From gd78059@sac.sfbay.sun.com Tue Jul 10 09:47:52 2007 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6AGlpiD009200 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:47:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id l6AGjtHg024360; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:45:56 +0100 (BST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JKZ007012KK0900@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:45:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sfbaymail2sca.sfbay.sun.com ([129.145.155.42]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JKZ0034I2KJC540@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:45:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sac.sfbay.sun.com (sac.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.226.132]) by sfbaymail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.10/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id l6AGjtC8000307; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:45:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sac.sfbay.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6AGlmWJ009195; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:47:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gd78059@localhost) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/Submit) id l6AGlmjL009191; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:47:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:47:48 -0700 (PDT) From: "Garrett D'Amore - sun microsystems" Subject: QFE/HME merge [PSARC/2007/404 FastTrack timeout 07/18/2007] To: PSARC-ext@sun.com Cc: Garrett.Damore@sun.com Message-id: <200707101647.l6AGlmjL009191@sac.sfbay.sun.com> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 Status: RO Content-Length: 4106 I'm submitting the following on my own behalf; its another hme/qfe related case. Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.63 06/14/07 SMI This information is Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems 1. Introduction 1.1. Project/Component Working Name: QFE/HME merge 1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier: Author: Garrett D'Amore 1.3 Date of This Document: 10 July, 2007 4. Technical Description Background ---------- Sun currently ships an unbundled device driver for old quad-fast-ethernet boards (qfe). These devices are the same controller as the Happy Meal Ethernet (hme), but there are four of them to a NIC, stuck behind an Intel PCI bridge. (SBus qfe cards exist as well, and are also driven by the same Happy Meal Ethernet mac controller.) The only distinguishing feature of them is the presence of Fcode to change the device name to "SUNW,qfe". The qfe driver offered a few features that the old hme driver lacked: 802.3ad trunking was supported using the unbundled Sun Trunking product (but only between qfe ports), the qfe supported Sheffield-specific fault tolerance. (This was on the Netra ft1800, see PSARC 1997/146 for more detail.) Problem ------- As a result of the commitment of the updated GLDv3 hme driver (see PSARC 2007/319) hme on Solaris Nevada will have support for generic 802.3ad link aggregation, VLAN support, IP instances, network auto-magic and IP multipathing. The new hme driver also supports IP hardware checksum offload, and has several other more minor enhancements. (We expect that this new hme driver will be putback in build 70 or 71, an RTI should be filed the week of July 10.) It would be nice if qfe could have these same features, could have its source code be part of ON, and (since it is the same hardware!) use the same source code as hme. Propsal ------- We propose the following course of action: * move the bulk of hme into a common misc module (happymeal) * make hme a thin layer above "happymeal" misc module * create a new qfe driver in ON, which is also a thin layer above "happymeal" * qfe/hme will use Solaris IP multipathing (instead of sheffield-specific fault tolerance) * qfe will support Solaris/Nemo link aggregation * Sun Trunking will continue to be used (for now) with ce and gem gigabit NICs Customers will see the same issues with this transition that the hme and eri nemo conversions created; namely there will be some impact to kstats and ndd. (ndd users must use the style 1 /dev/hmeX node. some of the kstats will be moved or renamed to facilitate more standard Nemo kstat reporting.) These details are recorded fully in PSARC 2007/319. Sun Trunking Impact ------------------- Customers with existing Sun Trunking configurations will, on upgrade to Nevada (with this release) have their trunks destroyed, so that only a single NIC (the active Trunk head) is plumbed. Other former trunk members will not be plumbed. The customer will need to reconfigure link aggregation manually using dladm. (However, the customer will now be able to use a larger set of devices in trunks.) The reason for choosing this approach (as opposed to trying to automatically "convert" Sun Trunking configurations) is that the Nevada link aggregation facility introduces a new DLPI provider, aggr, such that customer configurations (such as /etc/hostname.* files) must be changed to reflect the new aggregate devices. For example, the old trunk "qfe0" maybe called "aggr0" after conversion to the new Nemo aggregation code. Attempting to discover all cases of use and automate the upgrade would probably work for most cases, but for some cases where we are unaware of the network configuration data, it is likely to cause more problems than just asking the customer to manually recreate their configuration. Additionally, with Nemo aggregation, the customer will now have new options to choose from different devices to aggregate. 6. Resources and Schedule 6.4. Steering Committee requested information 6.4.1. Consolidation C-team Name: ON 6.5. ARC review type: FastTrack 6.6. ARC Exposure: open From iszczesniak@gmail.com Tue Jul 10 10:08:03 2007 Received: from sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6AH82JF010663 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:08:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id l6AH5wak003479 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 01:06:08 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JKZ008073I6WX00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:06:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sca-ea-mail-3.sun.com ([192.18.43.21]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JKZ0034C3I6CC40@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:06:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay41i.sun.com ([192.5.209.70]) by sca-ea-mail-3.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l6AH5MQu018398 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:06:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mms48es.sun.com ([160.41.221.231] [160.41.221.231]) by relay41i.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-423899 for PSARC-ext@sun.com; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:06:05 +0000 (Z) Received: from relay41i.sun.com ([192.5.209.70] [192.5.209.70]) by mms48es.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-148071 for PSARC-ext@sun.com; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:06:05 +0000 (Z) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.245] [209.85.132.245]) by relay4i.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-3033486 for PSARC-ext@sun.com; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:06:05 +0000 (Z) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c25so285361ana for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:06:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.178.7 with SMTP id a7mr2326797anf.1184087165317; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:06:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.111.19 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:06:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:06:05 +0200 From: "I. Szczesniak" Subject: Re: QFE/HME merge [PSARC/2007/404 FastTrack timeout 07/18/2007] In-reply-to: <200707101647.l6AGlmjL009191@sac.sfbay.sun.com> To: "Garrett D'Amore - sun microsystems" Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com, Garrett.Damore@sun.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=QA67MMqb30Ca2EcywJcQVm+K/MCFFO/lJqzm5pLDC5QtAEg+jHFYfikIwnZk74FL/ka2UBExrIqed0oOeuiOjmaS9xqAWWXmaezfwyc+VY6u9BPKc9buYD4buESDde/IBYH4Rte/lfEM5AY4vX+KjX8ef6E9+XVv0qUbX43LzpI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=XHfMM3EPP29j6K79AMV9PDaX8N0GywC3RqfSg7u4HZ5DyXhVzNEHsSDCnNmqqOX52WaDhoPEv3/2d/eVvqLPAd9eGKtHKqSRkYX9bcFlmUI3r/1uBESlZerkNQkYBZDE7tr3TW/6+ojwLKdkeNr5YQkMCpn5hHVzPhN/JrDBDi0= X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 References: <200707101647.l6AGlmjL009191@sac.sfbay.sun.com> Status: RO Content-Length: 580 On 7/10/07, Garrett D'Amore - sun microsystems wrote: > I'm submitting the following on my own behalf; its another hme/qfe related > case. > > Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.63 06/14/07 SMI > This information is Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems > 1. Introduction > 1.1. Project/Component Working Name: > QFE/HME merge > 1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier: > Author: Garrett D'Amore > 1.3 Date of This Document: > 10 July, 2007 > 4. Technical Description Are you going to support QFE cards on x86? Irek From glenn.skinner@sun.com Tue Jul 10 10:10:54 2007 Received: from sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail2sca.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.234]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6AHAskn010685 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:10:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id l6AH8uYY000177 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:08:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JKZ00D133MZDG00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:08:59 -0600 (MDT) Received: from sfbaymail1sca.SFBay.Sun.COM ([129.145.154.35]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JKZ00C4G3MPEH10@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:08:49 -0600 (MDT) Received: from ivrel.sfbay.sun.com (ivrel.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.74.76]) by sfbaymail1sca.SFBay.Sun.COM (8.13.6+Sun/8.13.6/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id l6AH8nHV011807; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:08:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivrel (ivrel [129.146.74.76]) by ivrel.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with SMTP id l6AGvvWc012429; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:57:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:57:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Glenn Skinner Subject: Re: 2007/404 [QFE/HME merge] To: PSARC-ext@sun.com Cc: Garrett.Damore@sun.com Reply-to: Glenn Skinner Message-id: <200707101657.l6AGvvWc012429@ivrel.sfbay.sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.6_36 SunOS 5.11 sun4u sparc Content-type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-MD5: yHAtOZsHTtum1xclf3gmNw== X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 Status: RO Content-Length: 918 Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:47:48 -0700 (PDT) From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: QFE/HME merge [PSARC/2007/404 FastTrack timeout 07/18/2007] I'm submitting the following on my own behalf; its another hme/qfe related case. ... Sun Trunking Impact ------------------- Customers with existing Sun Trunking configurations will, on upgrade to Nevada (with this release) have their trunks destroyed, so that only a single NIC (the active Trunk head) is plumbed. Other former trunk members will not be plumbed. The customer will need to reconfigure link aggregation manually using dladm. (However, the customer will now be able to use a larger set of devices in trunks.) ... I didn't see a release binding stated in the proposal. Given the trunking impact outlined above, it seems that it has to be minor. Right? -- Glenn From Garrett.Damore@sun.com Tue Jul 10 10:22:47 2007 Received: from sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail2sca.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.234]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6AHMl1Y011158 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:22:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id l6AHKq7S003472; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:20:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JKZ00D0R46SYR00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:20:52 -0600 (MDT) Received: from sca-es-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.43.133]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JKZ00CMD46QE910@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:20:50 -0600 (MDT) Received: from fe-sfbay-10.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l6AHKolG016270; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:20:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-10.sun.com by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JKZ0040142ZP700@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com> (original mail from Garrett.Damore@Sun.COM); Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:20:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.251.21] ([76.174.83.55]) by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JKZ006NW46P5O80@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:20:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:17:53 -0700 From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: Re: 2007/404 [QFE/HME merge] In-reply-to: <200707101657.l6AGvvWc012429@ivrel.sfbay.sun.com> Sender: Garrett.Damore@sun.com To: Glenn Skinner Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <4693BF41.2080409@sun.com> Organization: Sun Microsystems MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 References: <200707101657.l6AGvvWc012429@ivrel.sfbay.sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070605) Status: RO Content-Length: 1286 Glenn Skinner wrote: > Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:47:48 -0700 (PDT) > From: "Garrett D'Amore" > Subject: QFE/HME merge [PSARC/2007/404 FastTrack timeout > 07/18/2007] > > I'm submitting the following on my own behalf; its another hme/qfe > related case. > > ... > Sun Trunking Impact > ------------------- > > Customers with existing Sun Trunking configurations will, on > upgrade to Nevada (with this release) have their trunks destroyed, > so that only a single NIC (the active Trunk head) is plumbed. > Other former trunk members will not be plumbed. The customer will > need to reconfigure link aggregation manually using dladm. > (However, the customer will now be able to use a larger set of > devices in trunks.) > ... > > I didn't see a release binding stated in the proposal. Given the > trunking impact outlined above, it seems that it has to be minor. > Right? > Doh, I should have mentioned that. Yes, its minor binding. (I wonder if that should be one of the standard questions that sac_nextcase asks.) And not just because of trunking. ndd scripts that use /dev/qfe will have to be updated to use /dev/qfeX (where X is the device instance number). -- Garret From Garrett.Damore@sun.com Tue Jul 10 10:24:42 2007 Received: from sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6AHOfbV011178 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:24:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id l6AHMi77009361 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 01:22:46 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JKZ00E0F49X0W00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:22:45 -0600 (MDT) Received: from sca-es-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.43.133]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JKZ00CTR49VE910@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:22:44 -0600 (MDT) Received: from fe-sfbay-10.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l6AHMhcZ016513 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:22:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-10.sun.com by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JKZ0040142ZP700@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com> (original mail from Garrett.Damore@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:22:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.251.21] ([76.174.83.55]) by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JKZ006L449U5O90@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:22:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:19:46 -0700 From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: Re: QFE/HME merge [PSARC/2007/404 FastTrack timeout 07/18/2007] In-reply-to: Sender: Garrett.Damore@sun.com To: "I. Szczesniak" Cc: "Garrett D'Amore - sun microsystems" , PSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <4693BFB2.3020407@sun.com> Organization: Sun Microsystems MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 References: <200707101647.l6AGlmjL009191@sac.sfbay.sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070605) Status: RO Content-Length: 1095 I. Szczesniak wrote: > On 7/10/07, Garrett D'Amore - sun microsystems > wrote: >> I'm submitting the following on my own behalf; its another hme/qfe >> related >> case. >> >> Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.63 06/14/07 SMI >> This information is Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems >> 1. Introduction >> 1.1. Project/Component Working Name: >> QFE/HME merge >> 1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier: >> Author: Garrett D'Amore >> 1.3 Date of This Document: >> 10 July, 2007 >> 4. Technical Description > > Are you going to support QFE cards on x86? > > Irek Not as part of this case. I have asked around and gotten *very* little interest in x86 support for these NICs. Adding such support is not too hard, but it isn't trivial either. Right now only you and Darren Reed have expressed interest. (Assuming you are expressing interest?) If more people come forward asking for support, I might work on it on the side. Its scope-of-effort is a day or so. (Testing being the *bigger* consideration.) -- Garrett From al@logical-approach.com Tue Jul 10 11:05:46 2007 Received: from sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6AI5j0Q013885 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:05:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id l6AI3k0E021749; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 02:03:48 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JKZ00G0166ADA00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:03:46 -0600 (MDT) Received: from sca-ea-mail-4.sun.com ([192.18.43.22]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JKZ00CSR669EE40@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:03:45 -0600 (MDT) Received: from relay24.sun.com (ip192-12-251-74.block6.us.syntegra.com [192.12.251.74]) by sca-ea-mail-4.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l6AI3ifG019730; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:03:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mms22es.sun.com ([150.143.232.34] [150.143.232.34]) by relay24.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-499061; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:03:44 +0000 (Z) Received: from mms21bas.mms.us.syntegra.com (mms21bas.mms.us.syntegra.com [192.12.251.10]) by mms22es.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-699950; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:03:44 +0000 (Z) Received: from logical.logical-approach.com ([207.168.117.16] [207.168.117.16]) by relay25.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-6300431; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:03:44 +0000 (Z) Received: from logical (logical [207.168.117.16]) by logical.logical-approach.com (8.13.5/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l6AI3hFF022891; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:03:43 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:03:43 -0500 (CDT) From: Al Hopper Subject: Re: QFE/HME merge [PSARC/2007/404 FastTrack timeout 07/18/2007] In-reply-to: <4693BFB2.3020407@sun.com> To: "Garrett D'Amore" Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 References: <200707101647.l6AGlmjL009191@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <4693BFB2.3020407@sun.com> Status: RO Content-Length: 1890 On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > I. Szczesniak wrote: >> On 7/10/07, Garrett D'Amore - sun microsystems >> wrote: >>> I'm submitting the following on my own behalf; its another hme/qfe >>> related >>> case. >>> >>> Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.63 06/14/07 SMI >>> This information is Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems >>> 1. Introduction >>> 1.1. Project/Component Working Name: >>> QFE/HME merge >>> 1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier: >>> Author: Garrett D'Amore >>> 1.3 Date of This Document: >>> 10 July, 2007 >>> 4. Technical Description >> >> Are you going to support QFE cards on x86? >> >> Irek > > Not as part of this case. > > I have asked around and gotten *very* little interest in x86 support for > these NICs. Adding such support is not too hard, but it isn't trivial > either. Right now only you and Darren Reed have expressed interest. > (Assuming you are expressing interest?) > > If more people come forward asking for support, I might work on it on > the side. Its scope-of-effort is a day or so. (Testing being the > *bigger* consideration.) We have 3 or 4 qfe cards lying around here and I'd love to be able to use them in x86 boxes. With zones supporting separate IP stack per physical port, dual and quad port cards become even more useful - altough we've been equiping boxes with gigabit cards for a long time now and the majority of our production ports are gigabit capable. So ... "nice to have" is how I'd rate it .... and I'm willing to help you test if you decide to make it a priority. Regards, Al Hopper Logical Approach Inc, Plano, TX. al@logical-approach.com Voice: 972.379.2133 Fax: 972.379.2134 Timezone: US CDT OpenSolaris Governing Board (OGB) Member - Apr 2005 to Mar 2007 http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/ogb/ogb_2005-2007/ From boyd.adamson@gmail.com Tue Jul 10 17:58:24 2007 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6B0wNYn003283 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:58:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id l6B0uRRC025638 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 01:56:28 +0100 (BST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JKZ00H0HPA3B100@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:56:27 -0600 (MDT) Received: from brmea-mail-4.sun.com ([192.18.98.36]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JKZ001JPPA2LHD0@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:56:26 -0600 (MDT) Received: from relay42i.sun.com ([192.5.209.72]) by brmea-mail-4.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l6B0c2Cn005590 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 00:56:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mms48es.sun.com ([160.41.221.231] [160.41.221.231]) by relay42i.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-454769 for PSARC-ext@sun.com; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 00:56:26 +0000 (Z) Received: from relay42i.sun.com ([192.5.209.72] [192.5.209.72]) by mms48es.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-493419 for PSARC-ext@sun.com; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 00:56:25 +0000 (Z) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.176] [209.85.146.176]) by relay4i.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-3246470 for PSARC-ext@sun.com; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 00:56:25 +0000 (Z) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id l24so2073499waf for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:56:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.81.1 with SMTP id e1mr4659547wab.1184115380710; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:56:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.234.5 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:56:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:56:20 +1000 From: Boyd Adamson Subject: Re: QFE/HME merge [PSARC/2007/404 FastTrack timeout 07/18/2007] In-reply-to: Sender: boyd.adamson@gmail.com To: Al Hopper Cc: "Garrett D'Amore" , PSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <2d0f097e0707101756w3f8dc102rfbf226029f2d05d6@mail.gmail.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_2HvBjhbWH3WIhYVrOVzDLA)" DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=hmXovIQlDjqts8rz3BhSbKOUg1c24LS/YVlNh2kjeTaAFvQhArNfS6385gG1XzVag+1SlJ/TXNo09+KkRII5DOUAJ4jFLHAo70JyRmODqOdiTuU4ER+GrO0f4ci8X77jIRro5prTkQ2D6S+50rCudT7PaNnaIVruDGZmgy2I70c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=I73JtvyJz9gLHtfJlbBw0hAsYxwPVqL4fXIohwj708yo/iOp+zZK/hPHyatcx9aw0UdO+DWs+MFTkD1XY1LLCbxusIvbqYmUqszwGFyx6vqsnJ7mnPaHZ6/G8CIEVtTcEVX6/XT+0JI7kMpXC1oMWmxzA9NAaK/zkx91+YJ6TKI= X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8ec3d7afd5fbb952 References: <200707101647.l6AGlmjL009191@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <4693BFB2.3020407@sun.com> Status: RO Content-Length: 4817 --Boundary_(ID_2HvBjhbWH3WIhYVrOVzDLA) Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline On 7/11/07, Al Hopper wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > > > I. Szczesniak wrote: > >> On 7/10/07, Garrett D'Amore - sun microsystems > >> wrote: > >>> I'm submitting the following on my own behalf; its another hme/qfe > >>> related > >>> case. > >>> > >>> Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.63 06/14/07 SMI > >>> This information is Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems > >>> 1. Introduction > >>> 1.1. Project/Component Working Name: > >>> QFE/HME merge > >>> 1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier: > >>> Author: Garrett D'Amore > >>> 1.3 Date of This Document: > >>> 10 July, 2007 > >>> 4. Technical Description > >> > >> Are you going to support QFE cards on x86? > >> > >> Irek > > > > Not as part of this case. > > > > I have asked around and gotten *very* little interest in x86 support for > > these NICs. Adding such support is not too hard, but it isn't trivial > > either. Right now only you and Darren Reed have expressed interest. > > (Assuming you are expressing interest?) > > > > If more people come forward asking for support, I might work on it on > > the side. Its scope-of-effort is a day or so. (Testing being the > > *bigger* consideration.) > > We have 3 or 4 qfe cards lying around here and I'd love to be able to > use them in x86 boxes. With zones supporting separate IP stack per > physical port, dual and quad port cards become even more useful - > altough we've been equiping boxes with gigabit cards for a long time > now and the majority of our production ports are gigabit capable. > > So ... "nice to have" is how I'd rate it .... and I'm willing to help > you test if you decide to make it a priority. > Nice to have for me too. Boyd --Boundary_(ID_2HvBjhbWH3WIhYVrOVzDLA) Content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline
On 7/11/07, Al Hopper <al@logical-approach.com> wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Garrett D'Amore wrote:

> I. Szczesniak wrote:
>> On 7/10/07, Garrett D'Amore - sun microsystems
>> <gd78059@sac.sfbay.sun.com > wrote:
>>> I'm submitting the following on my own behalf; its another hme/qfe
>>> related
>>> case.
>>>
>>> Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.63 06/14/07 SMI
>>> This information is Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems
>>> 1. Introduction
>>>     1.1. Project/Component Working Name:
>>>          QFE/HME merge
>>>     1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier:
>>>          Author:  Garrett D'Amore
>>>     1.3  Date of This Document:
>>>         10 July, 2007
>>> 4. Technical Description
>>
>> Are you going to support QFE cards on x86?
>>
>> Irek
>
> Not as part of this case.
>
> I have asked around and gotten *very* little interest in x86 support for
> these NICs.  Adding such support is not too hard, but it isn't trivial
> either.  Right now only you and Darren Reed have expressed interest.
> (Assuming you are expressing interest?)
>
> If more people come forward asking for support, I might work on it on
> the side.  Its scope-of-effort is a day or so.  (Testing being the
> *bigger* consideration.)

We have 3 or 4 qfe cards lying around here and I'd love to be able to
use them in x86 boxes.  With zones supporting separate IP stack per
physical port, dual and quad port cards become even more useful -
altough we've been equiping boxes with gigabit cards for a long time
now and the majority of our production ports are gigabit capable.

So ... "nice to have" is how I'd rate it .... and I'm willing to help
you test if you decide to make it a priority.

Nice to have for me too.

Boyd

--Boundary_(ID_2HvBjhbWH3WIhYVrOVzDLA)-- From iszczesniak@gmail.com Wed Jul 11 05:42:40 2007 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6BCgdEp014532 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 05:42:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id l6BCdoLu056569 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 06:39:53 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JL000C0FLVVQD00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 05:40:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brmea-mail-3.sun.com ([192.18.98.34]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JL0005LOLVUOME0@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 05:40:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay24.sun.com (ip192-12-251-74.block6.us.syntegra.com [192.12.251.74]) by brmea-mail-3.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l6BCegsT027398 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:40:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mms25es.sun.com ([150.143.232.94] [150.143.232.94]) by relay24.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-595728 for PSARC-ext@sun.com; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:40:41 +0000 (Z) Received: from mms25bas.mms.us.syntegra.com (mms25bas.mms.us.syntegra.com [192.12.251.90]) by mms25es.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-1629142 for PSARC-ext@sun.com; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:40:41 +0000 (Z) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.251] [209.85.132.251]) by relay21.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-10450839 for PSARC-ext@sun.com; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:40:41 +0000 (Z) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c25so344338ana for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 05:40:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.123.9 with SMTP id v9mr2733887anc.1184157641046; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 05:40:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.111.19 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 05:40:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:40:40 +0200 From: "I. Szczesniak" Subject: Re: QFE/HME merge [PSARC/2007/404 FastTrack timeout 07/18/2007] In-reply-to: <4693BFB2.3020407@sun.com> To: "Garrett D'Amore" Cc: "Garrett D'Amore - sun microsystems" , PSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TPE5C+r+CUgdhfk3mTHR9ko2UmPXfELZnxFptTrdsL306eaOsAlCwbklJK3cBWHBntVHx+F/wh3qYWAc2loKcZKe1p4Eo7Gd6A0dORgWeuPETYZVzLOM40mN9cqjvwTcnmrUh6m7LpdtXbqnXlfIiyBG4wzuuynrfqkXldcN/g4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TBkroJBATBnbGxorGEz1SaFHqULR3skt/6qlez6lZJDDsmqgQVo9euwOgWIQuapbR1tUSh0wHTf6+K7MwylRkTMIxZwM4vuPTf0QYNVzpiKk4phtFg/PvzG74ykjoBil4nIkXuF+0vQ01i1PILg+zQkvQEgrBJQ0ZYwfuvQD87o= X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 References: <200707101647.l6AGlmjL009191@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <4693BFB2.3020407@sun.com> Status: RO Content-Length: 1106 On 7/10/07, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > I. Szczesniak wrote: > > On 7/10/07, Garrett D'Amore - sun microsystems > > wrote: > >> I'm submitting the following on my own behalf; its another hme/qfe > >> related > >> case. > >> > >> Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.63 06/14/07 SMI > >> This information is Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems > >> 1. Introduction > >> 1.1. Project/Component Working Name: > >> QFE/HME merge > >> 1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier: > >> Author: Garrett D'Amore > >> 1.3 Date of This Document: > >> 10 July, 2007 > >> 4. Technical Description > > > > Are you going to support QFE cards on x86? > > > > Irek > > Not as part of this case. > > I have asked around and gotten *very* little interest in x86 support for > these NICs. Did you ask in alt.solaris.x86 or Sun Managers? > Adding such support is not too hard, but it isn't trivial > either. Right now only you and Darren Reed have expressed interest. > (Assuming you are expressing interest?) I am expressing interest. Irek From Garrett.Damore@sun.com Wed Jul 11 08:29:01 2007 Received: from sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail3mpk.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.52]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6BFT1dC019400 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:29:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id l6BFR1HJ020609 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:27:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JL00041XTL4MY00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:27:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sca-es-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.43.133]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JL0002ZNTL24E40@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:27:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l6BFR22v024758 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:27:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-09.sun.com by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JL000K01T3BDV00@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> (original mail from Garrett.Damore@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:27:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.251.21] ([76.174.83.55]) by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JL000A4ZTL19X00@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:27:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:24:03 -0700 From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: Re: QFE/HME merge [PSARC/2007/404 FastTrack timeout 07/18/2007] In-reply-to: Sender: Garrett.Damore@sun.com To: "I. Szczesniak" Cc: "Garrett D'Amore - sun microsystems" , PSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <4694F613.2050109@sun.com> Organization: Sun Microsystems MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 References: <200707101647.l6AGlmjL009191@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <4693BFB2.3020407@sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070605) Status: RO Content-Length: 1434 I. Szczesniak wrote: > On 7/10/07, Garrett D'Amore wrote: >> I. Szczesniak wrote: >> > On 7/10/07, Garrett D'Amore - sun microsystems >> > wrote: >> >> I'm submitting the following on my own behalf; its another hme/qfe >> >> related >> >> case. >> >> >> >> Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.63 06/14/07 SMI >> >> This information is Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems >> >> 1. Introduction >> >> 1.1. Project/Component Working Name: >> >> QFE/HME merge >> >> 1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier: >> >> Author: Garrett D'Amore >> >> 1.3 Date of This Document: >> >> 10 July, 2007 >> >> 4. Technical Description >> > >> > Are you going to support QFE cards on x86? >> > >> > Irek >> >> Not as part of this case. >> >> I have asked around and gotten *very* little interest in x86 support for >> these NICs. > > Did you ask in alt.solaris.x86 or Sun Managers? No. I asked around the OpenSolaris community lists though. I also put a poll up on my blog. The responses were that folks mostly wanted GLDv3 support for qfe, but that very few people would really care much if qfe worked on x86. > >> Adding such support is not too hard, but it isn't trivial >> either. Right now only you and Darren Reed have expressed interest. >> (Assuming you are expressing interest?) > > I am expressing interest. Understood. -- Garrett > > Irek From casper@holland.sun.com Wed Jul 11 08:46:15 2007 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6BFkE1W020111 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:46:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id l6BFiBEr005203 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@Sun.COM>; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:44:18 +0100 (BST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JL00060ZUDRWN00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:44:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dm-holland-01.uk.sun.com ([129.156.101.192]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JL0001MIUDPULE0@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:44:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from holland (room101.Holland.Sun.COM [129.159.130.93]) by dm-holland-01.uk.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.13.6/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id l6BFiBFj011652; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:44:11 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:44:11 +0200 From: Casper.Dik@sun.com Subject: Re: QFE/HME merge [PSARC/2007/404 FastTrack timeout 07/18/2007] In-reply-to: <4694F613.2050109@sun.com> Sender: casper@holland.sun.com To: "Garrett D'Amore" Cc: "I. Szczesniak" , PSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <200707111544.l6BFiBFj011652@dm-holland-01.uk.sun.com> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 References: <200707101647.l6AGlmjL009191@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <4693BFB2.3020407@sun.com> <4694F613.2050109@sun.com> Status: RO Content-Length: 520 >>> Adding such support is not too hard, but it isn't trivial >>> either. Right now only you and Darren Reed have expressed interest. >>> (Assuming you are expressing interest?) >> >> I am expressing interest. > >Understood. I know of a few other people inside Sun who are using a ported x86 qfe driver and I am sure they would be interested in a "supoorted" one. There aren't all that many four-port fast ethernet cards (I know of only one other currently for sale: the Routerboard 44 of which I have one) Casper From Michael.Riley@sun.com Wed Jul 11 09:11:26 2007 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6BGBPqt021772 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:11:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id l6BG9Rkr012892 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:09:29 +0100 (BST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JL00080SVJS9T00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:09:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sca-es-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.43.133]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JL0002J4VJR4EC0@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:09:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l6BG9Rcj029410 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:09:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-09.sun.com by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JL000D01VA1X600@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> (original mail from Michael.Riley@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:09:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.201] ([68.108.178.101]) by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JL000FWCVJNCW10@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:09:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:09:32 -0700 From: Mike Riley Subject: Re: QFE/HME merge [PSARC/2007/404 FastTrack timeout 07/18/2007] In-reply-to: <4694F613.2050109@sun.com> Sender: Michael.Riley@sun.com To: "Garrett D'Amore" Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <4694F2AC.900@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 References: <200707101647.l6AGlmjL009191@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <4693BFB2.3020407@sun.com> <4694F613.2050109@sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) Status: RO Content-Length: 1598 Garrett D'Amore wrote: > I. Szczesniak wrote: >> On 7/10/07, Garrett D'Amore wrote: >>> I. Szczesniak wrote: >>> > On 7/10/07, Garrett D'Amore - sun microsystems >>> > wrote: >>> >> I'm submitting the following on my own behalf; its another hme/qfe >>> >> related >>> >> case. >>> >> >>> >> Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.63 06/14/07 SMI >>> >> This information is Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems >>> >> 1. Introduction >>> >> 1.1. Project/Component Working Name: >>> >> QFE/HME merge >>> >> 1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier: >>> >> Author: Garrett D'Amore >>> >> 1.3 Date of This Document: >>> >> 10 July, 2007 >>> >> 4. Technical Description >>> > >>> > Are you going to support QFE cards on x86? >>> > >>> > Irek >>> >>> Not as part of this case. >>> >>> I have asked around and gotten *very* little interest in x86 support for >>> these NICs. >> >> Did you ask in alt.solaris.x86 or Sun Managers? > > No. I asked around the OpenSolaris community lists though. > > I also put a poll up on my blog. > > The responses were that folks mostly wanted GLDv3 support for qfe, but > that very few people would really care much if qfe worked on x86. If you had asked on the Yahoo Solaris X86 group you would have gotten some positive responses. There are not many quad ethernet solutions for X86 at this time. A couple of dnet models that are no longer made and Intel e1000g, which is sometimes a bit of overkill, which is the only solution still in production that I am aware of. Mike From casper@holland.sun.com Wed Jul 11 09:15:58 2007 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6BGFvKM021852 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:15:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id l6BGDwsl014300 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@Sun.COM>; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:14:01 +0100 (BST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JL000803VRCMC00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:14:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dm-holland-01.uk.sun.com ([129.156.101.192]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JL0002DUVRB4CF0@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:13:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from holland (room101.Holland.Sun.COM [129.159.130.93]) by dm-holland-01.uk.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.13.6/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id l6BGDuhr017604; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:13:56 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:13:56 +0200 From: Casper.Dik@sun.com Subject: Re: QFE/HME merge [PSARC/2007/404 FastTrack timeout 07/18/2007] In-reply-to: <4694F2AC.900@sun.com> Sender: casper@holland.sun.com To: Mike Riley Cc: "Garrett D'Amore" , PSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <200707111613.l6BGDuhr017604@dm-holland-01.uk.sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 References: <200707101647.l6AGlmjL009191@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <4693BFB2.3020407@sun.com> <4694F613.2050109@sun.com> <4694F2AC.900@sun.com> Status: RO Content-Length: 461 >If you had asked on the Yahoo Solaris X86 group you would have gotten some >positive responses. There are not many quad ethernet solutions for X86 at >this time. A couple of dnet models that are no longer made and Intel >e1000g, which is sometimes a bit of overkill, which is the only solution >still in production that I am aware of. http://www.routerboard.com/rb44.html (Surprisingly, there's now also a Routerboard 44G (4 x 1GB Realtek) Casper From Menno.Lageman@sun.com Wed Jul 11 09:51:16 2007 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6BGpGp1022806 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:51:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id l6BGmRpP049173 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:48:29 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JL000B01XE8N200@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:49:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmp-ea-fw-1.sun.com ([129.156.42.5]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JL000911XE75F30@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:49:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from d1-emea-09.sun.com (d1-emea-09.sun.com [192.18.2.119]) by gmp-ea-fw-1.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l6BGnI3b018021 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:49:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.d1-emea-09.sun.com by d1-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) id <0JL000401XB2K800@d1-emea-09.sun.com> (original mail from Menno.Lageman@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:49:18 +0100 (BST) Received: from [129.150.120.109] by d1-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPSA id <0JL0005RMXE6QGHB@d1-emea-09.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:49:18 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:56:11 +0200 From: Menno Lageman Subject: Re: QFE/HME merge [PSARC/2007/404 FastTrack timeout 07/18/2007] In-reply-to: <200707111544.l6BFiBFj011652@dm-holland-01.uk.sun.com> Sender: Menno.Lageman@sun.com To: "Garrett D'Amore" Cc: Casper.Dik@sun.com, PSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <46950BAB.1010708@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 References: <200707101647.l6AGlmjL009191@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <4693BFB2.3020407@sun.com> <4694F613.2050109@sun.com> <200707111544.l6BFiBFj011652@dm-holland-01.uk.sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070618) Status: RO Content-Length: 777 Casper.Dik@Sun.COM wrote: >>>> Adding such support is not too hard, but it isn't trivial >>>> either. Right now only you and Darren Reed have expressed interest. >>>> (Assuming you are expressing interest?) >>> I am expressing interest. >> Understood. > > > I know of a few other people inside Sun who are using a ported x86 qfe > driver and I am sure they would be interested in a "supoorted" one. > I would be interested in a qfe driver for x86, but only for its GLD v3 features and the benefits that that brings. Being one of the folks that ported the (closed source) DLPI qfe driver to x86, support is not an issue for me obviously. If you need someone to test the x86 version, let me know. Menno -- Menno Lageman - Sun Microsystems - http://blogs.sun.com/menno From randyf@jurassic.eng.sun.com Wed Jul 11 11:10:00 2007 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6BIA03d001909 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:10:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id l6BI7B0r002716; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:07:12 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JL100D0Z11E3C00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:08:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jurassic.eng.sun.com ([129.146.228.31]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JL100C6511DCI10@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:08:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grimmy.eng.sun.com (grimmy.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.108.114]) by jurassic.eng.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with SMTP id l6BI7vat251924; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:07:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:07:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Randy Fishel Subject: Re: QFE/HME merge [PSARC/2007/404 FastTrack timeout 07/18/2007] To: iszczesniak@gmail.com, Garrett.Damore@sun.com Cc: gd78059@sac.sfbay.sun.com, PSARC-ext@sun.com Reply-to: Randy Fishel Message-id: <200707111807.l6BI7vat251924@jurassic.eng.sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.6_48 SunOS 5.10 sun4u sparc Content-type: text/PLAIN Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Sun-Text-type: ascii X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 Status: RO Content-Length: 745 > > > >> Adding such support is not too hard, but it isn't trivial > >> either. Right now only you and Darren Reed have expressed interest. > >> (Assuming you are expressing interest?) > > > > I am expressing interest. > > Understood. > > -- Garrett > > > > Irek The common case is that unless there is an significant reason for not supporting a driver on all platforms (i.e. nge is a network driver for chipsets _only_ found on x86 motherboards), then a driver must support all platforms. So if this hardware is available on both Sparc and x86, then architectual correctness indicates that it must be supported on those platforms. Phased delivery is between the implementor and the c-team the driver delivers into. ---- Randy From Garrett.Damore@sun.com Wed Jul 11 11:55:56 2007 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6BIttqi003843 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:55:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id l6BIr8eB011715 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:psarc-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:53:08 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JL100E0535ZR300@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for psarc-ext@sun.com (ORCPT psarc-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:53:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sca-es-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.43.133]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JL100C9Z35ZCE30@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for psarc-ext@sun.com (ORCPT psarc-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:53:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-sfbay-10.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l6BIrx54019774 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:53:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-10.sun.com by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JL100I0135PST00@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com> (original mail from Garrett.Damore@Sun.COM) for psarc-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT psarc-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:53:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.251.21] ([76.174.83.55]) by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JL10014035WNQ70@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:53:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:50:58 -0700 From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: Re: QFE/HME merge [PSARC/2007/404 FastTrack timeout 07/18/2007] In-reply-to: <200707111807.l6BI7vat251924@jurassic.eng.sun.com> Sender: Garrett.Damore@sun.com To: Randy Fishel Cc: iszczesniak@gmail.com, gd78059@sac.sfbay.sun.com, psarc-ext@sun.com Message-id: <46952692.50205@sun.com> Organization: Sun Microsystems MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 References: <200707111807.l6BI7vat251924@jurassic.eng.sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070605) Status: RO Content-Length: 1357 Randy Fishel wrote: >>>> Adding such support is not too hard, but it isn't trivial >>>> either. Right now only you and Darren Reed have expressed interest. >>>> (Assuming you are expressing interest?) >>>> >>> I am expressing interest. >>> >> Understood. >> >> -- Garrett >> >>> Irek >>> > > > The common case is that unless there is an significant reason for not > supporting a driver on all platforms (i.e. nge is a network driver for > chipsets _only_ found on x86 motherboards), then a driver must support > all platforms. > > So if this hardware is available on both Sparc and x86, then > architectual correctness indicates that it must be supported on those > platforms. Phased delivery is between the implementor and the c-team > the driver delivers into. > I would tend to agree, but there are considerations as well. 1) the hardware was only ever sold into SPARC markets, never to x86 markets 2) the hardware has long since stopped shipping 3) because of the inability to evaluate FCode, we cannot distinguish between qfe and hme boards on x86 4) which means that there may be different driver names used on x86 and SPARC. Anyway, we've already agreed (at PSARC) that the issue of x86 delivery is out of scope for this case, and may be handled by follow on work. -- Garrett > > ---- Randy > From Garrett.Damore@sun.com Wed Jul 11 12:01:15 2007 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6BJ1E44004100 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:01:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id l6BIxDQg005462 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:psarc-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:59:18 +0100 (BST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JL100B0O3EPUL00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for psarc-ext@sun.com (ORCPT psarc-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:59:13 -0600 (MDT) Received: from sca-es-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.43.132]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JL1007TK3EAIIB0@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for psarc-ext@sun.com (ORCPT psarc-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:58:58 -0600 (MDT) Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l6BIwwxn023147 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:58:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-09.sun.com by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JL1004013AWEP00@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> (original mail from Garrett.Damore@Sun.COM) for psarc-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT psarc-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:58:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.251.21] ([76.174.83.55]) by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JL100INO3E6QUD0@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:58:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:55:55 -0700 From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: Re: QFE/HME merge [PSARC/2007/404 FastTrack timeout 07/18/2007] In-reply-to: <46952692.50205@sun.com> Sender: Garrett.Damore@sun.com To: "Garrett D'Amore" Cc: Randy Fishel , iszczesniak@gmail.com, gd78059@sac.sfbay.sun.com, psarc-ext@sun.com Message-id: <469527BB.20205@sun.com> Organization: Sun Microsystems MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 References: <200707111807.l6BI7vat251924@jurassic.eng.sun.com> <46952692.50205@sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070605) Status: RO Content-Length: 71 FYI, this case was approved at today's PSARC meeting. -- Garrett From Garrett.Damore@sun.com Wed Aug 15 15:39:58 2007 Received: from sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail2sca.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.234]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l7FMdwRB023066 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:39:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id l7FMbUbR017997 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:psarc-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:37:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JMU000096UIZU00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for psarc-ext@sun.com (ORCPT psarc-ext@sun.com); Wed, 15 Aug 2007 16:37:30 -0600 (MDT) Received: from sca-es-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.43.133]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JMU008NG6UGA6D0@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for psarc-ext@sun.com (ORCPT psarc-ext@sun.com); Wed, 15 Aug 2007 16:37:29 -0600 (MDT) Received: from fe-sfbay-10.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l7FMbSlD017156 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:37:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-10.sun.com by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JMU00F016PQG700@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com> (original mail from Garrett.Damore@Sun.COM) for psarc-ext@sun.com (ORCPT psarc-ext@sun.com); Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:37:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.251.21] ([76.174.83.55]) by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JMU0035U6UGVFG0@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com> for psarc-ext@sun.com (ORCPT psarc-ext@sun.com); Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:37:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:33:30 -0700 From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: PSARC 2007/404 QFE/HME merge Sender: Garrett.Damore@sun.com To: psarc-ext@sun.com Message-id: <1187217210.909.200.camel@zippy> Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc. MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.2 Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 Status: RO Content-Length: 131 FYI, this case timed out a long time, without issues. I've updated the IAM file. Sorry for the long delay on this. -- Garrett