From gww@sac.sfbay.sun.com Wed Aug 22 14:37:49 2007 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l7MLbmq9024895 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:37:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id l7MLZEpc024089; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 22:35:16 +0100 (BST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JN70000P2MRR800@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:35:15 -0600 (MDT) Received: from sfbaymail1sca.SFBay.Sun.COM ([129.145.154.35]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JN7009TK2MPDME0@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:35:14 -0600 (MDT) Received: from sac.sfbay.sun.com (new-sac.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.175.65]) by sfbaymail1sca.SFBay.Sun.COM (8.13.6+Sun/8.13.6/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id l7MLZDGg013482; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:35:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sac.sfbay.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l7MLbhqA024890; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:37:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gww@localhost) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/Submit) id l7MLbhnX024886; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:37:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:37:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Gary Winiger Subject: SMF Read-Protected Property Storage Update [PSARC/2007/481 Self Review] To: PSARC-ext@sun.com Cc: Keith.Wesolowski@sun.com, smf-discuss@opensolaris.org Message-id: <200708222137.l7MLbhnX024886@sac.sfbay.sun.com> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 Status: RO Content-Length: 1215 I'm sponsoring this case for Keith Wesolowski and myself. I believe it qualifies for self review and therefore have marked it "closed approved automatic." I'm happy to turn it into a fast track and set the timer if anyone believes I've misjudged. Gary.. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Background: =========== PSARC/2007/177 SMF Read-Protected Property Storage specified the "read_authorization" property for property groups of type "application" (SCF_GROUP_APPLICATION). "application" is one of the predefined property group types. The other predefined types are "framework", "dependency", "method" and "template". SMF also provides for service bundles (manifests) to define other ``application-specific'' typed property groups as desired. Problem: ======== As specified, only "application" typed property groups may be read protected. This was not the original case's intent. Solution: ========= Extend the context of Read-Protected Property Storage to include application-specific typed property groups. "framework", "dependency", "method" and "template" typed property groups are part of the infrastructure and will not be permitted to be read protected. From gww@eng.sun.com Wed Aug 22 14:52:22 2007 Received: from sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail2sca [129.145.155.234]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l7MLqMt9025585 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:52:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id l7MLnnS7007181 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:49:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JN70010N3B1KW00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:49:49 -0600 (MDT) Received: from engmail3mpk.sfbay.Sun.COM ([129.146.11.26]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JN70018C3AZHT00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:49:47 -0600 (MDT) Received: from marduk.eng.sun.com (marduk.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.108.224]) by engmail3mpk.sfbay.Sun.COM (8.13.6+Sun/8.13.6/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id l7MLnlFU010425; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:49:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from marduk.eng.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by marduk.eng.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l7MLoUfR025547; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:50:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gww@localhost) by marduk.eng.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.11/Submit) id l7MLoU7n025546; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:50:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:50:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Gary Winiger Subject: Re: SMF Read-Protected Property Storage Update [PSARC/2007/481 Self Review] To: PSARC-ext@sun.com, gww@sac.sfbay.sun.com Cc: Keith.Wesolowski@sun.com, smf-discuss@opensolaris.org Message-id: <200708222150.l7MLoU7n025546@marduk.eng.sun.com> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 Status: RO Content-Length: 1385 > I'm sponsoring this case for Keith Wesolowski and myself. I believe > it qualifies for self review and therefore have marked it "closed approved > automatic." I'm happy to turn it into a fast track and set the timer if > anyone believes I've misjudged. So of course, I left out the release binding is unchanged as is the interface taxonomy: Patch/Committed. > > Gary.. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Background: > =========== > PSARC/2007/177 SMF Read-Protected Property Storage specified the > "read_authorization" property for property groups of type "application" > (SCF_GROUP_APPLICATION). "application" is one of the predefined property > group types. The other predefined types are "framework", "dependency", > "method" and "template". SMF also provides for service bundles (manifests) > to define other ``application-specific'' typed property groups as desired. > > Problem: > ======== > As specified, only "application" typed property groups may be read > protected. This was not the original case's intent. > > Solution: > ========= > Extend the context of Read-Protected Property Storage to include > application-specific typed property groups. > > "framework", "dependency", "method" and "template" typed property groups > are part of the infrastructure and will not be permitted to be read > protected. >