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l49HaRUo006491 for ; Wed, 09 May 2007 10:36:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.d1-sfbay-09.sun.com by d1-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) id <0JHS00001BFMWX00@d1-sfbay-09.sun.com> (original mail from Garrett.Damore@Sun.COM) for psarc-ext@sun.com (ORCPT psarc-ext@sun.com); Wed, 09 May 2007 10:36:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [129.150.12.94] by d1-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPSA id <0JHS004P3BKRJMM5@d1-sfbay-09.sun.com> for psarc-ext@sun.com (ORCPT psarc-ext@sun.com); Wed, 09 May 2007 10:36:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 10:36:38 -0700 From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: Re: 2007/243 Eri Conversion To GLDv3 In-reply-to: <17986.542.906788.232572@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Sender: Garrett.Damore@sun.com To: James Carlson Cc: psarc-ext@sun.com Message-id: <464206A6.9010308@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 References: <17970.20279.853879.382930@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <17986.542.906788.232572@gargle.gargle.HOWL> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b2 (X11/20070227) Status: RO Content-Length: 228 James Carlson wrote: > This fast-track request was approved during ARC business at today's > meeting. > > Thanks. I didn't attend today (although I had planned to) as I had an earlier meeting that ran over. -- Garrett