From Sebastien.Roy@sun.com Mon Apr 28 20:44:40 2008 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3T3idCR020641 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:44:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m3T3icG4003696 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:44:38 +0100 (BST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K0200K05IEDXT00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:44:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brmea-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.98.43]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K0200IW2IECUB20@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:44:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-amer-10.sun.com ([192.18.109.80]) by brmea-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m3T3iatb020896 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:44:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K0200D01IBL8E00@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from Sebastien.Roy@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:44:36 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([71.174.191.147]) by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K0200CNVIEB2B00@mail-amer.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:44:36 -0600 (MDT) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:37:05 -0400 From: Sebastien Roy Subject: 2008/288 Integrate libpcap Sender: Sebastien.Roy@sun.com To: PSARC-ext Cc: sagun shakya Message-id: <1209440225.5108.66.camel@localhost> Organization: Sun Microsystems MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.0 Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 Status: RO Content-Length: 1665 I'm submitting this fast-track for Sagun Shakya. The timer is set for May 5th, 2008. Integrate libpcap Release binding: Patch Target Consolidation: SFW 1. Summary libpcap is an open source user-level library that provides a high level packet capture interface. This project proposes to integrate libpcap version 0.9.8 plus additional changes specific to Solaris which causes libpcap to use libdlpi in order to be interoperable with Clearview Vanity Naming. These libdlpi changes have been integrated into the upstream public domain sources and therefore will be available in future releases of libpcap. Known applications that are dependent upon libpcap are Wireshark, tcpdump, snort, ngrep, and ntop. 2. Exported Interfaces All interfaces provided by libpcap are Uncommitted and are listed in the pcap.3 man page included in the case directory. 3. Imported Interfaces The version of libpcap being integrated by this project uses the libdlpi API defined in PSARC 2006/436. Its stability is Committed. 4. Packaging & Delivery SUNWlibpcap /usr/lib/libpcap.so.0.9.8 /usr/lib/libpcap.so -> /usr/lib/libpcap.so.0.9.8 /usr/include/pcap.h /usr/include/pcap-bpf.h /usr/include/pcap-namedb.h /usr/share/man/man3/pcap.3 64-bit libraries: /usr/lib/sparcv9/libpcap.so.0.9.8 /usr/lib/sparcv9/libpcap.so -> /usr/lib/sparcv9/libpcap.so.0.9.8 /usr/lib/amd64/libpcap.so.0.9.8 /usr/lib/amd64/libpcap.so -> /usr/lib/amd64/libpcap.so.0.9.8 5. Reference Documents: http://www.tcpdump.org/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/libpcap/ PSARC 2007/334 Add Wireshark 0.99.5 into Solaris From darren.reed@sun.com Mon Apr 28 21:29:31 2008 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3T4TVEP022172 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:29:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m3T4TT38018096 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 05:29:30 +0100 (BST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K0200301KH54U00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:29:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sineb-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.19.7]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K0200IYJKH4UB80@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:29:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-apac-05.sun.com (fe-apac-05.sun.com [192.18.19.176] (may be forged)) by sineb-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m3T4U4f9001607 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:30:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-apac.sun.com by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) id <0K0200G01KFVDB00@mail-apac.sun.com> (original mail from Darren.Reed@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:29:17 +0800 (SGT) Received: from [10.13.21.205] by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPSA id <0K0200MMBKGS9UNX@mail-apac.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:29:17 +0800 (SGT) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:28:40 +0800 From: Darren Reed Subject: Re: 2008/288 Integrate libpcap In-reply-to: <1209440225.5108.66.camel@localhost> Sender: darren.reed@sun.com To: Sebastien Roy Cc: PSARC-ext , sagun shakya Message-id: <4816A3F8.2030203@Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <1209440225.5108.66.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) Status: RO Content-Length: 297 The last comment for wireshark, PSARC/2007/334, was an acknowledgement from Bart to entertain the idea of shipping libpcap with that case. I suspect that this case would make that action redundant? Additionally, are the pathnames for the libraries, and the "-lpcap" also uncommitted? Darren From gdamore@Sun.COM Mon Apr 28 22:37:38 2008 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3T5bbpH022710 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:37:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m3T5bboe016705 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:37:37 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K0200205NMPLA00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:37:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sca-es-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.43.133]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K0200I7ANMOSW40@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:37:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m3T5baVH025093 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:37:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-09.sun.com by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K0200J01NL92G00@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> (original mail from gdamore@sun.com) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:37:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.251.106] ([76.174.83.55]) by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K0200M1ENMH0N80@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:37:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:32:19 -0700 From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: Re: 2008/288 Integrate libpcap In-reply-to: <1209440225.5108.66.camel@localhost> Sender: Garrett.Damore@Sun.COM To: Sebastien Roy Cc: PSARC-ext , sagun shakya Message-id: <4816B2E3.3040300@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <1209440225.5108.66.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071023) Status: RO Content-Length: 2217 General question for the project team (not really an issue for *this* case): Does it make sense to someday convert snoop to use libpcap? (Anyone know if there is packet capture functionality in snoop that libpcap *can't* provide?) (ISTR also that snoop was potentially headed for the axe, as ARC seemed to feel that wireshark was a superior option. Did we ever actually contemplate a real EOF for snoop?) -- Garrett Sebastien Roy wrote: > I'm submitting this fast-track for Sagun Shakya. The timer is set for > May 5th, 2008. > > Integrate libpcap > > Release binding: Patch > > Target Consolidation: SFW > > 1. Summary > > libpcap is an open source user-level library that provides a high > level packet capture interface. This project proposes to integrate > libpcap version 0.9.8 plus additional changes specific to Solaris > which causes libpcap to use libdlpi in order to be interoperable > with Clearview Vanity Naming. These libdlpi changes have been > integrated into the upstream public domain sources and therefore > will be available in future releases of libpcap. > > Known applications that are dependent upon libpcap are Wireshark, > tcpdump, snort, ngrep, and ntop. > > 2. Exported Interfaces > > All interfaces provided by libpcap are Uncommitted and are listed > in the pcap.3 man page included in the case directory. > > 3. Imported Interfaces > > The version of libpcap being integrated by this project uses the > libdlpi API defined in PSARC 2006/436. Its stability is Committed. > > 4. Packaging & Delivery > > SUNWlibpcap > > /usr/lib/libpcap.so.0.9.8 > /usr/lib/libpcap.so -> /usr/lib/libpcap.so.0.9.8 > /usr/include/pcap.h > /usr/include/pcap-bpf.h > /usr/include/pcap-namedb.h > /usr/share/man/man3/pcap.3 > > 64-bit libraries: > > /usr/lib/sparcv9/libpcap.so.0.9.8 > /usr/lib/sparcv9/libpcap.so -> /usr/lib/sparcv9/libpcap.so.0.9.8 > /usr/lib/amd64/libpcap.so.0.9.8 > /usr/lib/amd64/libpcap.so -> /usr/lib/amd64/libpcap.so.0.9.8 > > 5. Reference Documents: > > http://www.tcpdump.org/ > http://sourceforge.net/projects/libpcap/ > PSARC 2007/334 Add Wireshark 0.99.5 into Solaris > > > From Sebastien.Roy@sun.com Tue Apr 29 05:40:28 2008 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3TCeSi5002832 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 05:40:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m3TCeROb055986 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:40:28 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K0300E0V77FH200@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 05:40:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brmea-mail-4.sun.com ([192.18.98.36]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K0300KYM77ECK70@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 05:40:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-amer-09.sun.com ([192.18.109.79]) by brmea-mail-4.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m3TCeQiX000382 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:40:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K0300I0176DAY00@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from Sebastien.Roy@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:40:26 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([71.174.191.147]) by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K0300AMP77D0GA0@mail-amer.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:40:26 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:32:55 -0400 From: Sebastien Roy Subject: Re: 2008/288 Integrate libpcap In-reply-to: <4816A3F8.2030203@Sun.COM> Sender: Sebastien.Roy@sun.com To: Darren Reed Cc: PSARC-ext , sagun shakya Message-id: <1209472375.5108.98.camel@localhost> Organization: Sun Microsystems MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.0 Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <1209440225.5108.66.camel@localhost> <4816A3F8.2030203@Sun.COM> Status: RO Content-Length: 1200 On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 12:28 +0800, Darren Reed wrote: > The last comment for wireshark, PSARC/2007/334, was an acknowledgement > from Bart to entertain the idea of shipping libpcap with that case. I > suspect that > this case would make that action redundant? Yes, absolutely. I think it would be appropriate for Sagun or me to send mail to that case log to make that point clear and remove any potential confusion. > Additionally, are the pathnames for the libraries, and the "-lpcap" also > uncommitted? The /usr/include/pcap.h should be Committed, and the other header files listed in section 4 should be considered Project Private. The library paths are a different beast. Now that you bring it up, I don't think it's a good idea to encode "version 0.9.8" in the pathname of the library, as that forces us to keep it around forever. We'd have to ship every version of the library in the future (0.9.9, 0.10, 1.0, etc...) even if there are no incompatible changes between libraries in order to keep applications from breaking. I'm no linker expert, so is there a linker expert in the house who can provide some advice on what to ship as a shared object filename? libpcap.so.1? -Seb From Darren.Reed@sun.com Tue Apr 29 05:51:01 2008 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3TCp0Tj003275 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 05:51:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m3TCov32006387 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:50:59 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K03001097OWCG00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 05:50:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sineb-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.19.7]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K0300HZ77OVZZE0@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 05:50:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-apac-06.sun.com (fe-apac-06.sun.com [192.18.19.177] (may be forged)) by sineb-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m3TCpXIq026472 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:51:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-apac.sun.com by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) id <0K0300K017MLIH00@mail-apac.sun.com> (original mail from Darren.Reed@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:50:01 +0800 (SGT) Received: from [10.13.21.205] by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPSA id <0K0300BJO7NCRGR6@mail-apac.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:50:01 +0800 (SGT) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:50:05 +0800 From: Darren Reed Subject: Re: 2008/288 Integrate libpcap In-reply-to: <1209472375.5108.98.camel@localhost> Sender: Darren.Reed@sun.com To: Sebastien Roy Cc: PSARC-ext , sagun shakya Message-id: <4817197D.103@Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <1209440225.5108.66.camel@localhost> <4816A3F8.2030203@Sun.COM> <1209472375.5108.98.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) Status: RO Content-Length: 470 Sebastien Roy wrote: > On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 12:28 +0800, Darren Reed wrote: > > ... > >> Additionally, are the pathnames for the libraries, and the "-lpcap" also >> uncommitted? >> > > The /usr/include/pcap.h should be Committed, and the other header files > listed in section 4 should be considered Project Private. > For the sake of clarity, can I please ask for an interface table that lists which interfaces have which stability? Thanks, Darren From Sebastien.Roy@sun.com Tue Apr 29 06:40:18 2008 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3TDeH3u003928 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:40:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m3TDddRP026116 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:40:16 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K03003099Z26W00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brmea-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.98.43]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K03001N59Z1K150@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:40:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-amer-09.sun.com ([192.18.109.79]) by brmea-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m3TDeDOH028818 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:40:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K0300C017XBJN00@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from Sebastien.Roy@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:40:13 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([71.174.191.147]) by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K0300HWV9YMJW30@mail-amer.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:39:59 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:32:28 -0400 From: Sebastien Roy Subject: Re: 2008/288 Integrate libpcap In-reply-to: <4816B2E3.3040300@sun.com> Sender: Sebastien.Roy@sun.com To: "Garrett D'Amore" Cc: PSARC-ext , sagun shakya Message-id: <1209475948.5108.106.camel@localhost> Organization: Sun Microsystems MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.0 Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <1209440225.5108.66.camel@localhost> <4816B2E3.3040300@sun.com> Status: RO Content-Length: 1437 On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 22:32 -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > General question for the project team (not really an issue for *this* case): > > Does it make sense to someday convert snoop to use libpcap? (Anyone > know if there is packet capture functionality in snoop that libpcap > *can't* provide?) Answering the second question, yes; packet filtering in the kernel on Solaris. Snoop uses pfmod, while libpcap uses a user-space bpf, and tries to take advantage of kernel bpf on OSs that have such a thing. Solaris doesn't. Regarding the first question, I don't think it makes any sense to put engineering effort into snoop, nor into making it portable to other OSs (which I think would be the only benefit to having it use libpcap as opposed to directly using libdlpi as it does today.) We should be focusing on improving Wireshark and getting to a point where we can dump snoop. > (ISTR also that snoop was potentially headed for the > axe, as ARC seemed to feel that wireshark was a superior option. Did we > ever actually contemplate a real EOF for snoop?) Yes, I believe the Wireshark case established that Wireshark should be the long-term solution to replace snoop. For the reason stated above, however, I don't think that can happen yet. In order for Wireshark to be on par with snoop with regards to performance, we need an in-kernel bpf that libpcap can take advantage of on Solaris (among other things). -Seb From Sagun.Shakya@sun.com Tue Apr 29 07:03:38 2008 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3TE3cb9004665 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:03:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m3TE3bPq012445 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:03:38 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K030040BB217G00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:03:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brmea-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.98.31]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K03001B3B20K190@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:03:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-amer-09.sun.com ([192.18.109.79]) by brmea-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m3TE3ab1005905 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:03:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K0300001AYSTX00@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from Sagun.Shakya@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:03:36 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [129.148.174.193] by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K03004E6B1W7700@mail-amer.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:03:33 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:03:33 -0400 From: sagun shakya Subject: Re: 2008/288 Integrate libpcap In-reply-to: <4817197D.103@Sun.COM> Sender: Sagun.Shakya@sun.com To: Darren Reed Cc: Sebastien Roy , PSARC-ext Message-id: <48172AB5.7080508@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <1209440225.5108.66.camel@localhost> <4816A3F8.2030203@Sun.COM> <1209472375.5108.98.camel@localhost> <4817197D.103@Sun.COM> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080310) Status: RO Content-Length: 581 Darren Reed wrote: > > > Sebastien Roy wrote: >> On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 12:28 +0800, Darren Reed wrote: >> ... >> >>> Additionally, are the pathnames for the libraries, and the "-lpcap" >>> also uncommitted? >>> >> >> The /usr/include/pcap.h should be Committed, and the other header files >> listed in section 4 should be considered Project Private. >> > > For the sake of clarity, can I please ask for an interface table that > lists > which interfaces have which stability? > > Thanks, > Darren > I'll updated the document with an interface table. Thanks, sagun From gdamore@sun.com Tue Apr 29 07:48:33 2008 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3TEmW7X006497 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:48:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m3TEm8gg024262 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:48:32 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K0300D0BD4T1600@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:48:29 -0600 (MDT) Received: from sca-es-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.43.133]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K0300MHSD4TBKB0@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:48:29 -0600 (MDT) Received: from fe-sfbay-10.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m3TEmTCr008186 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:48:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-10.sun.com by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K0300J01CYE2200@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com> (original mail from gdamore@sun.com) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:48:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.251.106] ([76.174.83.55]) by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K0300G3UD4SCBB0@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:48:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:43:17 -0700 From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: Re: 2008/288 Integrate libpcap In-reply-to: <1209475948.5108.106.camel@localhost> Sender: Garrett.Damore@sun.com To: Sebastien Roy Cc: PSARC-ext , sagun shakya Message-id: <48173405.90200@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <1209440225.5108.66.camel@localhost> <4816B2E3.3040300@sun.com> <1209475948.5108.106.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071023) Status: RO Content-Length: 1628 Sebastien Roy wrote: > On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 22:32 -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > >> General question for the project team (not really an issue for *this* case): >> >> Does it make sense to someday convert snoop to use libpcap? (Anyone >> know if there is packet capture functionality in snoop that libpcap >> *can't* provide?) >> > > Answering the second question, yes; packet filtering in the kernel on > Solaris. Snoop uses pfmod, while libpcap uses a user-space bpf, and > tries to take advantage of kernel bpf on OSs that have such a thing. > Solaris doesn't. > > Regarding the first question, I don't think it makes any sense to put > engineering effort into snoop, nor into making it portable to other OSs > (which I think would be the only benefit to having it use libpcap as > opposed to directly using libdlpi as it does today.) We should be > focusing on improving Wireshark and getting to a point where we can dump > snoop. > > >> (ISTR also that snoop was potentially headed for the >> axe, as ARC seemed to feel that wireshark was a superior option. Did we >> ever actually contemplate a real EOF for snoop?) >> > > Yes, I believe the Wireshark case established that Wireshark should be > the long-term solution to replace snoop. For the reason stated above, > however, I don't think that can happen yet. In order for Wireshark to > be on par with snoop with regards to performance, we need an in-kernel > bpf that libpcap can take advantage of on Solaris (among other things). > Can Wireshark be changed to make use of the pfmod we have in Solaris? -- Garrett > -Seb > > > From carlsonj@phorcys.east.sun.com Tue Apr 29 08:06:56 2008 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3TF6unK007283 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:06:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m3TF6nuV036057; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:06:55 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K0300613DZGA700@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:06:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phorcys.east.sun.com ([129.148.174.143]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K03003H4DZFVG10@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:06:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phorcys.east.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phorcys.east.sun.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m3TF6p60028999; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:06:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from carlsonj@localhost) by phorcys.east.sun.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.2/Submit) id m3TF6pcl028996; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:06:51 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:06:51 -0400 From: James Carlson Subject: Re: 2008/288 Integrate libpcap In-reply-to: <48173405.90200@sun.com> To: "Garrett D'Amore" Cc: Sebastien Roy , PSARC-ext , sagun shakya Message-id: <18455.14731.62388.515916@gargle.gargle.HOWL> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: VM 7.01 under Emacs 21.3.1 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <1209440225.5108.66.camel@localhost> <4816B2E3.3040300@sun.com> <1209475948.5108.106.camel@localhost> <48173405.90200@sun.com> Status: RO Content-Length: 789 Garrett D'Amore writes: > > Yes, I believe the Wireshark case established that Wireshark should be > > the long-term solution to replace snoop. For the reason stated above, > > however, I don't think that can happen yet. In order for Wireshark to > > be on par with snoop with regards to performance, we need an in-kernel > > bpf that libpcap can take advantage of on Solaris (among other things). > > > > Can Wireshark be changed to make use of the pfmod we have in Solaris? Sure. It's likely a lot of work, though, and clearly out of scope for this case. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 From Sebastien.Roy@sun.com Tue Apr 29 09:57:36 2008 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3TGvZkZ011561 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:57:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m3TGvYdd011656 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:57:35 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K0300A03J3Z4R00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:57:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brmea-mail-3.sun.com ([192.18.98.34]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K0300660J3X91D0@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:57:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-amer-09.sun.com ([192.18.109.79]) by brmea-mail-3.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m3TGvXr0023159 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:57:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K0300001ITTS000@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from Sebastien.Roy@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:57:33 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [129.148.174.103] by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K0300C78J3PA150@mail-amer.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:57:25 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:57:24 -0400 From: Sebastien Roy Subject: Re: 2008/288 Integrate libpcap In-reply-to: <48172AB5.7080508@sun.com> Sender: Sebastien.Roy@sun.com To: sagun shakya Cc: Darren Reed , PSARC-ext Message-id: <1209488244.3536.11.camel@strat> Organization: Sun Microsystems MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.0 Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <1209440225.5108.66.camel@localhost> <4816A3F8.2030203@Sun.COM> <1209472375.5108.98.camel@localhost> <4817197D.103@Sun.COM> <48172AB5.7080508@sun.com> Status: RO Content-Length: 629 On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 10:03 -0400, sagun shakya wrote: > I'll updated the document with an interface table. > Thanks Sagun; An interface table has been added to the spec, which has been placed in the materials directory. For those who'd rather no have to go look, the interface table looks like: Interface Classification Comments --------------------------------------------------------------- pcap.3 Uncommitted API defined in the pcap.3 man page -lpcap Committed library path Committed header file paths Project Private Project Private -Seb From Sebastien.Roy@Sun.COM Tue Apr 29 13:03:03 2008 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3TK32uN018901 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:03:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m3TK2rMe000696 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:psarc-ext@sun.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:03:01 +0100 (BST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K0300H01RP0NU00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for psarc-ext@sun.com (ORCPT psarc-ext@sun.com); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:03:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brmea-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.98.31]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K0300BAWROZ2D90@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for psarc-ext@sun.com (ORCPT psarc-ext@sun.com); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:02:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-amer-09.sun.com ([192.18.109.79]) by brmea-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m3TK2xX6009035 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:02:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K0300801PM9XQ00@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from Sebastien.Roy@Sun.COM) for psarc-ext@sun.com (ORCPT psarc-ext@sun.com); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:02:59 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [129.148.174.103] by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K0300ISGROSY710@mail-amer.sun.com> for psarc-ext@sun.com (ORCPT psarc-ext@sun.com); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:02:53 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:02:52 -0400 From: Sebastien Roy Subject: Re: 2008/288 Integrate libpcap In-reply-to: <1209472375.5108.98.camel@localhost> Sender: Sebastien.Roy@Sun.COM To: psarc-ext Cc: sagun shakya Message-id: <1209499372.3986.29.camel@strat> Organization: Sun Microsystems MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.0 Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <1209440225.5108.66.camel@localhost> <4816A3F8.2030203@Sun.COM> <1209472375.5108.98.camel@localhost> Status: RO Content-Length: 1261 On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 08:32 -0400, Sebastien Roy wrote: > The library paths are a different beast. Now that you bring it up, I > don't think it's a good idea to encode "version 0.9.8" in the pathname > of the library, as that forces us to keep it around forever. We'd have > to ship every version of the library in the future (0.9.9, 0.10, 1.0, > etc...) even if there are no incompatible changes between libraries in > order to keep applications from breaking. I'm no linker expert, so is > there a linker expert in the house who can provide some advice on what > to ship as a shared object filename? libpcap.so.1? After having spoken to a few people, the project team is leaving the spec as-is, leaving the symbolic link from libpcap.so to libpcap.so.0.9.8. Releases of libpcap are infrequent and usually don't entail incompatible changes. As such, maintaining compatibility of library versions through symbolic links will likely be manageable for now. In any case, the next release of libpcap is expected to be 1.0, so any fancy tricks that the project team might come up with to play with 0.9.* versioning will likely be needless. To summarize, this is a non-issue as far as I'm concerned, and the spec in the case directory is fine as-is. -Seb From Sebastien.Roy@sun.com Tue May 6 13:48:27 2008 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m46KmQhB006283 for ; Tue, 6 May 2008 13:48:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m46KmH2W000811 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 7 May 2008 04:48:25 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K0G00I09SGPVL00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 06 May 2008 13:48:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brmea-mail-3.sun.com ([192.18.98.34]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K0G00IENSGOMZ10@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 06 May 2008 13:48:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-amer-09.sun.com ([192.18.109.79]) by brmea-mail-3.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m46KmOID002950 for ; Tue, 06 May 2008 20:48:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K0G00701S5PIX00@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from Sebastien.Roy@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 06 May 2008 14:48:24 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [129.148.174.103] by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K0G00ELESGIPC50@mail-amer.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 06 May 2008 14:48:19 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 16:48:18 -0400 From: Sebastien Roy Subject: Re: 2008/288 Integrate libpcap In-reply-to: <1209440225.5108.66.camel@localhost> Sender: Sebastien.Roy@sun.com To: PSARC-ext Cc: sagun shakya Message-id: <1210106898.21183.62.camel@strat> Organization: Sun Microsystems MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.0 Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <1209440225.5108.66.camel@localhost> Status: RO Content-Length: 213 On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 23:37 -0400, Sebastien Roy wrote: > I'm submitting this fast-track for Sagun Shakya. The timer is set for > May 5th, 2008. The timer for this case has expired, the case is approved. -Seb