From sacadmin Thu Nov 8 13:42:29 2007 Received: from sfbaymail1sca.SFBay.Sun.COM (sfbaymail1sca [129.145.154.35]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lA8LgTIF010667 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:42:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from sca-es-mail-1.sun.com (sca-es-mail-1.Sun.COM [192.18.43.132]) by sfbaymail1sca.SFBay.Sun.COM (8.13.6+Sun/8.13.6/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id lA8LcmH3025164 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:38:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id lA8LcgUV026967 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:38:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-09.sun.com by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JR700E01ILWEA00@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> (original mail from John.Plocher@Sun.COM) for psarc-record@sac.sfbay.sun.com; Thu, 08 Nov 2007 13:38:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from Macintosh.local ([208.74.177.212]) by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JR700LVOISIHQE0@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> for psarc-record@sac.sfbay.sun.com; Thu, 08 Nov 2007 13:38:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 13:38:41 -0800 From: John Plocher Subject: [Fwd: sacMaiL Error [PSARC]: Re: PSARC 2007/501 - Updated materials] Sender: John.Plocher@Sun.COM To: psarc-record@sac.sfbay.sun.com Message-id: <473381E1.4000409@Sun.Com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) Status: RO Content-Length: 1948 Fixed project.db entries -------- Original Message -------- Subject: sacMaiL Error [PSARC]: Re: PSARC 2007/501 - Updated materials Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 11:49:19 -0800 (PST) From: Sac Administrator To: undisclosed-recipients: ; [This message was auto-generated by the SAC mail system] NO CASE: 2007/501 The ProjectID or case number was not found in SAC database. The message's Subject line has what looks like a project-id or case number, but SAC's project database does not contain any information about it. The project-id or case number is most likely slightly erroneous or does not reference an official SAC project; please check it for validity. Please contact SACAdmin@sac.sfbay if you have questions. ---- original message follows ---- Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 11:45:33 -0800 From: Aarti Pai Subject: Re: PSARC 2007/501 - Updated materials To: psarc@sun.com Cc: Aaron.Dailey@sun.com sac% pwd /shared/sac/Archives/CaseLog/arc/PSARC/2007/501/inception.materials sac% ls -l total 936 -rw-r--r-- 1 apai sac 1664 Nov 8 11:47 fcadm.man <=======UPDATED FILE -rw-r--r-- 1 apai sac 1644 Nov 7 08:29 fcadm.man.old -rw-r--r-- 1 apai sac 757 Nov 7 08:29 HBA_API_ext.man -rw-r--r-- 1 apai sac 76069 Nov 7 08:29 NPIV_FCA_Interface_Doc-0.2.pdf -rw-r--r-- 1 apai sac 153002 Nov 7 08:29 NPIV_Func_spec.pdf -rw-r--r-- 1 apai sac 62007 Nov 7 08:29 NPIV_Solaris_Intro.pdf -rw-r--r-- 1 apai sac 38226 Nov 7 08:29 psarc_20q_npiv.pdf -rw-r--r-- 1 apai sac 312 Nov 7 08:29 xenstore.man -rw-r--r-- 1 apai sac 1169 Nov 7 08:29 xm.man -rw-r--r-- 1 apai sac 22632 Nov 7 08:29 zonecfg.man Aarti Aaron Dailey wrote: > Please update the following file. I already had some comments ... > > ---- end of original message ---- From sacadmin Thu Nov 8 13:43:09 2007 Received: from sfbaymail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (sfbaymail2sca [129.145.155.42]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lA8Lh9cU010678 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:43:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from sca-es-mail-1.sun.com (sca-es-mail-1.Sun.COM [192.18.43.132]) by sfbaymail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.10/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id lA8LdS7f011806 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:39:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from fe-sfbay-10.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id lA8LdN6i027096 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:39:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-10.sun.com by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JR700L01IQ97300@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com> (original mail from John.Plocher@Sun.COM) for psarc-record@sac.sfbay.sun.com; Thu, 08 Nov 2007 13:39:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from Macintosh.local ([208.74.177.212]) by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JR700HBCIT9YUA0@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com> for psarc-record@sac.sfbay.sun.com; Thu, 08 Nov 2007 13:39:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 13:39:09 -0800 From: John Plocher Subject: [Fwd: PSARC Agenda - 11/14/2007 - Late Mtg - (2007/501)] Sender: John.Plocher@Sun.COM To: psarc-record@sac.sfbay.sun.com Message-id: <473381FD.1080100@Sun.Com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) Status: RO Content-Length: 2171 -------- Original Message -------- From sacadmin Wed Nov 14 09:09:50 2007 Received: from phorcys.east.sun.com (phorcys.East.Sun.COM [129.148.174.143]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lAEH9nh9004705; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:09:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from phorcys.east.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phorcys.east.sun.com (8.14.1+Sun/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lAEH95Nm013375; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:09:05 -0500 (EST) Received: (from carlsonj@localhost) by phorcys.east.sun.com (8.14.1+Sun/8.14.1/Submit) id lAEH95EX013372; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:09:05 -0500 (EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18235.11181.930072.323558@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:09:01 -0500 From: James Carlson To: Mark Carlson cc: aaron.dailey@sun.com, Garrett.Damore@sun.com, john.plocher@sun.com, psarc@sac.sfbay.sun.com Subject: 2007/501 N_Port_ID Virtualization for Solaris X-Mailer: VM 7.01 under Emacs 21.3.1 Status: RO Content-Length: 521 [Resending; no reply received to message sent on Monday.] I just noticed that 2007/501 is marked as "exposure: closed" in the IAM file, but the original 1-pager specified open review, and the project itself seems to be an opensolaris.org project. What happened here? Can the IAM file be fixed? -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 From sacadmin Wed Nov 14 09:22:39 2007 Received: from sfbaymail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (sfbaymail2sca [129.145.155.42]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lAEHMdJA005126; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:22:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (sca-es-mail-2.Sun.COM [192.18.43.133]) by sfbaymail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.10/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id lAEHMdXI024300; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:22:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from fe-sfbay-10.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id lAEHMXqA000044; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:22:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-10.sun.com by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JRI00I01ARO7T00@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com> (original mail from gdamore@sun.com) ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:22:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.251.106] ([76.174.83.55]) by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JRI00A20AXL5P60@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com>; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:22:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:18:13 -0800 From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: Re: 2007/501 N_Port_ID Virtualization for Solaris In-reply-to: <18235.11181.930072.323558@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Sender: Garrett.Damore@sun.com To: James Carlson Cc: Mark Carlson , Aaron.Dailey@sun.com, Garrett.Damore@sun.com, John.Plocher@sun.com, psarc@sac.sfbay.sun.com Message-id: <473B2DD5.9050504@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <18235.11181.930072.323558@gargle.gargle.HOWL> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070827) Status: RO Content-Length: 434 James Carlson wrote: > [Resending; no reply received to message sent on Monday.] > > I just noticed that 2007/501 is marked as "exposure: closed" in the > IAM file, but the original 1-pager specified open review, and the > project itself seems to be an opensolaris.org project. > > What happened here? Can the IAM file be fixed? > > I think so, but I need confirmation from Aaron. Aaron, can I fix the IAM file? -- Garrett From sacadmin Wed Nov 14 13:55:23 2007 Received: from dm-sfbay-02.sfbay.sun.com (dm-sfbay-02 [129.146.11.31]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lAELtM6s011633; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:55:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from brmea-mail-3.sun.com (brmea-mail-3.Sun.COM [192.18.98.34]) by dm-sfbay-02.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id lAELtM7t045534; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:55:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from fe-amer-10.sun.com ([192.18.109.80]) by brmea-mail-3.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id lAELtMvA013027; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:55:22 GMT Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JRI00H01LZDJE00@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from Aaron.Dailey@Sun.COM); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:55:22 -0700 (MST) Received: from [129.150.144.13] by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JRI00AM9NJHLW70@mail-amer.sun.com>; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:55:19 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 05:54:55 +0800 From: Aaron Dailey Subject: Re: 2007/501 N_Port_ID Virtualization for Solaris In-reply-to: <473B2DD5.9050504@sun.com> Sender: Aaron.Dailey@Sun.COM To: "Garrett D'Amore" Cc: James Carlson , Mark Carlson , Garrett.Damore@Sun.COM, John.Plocher@Sun.COM, psarc@sac.sfbay.sun.com Message-id: <473B6EAF.8050707@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <18235.11181.930072.323558@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <473B2DD5.9050504@sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) Status: RO Content-Length: 514 Garrett D'Amore wrote: > James Carlson wrote: >> [Resending; no reply received to message sent on Monday.] >> >> I just noticed that 2007/501 is marked as "exposure: closed" in the >> IAM file, but the original 1-pager specified open review, and the >> project itself seems to be an opensolaris.org project. >> >> What happened here? Can the IAM file be fixed? >> >> > I think so, but I need confirmation from Aaron. Aaron, can I fix the > IAM file? Yes, it should be an open case. Aaron > > -- Garrett From gdamore@sun.com Wed Nov 14 14:08:44 2007 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lAEM8hU1012008 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:08:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id lAEM8fiS024448 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 06:08:42 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JRI00905O6HJL00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:08:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from sca-es-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.43.133]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JRI006RSO6GB240@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:08:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id lAEM8enw006996 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:08:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-09.sun.com by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JRI00D01O37ME00@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> (original mail from gdamore@sun.com) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:08:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.251.106] ([76.174.83.55]) by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JRI00JKQO6F9YC0@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com>; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:08:39 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:04:19 -0800 From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: Re: 2007/501 N_Port_ID Virtualization for Solaris In-reply-to: <473B6EAF.8050707@sun.com> Sender: Garrett.Damore@sun.com To: Aaron Dailey Cc: James Carlson , Mark Carlson , Garrett.Damore@sun.com, John.Plocher@sun.com, PSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <473B70E3.70001@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 References: <18235.11181.930072.323558@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <473B2DD5.9050504@sun.com> <473B6EAF.8050707@sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070827) Status: RO Content-Length: 784 I've fixed the IAM file. I've also changed the CC to the external alias, so external folks that want to attend today have at least a small chance of knowing about it. :-) Aarti, can you update the agenda? -- Garrett Aaron Dailey wrote: > Garrett D'Amore wrote: >> James Carlson wrote: >>> [Resending; no reply received to message sent on Monday.] >>> >>> I just noticed that 2007/501 is marked as "exposure: closed" in the >>> IAM file, but the original 1-pager specified open review, and the >>> project itself seems to be an opensolaris.org project. >>> >>> What happened here? Can the IAM file be fixed? >>> >>> >> I think so, but I need confirmation from Aaron. Aaron, can I fix the >> IAM file? > Yes, it should be an open case. > > Aaron >> >> -- Garrett > From Aarti.Pai@sun.com Wed Nov 14 14:17:09 2007 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lAEMH7Ei012323 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:17:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id lAEMH0qX029611 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 06:17:07 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JRI0010NOKEA900@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:17:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from brmea-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.98.31]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JRI009GPOJ7HOC0@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:16:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from fe-amer-09.sun.com ([192.18.109.79]) by brmea-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id lAEMGJnT002625 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:16:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JRI00401LMZE800@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from Aarti.Pai@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:16:19 -0700 (MST) Received: from [129.145.154.107] by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JRI004EKOJ1ALE0@mail-amer.sun.com>; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:16:13 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:16:13 -0800 From: Aarti Pai Subject: Re: 2007/501 N_Port_ID Virtualization for Solaris In-reply-to: <473B70E3.70001@sun.com> Sender: Aarti.Pai@sun.com To: "Garrett D'Amore" Cc: Aaron Dailey , James Carlson , Mark Carlson , Garrett.Damore@sun.com, John.Plocher@sun.com, PSARC-ext@sun.com Reply-to: Aarti.Pai@sun.com Message-id: <473B73AD.90401@Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 References: <18235.11181.930072.323558@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <473B2DD5.9050504@sun.com> <473B6EAF.8050707@sun.com> <473B70E3.70001@sun.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4v; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20070109 Status: RO Content-Length: 943 Done ... http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/announcements/ Aarti Garrett D'Amore wrote: > I've fixed the IAM file. I've also changed the CC to the external > alias, so external folks that want to attend today have at least a > small chance of knowing about it. :-) > > Aarti, can you update the agenda? > > -- Garrett > > Aaron Dailey wrote: > >> Garrett D'Amore wrote: >> >>> James Carlson wrote: >>> >>>> [Resending; no reply received to message sent on Monday.] >>>> >>>> I just noticed that 2007/501 is marked as "exposure: closed" in the >>>> IAM file, but the original 1-pager specified open review, and the >>>> project itself seems to be an opensolaris.org project. >>>> >>>> What happened here? Can the IAM file be fixed? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> I think so, but I need confirmation from Aaron. Aaron, can I fix >>> the IAM file? >> >> Yes, it should be an open case. >> >> Aaron >> >>> >>> -- Garrett >> >> > From sacadmin Thu Nov 15 16:09:25 2007 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lAG09PUi015293 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:09:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id lAG09OuD051074 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:psarc@sun.com>; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:09:24 -0700 (MST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JRK00909OFOEC00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for psarc@sun.com (ORCPT psarc@Sun.COM); Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:09:24 -0700 (MST) Received: from brmea-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.98.31]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JRK0056XOFNT230@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for psarc@sun.com (ORCPT psarc@Sun.COM); Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:09:24 -0700 (MST) Received: from fe-amer-10.sun.com ([192.18.109.80]) by brmea-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id lAG09Ncc025411 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 00:09:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JRK00B01O6GUR00@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from Aarti.Pai@Sun.COM) for psarc@Sun.COM (ORCPT psarc@Sun.COM); Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:09:23 -0700 (MST) Received: from [129.145.154.107] by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JRK00BB1OFHEL20@mail-amer.sun.com> for psarc@Sun.COM (ORCPT psarc@Sun.COM); Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:09:17 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:09:17 -0800 From: Aarti Pai Subject: Meeting Minutes for PSARC - 11/14/2007 - (2007/501) Sender: Aarti.Pai@sun.com To: psarc@sun.com Cc: Aaron Dailey , Nicolas Droux Reply-to: Aarti.Pai@sun.com Message-id: <473CDFAD.902@Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_e7TVA8YrlfoxPGMAjxXBvw)" X-Accept-Language: en-us, en X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4v; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20070109 Status: RO Content-Length: 2286 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_e7TVA8YrlfoxPGMAjxXBvw) Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Minutes/Audio for PSARC meeting 11/15/2007 are now available: - Arc Business: http://sac.sfbay/Archives/Minutes/PSARC/2007/20071114.arcbiz Audio: http://sac.sfbay/Archives/Minutes/PSARC/2007/20071114.arcbiz.open.mp3 - Inception Case N_Port_ID_Virtualization_for_Solaris (2007/501): http://sac.sfbay/Archives/Minutes/PSARC/2007/20071114.2007.501.inception Audio: http://sac.sfbay/Archives/Minutes/PSARC/2007/20071114.2007.501.inception.mp3 Please contact me directly if you require any corrections/modifications to these minutes. Aarti --Boundary_(ID_e7TVA8YrlfoxPGMAjxXBvw) Content-type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Minutes/Audio for PSARC meeting 11/15/2007 are now available:

- Arc Business: 
http://sac.sfbay/Archives/Minutes/PSARC/2007/20071114.arcbiz
Audio:  http://sac.sfbay/Archives/Minutes/PSARC/2007/20071114.arcbiz.open.mp3

- Inception Case N_Port_ID_Virtualization_for_Solaris (2007/501): 
http://sac.sfbay/Archives/Minutes/PSARC/2007/20071114.2007.501.inception
Audio: 
http://sac.sfbay/Archives/Minutes/PSARC/2007/20071114.2007.501.inception.mp3

Please contact me directly if you require any corrections/modifications
to these minutes.

Aarti
--Boundary_(ID_e7TVA8YrlfoxPGMAjxXBvw)-- From sacadmin Thu Feb 7 11:03:12 2008 Received: from sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail2sca [129.145.155.234]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m17J3CQ1007149 for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 11:03:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m17J3ADb018331 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:psarc@sun.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 11:03:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JVV00HAZU97MV00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for psarc@sun.com (ORCPT psarc@Sun.COM); Thu, 07 Feb 2008 11:03:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from brmea-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.98.31]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JVV001JFU91I4C0@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for psarc@sun.com (ORCPT psarc@Sun.COM); Thu, 07 Feb 2008 11:03:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from fe-amer-09.sun.com ([192.18.109.79]) by brmea-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m17J31q5007342 for ; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 19:03:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JVV00I01TROS800@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from Aarti.Pai@Sun.COM) for psarc@Sun.COM (ORCPT psarc@Sun.COM); Thu, 07 Feb 2008 12:03:01 -0700 (MST) Received: from [129.145.154.90] by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JVV005FDU8VTP40@mail-amer.sun.com> for psarc@Sun.COM (ORCPT psarc@Sun.COM); Thu, 07 Feb 2008 12:03:00 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 11:02:55 -0800 From: Aarti Pai Subject: Case materials for PSARC 2007/501 commitment In-reply-to: <47AAC2EF.5070802@Sun.COM> Sender: Aarti.Pai@sun.com To: psarc@sun.com Cc: Aaron.Dailey@sun.com Reply-to: Aarti.Pai@sun.com Message-id: <47AB55DF.5090206@Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 References: <47AAC2EF.5070802@Sun.COM> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070802) Status: RO Content-Length: 682 sac% pwd /shared/sac/Archives/CaseLog/arc/PSARC/2007/501/commitment.materials sac% ls -l total 733 -r--r--r-- 1 apai sac 986 Feb 7 10:58 HBA_API_ext.man -r--r--r-- 1 apai sac 76069 Feb 7 10:58 NPIV_FCA_Interface_Doc-0.2.pdf -r--r--r-- 1 apai sac 169545 Feb 7 10:58 NPIV_Func_spec.pdf -r--r--r-- 1 apai sac 1346 Feb 7 10:58 npivxend.man -r--r--r-- 1 apai sac 21733 Feb 7 10:58 psarc_20q_npiv -r--r--r-- 1 apai sac 713 Feb 7 10:58 scf_schema -r--r--r-- 1 apai sac 311 Feb 7 10:58 xenstore.man -r--r--r-- 1 apai sac 1391 Feb 7 10:58 xm.man Aaron Dailey wrote: > From gdamore@sun.com Thu Feb 21 09:13:54 2008 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1LHDrCm016994 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:13:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m1LHDfCc000571 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 01:13:52 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JWL00E0RMJ2BT00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:13:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from sca-es-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.43.132]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JWL00ATDMJ2I290@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:13:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m1LHDnw0007514 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:13:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-09.sun.com by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JWL00L01M1JDY00@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> (original mail from gdamore@sun.com) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:13:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.251.106] ([76.174.83.55]) by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JWL00GQRMJ14G00@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:13:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:12:12 -0800 From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: Opinion for Review: PSARC 2007/501 N_Port_ID Virtualization for Solaris (02/28/2008) Sender: Garrett.Damore@sun.com To: PSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <47BDB0EC.80405@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071023) Status: RO Content-Length: 4453 sun microsystems Systems Architecture Committee _________________________________________________________________ Subject: N_Port_ID Virtualization for Solaris Submitted by: Aaron Dailey File: PSARC/2007/501/opinion.ms Date: February 20th, 2008. Committee: Mark Carlson (opinion written by Garrett D'Amore), Kais Belgaied. Product Approval Committee: Solaris PAC solaris-pac-opinion@sun.com 1. Summary N_Port_ID Virtualization (NPIV) allows one Fibre Channel port to represent many physical ports, thus virtualizing the hardware. NPIV is especially useful for virtual machine environments. 2. Decision & Precedence Information The project is approved as specified in reference [1]. The project may be delivered in a minor release of the ON consolidation. 3. Interfaces The project exports the following interfaces. _____________________________________________________________________________ | Interfaces Exported | |______________________|_________________|__________________________________| |Interface | Classification | Comments | |______________________|_________________|__________________________________| |FCA | Project Private| Specified in [2]. | |HBA-API extensions | Project Private| Specified in [3]. | |fcadm command line | Committed | See [4]. | |fcadm output | Uncommitted | See [4]. | |fcinfo output | Uncommitted | See [4]. | |fcadm SCF | Project Private| Storage for NPIV WWWN. | |xenstore | Volatile | Changes for existen Xen database| |______________________|_________________|__________________________________| PSARC/2007/501 Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems - 2 - _____________________________________________________________________________ | Interfaces Exported | |______________________|_________________|__________________________________| |Interface | Classification | Comments | |______________________|_________________|__________________________________| |xm input/output | Volatile | Xen CLI | |/usr/lib/xennpivd file| Project Private| Xen reconfiguration daemon | |xnpivd file | Project Private| Xen reconfiguration driver | |______________________|_________________|__________________________________| The project imports the following interfaces. ____________________________________________________________ | Interfaces Imported | |________________|________________|________________________| |Interface | Classification| Comments | |________________|________________|________________________| |T11 NPIV Specs | Standard | From the T11 web site.| |libhbaaapi(3LIB)| Standard | Derived from T11 FC-MI| |________________|________________|________________________| 4. Opinion No issues were raised for the project team at commitment review. 5. Minority Opinion(s) None. 6. Advisory Information None. 7. Appendices 7.1. Appendix A: Technical Changes Required None. 7.2. Appendix B: Technical Changes Advised None. 7.3. Appendix C: Reference Material Unless stated otherwise, path names are relative to the case directory PSARC/2007/501. 1 Functional specifcation. File: commitment.materials/NPIV_Func_spec.pdf PSARC/2007/501 Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems - 3 - 2 FCA Interface Changs to Support NPIV. File: commitment.materials/NPIV_FCA_Interface_Doc- 0.2.1.pdf 3 fcinfo, fcadm manual page with changes. File: commitment.materials/fcinfo.man 4 PSARC 20 Questions. File: commitment.materials/psarc_20q_npiv 5 npivxend manual page. File: commitment.materials/npivxend.man 6 xenstore manual page. File: commitment.materials/xenstore.man 7 xm manual page. File: commitment.materials/xm.man 8 Issues file. File: issues PSARC/2007/501 Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems From gww@eng.sun.com Thu Feb 21 10:06:13 2008 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1LI6C97018761 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:06:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m1LI69O8022218; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 02:06:09 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JWL00J0ZOY5M500@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:06:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from dm-eng-02.sfbay.sun.com ([129.146.11.32]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JWL00GWUOY3O030@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:06:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from marduk.eng.sun.com (marduk.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.108.224]) by dm-eng-02.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m1LI63Qo033944; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:06:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from marduk.eng.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by marduk.eng.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m1LI6QB6022951; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:06:26 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gww@localhost) by marduk.eng.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.11/Submit) id m1LI6QnJ022950; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:06:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:06:26 -0800 (PST) From: Gary Winiger Subject: Re: Opinion for Review: PSARC 2007/501 N_Port_ID Virtualization for Solaris (02/28/2008) To: PSARC-ext@sun.com, gdamore@sun.com Message-id: <200802211806.m1LI6QnJ022950@marduk.eng.sun.com> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 Status: RO Content-Length: 219 > 4. Opinion > > No issues were raised for the project team at commitment > review. There seemed to be issues discussed at the inception review. Were none of them worthy enough to note in the opinion? Gary.. From gdamore@sun.com Thu Feb 21 10:27:27 2008 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1LIRQgu020981 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:27:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m1LIRIpc000039 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:psarc-ext@sun.com>; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 02:27:25 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JWL00L0DPXNNL00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for psarc-ext@sun.com (ORCPT psarc-ext@sun.com); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:27:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from sca-es-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.43.133]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JWL00GIZPXMO350@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for psarc-ext@sun.com (ORCPT psarc-ext@sun.com); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:27:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m1LIRM0E006696 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:27:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-09.sun.com by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JWL00D01PU4ZF00@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> (original mail from gdamore@sun.com) for psarc-ext@sun.com (ORCPT psarc-ext@sun.com); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:27:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.251.106] ([76.174.83.55]) by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JWL00HJ7PXKF880@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:27:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:25:42 -0800 From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: Re: Opinion for Review: PSARC 2007/501 N_Port_ID Virtualization for Solaris (02/28/2008) In-reply-to: <200802211806.m1LI6QnJ022950@marduk.eng.sun.com> Sender: Garrett.Damore@sun.com To: Gary Winiger Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <47BDC226.9060102@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 References: <200802211806.m1LI6QnJ022950@marduk.eng.sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071023) Status: RO Content-Length: 1144 Gary Winiger wrote: >> 4. Opinion >> >> No issues were raised for the project team at commitment >> review. >> > > There seemed to be issues discussed at the inception review. > Were none of them worthy enough to note in the opinion? > > Gary.. > There were issues at inception, indeed. They had all been resolved before commitment though. I am uncertain what the procedure is for noting issues that are resolved before a project comes for commitment -- certainly there was no advice or discussion at commitment. Put another way, I _thought_ that the opinion does not stand alone, but exists in conjunction with the case materials. Those case materials (the commitment versions) had, I presume, been found acceptable without need or desire for change. So I called out a reference to them, and didn't mention it further. Admittedly, I'm still new to the process here, but if there is something else that folks would like this opinion to reflect, I'm happy to change it. In such a case, though, I'd like to have a little more guidance as to what should or should not be recorded in the opinion. -- Garrett From glenn.skinner@sun.com Thu Feb 21 11:13:56 2008 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1LJDtuD023558 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:13:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m1LJDbfG014261 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:13:55 GMT Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JWL0030BS362P00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:13:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from ivrel.sfbay.sun.com ([129.146.74.76]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JWL00GY4S35O4A0@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:13:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from ivrel (ivrel [129.146.74.76]) by ivrel.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with SMTP id m1LJDrJS024233 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:13:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:13:53 -0800 (PST) From: Glenn Skinner Subject: Re: Opinion for Review: 2007/501 [N_Port_ID Virtualization for Solaris] To: PSARC-ext@sun.com Reply-to: Glenn Skinner Message-id: <200802211913.m1LJDrJS024233@ivrel.sfbay.sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.6_36 SunOS 5.11 sun4u sparc Content-type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-MD5: bFhdpQhiyXlNYvrd8/uEqg== X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 Status: RO Content-Length: 2111 Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:25:42 -0800 From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: Re: Opinion for Review: PSARC 2007/501 N_Port_ID Virtualization for Solaris (02/28/2008) Gary Winiger wrote: >> >> No issues were raised for the project team at commitment >> review. > > There seemed to be issues discussed at the inception review. > Were none of them worthy enough to note in the opinion? There were issues at inception, indeed. They had all been resolved before commitment though. I am uncertain what the procedure is for noting issues that are resolved before a project comes for commitment -- certainly there was no advice or discussion at commitment. Put another way, I _thought_ that the opinion does not stand alone, but exists in conjunction with the case materials. Those case materials (the commitment versions) had, I presume, been found acceptable without need or desire for change. So I called out a reference to them, and didn't mention it further. Admittedly, I'm still new to the process here, but if there is something else that folks would like this opinion to reflect, I'm happy to change it. In such a case, though, I'd like to have a little more guidance as to what should or should not be recorded in the opinion. Although the opinion certainly can and must refer to the case materials, you can't expect most people reading the opinion to refer to the materials; only people with a deep interest in the case are likely to do that. Thus, the opinion should be written to stand on its own. That's not to say that it should duplicate information in the materials. Instead, it should focus on issues pertinent to the project's architecture, adding additional information only to the extent needed to make the architectural discussion understandable. When a given issue was resolved is irrelevant for the purposes of the opinion's discussion. If it was important enough to occupy reviewers' attention, it likely deserves illumination in the opinion. -- Glenn From Mark.Carlson@sun.com Thu Feb 21 11:24:50 2008 Received: from sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail2sca [129.145.155.234]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1LJOnIh023834 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:24:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m1LJOneb023136 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:24:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JWL0030NSLBZN00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:24:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from brmea-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.98.31]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JWL00GWDSLAO0A0@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:24:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from fe-amer-09.sun.com ([192.18.109.79]) by brmea-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m1LJOkkw024755 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:24:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JWL00L01R9RAZ00@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from Mark.Carlson@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:24:46 -0700 (MST) Received: from Macintosh-39.local ([192.18.100.132]) by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JWL008JUSL1ZL10@mail-amer.sun.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:24:41 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:24:37 -0700 From: "Mark A. Carlson" Subject: Re: Opinion for Review: PSARC 2007/501 N_Port_ID Virtualization for Solaris (02/28/2008) In-reply-to: <47BDC226.9060102@sun.com> Sender: Mark.Carlson@sun.com To: "Garrett D'Amore" Cc: Gary Winiger , PSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <47BDCFF5.5070002@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 References: <200802211806.m1LI6QnJ022950@marduk.eng.sun.com> <47BDC226.9060102@sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) Status: RO Content-Length: 1425 Garret, If, in your opinion, you find any inception issues (even if they were resolved) that other projects can learn from, please include the issue and it's resolution in the opinion. Thanks, -- mark Garrett D'Amore wrote: > Gary Winiger wrote: >>> 4. Opinion >>> >>> No issues were raised for the project team at commitment >>> review. >>> >> >> There seemed to be issues discussed at the inception review. >> Were none of them worthy enough to note in the opinion? >> >> Gary.. >> > > There were issues at inception, indeed. They had all been resolved > before commitment though. I am uncertain what the procedure is for > noting issues that are resolved before a project comes for commitment > -- certainly there was no advice or discussion at commitment. > > Put another way, I _thought_ that the opinion does not stand alone, > but exists in conjunction with the case materials. Those case > materials (the commitment versions) had, I presume, been found > acceptable without need or desire for change. So I called out a > reference to them, and didn't mention it further. > > Admittedly, I'm still new to the process here, but if there is > something else that folks would like this opinion to reflect, I'm > happy to change it. In such a case, though, I'd like to have a little > more guidance as to what should or should not be recorded in the opinion. > > -- Garrett From gww@eng.sun.com Thu Feb 21 12:12:58 2008 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1LKCvPK026850 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:12:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m1LKCs7n011539; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 04:12:55 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JWL00K05UTGSG00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:12:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from dm-eng-02.sfbay.sun.com ([129.146.11.32]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JWL00GE0UTGLM60@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:12:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from marduk.eng.sun.com (marduk.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.108.224]) by dm-eng-02.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m1LKCqoR058068; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:12:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from marduk.eng.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by marduk.eng.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m1LKDFvU023239; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:13:15 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gww@localhost) by marduk.eng.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.11/Submit) id m1LKDFaH023238; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:13:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:13:15 -0800 (PST) From: Gary Winiger Subject: Re: Opinion for Review: PSARC 2007/501 N_Port_ID Virtualization for Solaris (02/28/2008) To: gdamore@sun.com Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <200802212013.m1LKDFaH023238@marduk.eng.sun.com> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 Status: RO Content-Length: 983 I see other's have responded before I could. I'd just +1 Gary.. > There were issues at inception, indeed. They had all been resolved > before commitment though. I am uncertain what the procedure is for > noting issues that are resolved before a project comes for commitment -- > certainly there was no advice or discussion at commitment. > > Put another way, I _thought_ that the opinion does not stand alone, but > exists in conjunction with the case materials. Those case materials > (the commitment versions) had, I presume, been found acceptable without > need or desire for change. So I called out a reference to them, and > didn't mention it further. > > Admittedly, I'm still new to the process here, but if there is something > else that folks would like this opinion to reflect, I'm happy to change > it. In such a case, though, I'd like to have a little more guidance as > to what should or should not be recorded in the opinion. > > -- Garrett > From gdamore@sun.com Thu Feb 21 12:16:22 2008 Received: from sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail2sca [129.145.155.234]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1LKGMXa027196 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:16:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m1LKGM6C006483 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:16:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JWL0090BUZ7AN00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:16:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from sca-es-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.43.133]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JWL008AWUZ7K130@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:16:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from fe-sfbay-10.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m1LKGJv0020291 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:16:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-10.sun.com by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JWL00001UT83M00@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com> (original mail from gdamore@sun.com) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:16:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.251.106] ([76.174.83.55]) by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JWL007PCUZ3E870@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:16:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:14:36 -0800 From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: Re: Opinion for Review: PSARC 2007/501 N_Port_ID Virtualization for Solaris (02/28/2008) In-reply-to: <47BDCFF5.5070002@sun.com> Sender: Garrett.Damore@sun.com To: "Mark A. Carlson" Cc: Gary Winiger , PSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <47BDDBAC.3000800@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 References: <200802211806.m1LI6QnJ022950@marduk.eng.sun.com> <47BDC226.9060102@sun.com> <47BDCFF5.5070002@sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071023) Status: RO Content-Length: 1848 Hmm... going over the issues file now, I kind of wish we had covered a few issues during commitment. Specifically, jdc-5 indicates that resolution would done in commitment review. Likewise kb-02 wasn't fully addressed. How best to handle the fact that the project was voted on, but these issues weren't covered at commitment? -- Garrett Mark A. Carlson wrote: > Garret, > > If, in your opinion, you find any inception issues > (even if they were resolved) that other projects > can learn from, please include the issue and it's > resolution in the opinion. > > Thanks, > > -- mark > > Garrett D'Amore wrote: >> Gary Winiger wrote: >>>> 4. Opinion >>>> >>>> No issues were raised for the project team at commitment >>>> review. >>>> >>> >>> There seemed to be issues discussed at the inception review. >>> Were none of them worthy enough to note in the opinion? >>> Gary.. >>> >> >> There were issues at inception, indeed. They had all been resolved >> before commitment though. I am uncertain what the procedure is for >> noting issues that are resolved before a project comes for commitment >> -- certainly there was no advice or discussion at commitment. >> >> Put another way, I _thought_ that the opinion does not stand alone, >> but exists in conjunction with the case materials. Those case >> materials (the commitment versions) had, I presume, been found >> acceptable without need or desire for change. So I called out a >> reference to them, and didn't mention it further. >> >> Admittedly, I'm still new to the process here, but if there is >> something else that folks would like this opinion to reflect, I'm >> happy to change it. In such a case, though, I'd like to have a >> little more guidance as to what should or should not be recorded in >> the opinion. >> >> -- Garrett From gdamore@sun.com Fri Feb 22 09:30:44 2008 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1MHUhMY002753 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:30:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m1MHUbLS024663 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:30:42 GMT Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JWN00M0DHZ32T00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:30:39 -0700 (MST) Received: from sca-es-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.43.133]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JWN009ULHZ3ZI90@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:30:39 -0700 (MST) Received: from fe-sfbay-10.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m1MHUdcH025472 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:30:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-10.sun.com by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JWN00C01FMROG00@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com> (original mail from gdamore@sun.com) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:30:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.251.106] ([76.174.83.55]) by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JWN00H1CHYUKX00@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com>; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:30:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:28:50 -0800 From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: Re: Opinion for Review: PSARC 2007/501 N_Port_ID Virtualization for Solaris (02/28/2008) In-reply-to: <47BDC226.9060102@sun.com> Sender: Garrett.Damore@sun.com To: Gary Winiger Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com, Aaron Dailey , "Mark A. Carlson" Message-id: <47BF0652.9000703@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 References: <200802211806.m1LI6QnJ022950@marduk.eng.sun.com> <47BDC226.9060102@sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071023) Status: RO Content-Length: 1524 I've updated the draft opinion in the case directory adding details taken from inception review, as well as from some responses to the issues file by the project team that were given to me out-of-band. I've reset the timer for 2/29, as a result. Please have another look. Thanks. -- Garrett Garrett D'Amore wrote: > Gary Winiger wrote: >>> 4. Opinion >>> >>> No issues were raised for the project team at commitment >>> review. >>> >> >> There seemed to be issues discussed at the inception review. >> Were none of them worthy enough to note in the opinion? >> >> Gary.. >> > > There were issues at inception, indeed. They had all been resolved > before commitment though. I am uncertain what the procedure is for > noting issues that are resolved before a project comes for commitment > -- certainly there was no advice or discussion at commitment. > > Put another way, I _thought_ that the opinion does not stand alone, > but exists in conjunction with the case materials. Those case > materials (the commitment versions) had, I presume, been found > acceptable without need or desire for change. So I called out a > reference to them, and didn't mention it further. > > Admittedly, I'm still new to the process here, but if there is > something else that folks would like this opinion to reflect, I'm > happy to change it. In such a case, though, I'd like to have a little > more guidance as to what should or should not be recorded in the opinion. > > -- Garrett From sacadmin Fri Feb 22 12:22:40 2008 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1MKMdP5014082 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:22:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m1MKMVWT009784 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:psarc@sun.com>; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:22:38 GMT Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JWN00N0LPXQ2400@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for psarc@sun.com (ORCPT psarc@sun.com); Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:22:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from brmea-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.98.43]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JWN00805PXPQK50@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for psarc@sun.com (ORCPT psarc@sun.com); Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:22:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from fe-amer-10.sun.com ([192.18.109.80]) by brmea-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m1MKMbpx015867 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:22:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JWN00B01MEJD900@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from Aarti.Pai@Sun.COM) for psarc@sun.com (ORCPT psarc@sun.com); Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:22:37 -0700 (MST) Received: from [129.150.35.78] by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JWN003B0PXFS940@mail-amer.sun.com> for psarc@sun.com (ORCPT psarc@sun.com); Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:22:28 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:22:20 -0800 From: Aarti Pai Subject: Meeting Minutes for PSARC - 02/20/2008 - [2007/501] Sender: Aarti.Pai@sun.com To: psarc@sun.com Cc: Sumit.Gupta@sun.com, Aaron.Dailey@sun.com, Glenn.Faden@sun.com Reply-to: Aarti.Pai@sun.com Message-id: <47BF2EFC.3050701@Sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.13pre (Windows/20080220) Status: RO Content-Length: 743 Minutes/Audio for PSARC 02/20/2008 are now available: - Closed ARC Business: http://sac.sfbay/Archives/Minutes/PSARC/2008/20080220.arcbiz.closed Audio: http://sac.sfbay/Archives/Minutes/PSARC/2008/20080220.arcbiz.closed.mp3 -Open ARC Business: http://sac.sfbay/Archives/Minutes/PSARC/2008/20080220.arcbiz.open Audio: http://sac.sfbay/Archives/Minutes/PSARC/2008/20080220.arcbiz.open.mp3 - Open Committment: N_Port_ID Virtualization for Solaris (2007/501) http://sac.sfbay/Archives/Minutes/PSARC/2008/20080220.2007.501.commitment Audio: http://sac.sfbay/Archives/Minutes/PSARC/2008/20080220.2007.501.commitment.mp3 Please contact me directly if you require any corrections/modifications to these minutes. Aarti From sac-owner Fri Feb 22 12:27:45 2008 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1MKRjnU014225 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:27:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m1MKRZ81019683 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:All-ARCs@sun.com>; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 04:27:44 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0JWN00001Q664V00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for All-ARCs@sun.com (ORCPT All-ARCs@sun.com); Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:27:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from brmea-mail-4.sun.com ([192.18.98.36]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JWN0080HQ65R650@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for All-ARCs@sun.com (ORCPT All-ARCs@sun.com); Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:27:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from fe-amer-09.sun.com ([192.18.109.79]) by brmea-mail-4.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m1MKRff2013316 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:27:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JWN00601POWS100@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from Aarti.Pai@Sun.COM) for All-ARCs@sun.com (ORCPT All-ARCs@sun.com); Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:27:41 -0700 (MST) Received: from [129.150.35.78] by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JWN000P3Q5XM800@mail-amer.sun.com> for All-ARCs@sun.com (ORCPT All-ARCs@sun.com); Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:27:33 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:27:29 -0800 From: Aarti Pai Subject: PSARC approved 02/20/2008 (2007/501) Sender: Aarti.Pai@sun.com To: Aarti.Pai@sun.com Message-id: <47BF3031.7030505@Sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.13pre (Windows/20080220) Status: RO Content-Length: 226 PSARC approved 02/20/2008 Case: N_Port_ID Virtualization for Solaris (2007/501) Incompatible Changes: none Precedent: none If more information is needed, please contact the case owner/intern. Aarti From sac-owner Fri Feb 29 16:36:13 2008 Received: from dm-eng-02.sfbay.sun.com (dm-eng-02 [129.146.11.32]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m210aDKm007594 for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:36:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from sca-ea-mail-1.sun.com (sca-ea-mail-1.Sun.COM [192.18.43.24]) by dm-eng-02.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m210aDmP008846 for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:36:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay22.sun.com (relay22.sun.com [192.12.251.34] (may be forged)) by sca-ea-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m210V4o1015929 for ; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 00:36:13 GMT Received: from mms23es.sun.com ([150.143.232.54] [150.143.232.54]) by relay22i.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-504014 for sac-review@sac.eng.sun.com; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 00:36:02 Z Received: from relay21.sun.com (relay21.sun.com [192.12.251.24]) by mms23es.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-4317544 for sac-review@sac.eng.sun.com; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 00:36:02 Z Received: from outbound-mail-17.bluehost.com ([69.89.20.232] [69.89.20.232]) by relay21i.sun.com id BT-MMP-27353924 for sac-review@sac.eng.sun.com; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 00:36:02 Z Received: (qmail 19494 invoked by uid 0); 1 Mar 2008 00:36:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box374.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.174) by mailproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 1 Mar 2008 00:36:00 -0000 Received: from sca-ea-fw-1.sun.com ([192.18.43.225] helo=[10.7.251.172]) by box374.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JVFho-0000oR-Ez for sac-review@sac.eng.sun.com; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:36:00 -0700 Message-ID: <47C8A478.1000009@damore.org> Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:34:00 -0800 From: "Garrett D'Amore" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071023) To: sac-review@sac.sfbay.sun.com Subject: Opinion for Review (03/07/2008): PSARC 2007/501 N_Port_ID Virtualization for Solaris X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Identified-User: {2225:box374.bluehost.com:damoreor:damore.org} {sentby:smtp auth 192.18.43.225 authed with garrett+damore.org} X-Antispam: No, score=-2.6/5.0, scanned in 0.119sec at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smf-spamd v1.3.1 - http://smfs.sf.net/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------040907080504050808020602" Status: RO Content-Length: 6145 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040907080504050808020602 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --------------040907080504050808020602 Content-Type: text/plain; name="opinion-draft.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="opinion-draft.txt" sun microsystems Systems Architecture Committee _________________________________________________________________ Subject: N_Port_ID Virtualization for Solaris Submitted by: Aaron Dailey File: PSARC/2007/501/opinion.ms Date: February 20th, 2008. Committee: Mark Carlson (opinion written by Garrett D'Amore), Kais Belgaied. Product Approval Committee: Solaris PAC solaris-pac-opinion@sun.com 1. Summary N_Port_ID Virtualization (NPIV) allows one Fibre Channel port to represent many physical ports, thus virtualizing the hardware. NPIV is especially useful for virtual machine environments. 2. Decision & Precedence Information The project is approved as specified in reference [1]. The project may be delivered in a minor release of the ON consolidation. 3. Interfaces The project exports the following interfaces. _____________________________________________________________________________ | Interfaces Exported | |______________________|_________________|__________________________________| |Interface | Classification | Comments | |______________________|_________________|__________________________________| |FCA | Project Private| Specified in [2]. | |HBA-API extensions | Project Private| Specified in [3]. | |fcadm command line | Committed | See [4]. | |fcadm output | Uncommitted | See [4]. | |fcinfo output | Uncommitted | See [4]. | |fcadm SCF | Project Private| Storage for NPIV WWWN. | |xenstore | Volatile | Changes for existen Xen database| |______________________|_________________|__________________________________| PSARC/2007/501 Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems - 2 - _____________________________________________________________________________ | Interfaces Exported | |______________________|_________________|__________________________________| |Interface | Classification | Comments | |______________________|_________________|__________________________________| |xm input/output | Volatile | Xen CLI | |/usr/lib/xennpivd file| Project Private| Xen reconfiguration daemon | |xnpivd file | Project Private| Xen reconfiguration driver | |______________________|_________________|__________________________________| The project imports the following interfaces. ____________________________________________________________ | Interfaces Imported | |________________|________________|________________________| |Interface | Classification| Comments | |________________|________________|________________________| |T11 NPIV Specs | Standard | From the T11 web site.| |libhbaaapi(3LIB)| Standard | Derived from T11 FC-MI| |________________|________________|________________________| 4. Opinion 4.1. Configuration and Locking During inception, several questions were raised about a con- figuration file, and locking of the configuration database. The project team decided to change to use standard libscf(3LIB) APIs for this, resolving the issue suitably. 4.2. Daemon Startup During inception, a question was raised pertaining to daemon startup. The project team's response is that SMF is used to start the deamon, and only for Xen. 4.3. NPIV Configuration and Zones During inception a member asked what the administrative experience would be for a zone when an NPIV device is con- figured for the zone, but the underlying HBA doesn't support NPIV. Offline, the project team decided to reduce the scope of the project to exclude zones. This question will need to be answered in another case if/when the project team revisits support for zones. 4.4. Relationship to Other Virtualized IO Projects A member raised a concern about the relationship of this project to other projects, such as Crossbow, which are also providing facilities for IO virtualization. The project PSARC/2007/501 Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems - 3 - team examined Crossbow in particular, and found some simi- larities, but there were enough differences as well. No action to unify interfaces between networking and storage virtualization was requested, and none was taken. 5. Minority Opinion(s) None. 6. Advisory Information None. 7. Appendices 7.1. Appendix A: Technical Changes Required None. 7.2. Appendix B: Technical Changes Advised None. 7.3. Appendix C: Reference Material Unless stated otherwise, path names are relative to the case directory PSARC/2007/501. 1 Functional specifcation. File: commitment.materials/NPIV_Func_spec.pdf 2 FCA Interface Changs to Support NPIV. File: commitment.materials/NPIV_FCA_Interface_Doc- 0.2.1.pdf 3 fcinfo, fcadm manual page with changes. File: commitment.materials/fcinfo.man 4 PSARC 20 Questions. File: commitment.materials/psarc_20q_npiv 5 npivxend manual page. File: commitment.materials/npivxend.man 6 xenstore manual page. File: commitment.materials/xenstore.man 7 xm manual page. File: commitment.materials/xm.man 8 Issues file. File: issues PSARC/2007/501 Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems --------------040907080504050808020602-- From sac-owner Wed Mar 12 08:23:07 2008 Received: from dm-eng-02.sfbay.sun.com (dm-eng-02 [129.146.11.32]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2CFN7tq016051 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:23:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (sca-es-mail-2.Sun.COM [192.18.43.133]) by dm-eng-02.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m2CFN7K0011325 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:23:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m2CFN268020885 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:23:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-09.sun.com by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JXM00A01IJN9700@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> (original mail from Garrett.Damore@Sun.COM) for sac-opinion@sac.eng.sun.com; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:23:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [129.153.2.14] by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JXM00B9ZIQE6SA0@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com>; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:23:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:23:01 -0700 From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: PSARC 2007/501 N_Port_ID Virtualization for Solaris Sender: Garrett.Damore@sun.com To: sac-opinion@sac.sfbay.sun.com, solaris-pac-opinion@sun.com Message-id: <47D7F555.2030900@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Boundary_(ID_W7sBFl6cFaqjbcGLkHk+7w)" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070802) Status: RO Content-Length: 6129 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_W7sBFl6cFaqjbcGLkHk+7w) Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT --Boundary_(ID_W7sBFl6cFaqjbcGLkHk+7w) Content-type: text/plain; name=opinion.txt Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline; filename=opinion.txt sun microsystems Systems Architecture Committee _________________________________________________________________ Subject: N_Port_ID Virtualization for Solaris Submitted by: Aaron Dailey File: PSARC/2007/501/opinion.ms Date: February 20th, 2008. Committee: Mark Carlson (opinion written by Garrett D'Amore), Kais Belgaied. Product Approval Committee: Solaris PAC solaris-pac-opinion@sun.com 1. Summary N_Port_ID Virtualization (NPIV) allows one Fibre Channel port to represent many physical ports, thus virtualizing the hardware. NPIV is especially useful for virtual machine environments. 2. Decision & Precedence Information The project is approved as specified in reference [1]. The project may be delivered in a minor release of the ON consolidation. 3. Interfaces The project exports the following interfaces. _____________________________________________________________________________ | Interfaces Exported | |______________________|_________________|__________________________________| |Interface | Classification | Comments | |______________________|_________________|__________________________________| |FCA | Project Private| Specified in [2]. | |HBA-API extensions | Project Private| Specified in [3]. | |fcadm command line | Committed | See [4]. | |fcadm output | Uncommitted | See [4]. | |fcinfo output | Uncommitted | See [4]. | |fcadm SCF | Project Private| Storage for NPIV WWWN. | |xenstore | Volatile | Changes for existen Xen database| |______________________|_________________|__________________________________| PSARC/2007/501 Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems - 2 - _____________________________________________________________________________ | Interfaces Exported | |______________________|_________________|__________________________________| |Interface | Classification | Comments | |______________________|_________________|__________________________________| |xm input/output | Volatile | Xen CLI | |/usr/lib/xennpivd file| Project Private| Xen reconfiguration daemon | |xnpivd file | Project Private| Xen reconfiguration driver | |______________________|_________________|__________________________________| The project imports the following interfaces. ____________________________________________________________ | Interfaces Imported | |________________|________________|________________________| |Interface | Classification| Comments | |________________|________________|________________________| |T11 NPIV Specs | Standard | From the T11 web site.| |libhbaaapi(3LIB)| Standard | Derived from T11 FC-MI| |________________|________________|________________________| 4. Opinion 4.1. Configuration and Locking During inception, several questions were raised about a con- figuration file, and locking of the configuration database. The project team decided to change to use standard libscf(3LIB) APIs for this, resolving the issue suitably. 4.2. Daemon Startup During inception, a question was raised pertaining to daemon startup. The project team's response is that SMF is used to start the deamon, and only for Xen. 4.3. NPIV Configuration and Zones During inception a member asked what the administrative experience would be for a zone when an NPIV device is con- figured for the zone, but the underlying HBA doesn't support NPIV. Offline, the project team decided to reduce the scope of the project to exclude zones. This question will need to be answered in another case if/when the project team revisits support for zones. 4.4. Relationship to Other Virtualized IO Projects A member raised a concern about the relationship of this project to other projects, such as Crossbow, which are also providing facilities for IO virtualization. The project PSARC/2007/501 Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems - 3 - team examined Crossbow in particular, and found some simi- larities, but there were enough differences as well. No action to unify interfaces between networking and storage virtualization was requested, and none was taken. 5. Minority Opinion(s) None. 6. Advisory Information None. 7. Appendices 7.1. Appendix A: Technical Changes Required None. 7.2. Appendix B: Technical Changes Advised None. 7.3. Appendix C: Reference Material Unless stated otherwise, path names are relative to the case directory PSARC/2007/501. 1 Functional specifcation. File: commitment.materials/NPIV_Func_spec.pdf 2 FCA Interface Changs to Support NPIV. File: commitment.materials/NPIV_FCA_Interface_Doc- 0.2.1.pdf 3 fcinfo, fcadm manual page with changes. File: commitment.materials/fcinfo.man 4 PSARC 20 Questions. File: commitment.materials/psarc_20q_npiv 5 npivxend manual page. File: commitment.materials/npivxend.man 6 xenstore manual page. File: commitment.materials/xenstore.man 7 xm manual page. File: commitment.materials/xm.man 8 Issues file. File: issues PSARC/2007/501 Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems --Boundary_(ID_W7sBFl6cFaqjbcGLkHk+7w)--