From Fri May 30 15:08:46 2008 Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 15:08:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Postmaster Subject: Message from mail server Content-Length: 94 Mime-Version: 1.0 Status: RO X-IMAP: 1212185326 10 Delete. This is a system message. --END+PSEUDO-- From johnf@sac.sfbay.sun.com Thu May 22 16:15:41 2008 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4MNFeMM013400 for ; Thu, 22 May 2008 16:15:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m4MNFajr019425; Fri, 23 May 2008 07:15:39 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K1A00B03LY2BW00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Thu, 22 May 2008 16:15:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dm-sfbay-02.sfbay.sun.com ([129.146.11.31]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K1A00LL3LY1A850@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Thu, 22 May 2008 16:15:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sac.sfbay.sun.com (new-sac.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.175.65]) by dm-sfbay-02.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m4MNFai9035949; Thu, 22 May 2008 16:15:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sac.sfbay.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4MNFYV9013395; Thu, 22 May 2008 16:15:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from johnf@localhost) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/Submit) id m4MNFYWQ013391; Thu, 22 May 2008 16:15:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 16:15:34 -0700 (PDT) From: John Fischer Subject: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] To: PSARC-ext@sun.com Cc: jia.ni@sun.com Message-id: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 Content-Length: 2349 Status: RO X-Status: $$$$ X-UID: 0000000001 Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.66 04/17/08 SMI This information is Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems 1. Introduction 1.1. Project/Component Working Name: pen load balancer 1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier: Author: Jia Ni 1.3 Date of This Document: 22 May, 2008 4. Technical Description Summary ======= Pen[1] is a tool designed to do load balance for "simple" tcp based protocols such as http or smtp. It allows several servers to appear as one to the outside and automatically detects servers that are down and distributes clients among the available servers. This gives high availability and scalable performance. pen-0.17.2 will be integrated into the SFW consolidation as part of this proposal, and will be installed as SUNWpen. This project requests a minor release binding. Discussion ========== In OpenSolaris, the public interface to start and stop pen will be SMF and the service will be named: svc:/network/pen:default In order to start pen by SMF, a configure file is needed in: /etc/pen/pen.conf Most options and arguments of pen can be found equivalently in this file. A sample file is also provided at /etc/pen/pen.conf.sample, in order to help user setup the configure file easily. User can write the pen.conf following the comments in this sample file. Note that user can still start pen in command line for other purposes which SMF does not support (eg., foreground or debug mode). Dependencies ============ OpenSSL (snv_84 version 0.9.8a) Interfaces ========== Exported Interfaces Classification Comment ------------------- -------------- ------- SUNWpen Uncommitted Package /usr/bin/pen Uncommitted Command /usr/bin/mergelogs Uncommitted Command /usr/bin/penctl Uncommitted Command /usr/bin/penlog Uncommitted Command /usr/bin/penlogd Uncommitted Command /etc/pen/pen.conf Uncommitted Pen Configure file /usr/share/doc/pen/ Uncommitted Pen documents Imported Interfaces ------------------- NAME STABILITY NOTES OpenSSL External/Volatile PSARC/2003/500 Reference Documents =================== [1] http://siag.nu/pen RFE ID# 6674372 for pen 6. Resources and Schedule 6.4. Steering Committee requested information 6.4.1. Consolidation C-team Name: SFW 6.5. ARC review type: FastTrack 6.6. ARC Exposure: open From John.Fischer@sun.com Thu May 22 16:24:19 2008 Received: from sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail2sca.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.234]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4MNOJ8L013748 for ; Thu, 22 May 2008 16:24:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m4MNOHvK012173 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:psarc-ext@sun.com>; Thu, 22 May 2008 16:24:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K1A0030DMCH8100@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for psarc-ext@sun.com (ORCPT psarc-ext@sun.com); Thu, 22 May 2008 17:24:17 -0600 (MDT) Received: from brmea-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.98.31]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K1A000HJMCHGF10@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for psarc-ext@sun.com (ORCPT psarc-ext@sun.com); Thu, 22 May 2008 17:24:17 -0600 (MDT) Received: from fe-amer-09.sun.com ([192.18.109.79]) by brmea-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m4MNOHnQ020814 for ; Thu, 22 May 2008 23:24:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K1A00001M6UB500@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from John.Fischer@Sun.COM) for psarc-ext@sun.com (ORCPT psarc-ext@sun.com); Thu, 22 May 2008 17:24:17 -0600 (MDT) Received: from 129.145.154.70 ([129.145.154.70]) by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K1A009JSMC5OD50@mail-amer.sun.com> for psarc-ext@sun.com (ORCPT psarc-ext@sun.com); Thu, 22 May 2008 17:24:06 -0600 (MDT) Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 16:24:05 -0700 From: John Fischer Subject: PSARC/2008/339 - pen load balancer Sender: John.Fischer@sun.com To: PSARC-ext@sun.com Cc: John Fischer , Jia.Ni@sun.com Reply-to: John.Fischer@sun.com Message-id: <1211498644.33265.5.camel@sr1-umpk-19> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6.301 Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Boundary_(ID_bRLHdqrtbQt/2fOVwOKxLQ)" X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 Content-Length: 2683 Status: RO X-Status: $$$$ X-UID: 0000000002 --Boundary_(ID_bRLHdqrtbQt/2fOVwOKxLQ) Content-type: text/plain; charset=ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT PSARC, I am sponsoring this fast track for Jia Ni of the Core technologies team in Beijing. The case directory contains this proposal, man pages and a draft contract for the imported OpenSSL interface. The contract will be ratified in parallel to this case. This project will integrate the Pen TCP load balancer into a Minor release of Solaris. The project team is supplying an SMF service named svc:/network/pen:default. The interfaces are being declared Uncommitted. Thanks, John --Boundary_(ID_bRLHdqrtbQt/2fOVwOKxLQ) Content-type: text/plain; charset=ASCII; name=proposal.txt Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: attachment; filename=proposal.txt Summary ======= Pen[1] is a tool designed to do load balance for "simple" tcp based protocols such as http or smtp. It allows several servers to appear as one to the outside and automatically detects servers that are down and distributes clients among the available servers. This gives high availability and scalable performance. pen-0.17.2 will be integrated into the SFW consolidation as part of this proposal, and will be installed as SUNWpen. This project requests a minor release binding. Discussion ========== In OpenSolaris, the public interface to start and stop pen will be SMF and the service will be named: svc:/network/pen:default In order to start pen by SMF, a configure file is needed in: /etc/pen/pen.conf Most options and arguments of pen can be found equivalently in this file. A sample file is also provided at /etc/pen/pen.conf.sample, in order to help user setup the configure file easily. User can write the pen.conf following the comments in this sample file. Note that user can still start pen in command line for other purposes which SMF does not support (eg., foreground or debug mode). Dependencies ============ OpenSSL (snv_84 version 0.9.8a) Interfaces ========== Exported Interfaces Classification Comment ------------------- -------------- ------- SUNWpen Uncommitted Package /usr/bin/pen Uncommitted Command /usr/bin/mergelogs Uncommitted Command /usr/bin/penctl Uncommitted Command /usr/bin/penlog Uncommitted Command /usr/bin/penlogd Uncommitted Command /etc/pen/pen.conf Uncommitted Pen Configure file /usr/share/doc/pen/ Uncommitted Pen documents Imported Interfaces ------------------- NAME STABILITY NOTES OpenSSL External/Volatile PSARC/2003/500 Reference Documents =================== [1] http://siag.nu/pen RFE ID# 6674372 for pen --Boundary_(ID_bRLHdqrtbQt/2fOVwOKxLQ)-- From David.Comay@sun.com Thu May 22 16:27:05 2008 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4MNR4C0013946 for ; Thu, 22 May 2008 16:27:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m4MNQvBF023393; Fri, 23 May 2008 07:27:03 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K1A00C05MH2MH00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Thu, 22 May 2008 16:27:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from izimbra.SFBay.Sun.COM ([129.146.226.141]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K1A00L61MH1AB60@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Thu, 22 May 2008 16:27:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by izimbra.SFBay.Sun.COM (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m4MNR1ZV005282; Thu, 22 May 2008 16:27:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 16:27:01 -0700 (PDT) From: David.Comay@sun.com Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] In-reply-to: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> Sender: comay@izimbra.SFBay.Sun.COM To: jia.ni@sun.com, John Fischer Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> Content-Length: 584 Status: RO X-Status: $$$$ X-UID: 0000000003 > Most options and arguments of pen can be found equivalently in this > file. A sample file is also provided at /etc/pen/pen.conf.sample, in > order to help user setup the configure file easily. User can write > the pen.conf following the comments in this sample file. > Interfaces > ========== > > Exported Interfaces Classification Comment > ------------------- -------------- ------- > SUNWpen Uncommitted Package Given that files are being delivered under both /etc and /usr, it looks like you'll need to deliver two packages, presumedly SUNWpenr and SUNWpenu. dsc From John.Fischer@sun.com Thu May 22 16:36:39 2008 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4MNacta014482 for ; Thu, 22 May 2008 16:36:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m4MNaaF5002534 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Fri, 23 May 2008 00:36:37 +0100 (BST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K1A00D03MX0OM00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 22 May 2008 16:36:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brmea-mail-4.sun.com ([192.18.98.36]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K1A00LE8MX0AE60@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 22 May 2008 16:36:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-amer-10.sun.com ([192.18.109.80]) by brmea-mail-4.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m4MNaa3x005840 for ; Thu, 22 May 2008 23:36:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K1A00C01MLE1O00@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from John.Fischer@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 22 May 2008 17:36:36 -0600 (MDT) Received: from 129.145.154.70 ([129.145.154.70]) by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K1A00EPGMWZQB60@mail-amer.sun.com>; Thu, 22 May 2008 17:36:35 -0600 (MDT) Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 16:36:35 -0700 From: John Fischer Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] In-reply-to: Sender: John.Fischer@sun.com To: David.Comay@sun.com Cc: John Fischer , Jia.Ni@sun.com, John Fischer , PSARC-ext@sun.com Reply-to: John.Fischer@sun.com Message-id: <1211499394.33265.14.camel@sr1-umpk-19> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6.301 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> Content-Length: 838 Status: RO X-Status: $$$$ X-UID: 0000000004 David, Correct. I totally missed that fine point. The project will be modified to include SUNWpenu and SUNWpenr packages both being Uncommitted. Thanks, John On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 16:27, David.Comay@Sun.COM wrote: > > Most options and arguments of pen can be found equivalently in this > > file. A sample file is also provided at /etc/pen/pen.conf.sample, in > > order to help user setup the configure file easily. User can write > > the pen.conf following the comments in this sample file. > > > Interfaces > > ========== > > > > Exported Interfaces Classification Comment > > ------------------- -------------- ------- > > SUNWpen Uncommitted Package > > Given that files are being delivered under both /etc and /usr, it looks > like you'll need to deliver two packages, presumedly SUNWpenr and > SUNWpenu. > > dsc From Andrew.Gabriel@sun.com Thu May 22 17:02:51 2008 Received: from sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail3mpk.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.52]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4N02p3o015677 for ; Thu, 22 May 2008 17:02:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m4N02plN006936 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Thu, 22 May 2008 17:02:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K1A00G01O4OMT00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 22 May 2008 17:02:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com ([192.18.6.21]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K1A00LUNO4NAC60@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 22 May 2008 17:02:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-emea-09.sun.com (gmp-eb-lb-2-fe2.eu.sun.com [192.18.6.11]) by gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m4N02lv8018514 for ; Fri, 23 May 2008 00:02:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-emea-09.sun.com by fe-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K1A00201O0FPI00@fe-emea-09.sun.com> (original mail from Andrew.Gabriel@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Fri, 23 May 2008 01:02:46 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.9.200.17] ([81.187.162.106]) by fe-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K1A009QUO4M2OA0@fe-emea-09.sun.com>; Fri, 23 May 2008 01:02:46 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 01:03:24 +0100 From: Andrew Gabriel Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] In-reply-to: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> Sender: Andrew.Gabriel@sun.com To: John Fischer Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com, Jia.Ni@sun.com Message-id: <483609CC.4070603@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080422) Content-Length: 580 Status: RO X-Status: $$$$ X-UID: 0000000005 John Fischer wrote: > In order to start pen by SMF, a configure file is needed in: > > /etc/pen/pen.conf > > Most options and arguments of pen can be found equivalently in this > file. A sample file is also provided at /etc/pen/pen.conf.sample, in > order to help user setup the configure file easily. User can write > the pen.conf following the comments in this sample file. Given there's only one config file, does this really merit a dedicated directory in /etc? A glance at the webpage would seem to imply the config file lives in /etc/pen.cf normally. -- Andrew From Darren.Moffat@sun.com Fri May 23 03:33:18 2008 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4NAXHRs000449 for ; Fri, 23 May 2008 03:33:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m4NAXGTO004656 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Fri, 23 May 2008 11:33:17 +0100 (BST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K1B00K07HBFAG00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Fri, 23 May 2008 03:33:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com ([192.18.6.21]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K1B007AOHBERB80@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Fri, 23 May 2008 03:33:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-emea-10.sun.com (gmp-eb-lb-2-fe1.eu.sun.com [192.18.6.10]) by gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m4NAXEAh029652 for ; Fri, 23 May 2008 10:33:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-emea-10.sun.com by fe-emea-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K1B00M01FSJUE00@fe-emea-10.sun.com> (original mail from Darren.Moffat@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Fri, 23 May 2008 11:33:14 +0100 (BST) Received: from [129.156.173.21] by fe-emea-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K1B00E52HB9YC10@fe-emea-10.sun.com>; Fri, 23 May 2008 11:33:10 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 11:33:09 +0100 From: Darren J Moffat Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] In-reply-to: <483609CC.4070603@sun.com> Sender: Darren.Moffat@sun.com To: Jia.Ni@sun.com Cc: John Fischer , PSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <48369D65.4010005@Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <483609CC.4070603@sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080326) Content-Length: 1239 Status: RO X-Status: $$$$ X-UID: 0000000006 I think the SMF configuration for pen needs to support multiple instances. Why am I recommending this ? By having simple multi instance support the per protocol each protocol's load balancer can be admnistered, monitored and configured independently. It is also my understanding that to support multiple different protocols there would actually be multiple pen processes running - this naturally leads to these being separate SMF instances of the same base service. For example I would expect the following: svc:/network/pen:http svc:/network/pen:ftp svc:/network/pen:smtp I came to this conclusion by looking at the pen site and the default start script: http://siag.nu/pen/startscripts.shtml. This is basically multi instance support via init.d startup scripts. I also looked over the pen.1 man page in the source file. My understanding from the above reference is that the pen program itself does NOT read the /etc/pen.cf file by default (it does take -f argument). In this case I highly recommend that the pen configuration be via SMF properties able to be set per instance of svc:/network/pen/ or at least that there is a per instance property for specifying the config file location. -- Darren J Moffat From Darren.Moffat@sun.com Fri May 23 03:37:29 2008 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4NAbSrF000467 for ; Fri, 23 May 2008 03:37:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m4NAbHq7025199 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Fri, 23 May 2008 18:37:27 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K1B00M01HIDU200@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Fri, 23 May 2008 03:37:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmp-eb-inf-2.sun.com ([192.18.6.24]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K1B00M6XHICG030@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Fri, 23 May 2008 03:37:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-emea-09.sun.com (gmp-eb-lb-2-fe2.eu.sun.com [192.18.6.11]) by gmp-eb-inf-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m4NAbNoP027232 for ; Fri, 23 May 2008 10:37:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-emea-09.sun.com by fe-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K1B00701FLFD600@fe-emea-09.sun.com> (original mail from Darren.Moffat@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Fri, 23 May 2008 11:37:23 +0100 (BST) Received: from [129.156.173.21] by fe-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K1B00D8PHI3PL10@fe-emea-09.sun.com>; Fri, 23 May 2008 11:37:16 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 11:37:15 +0100 From: Darren J Moffat Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] In-reply-to: <48369D65.4010005@Sun.COM> Sender: Darren.Moffat@sun.com To: Jia.Ni@sun.com Cc: John Fischer , PSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <48369E5B.80105@Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <483609CC.4070603@sun.com> <48369D65.4010005@Sun.COM> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080326) Content-Length: 449 Status: RO X-Status: $$$$ X-UID: 0000000007 Some other things I forgot to bring up in the previous email. What SMF method_credential is used for starting pen ? Basically what uid/gid does it run with and what privileges ? Hint the correct answer is likely NOT uid/gid 0 and all privileges. I would expect pen to run as the daemon (or noaccess) user account with net_privaddr (since it will need to bind to privielged ports). I'm assuming it works in non global zones. -- Darren J Moffat From Jia.Ni@Sun.COM Sun May 25 23:43:42 2008 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4Q6hfuB009277 for ; Sun, 25 May 2008 23:43:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sineb-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.19.7]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m4Q6hfKB021751 for ; Mon, 26 May 2008 14:43:41 +0800 (SGT) Received: from fe-apac-06.sun.com (fe-apac-06.sun.com [192.18.19.177] (may be forged)) by sineb-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m4Q6iOYd022927 for ; Mon, 26 May 2008 06:44:24 GMT Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-apac.sun.com by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) id <0K1G00J01QEA6G00@mail-apac.sun.com> (original mail from Jia.Ni@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Mon, 26 May 2008 14:42:13 +0800 (SGT) Received: from [129.158.219.50] by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPSA id <0K1G009T4QMC8G2L@mail-apac.sun.com>; Mon, 26 May 2008 14:42:13 +0800 (SGT) Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 14:43:41 +0800 From: Jia Ni Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] In-reply-to: <48369E5B.80105@Sun.COM> Sender: Jia.Ni@Sun.COM To: Darren J Moffat Cc: John Fischer , PSARC-ext@Sun.COM, Huafeng Lu Reply-to: Jia.Ni@Sun.COM Message-id: <483A5C1D.80301@Sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <483609CC.4070603@sun.com> <48369D65.4010005@Sun.COM> <48369E5B.80105@Sun.COM> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080225) Content-Length: 833 Status: RO X-Status: $$$$ X-UID: 0000000008 -----Original Message----- From: Darren J Moffat Sent: 05/23/08 18:37 > Some other things I forgot to bring up in the previous email. > > What SMF method_credential is used for starting pen ? > Basically what uid/gid does it run with and what privileges ? > Hint the correct answer is likely NOT uid/gid 0 and all privileges. I > would expect pen to run as the daemon (or noaccess) user account with > net_privaddr (since it will need to bind to privielged ports). Thanks. But, I am not an expert of smf and security. Last time I just write the smf manifest following some existing network ones. Could you please tell me who could give me some more information about how to write smf scripts with privilege (? or RBAC etc.?) ? > > I'm assuming it works in non global zones. > > -- > Darren J Moffat -- Best regards, Jia From Jia.Ni@Sun.COM Sun May 25 23:50:39 2008 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4Q6ocOO009301 for ; Sun, 25 May 2008 23:50:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sineb-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.19.7]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m4Q6ob18024863 for ; Mon, 26 May 2008 14:50:37 +0800 (SGT) Received: from fe-apac-05.sun.com (fe-apac-05.sun.com [192.18.19.176] (may be forged)) by sineb-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m4Q6pKrL023712 for ; Mon, 26 May 2008 06:51:20 GMT Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-apac.sun.com by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) id <0K1G00D01QU3NI00@mail-apac.sun.com> (original mail from Jia.Ni@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Mon, 26 May 2008 14:50:15 +0800 (SGT) Received: from [129.158.219.50] by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPSA id <0K1G00M2ZQZL9VZD@mail-apac.sun.com>; Mon, 26 May 2008 14:50:15 +0800 (SGT) Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 14:50:32 +0800 From: Jia Ni Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] In-reply-to: <48369D65.4010005@Sun.COM> Sender: Jia.Ni@Sun.COM To: Darren J Moffat Cc: John Fischer , PSARC-ext@Sun.COM, Huafeng Lu Reply-to: Jia.Ni@Sun.COM Message-id: <483A5DB8.5030909@Sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <483609CC.4070603@sun.com> <48369D65.4010005@Sun.COM> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080225) Content-Length: 1880 Status: RO X-Status: $$$$ X-UID: 0000000009 Thank you very much! -----Original Message----- From: Darren J Moffat Sent: 05/23/08 18:33 > I think the SMF configuration for pen needs to support multiple instances. > > Why am I recommending this ? > > By having simple multi instance support the per protocol each protocol's > load balancer can be admnistered, monitored and configured independently. > > It is also my understanding that to support multiple different protocols > there would actually be multiple pen processes running - this naturally > leads to these being separate SMF instances of the same base service. > > For example I would expect the following: > > svc:/network/pen:http > svc:/network/pen:ftp > svc:/network/pen:smtp Good suggestion. Thanks. I agree. > > I came to this conclusion by looking at the pen site and the default > start script: http://siag.nu/pen/startscripts.shtml. This is basically > multi instance support via init.d startup scripts. I also looked over Yes and thanks. Though these scripts are not official ones. We can still take them as a good reference. > the pen.1 man page in the source file. > > My understanding from the above reference is that the pen program itself > does NOT read the /etc/pen.cf file by default (it does take -f > argument). In this case I highly recommend that the pen configuration > be via SMF properties able to be set per instance of svc:/network/pen/ > or at least that there is a per instance property for specifying the > config file location. Sorry. I am not quite understand the meaning of "specifying config file location"? Usually, smf instance don't take any arguments and it's config file is fixed somewhere. Do you mean I should set the each instance of pen config file in a separate place? Eg, "pen.http.conf" for http, "pen.ftp.conf" for ftp ...? > > > -- > Darren J Moffat > > > -- Best regards, Jia From Jia.Ni@Sun.COM Tue May 27 01:24:37 2008 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4R8Oajt008432 for ; Tue, 27 May 2008 01:24:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sineb-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.19.7]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m4R8OZcf012524 for ; Tue, 27 May 2008 16:24:35 +0800 (SGT) Received: from fe-apac-06.sun.com (fe-apac-06.sun.com [192.18.19.177] (may be forged)) by sineb-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m4R8PIQb001953 for ; Tue, 27 May 2008 08:25:18 GMT Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-apac.sun.com by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) id <0K1I00K01PLPQP00@mail-apac.sun.com> (original mail from Jia.Ni@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@Sun.Com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.Com); Tue, 27 May 2008 16:23:06 +0800 (SGT) Received: from [129.158.219.50] by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPSA id <0K1I0095MPYH8AYR@mail-apac.sun.com>; Tue, 27 May 2008 16:23:06 +0800 (SGT) Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 16:24:35 +0800 From: Jia Ni Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] In-reply-to: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> Sender: Jia.Ni@Sun.COM To: John Fischer Cc: PSARC-ext@Sun.COM, Huafeng Lu Reply-to: Jia.Ni@Sun.COM Message-id: <483BC543.8040201@Sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080225) Content-Length: 2837 Status: RO X-Status: $$$$ X-UID: 0000000010 Hi John, And could you please also CC our future discussion emails to Huafeng Lv (Huafeng.Lv@Sun.COM). Huafeng and I are both doing the "pen" porting together. I think his comments are also very important. Thanks very much! -----Original Message----- From: John Fischer Sent: 05/23/08 07:15 > Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.66 04/17/08 SMI > This information is Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems > 1. Introduction > 1.1. Project/Component Working Name: > pen load balancer > 1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier: > Author: Jia Ni > 1.3 Date of This Document: > 22 May, 2008 > 4. Technical Description > Summary > ======= > Pen[1] is a tool designed to do load balance for "simple" tcp based > protocols such as http or smtp. > > It allows several servers to appear as one to the outside and > automatically detects servers that are down and distributes clients > among the available servers. This gives high availability and scalable > performance. > > pen-0.17.2 will be integrated into the SFW consolidation as part of this > proposal, and will be installed as SUNWpen. > > This project requests a minor release binding. > > Discussion > ========== > > In OpenSolaris, the public interface to start and stop pen will be SMF > and the service will be named: > > svc:/network/pen:default > > In order to start pen by SMF, a configure file is needed in: > > /etc/pen/pen.conf > > Most options and arguments of pen can be found equivalently in this > file. A sample file is also provided at /etc/pen/pen.conf.sample, in > order to help user setup the configure file easily. User can write > the pen.conf following the comments in this sample file. > > Note that user can still start pen in command line for other purposes > which SMF does not support (eg., foreground or debug mode). > > Dependencies > ============ > > OpenSSL (snv_84 version 0.9.8a) > > Interfaces > ========== > > Exported Interfaces Classification Comment > ------------------- -------------- ------- > SUNWpen Uncommitted Package > /usr/bin/pen Uncommitted Command > /usr/bin/mergelogs Uncommitted Command > /usr/bin/penctl Uncommitted Command > /usr/bin/penlog Uncommitted Command > /usr/bin/penlogd Uncommitted Command > /etc/pen/pen.conf Uncommitted Pen Configure file > /usr/share/doc/pen/ Uncommitted Pen documents > > Imported Interfaces > ------------------- > NAME STABILITY NOTES > OpenSSL External/Volatile PSARC/2003/500 > > Reference Documents > =================== > [1] http://siag.nu/pen > > RFE ID# 6674372 for pen > > > 6. Resources and Schedule > 6.4. Steering Committee requested information > 6.4.1. Consolidation C-team Name: > SFW > 6.5. ARC review type: FastTrack > 6.6. ARC Exposure: open > -- Best regards, Jia From Darren.Moffat@sun.com Tue Jun 3 08:26:18 2008 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m53FQIFF025685 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 08:26:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m53FQA5n035223 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 09:26:17 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K1W0003187R5Z00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Tue, 03 Jun 2008 09:26:15 -0600 (MDT) Received: from gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com ([192.18.6.21]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K1W00FP887PEI70@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Tue, 03 Jun 2008 09:26:14 -0600 (MDT) Received: from fe-emea-09.sun.com (gmp-eb-lb-2-fe2.eu.sun.com [192.18.6.11]) by gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m53FQDk7022609 for ; Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:26:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-emea-09.sun.com by fe-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K1W00I017RE5S00@fe-emea-09.sun.com> (original mail from Darren.Moffat@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Tue, 03 Jun 2008 16:26:13 +0100 (BST) Received: from [129.156.173.21] by fe-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K1W009MA87N88C0@fe-emea-09.sun.com>; Tue, 03 Jun 2008 16:26:12 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 16:26:11 +0100 From: Darren J Moffat Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] In-reply-to: <483A5DB8.5030909@Sun.com> Sender: Darren.Moffat@sun.com To: Jia.Ni@sun.com Cc: John Fischer , PSARC-ext@sun.com, Huafeng Lu Message-id: <48456293.4020905@Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <483609CC.4070603@sun.com> <48369D65.4010005@Sun.COM> <483A5DB8.5030909@Sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080507) Status: RO Content-Length: 1100 Jia Ni wrote: >> My understanding from the above reference is that the pen program >> itself does NOT read the /etc/pen.cf file by default (it does take -f >> argument). In this case I highly recommend that the pen >> configuration be via SMF properties able to be set per instance of >> svc:/network/pen/ or at least that there is a per instance property >> for specifying the config file location. > Sorry. I am not quite understand the meaning of "specifying config file > location"? > Usually, smf instance don't take any arguments and it's config file is > fixed somewhere. Do you mean I should set the each instance of pen > config file in a separate place? Eg, "pen.http.conf" for http, > "pen.ftp.conf" for ftp ...? Two choices either use SMF properties for all of the configuration options of pen - this is the idea case. Or create a smaller set of SMF properties including one that gives the location of a pen.cf file, the method script would use that property to find pen.cf instead of being hardcoded to /etc/pen.cf as it would in the original spec. -- Darren J Moffat From Jia.Ni@sun.com Wed Jun 4 02:01:47 2008 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m5491kf5008443 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 02:01:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m5491ivA003267 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 17:01:45 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K1X00C0BL2WTK00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 04 Jun 2008 03:01:44 -0600 (MDT) Received: from sineb-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.19.6]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K1X009CWL2VFD20@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 04 Jun 2008 03:01:44 -0600 (MDT) Received: from fe-apac-06.sun.com (fe-apac-06.sun.com [192.18.19.177] (may be forged)) by sineb-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m54924wf022719 for ; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 09:02:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-apac.sun.com by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) id <0K1X00301KLIHC00@mail-apac.sun.com> (original mail from Jia.Ni@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:00:10 +0800 (SGT) Received: from [129.158.219.50] by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPSA id <0K1X00L19KZWYPB0@mail-apac.sun.com>; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:59:58 +0800 (SGT) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:01:33 +0800 From: Jia Ni Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] In-reply-to: <48456293.4020905@Sun.COM> Sender: Jia.Ni@sun.com To: Darren J Moffat Cc: John Fischer , PSARC-ext@sun.com, Huafeng Lu Reply-to: Jia.Ni@sun.com Message-id: <484659ED.9030600@Sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <483609CC.4070603@sun.com> <48369D65.4010005@Sun.COM> <483A5DB8.5030909@Sun.com> <48456293.4020905@Sun.COM> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080225) Status: RO Content-Length: 1750 Thanks for your advice. -----Original Message----- From: Darren J Moffat Sent: 06/03/08 23:26 > Jia Ni wrote: >>> My understanding from the above reference is that the pen program >>> itself does NOT read the /etc/pen.cf file by default (it does take -f >>> argument). In this case I highly recommend that the pen >>> configuration be via SMF properties able to be set per instance of >>> svc:/network/pen/ or at least that there is a per instance property >>> for specifying the config file location. >> Sorry. I am not quite understand the meaning of "specifying config file >> location"? >> Usually, smf instance don't take any arguments and it's config file is >> fixed somewhere. Do you mean I should set the each instance of pen >> config file in a separate place? Eg, "pen.http.conf" for http, >> "pen.ftp.conf" for ftp ...? > > Two choices either use SMF properties for all of the configuration > options of pen - this is the idea case. Or create a smaller set of SMF When Huafeng and I doing the porting, we actually once thought about this method. But the difficulty is we can't set every argument with a default value. Eg, you can't image which hostname/ip will the back-end server be. So, if a user want to start 'pen', he should first set several SMF properties correctly (and maybe he should understand what these properties represent before that). > properties including one that gives the location of a pen.cf file, the Yes. I think a configure file is really easy for user to setup and start 'pen', rather than SMF properties. > method script would use that property to find pen.cf instead of being > hardcoded to /etc/pen.cf as it would in the original spec. I agree. Thanks! > -- Best regards, Jia From sacadmin Wed Jun 4 13:56:17 2008 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m54KuG4X014642 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 13:56:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m54KuCRE004610 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:psarc-record@sun.com>; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 04:56:15 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K1Y00I0BI5QNJ00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for psarc-record@sun.com (ORCPT psarc-record@sun.com); Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:56:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brmea-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.98.31]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K1Y00H5DI5QJB20@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for psarc-record@sun.com (ORCPT psarc-record@sun.com); Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:56:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-amer-09.sun.com ([192.18.109.79]) by brmea-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m54KuD7A005257 for ; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 20:56:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K1Y00G01HWQD800@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from Richard.Matthews@Sun.COM) for psarc-record@sun.com (ORCPT psarc-record@sun.com); Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:56:13 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [129.152.9.14] by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K1Y004UTI5JQ440@mail-amer.sun.com> for psarc-record@sun.com (ORCPT psarc-record@sun.com); Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:56:08 -0600 (MDT) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:56:02 -0500 From: Rick Matthews Subject: PSARC/2008/339 - pen load balancer Sender: Richard.Matthews@sun.com To: John Fischer , Jia Ni Cc: Darren Moffat , psarc-record@sun.com Reply-to: Richard.Matthews@sun.com Message-id: <48470162.6010207@Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080228) Status: RO Content-Length: 722 John and project team, Darren Moffat had asked in an email to have the spec updated for this project with regard to issues he has raised. Please change the state of the fast track (IAM file) to waiting need spec, and work with Darren on the update. -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Rick Matthews email: Rick.Matthews@sun.com Sun Microsystems, Inc. phone:+1(651) 554-1518 1270 Eagan Industrial Road phone(internal): 54418 Suite 160 fax: +1(651) 554-1540 Eagan, MN 55121-1231 USA main: +1(651) 554-1500 --------------------------------------------------------------------- From Darren.Moffat@sun.com Fri Jun 6 02:35:00 2008 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m569YxVT015413 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 02:34:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m569YwAv044436 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 03:34:59 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K210000HBYA5X00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Fri, 06 Jun 2008 02:34:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmp-eb-inf-2.sun.com ([192.18.6.24]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K2100666BY98MB0@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Fri, 06 Jun 2008 02:34:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-emea-09.sun.com (gmp-eb-lb-2-fe3.eu.sun.com [192.18.6.12]) by gmp-eb-inf-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m569Yuj2000540 for ; Fri, 06 Jun 2008 09:34:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-emea-09.sun.com by fe-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K2100801AN54R00@fe-emea-09.sun.com> (original mail from Darren.Moffat@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Fri, 06 Jun 2008 10:34:56 +0100 (BST) Received: from [129.156.173.21] by fe-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K21003BVBY4Z700@fe-emea-09.sun.com>; Fri, 06 Jun 2008 10:34:53 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 10:34:52 +0100 From: Darren J Moffat Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] In-reply-to: <484659ED.9030600@Sun.com> Sender: Darren.Moffat@sun.com To: Jia.Ni@sun.com Cc: John Fischer , PSARC-ext@sun.com, Huafeng Lu Message-id: <484904BC.9060607@Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <483609CC.4070603@sun.com> <48369D65.4010005@Sun.COM> <483A5DB8.5030909@Sun.com> <48456293.4020905@Sun.COM> <484659ED.9030600@Sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080507) Status: RO Content-Length: 1361 Jia Ni wrote: >> Two choices either use SMF properties for all of the configuration >> options of pen - this is the idea case. Or create a smaller set of SMF > When Huafeng and I doing the porting, we actually once thought about > this method. > > But the difficulty is we can't set every argument with a default value. > Eg, you can't image which hostname/ip will the back-end server be. > So, if a user want to start 'pen', he should first set several SMF > properties correctly (and maybe he should understand what these > properties represent before that). You don't need to have default values for properties, for example the hostname/ip would just be empty. The method script just needs to know what the property names are and translate the property name values that are set into pen cli flags. >> properties including one that gives the location of a pen.cf file, the > Yes. > I think a configure file is really easy for user to setup and start > 'pen', rather than SMF properties. Depends on your definition of easier, I would much prefer to see this done as SMF properties on the instance. >> method script would use that property to find pen.cf instead of being >> hardcoded to /etc/pen.cf as it would in the original spec. > I agree. Thanks! Please provide an updated spec using one of the above to methods. -- Darren J Moffat From John.Fischer@sun.com Mon Aug 4 09:37:15 2008 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m74GbFhL021275 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 09:37:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m74Gb7ep024536 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 10:37:14 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K5300K114U11I00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Mon, 04 Aug 2008 09:37:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brmea-mail-3.sun.com ([192.18.98.34]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K53009NT4TYWYA0@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Mon, 04 Aug 2008 09:37:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-amer-10.sun.com ([192.18.109.80]) by brmea-mail-3.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m74Gb9uH018884 for ; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:37:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K5300J013HTO900@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from John.Fischer@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Mon, 04 Aug 2008 10:37:09 -0600 (MDT) Received: from 129.145.154.66 ([129.145.154.66]) by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K53004MF4RPZ120@mail-amer.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Mon, 04 Aug 2008 10:35:50 -0600 (MDT) Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 09:35:49 -0700 From: John Fischer Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] In-reply-to: <48456293.4020905@Sun.COM> Sender: John.Fischer@sun.com To: Darren J Moffat Cc: John Fischer , Jia.Ni@sun.com, PSARC-ext@sun.com, Huafeng Lu Reply-to: John.Fischer@sun.com Message-id: <1217867748.7738.5.camel@sr1-umpk-16> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6.301 Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Boundary_(ID_30uRsLH1icoffXJOQ1Cfuw)" X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <483609CC.4070603@sun.com> <48369D65.4010005@Sun.COM> <483A5DB8.5030909@Sun.com> <48456293.4020905@Sun.COM> Status: RO Content-Length: 3595 --Boundary_(ID_30uRsLH1icoffXJOQ1Cfuw) Content-type: text/plain; charset=ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT All, Jia has provided updated materials (the updated proposal is attached). The updated case materials also includes updated man pages. The external site will be automatically updated soon. Thanks, John On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 08:26, Darren J Moffat wrote: > Jia Ni wrote: > >> My understanding from the above reference is that the pen program > >> itself does NOT read the /etc/pen.cf file by default (it does take -f > >> argument). In this case I highly recommend that the pen > >> configuration be via SMF properties able to be set per instance of > >> svc:/network/pen/ or at least that there is a per instance property > >> for specifying the config file location. > > Sorry. I am not quite understand the meaning of "specifying config file > > location"? > > Usually, smf instance don't take any arguments and it's config file is > > fixed somewhere. Do you mean I should set the each instance of pen > > config file in a separate place? Eg, "pen.http.conf" for http, > > "pen.ftp.conf" for ftp ...? > > Two choices either use SMF properties for all of the configuration > options of pen - this is the idea case. Or create a smaller set of SMF > properties including one that gives the location of a pen.cf file, the > method script would use that property to find pen.cf instead of being > hardcoded to /etc/pen.cf as it would in the original spec. > > -- > Darren J Moffat --Boundary_(ID_30uRsLH1icoffXJOQ1Cfuw) Content-type: text/plain; charset=ASCII; name=proposal.txt Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: attachment; filename=proposal.txt Summary ======= Pen[1] is a tool designed to do load balance for "simple" tcp based protocols such as http or smtp. It allows several servers to appear as one to the outside and automatically detects servers that are down and distributes clients among the available servers. This gives high availability and scalable performance. pen-0.17.2 will be integrated into the SFW consolidation as part of this proposal, and will be installed as SUNWpen. This project requests a minor release binding. Discussion ========== In OpenSolaris, the public interface to start and stop pen will be SMF and the service will be named: svc:/network/pen:default In order to start pen by SMF, two SMF properties must be set: pen/listenport and pen/servers Other properties can be set optionally. Each SMF property has a corresponding command line option. These properties are explained in the "SMF PROPERTIES" section of the pen(1) manual page. Users can easily change these properties and start pen with different configurations. Note that users can still start pen from command line for other purposes which are not supported by the SMF service (eg., foreground or debug mode). Dependencies ============ OpenSSL (snv_84 version 0.9.8a) Interfaces ========== Exported Interfaces Classification Comment ------------------- -------------- ------- SUNWpen Uncommitted Package /usr/bin/pen Uncommitted Command /usr/bin/mergelogs Uncommitted Command /usr/bin/penctl Uncommitted Command /usr/bin/penlog Uncommitted Command /usr/bin/penlogd Uncommitted Command /usr/share/doc/pen/ Uncommitted Pen documents Imported Interfaces ------------------- NAME STABILITY NOTES OpenSSL External/Volatile PSARC/2003/500 Reference Documents =================== [1] http://siag.nu/pen RFE ID# 6674372 for pen --Boundary_(ID_30uRsLH1icoffXJOQ1Cfuw)-- From Darren.Moffat@sun.com Tue Aug 5 03:31:47 2008 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m75AVlZU024055 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 03:31:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m75AVdQw012171 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 11:31:45 +0100 (BST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K5400605IKWE900@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Tue, 05 Aug 2008 03:31:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com ([192.18.6.21]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K5400LIEIKVTI80@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Tue, 05 Aug 2008 03:31:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-emea-09.sun.com (gmp-eb-lb-2-fe2.eu.sun.com [192.18.6.11] (may be forged)) by gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m75AVgCI024607 for ; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 10:31:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-emea-09.sun.com by fe-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K5400E01IAX3O00@fe-emea-09.sun.com> (original mail from Darren.Moffat@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:31:34 +0100 (BST) Received: from [129.156.173.21] by fe-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K5400KDEIKCW4E0@fe-emea-09.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:31:25 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:31:24 +0100 From: Darren J Moffat Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] In-reply-to: <1217867748.7738.5.camel@sr1-umpk-16> Sender: Darren.Moffat@sun.com To: John.Fischer@sun.com Cc: Jia.Ni@sun.com, PSARC-ext@sun.com, Huafeng Lu Message-id: <48982BFC.40909@Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <483609CC.4070603@sun.com> <48369D65.4010005@Sun.COM> <483A5DB8.5030909@Sun.com> <48456293.4020905@Sun.COM> <1217867748.7738.5.camel@sr1-umpk-16> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080630) Status: RO Content-Length: 389 The major motivation for using SMF for the configuration was to easily support multiple instances. For the man page that is delivered please include some multiinstance examples eg: svc://network/pen:http svc://network/pen:ftp The case doesn't need to be updated with this material for me to be happy for the case to be approved, but it would be nice to do so. -- Darren J Moffat From Jia.Ni@sun.com Tue Aug 5 21:31:50 2008 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m764VYfO005678 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 21:31:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m764VNW6028634 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 12:31:28 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K5500G03WKCDG00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:31:24 -0600 (MDT) Received: from sineb-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.19.7]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K550056MWKA3V50@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:31:23 -0600 (MDT) Received: from fe-apac-06.sun.com (fe-apac-06.sun.com [192.18.19.177] (may be forged)) by sineb-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m764VMMo010039 for ; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 04:31:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-apac.sun.com by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) id <0K5500601WIJJN00@mail-apac.sun.com> (original mail from Jia.Ni@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:31:22 +0800 (SGT) Received: from [129.158.219.50] by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPSA id <0K5500616WK8HE00@mail-apac.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:31:22 +0800 (SGT) Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:31:25 +0800 From: Jia Ni Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] In-reply-to: <48982BFC.40909@Sun.COM> Sender: Jia.Ni@sun.com To: Darren J Moffat Cc: John.Fischer@sun.com, PSARC-ext@sun.com, Huafeng Lu Reply-to: Jia.Ni@sun.com Message-id: <4899291D.9070703@Sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <483609CC.4070603@sun.com> <48369D65.4010005@Sun.COM> <483A5DB8.5030909@Sun.com> <48456293.4020905@Sun.COM> <1217867748.7738.5.camel@sr1-umpk-16> <48982BFC.40909@Sun.COM> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080225) Status: RO Content-Length: 800 We don't do such a multi-instance services, right now. Because when testing 'pen', I found it doesn't work for ftp. As it doesn't analyze application layer protocol, so it can't be used in both PASV and PORT mode. I think a good example is only http. So we just give out a pen:default instance. Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: Darren J Moffat Sent: 08/05/08 18:31 > The major motivation for using SMF for the configuration was to easily > support multiple instances. > > For the man page that is delivered please include some multiinstance > examples eg: > > svc://network/pen:http > svc://network/pen:ftp > > The case doesn't need to be updated with this material for me to be > happy for the case to be approved, but it would be nice to do so. > -- Best regards, Jia From Darren.Moffat@sun.com Wed Aug 6 02:12:30 2008 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m769CUlm019829 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 02:12:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m769CU8g029881 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 03:12:30 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K5600J019KTN100@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 06 Aug 2008 02:12:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com ([192.18.6.21]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K5600FLS9KSNQ50@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 06 Aug 2008 02:12:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-emea-09.sun.com (gmp-eb-lb-2-fe3.eu.sun.com [192.18.6.12] (may be forged)) by gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m769CS8l007000 for ; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 09:12:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-emea-09.sun.com by fe-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K56005018QYZS00@fe-emea-09.sun.com> (original mail from Darren.Moffat@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:12:08 +0100 (BST) Received: from [129.156.173.21] by fe-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K5600JNB9K4J8B0@fe-emea-09.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:12:05 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:12:03 +0100 From: Darren J Moffat Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] In-reply-to: <4899291D.9070703@Sun.com> Sender: Darren.Moffat@sun.com To: Jia.Ni@sun.com Cc: John.Fischer@sun.com, PSARC-ext@sun.com, Huafeng Lu Message-id: <48996AE3.50503@Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <483609CC.4070603@sun.com> <48369D65.4010005@Sun.COM> <483A5DB8.5030909@Sun.com> <48456293.4020905@Sun.COM> <1217867748.7738.5.camel@sr1-umpk-16> <48982BFC.40909@Sun.COM> <4899291D.9070703@Sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080630) Status: RO Content-Length: 488 Jia Ni wrote: > We don't do such a multi-instance services, right now. > Because when testing 'pen', I found it doesn't work for ftp. As it > doesn't analyze application layer protocol, so it can't be used in both > PASV and PORT mode. So because of one protocol you aren't doing multi-instance for any of them ? Why not just document that in the SMF section of the man page that multi-instance doesn't work for all protocols because of how pen actually works. -- Darren J Moffat From Darren.Moffat@sun.com Wed Aug 6 02:14:02 2008 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m769E2G4019936 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 02:14:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m769E1JU030146 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 03:14:02 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K5600J0T9NDPB00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 06 Aug 2008 02:14:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com ([192.18.6.21]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K5600F459NCNS70@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 06 Aug 2008 02:14:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-emea-10.sun.com (gmp-eb-lb-2-fe3.eu.sun.com [192.18.6.12] (may be forged)) by gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m769DxJ2007375 for ; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 09:13:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-emea-10.sun.com by fe-emea-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K5600H018JM5S00@fe-emea-10.sun.com> (original mail from Darren.Moffat@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:13:48 +0100 (BST) Received: from [129.156.173.21] by fe-emea-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K56009O79MITNA0@fe-emea-10.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:13:31 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:13:30 +0100 From: Darren J Moffat Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] In-reply-to: <4899291D.9070703@Sun.com> Sender: Darren.Moffat@sun.com To: Jia.Ni@sun.com Cc: John.Fischer@sun.com, PSARC-ext@sun.com, Huafeng Lu Message-id: <48996B3A.3050709@Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <483609CC.4070603@sun.com> <48369D65.4010005@Sun.COM> <483A5DB8.5030909@Sun.com> <48456293.4020905@Sun.COM> <1217867748.7738.5.camel@sr1-umpk-16> <48982BFC.40909@Sun.COM> <4899291D.9070703@Sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080630) Status: RO Content-Length: 642 Jia Ni wrote: > We don't do such a multi-instance services, right now. > Because when testing 'pen', I found it doesn't work for ftp. As it > doesn't analyze application layer protocol, so it can't be used in both > PASV and PORT mode. I don't understand why you can't have to instances of the SMF service one configured for ftp on the ftp port and one configured for http on its ports. This would be two different pen processes. I'm pretty sure that would work given the documentation for pen, or am I missing something really fundamental about pen in that only a single process can exist on a given system ? -- Darren J Moffat From Jia.Ni@sun.com Wed Aug 6 04:32:39 2008 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m76BWc04022888 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 04:32:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m76BWXnc017231 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 12:32:37 +0100 (BST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K5600603G2CIN00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 06 Aug 2008 04:32:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sineb-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.19.7]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K5600L3RG2B80E0@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 06 Aug 2008 04:32:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-apac-06.sun.com (fe-apac-06.sun.com [192.18.19.177] (may be forged)) by sineb-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m76BWZ5X008867 for ; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 11:32:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-apac.sun.com by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) id <0K5600I01FV0SY00@mail-apac.sun.com> (original mail from Jia.Ni@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:32:35 +0800 (SGT) Received: from [129.158.219.50] by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPSA id <0K56006HHG29HA70@mail-apac.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:32:34 +0800 (SGT) Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:32:40 +0800 From: Jia Ni Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] In-reply-to: <48996B3A.3050709@Sun.COM> Sender: Jia.Ni@sun.com To: Darren J Moffat Cc: John.Fischer@sun.com, PSARC-ext@sun.com, Huafeng Lu Reply-to: Jia.Ni@sun.com Message-id: <48998BD8.6040206@Sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <483609CC.4070603@sun.com> <48369D65.4010005@Sun.COM> <483A5DB8.5030909@Sun.com> <48456293.4020905@Sun.COM> <1217867748.7738.5.camel@sr1-umpk-16> <48982BFC.40909@Sun.COM> <4899291D.9070703@Sun.com> <48996B3A.3050709@Sun.COM> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080225) Status: RO Content-Length: 1311 I don't mean there can't be 2 pen process in the system. I mean pen can't be used on ftp, according to my comprehension. Back to you question, I can configure 'pen' on port 80 for http request. Meanwhile, I can configure it on port 8080 for http request. Again, I can configure it on port 8888 for http request at the same time. I don't know how to deal with such situation according to your assumption. Should I add pen:http, pen:http8080, pen:http8888? Or I just add an example as pen:http, and then ask user to do their own instances when they need? Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: Darren J Moffat Sent: 08/06/08 17:13 > Jia Ni wrote: >> We don't do such a multi-instance services, right now. >> Because when testing 'pen', I found it doesn't work for ftp. As it >> doesn't analyze application layer protocol, so it can't be used in both >> PASV and PORT mode. > > I don't understand why you can't have to instances of the SMF service > one configured for ftp on the ftp port and one configured for http on > its ports. This would be two different pen processes. I'm pretty sure > that would work given the documentation for pen, or am I missing > something really fundamental about pen in that only a single process can > exist on a given system ? > -- Best regards, Jia From Darren.Moffat@sun.com Wed Aug 6 06:07:50 2008 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m76D7nXu026082 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 06:07:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m76D7k5r030272 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 07:07:49 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K5600609KH0UR00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 06 Aug 2008 06:07:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com ([192.18.6.21]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K56006AIKGYHO00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 06 Aug 2008 06:07:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-emea-10.sun.com (gmp-eb-lb-2-fe1.eu.sun.com [192.18.6.10] (may be forged)) by gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m76D7iqt008261 for ; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:07:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-emea-10.sun.com by fe-emea-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K5600801J6ZYP00@fe-emea-10.sun.com> (original mail from Darren.Moffat@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 06 Aug 2008 14:07:46 +0100 (BST) Received: from [129.156.173.21] by fe-emea-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K56008QHKGVAL70@fe-emea-10.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 06 Aug 2008 14:07:44 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 14:07:43 +0100 From: Darren J Moffat Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] In-reply-to: <48998BD8.6040206@Sun.com> Sender: Darren.Moffat@sun.com To: Jia.Ni@sun.com Cc: John.Fischer@sun.com, PSARC-ext@sun.com, Huafeng Lu Message-id: <4899A21F.5020302@Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <483609CC.4070603@sun.com> <48369D65.4010005@Sun.COM> <483A5DB8.5030909@Sun.com> <48456293.4020905@Sun.COM> <1217867748.7738.5.camel@sr1-umpk-16> <48982BFC.40909@Sun.COM> <4899291D.9070703@Sun.com> <48996B3A.3050709@Sun.COM> <48998BD8.6040206@Sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080630) Status: RO Content-Length: 557 Jia Ni wrote: > I don't mean there can't be 2 pen process in the system. > I mean pen can't be used on ftp, according to my comprehension. > > Back to you question, I can configure 'pen' on port 80 for http request. > Meanwhile, I can configure it on port 8080 for http request. > Again, I can configure it on port 8888 for http request at the same time. > > I don't know how to deal with such situation according to your > assumption. Should I add pen:http, pen:http8080, pen:http8888? Yes that is exactly what I was suggesting. -- Darren J Moffat From John.Plocher@sun.com Wed Aug 6 08:58:11 2008 Received: from sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail3mpk.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.52]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m76FwBom003120 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 08:58:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m76FwA4c020447 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 08:58:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K5600J0BSCXPO00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 06 Aug 2008 09:58:09 -0600 (MDT) Received: from sca-es-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.43.132]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K5600EZSSCV2I50@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 06 Aug 2008 09:58:07 -0600 (MDT) Received: from fe-sfbay-10.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m76Fw76H003253 for ; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 08:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-10.sun.com by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K5600C01SATEG00@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com> (original mail from John.Plocher@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 06 Aug 2008 08:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.168.4] ([208.74.177.212]) by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K5600GZXSCU7M60@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 06 Aug 2008 08:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 08:58:06 -0700 From: John Plocher Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] In-reply-to: <48996B3A.3050709@Sun.COM> Sender: John.Plocher@sun.com To: Darren J Moffat Cc: Jia.Ni@sun.com, John.Fischer@sun.com, PSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <4899CA0E.30202@Sun.Com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <483609CC.4070603@sun.com> <48369D65.4010005@Sun.COM> <483A5DB8.5030909@Sun.com> <48456293.4020905@Sun.COM> <1217867748.7738.5.camel@sr1-umpk-16> <48982BFC.40909@Sun.COM> <4899291D.9070703@Sun.com> <48996B3A.3050709@Sun.COM> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) Status: RO Content-Length: 488 Darren J Moffat wrote: > Jia Ni wrote: >> We don't do such a multi-instance services, right now. >> Because when testing 'pen', I found it doesn't work for ftp. > I don't understand why you can't have to instances of the SMF service Even if it doesn't do both http on port 80 and FTP, it certainly should be able to do HTTP(80) and HTTP(8080) and Tomcat and IPS ... Multi-instance on OpenSolaris seems to be a no-brainer, especially given how easy it is to do with SMF... -John From Huafeng.Lv@Sun.COM Wed Aug 6 21:41:37 2008 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m774faah008653 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 21:41:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m774fTKF011846 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 12:41:35 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K5700703RPA7H00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 06 Aug 2008 22:41:34 -0600 (MDT) Received: from gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com ([192.18.6.21]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K5700DXYRP9II90@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 06 Aug 2008 22:41:33 -0600 (MDT) Received: from fe-emea-10.sun.com (gmp-eb-lb-2-fe1.eu.sun.com [192.18.6.10] (may be forged)) by gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m774fWPX028212 for ; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 04:41:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-emea-10.sun.com by fe-emea-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K5700501RJMTZ00@fe-emea-10.sun.com> (original mail from Huafeng.Lv@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Thu, 07 Aug 2008 05:41:17 +0100 (BST) Received: from [129.158.215.196] by fe-emea-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K5700CYYROQQF40@fe-emea-10.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Thu, 07 Aug 2008 05:41:17 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 12:40:30 +0800 From: Huafeng Lu Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] In-reply-to: <4899A21F.5020302@Sun.COM> Sender: Huafeng.Lv@Sun.COM To: Darren J Moffat Cc: Jia.Ni@Sun.COM, John.Fischer@Sun.COM, PSARC-ext@Sun.COM Message-id: <489A7CBE.4070006@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <483609CC.4070603@sun.com> <48369D65.4010005@Sun.COM> <483A5DB8.5030909@Sun.com> <48456293.4020905@Sun.COM> <1217867748.7738.5.camel@sr1-umpk-16> <48982BFC.40909@Sun.COM> <4899291D.9070703@Sun.com> <48996B3A.3050709@Sun.COM> <48998BD8.6040206@Sun.com> <4899A21F.5020302@Sun.COM> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071119) Status: RO Content-Length: 905 Darren J Moffat wrote: > Jia Ni wrote: >> I don't mean there can't be 2 pen process in the system. >> I mean pen can't be used on ftp, according to my comprehension. >> >> Back to you question, I can configure 'pen' on port 80 for http >> request. Meanwhile, I can configure it on port 8080 for http request. >> Again, I can configure it on port 8888 for http request at the same time. >> >> I don't know how to deal with such situation according to your >> assumption. Should I add pen:http, pen:http8080, pen:http8888? > > Yes that is exactly what I was suggesting. I'm not sure if I understand you correctly. Providing multiple SMF instances for many http ports looks really funny to me. (Yes 8080 and 8888 are common for http; with the pen command line options it's easy to configure, but providing a SMF instance for each port doesn't seem graceful to me.) Any better solutions? -- Huafeng From Darren.Moffat@Sun.COM Thu Aug 7 01:14:33 2008 Received: from sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail2sca.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.234]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m778EXWO015414 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 01:14:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m778EWnm009303 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 01:14:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K58004071K7Z700@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Thu, 07 Aug 2008 01:14:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com ([192.18.6.21]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K58000HR1K6AW30@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Thu, 07 Aug 2008 01:14:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-emea-10.sun.com (gmp-eb-lb-2-fe3.eu.sun.com [192.18.6.12] (may be forged)) by gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m778ETtq024872 for ; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 08:14:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-emea-10.sun.com by fe-emea-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K5800G010PBPX00@fe-emea-10.sun.com> (original mail from Darren.Moffat@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Thu, 07 Aug 2008 09:14:24 +0100 (BST) Received: from [129.156.173.21] by fe-emea-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K5800G9C1JLCE80@fe-emea-10.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Thu, 07 Aug 2008 09:14:10 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 09:14:09 +0100 From: Darren J Moffat Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] In-reply-to: <489A7CBE.4070006@sun.com> Sender: Darren.Moffat@Sun.COM To: Huafeng Lu Cc: Jia.Ni@Sun.COM, John.Fischer@Sun.COM, PSARC-ext@Sun.COM Message-id: <489AAED1.9090907@Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <483609CC.4070603@sun.com> <48369D65.4010005@Sun.COM> <483A5DB8.5030909@Sun.com> <48456293.4020905@Sun.COM> <1217867748.7738.5.camel@sr1-umpk-16> <48982BFC.40909@Sun.COM> <4899291D.9070703@Sun.com> <48996B3A.3050709@Sun.COM> <48998BD8.6040206@Sun.com> <4899A21F.5020302@Sun.COM> <489A7CBE.4070006@sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080630) Status: RO Content-Length: 1402 Huafeng Lu wrote: > Darren J Moffat wrote: >> Jia Ni wrote: >>> I don't mean there can't be 2 pen process in the system. >>> I mean pen can't be used on ftp, according to my comprehension. >>> >>> Back to you question, I can configure 'pen' on port 80 for http >>> request. Meanwhile, I can configure it on port 8080 for http request. >>> Again, I can configure it on port 8888 for http request at the same time. >>> >>> I don't know how to deal with such situation according to your >>> assumption. Should I add pen:http, pen:http8080, pen:http8888? >> Yes that is exactly what I was suggesting. > > I'm not sure if I understand you correctly. Providing multiple SMF > instances for many http ports looks really funny to me. (Yes 8080 and > 8888 are common for http; with the pen command line options it's easy to > configure, but providing a SMF instance for each port doesn't seem > graceful to me.) That is the whole point of SMF instances. What you get from this is the ability to have different people control the difference instances and for them to be managed independently. For example if the 8080 service needs to come down for maintenance the 80 and 8888 versions stay running if they are separate instances, if you put them all in one instance you disrupt all three. This is a known and well understood use of SMF that applies perfectly to this case. -- Darren J Moffat From Huafeng.Lv@sun.com Thu Aug 7 01:35:07 2008 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m778Z6H2015579 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 01:35:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m778YvU5027277 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:35:05 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K5800C172IGSO00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 07 Aug 2008 01:35:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com ([192.18.6.21]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K5800ATK2IF9D60@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 07 Aug 2008 01:35:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-emea-10.sun.com (gmp-eb-lb-2-fe2.eu.sun.com [192.18.6.11] (may be forged)) by gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m778Z2li000363 for ; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 08:35:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-emea-10.sun.com by fe-emea-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K5800I011ZHHQ00@fe-emea-10.sun.com> (original mail from Huafeng.Lv@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 07 Aug 2008 09:34:56 +0100 (BST) Received: from [129.158.215.196] by fe-emea-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K58005062HRBS20@fe-emea-10.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 07 Aug 2008 09:34:42 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:33:55 +0800 From: Huafeng Lu Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] In-reply-to: <489AAED1.9090907@Sun.COM> Sender: Huafeng.Lv@sun.com To: Darren J Moffat Cc: Jia.Ni@sun.com, John.Fischer@sun.com, PSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <489AB373.2080601@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <483609CC.4070603@sun.com> <48369D65.4010005@Sun.COM> <483A5DB8.5030909@Sun.com> <48456293.4020905@Sun.COM> <1217867748.7738.5.camel@sr1-umpk-16> <48982BFC.40909@Sun.COM> <4899291D.9070703@Sun.com> <48996B3A.3050709@Sun.COM> <48998BD8.6040206@Sun.com> <4899A21F.5020302@Sun.COM> <489A7CBE.4070006@sun.com> <489AAED1.9090907@Sun.COM> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071119) Status: RO Content-Length: 1534 Darren J Moffat 写道: > Huafeng Lu wrote: >> Darren J Moffat wrote: >>> Jia Ni wrote: >>>> I don't mean there can't be 2 pen process in the system. >>>> I mean pen can't be used on ftp, according to my comprehension. >>>> >>>> Back to you question, I can configure 'pen' on port 80 for http >>>> request. Meanwhile, I can configure it on port 8080 for http request. >>>> Again, I can configure it on port 8888 for http request at the same >>>> time. >>>> >>>> I don't know how to deal with such situation according to your >>>> assumption. Should I add pen:http, pen:http8080, pen:http8888? >>> Yes that is exactly what I was suggesting. >> >> I'm not sure if I understand you correctly. Providing multiple SMF >> instances for many http ports looks really funny to me. (Yes 8080 and >> 8888 are common for http; with the pen command line options it's easy >> to configure, but providing a SMF instance for each port doesn't seem >> graceful to me.) > > That is the whole point of SMF instances. What you get from this is the > ability to have different people control the difference instances and > for them to be managed independently. For example if the 8080 service > needs to come down for maintenance the 80 and 8888 versions stay running > if they are separate instances, if you put them all in one instance you > disrupt all three. So how about other ports? do we also need http:8088, http:6666, http:8765, etc? > This is a known and well understood use of SMF that applies perfectly to > this case. > From Darren.Moffat@Sun.COM Thu Aug 7 01:45:59 2008 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m778jxD0015727 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 01:45:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m778juXq021659 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 09:45:58 +0100 (BST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K580020D30KLN00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 07 Aug 2008 02:45:56 -0600 (MDT) Received: from gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com ([192.18.6.21]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K5800I2230J2W60@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 07 Aug 2008 02:45:56 -0600 (MDT) Received: from fe-emea-09.sun.com (gmp-eb-lb-2-fe3.eu.sun.com [192.18.6.12] (may be forged)) by gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m778jsjU003465 for ; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 08:45:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-emea-09.sun.com by fe-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K5800J012S89U00@fe-emea-09.sun.com> (original mail from Darren.Moffat@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 07 Aug 2008 09:45:48 +0100 (BST) Received: from [129.156.173.21] by fe-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K58009XI2ZZ4WA0@fe-emea-09.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 07 Aug 2008 09:45:36 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 09:45:35 +0100 From: Darren J Moffat Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] In-reply-to: <489AB373.2080601@sun.com> Sender: Darren.Moffat@Sun.COM To: Huafeng Lu Cc: Jia.Ni@Sun.COM, John.Fischer@Sun.COM, PSARC-ext@Sun.COM Message-id: <489AB62F.2070603@Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <483609CC.4070603@sun.com> <48369D65.4010005@Sun.COM> <483A5DB8.5030909@Sun.com> <48456293.4020905@Sun.COM> <1217867748.7738.5.camel@sr1-umpk-16> <48982BFC.40909@Sun.COM> <4899291D.9070703@Sun.com> <48996B3A.3050709@Sun.COM> <48998BD8.6040206@Sun.com> <4899A21F.5020302@Sun.COM> <489A7CBE.4070006@sun.com> <489AAED1.9090907@Sun.COM> <489AB373.2080601@sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080630) Status: RO Content-Length: 1848 Huafeng Lu wrote: > Darren J Moffat 写道: >> Huafeng Lu wrote: >>> Darren J Moffat wrote: >>>> Jia Ni wrote: >>>>> I don't mean there can't be 2 pen process in the system. >>>>> I mean pen can't be used on ftp, according to my comprehension. >>>>> >>>>> Back to you question, I can configure 'pen' on port 80 for http >>>>> request. Meanwhile, I can configure it on port 8080 for http request. >>>>> Again, I can configure it on port 8888 for http request at the same >>>>> time. >>>>> >>>>> I don't know how to deal with such situation according to your >>>>> assumption. Should I add pen:http, pen:http8080, pen:http8888? >>>> Yes that is exactly what I was suggesting. >>> >>> I'm not sure if I understand you correctly. Providing multiple SMF >>> instances for many http ports looks really funny to me. (Yes 8080 and >>> 8888 are common for http; with the pen command line options it's easy >>> to configure, but providing a SMF instance for each port doesn't seem >>> graceful to me.) >> >> That is the whole point of SMF instances. What you get from this is >> the ability to have different people control the difference instances >> and for them to be managed independently. For example if the 8080 >> service needs to come down for maintenance the 80 and 8888 versions >> stay running if they are separate instances, if you put them all in >> one instance you disrupt all three. > > So how about other ports? do we also need http:8088, http:6666, > http:8765, etc? You wouldn't use a : in the instance name it would look like this: svc:/network/pen:default May have nothing configured svc:/network/pen:http80 pen/listen_port = 80 svc:/network/pen:http8080 pen/listen_port = 8080 All instances in this case would have the same start/stop methods but would be able to have different properties. -- Darren J Moffat From Jia.Ni@SUN.COM Thu Aug 7 02:07:05 2008 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m77974Qx017941 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 02:07:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m7796gYt000503 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 10:07:03 +0100 (BST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K5800E033ZQ6A00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 07 Aug 2008 02:07:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sineb-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.19.7]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K5800AXB3ZP9BD0@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 07 Aug 2008 02:07:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-apac-06.sun.com (fe-apac-06.sun.com [192.18.19.177] (may be forged)) by sineb-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m77971OU000239 for ; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 09:07:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-apac.sun.com by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) id <0K58002013ZBZA00@mail-apac.sun.com> (original mail from Jia.Ni@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:07:01 +0800 (SGT) Received: from [129.158.219.50] by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPSA id <0K5800AQ23ZN1V50@mail-apac.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:07:00 +0800 (SGT) Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:07:04 +0800 From: Jia Ni Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] In-reply-to: <489AB62F.2070603@Sun.COM> Sender: Jia.Ni@SUN.COM To: Darren J Moffat Cc: Huafeng Lu , John.Fischer@SUN.COM, PSARC-ext@SUN.COM Reply-to: Jia.Ni@SUN.COM Message-id: <489ABB38.7010603@Sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <483609CC.4070603@sun.com> <48369D65.4010005@Sun.COM> <483A5DB8.5030909@Sun.com> <48456293.4020905@Sun.COM> <1217867748.7738.5.camel@sr1-umpk-16> <48982BFC.40909@Sun.COM> <4899291D.9070703@Sun.com> <48996B3A.3050709@Sun.COM> <48998BD8.6040206@Sun.com> <4899A21F.5020302@Sun.COM> <489A7CBE.4070006@sun.com> <489AAED1.9090907@Sun.COM> <489AB373.2080601@sun.com> <489AB62F.2070603@Sun.COM> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080225) Status: RO Content-Length: 2861 Let me integrate John's, Huafeng's, Kacheong's and your options: 1, A SMF instance example will be created, like pen:http, which set the listenport property to 80. So users can start/stop separating instances conveniently. And this case shows the advantage of SMF. 2, Information will be provided in the man page. Users will be told multiple 'pen' processes could be executed by creating multiple SMF instances, following the example, like pen:http. 3, No pen:http8888, pen:http8080, pen:http12345 etc. instances will be shipped with the release. I think that makes solaris services look in a ridiculous way. Just ask administrator to do so when they need. 4, 'pen' will be now located at svc:/network/loadbalancer/pen:default. By the way, if a user want to create a new instance manually through command line, the only way is to use 'svccfg import' utility, right? Thank you! -----Original Message----- From: Darren J Moffat Sent: 08/07/08 16:45 > Huafeng Lu wrote: >> Darren J Moffat 写道: >>> Huafeng Lu wrote: >>>> Darren J Moffat wrote: >>>>> Jia Ni wrote: >>>>>> I don't mean there can't be 2 pen process in the system. >>>>>> I mean pen can't be used on ftp, according to my comprehension. >>>>>> >>>>>> Back to you question, I can configure 'pen' on port 80 for http >>>>>> request. Meanwhile, I can configure it on port 8080 for http request. >>>>>> Again, I can configure it on port 8888 for http request at the same >>>>>> time. >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't know how to deal with such situation according to your >>>>>> assumption. Should I add pen:http, pen:http8080, pen:http8888? >>>>> Yes that is exactly what I was suggesting. >>>> I'm not sure if I understand you correctly. Providing multiple SMF >>>> instances for many http ports looks really funny to me. (Yes 8080 and >>>> 8888 are common for http; with the pen command line options it's easy >>>> to configure, but providing a SMF instance for each port doesn't seem >>>> graceful to me.) >>> That is the whole point of SMF instances. What you get from this is >>> the ability to have different people control the difference instances >>> and for them to be managed independently. For example if the 8080 >>> service needs to come down for maintenance the 80 and 8888 versions >>> stay running if they are separate instances, if you put them all in >>> one instance you disrupt all three. >> So how about other ports? do we also need http:8088, http:6666, >> http:8765, etc? > > You wouldn't use a : in the instance name it would look like this: > > svc:/network/pen:default > May have nothing configured > svc:/network/pen:http80 > pen/listen_port = 80 > svc:/network/pen:http8080 > pen/listen_port = 8080 > > All instances in this case would have the same start/stop methods but > would be able to have different properties. > -- Best regards, Jia From Darren.Moffat@Sun.COM Thu Aug 7 02:49:38 2008 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m779nbg3018493 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 02:49:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m779naRY018353 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 10:49:36 +0100 (BST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K5800F015YOCM00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 07 Aug 2008 02:49:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com ([192.18.6.21]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K58000ML5YMAP90@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 07 Aug 2008 02:49:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-emea-10.sun.com (gmp-eb-lb-2-fe1.eu.sun.com [192.18.6.10] (may be forged)) by gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m779nXS6021780 for ; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 09:49:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-emea-10.sun.com by fe-emea-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K580000153P7W00@fe-emea-10.sun.com> (original mail from Darren.Moffat@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 07 Aug 2008 10:49:21 +0100 (BST) Received: from [129.156.173.21] by fe-emea-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K5800GZH5XWCED0@fe-emea-10.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 07 Aug 2008 10:49:09 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 10:49:08 +0100 From: Darren J Moffat Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] In-reply-to: <489ABB38.7010603@Sun.com> Sender: Darren.Moffat@Sun.COM To: Jia.Ni@Sun.COM Cc: Huafeng Lu , John.Fischer@Sun.COM, PSARC-ext@Sun.COM Message-id: <489AC514.6030506@Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <483609CC.4070603@sun.com> <48369D65.4010005@Sun.COM> <483A5DB8.5030909@Sun.com> <48456293.4020905@Sun.COM> <1217867748.7738.5.camel@sr1-umpk-16> <48982BFC.40909@Sun.COM> <4899291D.9070703@Sun.com> <48996B3A.3050709@Sun.COM> <48998BD8.6040206@Sun.com> <4899A21F.5020302@Sun.COM> <489A7CBE.4070006@sun.com> <489AAED1.9090907@Sun.COM> <489AB373.2080601@sun.com> <489AB62F.2070603@Sun.COM> <489ABB38.7010603@Sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080630) Status: RO Content-Length: 1150 Jia Ni wrote: > Let me integrate John's, Huafeng's, Kacheong's and your options: > > 1, A SMF instance example will be created, like pen:http, which set the > listenport property to 80. So users can start/stop separating instances > conveniently. And this case shows the advantage of SMF. I wasn't asking for that but I think it is a very good idea, so thanks for including it. > 2, Information will be provided in the man page. Users will be told > multiple 'pen' processes could be executed by creating multiple SMF > instances, following the example, like pen:http. That is all I was asking for. > 3, No pen:http8888, pen:http8080, pen:http12345 etc. instances will be > shipped with the release. I think that makes solaris services look in a > ridiculous way. Just ask administrator to do so when they need. Correct I was only asking for examples in the man page not actual instances. > 4, 'pen' will be now located at svc:/network/loadbalancer/pen:default. Is there an expectation that there will be other network/loadbalander/ services included in the future ? Regardless I'm happy with the updated FMRI. -- Darren J Moffat From John.Plocher@sun.com Thu Aug 7 08:51:22 2008 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m77FpLHb025509 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 08:51:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m77Fp9wn026147 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 23:51:20 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K5800807MPI0Q00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@SUN.COM); Thu, 07 Aug 2008 08:51:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sca-es-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.43.133]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K5800419MPGYA80@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@SUN.COM); Thu, 07 Aug 2008 08:51:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m77FpFwb006773 for ; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 08:51:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-09.sun.com by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K5800I01MNMT700@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> (original mail from John.Plocher@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@SUN.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@SUN.COM); Thu, 07 Aug 2008 08:51:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.168.4] ([208.74.177.212]) by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K58006T8MPF7740@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@SUN.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@SUN.COM); Thu, 07 Aug 2008 08:51:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 08:51:15 -0700 From: John Plocher Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] In-reply-to: <489AB62F.2070603@Sun.COM> Sender: John.Plocher@sun.com To: Darren J Moffat Cc: Huafeng Lu , Jia.Ni@sun.com, John.Fischer@sun.com, PSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <489B19F3.7000503@Sun.Com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <483609CC.4070603@sun.com> <48369D65.4010005@Sun.COM> <483A5DB8.5030909@Sun.com> <48456293.4020905@Sun.COM> <1217867748.7738.5.camel@sr1-umpk-16> <48982BFC.40909@Sun.COM> <4899291D.9070703@Sun.com> <48996B3A.3050709@Sun.COM> <48998BD8.6040206@Sun.com> <4899A21F.5020302@Sun.COM> <489A7CBE.4070006@sun.com> <489AAED1.9090907@Sun.COM> <489AB373.2080601@sun.com> <489AB62F.2070603@Sun.COM> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) Status: RO Content-Length: 766 Darren J Moffat wrote: > You wouldn't use a : in the instance name it would look like this: > > svc:/network/pen:default > May have nothing configured > svc:/network/pen:http80 > pen/listen_port = 80 > svc:/network/pen:http8080 > pen/listen_port = 8080 > > All instances in this case would have the same start/stop methods but > would be able to have different properties. I *think* Huafeng was asking "what specific SMF instances need to be instantiated and delivered by this project?" Your examples seem to be more of the "If you set things up correctly, then the user/admin can simply and easily extend the setup to fit their needs". IMO, the man page for the pen program needs to document exactly how one would make and use these "clones". -John From Darren.Moffat@sun.com Fri Aug 8 01:51:02 2008 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m788p15k024457 for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2008 01:51:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m788ort5021911 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Fri, 8 Aug 2008 16:51:00 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K5900A03XWX9H00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@SUN.COM); Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:50:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com ([192.18.6.21]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K5900NUAXWW4H90@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@SUN.COM); Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:50:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-emea-09.sun.com (gmp-eb-lb-2-fe3.eu.sun.com [192.18.6.12] (may be forged)) by gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m788otvk009042 for ; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 08:50:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-emea-09.sun.com by fe-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K5900401WYKBA00@fe-emea-09.sun.com> (original mail from Darren.Moffat@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@SUN.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@SUN.COM); Fri, 08 Aug 2008 09:50:52 +0100 (BST) Received: from [129.156.173.21] by fe-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K5900DHRXWNB4B0@fe-emea-09.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@SUN.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@SUN.COM); Fri, 08 Aug 2008 09:50:49 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 09:50:47 +0100 From: Darren J Moffat Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] In-reply-to: <489B19F3.7000503@Sun.Com> Sender: Darren.Moffat@sun.com To: John Plocher Cc: Huafeng Lu , Jia.Ni@sun.com, John.Fischer@sun.com, PSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <489C08E7.8090802@Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <483609CC.4070603@sun.com> <48369D65.4010005@Sun.COM> <483A5DB8.5030909@Sun.com> <48456293.4020905@Sun.COM> <1217867748.7738.5.camel@sr1-umpk-16> <48982BFC.40909@Sun.COM> <4899291D.9070703@Sun.com> <48996B3A.3050709@Sun.COM> <48998BD8.6040206@Sun.com> <4899A21F.5020302@Sun.COM> <489A7CBE.4070006@sun.com> <489AAED1.9090907@Sun.COM> <489AB373.2080601@sun.com> <489AB62F.2070603@Sun.COM> <489B19F3.7000503@Sun.Com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080630) Status: RO Content-Length: 1166 John Plocher wrote: > Darren J Moffat wrote: >> You wouldn't use a : in the instance name it would look like this: >> >> svc:/network/pen:default >> May have nothing configured >> svc:/network/pen:http80 >> pen/listen_port = 80 >> svc:/network/pen:http8080 >> pen/listen_port = 8080 >> >> All instances in this case would have the same start/stop methods but >> would be able to have different properties. > > > I *think* Huafeng was asking "what specific SMF instances > need to be instantiated and delivered by this project?" Originally I wasn't suggesting any be delivered other than the unconfigured default. However the project team appears to have agreed to deliver a very useful http on port 80 instance as pen:http. A good addition IMO. > Your examples seem to be more of the "If you set things > up correctly, then the user/admin can simply and easily > extend the setup to fit their needs". > IMO, the man page for the pen program needs to document > exactly how one would make and use these "clones". That is what I asked for originally, documentation in the man page showing how to configure new instances. -- Darren J Moffat From Jia.Ni@sun.com Wed Aug 13 02:35:48 2008 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m7D9ZlMc022820 for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 02:35:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m7D9ZiqN028952 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:35:47 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K5J00D0F9BM6F00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 13 Aug 2008 02:35:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sineb-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.19.6]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K5J00JBA9BKWTE0@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 13 Aug 2008 02:35:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-apac-06.sun.com (fe-apac-06.sun.com [192.18.19.177] (may be forged)) by sineb-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m7D9Ziao008090 for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:35:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-apac.sun.com by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) id <0K5J00H019A6N100@mail-apac.sun.com> (original mail from Jia.Ni@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:35:44 +0800 (SGT) Received: from [129.158.219.50] by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPSA id <0K5J006ZH9BIG3J0@mail-apac.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:35:43 +0800 (SGT) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:35:48 +0800 From: Jia Ni Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] In-reply-to: <489C08E7.8090802@Sun.COM> Sender: Jia.Ni@sun.com To: Darren J Moffat , John Plocher , Huafeng Lu , John.Fischer@sun.com, Jim Walker Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com Reply-to: Jia.Ni@sun.com Message-id: <48A2AAF4.7010901@Sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Boundary_(ID_ne8IsfnRRvq/w+b+SKt+7g)" X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <483609CC.4070603@sun.com> <48369D65.4010005@Sun.COM> <483A5DB8.5030909@Sun.com> <48456293.4020905@Sun.COM> <1217867748.7738.5.camel@sr1-umpk-16> <48982BFC.40909@Sun.COM> <4899291D.9070703@Sun.com> <48996B3A.3050709@Sun.COM> <48998BD8.6040206@Sun.com> <4899A21F.5020302@Sun.COM> <489A7CBE.4070006@sun.com> <489AAED1.9090907@Sun.COM> <489AB373.2080601@sun.com> <489AB62F.2070603@Sun.COM> <489B19F3.7000503@Sun.Com> <489C08E7.8090802@Sun.COM> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080225) Status: RO Content-Length: 4990 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_ne8IsfnRRvq/w+b+SKt+7g) Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Hi John Fischer and Jim Walker, Could you please help us update the PSARC proposal? The attach file is the new proposal draft. Thank you! Hi all, Huafeng and I have spent some time and update the 'pen' porting project again. We mainly focus on: Changing the pen service into a multiple instance service; Adding a new "pen:http" instance; Updating pen(1) manpage and fasttrack material. You can find the entire changes for pen project at opensolaris site: You can find webrev at: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/webrev You can find fast track file at: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/pen_fasttrack.txt You can find man pages at: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/man/man1/pen.1.txt http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/man/man1/mergelogs.1.txt http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/man/man1/penctl.1.txt http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/man/man1/penlog.1.txt http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/man/man1/penlogd.1.txt You can find ssl contract at: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/contract-20.txt Thank you! -----Original Message----- From: Darren J Moffat Sent: 08/08/08 16:50 > John Plocher wrote: >> Darren J Moffat wrote: >>> You wouldn't use a : in the instance name it would look like this: >>> >>> svc:/network/pen:default >>> May have nothing configured >>> svc:/network/pen:http80 >>> pen/listen_port = 80 >>> svc:/network/pen:http8080 >>> pen/listen_port = 8080 >>> >>> All instances in this case would have the same start/stop methods but >>> would be able to have different properties. >> >> I *think* Huafeng was asking "what specific SMF instances >> need to be instantiated and delivered by this project?" > > Originally I wasn't suggesting any be delivered other than the > unconfigured default. > > However the project team appears to have agreed to deliver a very useful > http on port 80 instance as pen:http. A good addition IMO. > >> Your examples seem to be more of the "If you set things >> up correctly, then the user/admin can simply and easily >> extend the setup to fit their needs". > >> IMO, the man page for the pen program needs to document >> exactly how one would make and use these "clones". > > That is what I asked for originally, documentation in the man page > showing how to configure new instances. > > -- Best regards, Jia --Boundary_(ID_ne8IsfnRRvq/w+b+SKt+7g) Content-type: text/plain; name=pen_fasttrack.txt Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline; filename=pen_fasttrack.txt Summary ======= Pen[1] is a tool designed to do load balance for "simple" tcp based protocols such as http or smtp. It allows several servers to appear as one to the outside and automatically detects servers that are down and distributes clients among the available servers. This gives high availability and scalable performance. pen-0.17.2 will be integrated into the SFW consolidation as part of this proposal, and will be installed as SUNWpen. This project requests a minor release binding. Discussion ========== In OpenSolaris, the public interface to start and stop pen will be SMF and the service will be named: svc:/network/pen It is a multiple instance service. Multiple pen processes can be executed separately at the same time in one machine. A http load balancer service instance is shipped as an example. Users can also create their own instances following the SMF framework. The default instance is: svc:/network/pen:default The example instance for http load balancer is: svc:/network/pen:http In order to start pen by SMF, two SMF properties must be set: pen/listenport and pen/servers Other properties can be set optionally. Each SMF property has a corresponding command line option. These properties are explained in the "SMF PROPERTIES" section of the pen(1) manual page. Users can easily change these properties and start pen with different configurations. Note that users can still start pen from command line for other purposes which are not supported by the SMF service (eg., foreground or debug mode). Dependencies ============ OpenSSL (snv_84 version 0.9.8a) Interfaces ========== Exported Interfaces Classification Comment ------------------- -------------- ------- SUNWpen Uncommitted Package /usr/bin/pen Uncommitted Command /usr/bin/mergelogs Uncommitted Command /usr/bin/penctl Uncommitted Command /usr/bin/penlog Uncommitted Command /usr/bin/penlogd Uncommitted Command /usr/share/doc/pen/ Uncommitted Pen documents Imported Interfaces ------------------- NAME STABILITY NOTES OpenSSL External/Volatile PSARC/2003/500 Reference Documents =================== [1] http://siag.nu/pen RFE ID# 6674372 for pen --Boundary_(ID_ne8IsfnRRvq/w+b+SKt+7g)-- From Jia.Ni@sun.com Wed Aug 13 04:21:22 2008 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m7DBLLKb024145 for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 04:21:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m7DBLHcH004750 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:21:20 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K5J00I05E7JLI00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 13 Aug 2008 04:21:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sineb-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.19.7]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K5J003PUE7IXS60@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 13 Aug 2008 04:21:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-apac-05.sun.com (fe-apac-05.sun.com [192.18.19.176] (may be forged)) by sineb-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m7DBLIJe019585 for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:21:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-apac.sun.com by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) id <0K5J00601E6Q5E00@mail-apac.sun.com> (original mail from Jia.Ni@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:21:18 +0800 (SGT) Received: from [129.158.219.50] by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPSA id <0K5J0075YE7FGDA0@mail-apac.sun.com>; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:21:17 +0800 (SGT) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:21:20 +0800 From: Jia Ni Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] In-reply-to: <48A2AAF4.7010901@Sun.com> Sender: Jia.Ni@sun.com To: Darren J Moffat , John Plocher , Huafeng Lu , John.Fischer@sun.com, Jim Walker , Kacheong.Poon@sun.com Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com Reply-to: Jia.Ni@sun.com Message-id: <48A2C3B0.5090408@Sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Boundary_(ID_VRSPffhkz2bZNjYjMTZ8vw)" X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <483609CC.4070603@sun.com> <48369D65.4010005@Sun.COM> <483A5DB8.5030909@Sun.com> <48456293.4020905@Sun.COM> <1217867748.7738.5.camel@sr1-umpk-16> <48982BFC.40909@Sun.COM> <4899291D.9070703@Sun.com> <48996B3A.3050709@Sun.COM> <48998BD8.6040206@Sun.com> <4899A21F.5020302@Sun.COM> <489A7CBE.4070006@sun.com> <489AAED1.9090907@Sun.COM> <489AB373.2080601@sun.com> <489AB62F.2070603@Sun.COM> <489B19F3.7000503@Sun.Com> <489C08E7.8090802@Sun.COM> <48A2AAF4.7010901@Sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080225) Status: RO Content-Length: 6603 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_VRSPffhkz2bZNjYjMTZ8vw) Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Sorry! I make a mistake in the last update. I forget to change the SMF service location from: svc:/network/pen to svc:/network/loadbalancer/pen Thanks very much for Kacheong's reminding. Here is the new update: Changing the service location under "loadbalancer" subcategory. Changing the pen service into a multiple instance service; Adding a new "pen:http" instance; Updating pen(1) manpage and fasttrack material. So John Fischer and Jim Walker, could you please help us update the PSARC proposal use this attach file? Thanks! You can also find these at opensolaris site: webrev: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/webrev fast track: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/pen_fasttrack.txt man pages: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/man/man1/pen.1.txt http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/man/man1/mergelogs.1.txt http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/man/man1/penctl.1.txt http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/man/man1/penlog.1.txt http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/man/man1/penlogd.1.txt ssl contract: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/contract-20.txt Thank you! -----Original Message----- From: Kacheong Poon Sent: 08/13/08 17:52 > Jia Ni wrote: >> Hi John Fischer and Jim Walker, >> >> Could you please help us update the PSARC proposal? The attach file is >> the new proposal draft. > > > The FRMI is still not svc:/network/loadbalancer/pen:... > -----Original Message----- From: Jia Ni Sent: 08/13/08 17:35 > Hi John Fischer and Jim Walker, > > Could you please help us update the PSARC proposal? The attach file is the new > proposal draft. > > Thank you! > > > Hi all, > > Huafeng and I have spent some time and update the 'pen' porting project again. > We mainly focus on: > Changing the pen service into a multiple instance service; > Adding a new "pen:http" instance; > Updating pen(1) manpage and fasttrack material. > > You can find the entire changes for pen project at opensolaris site: > You can find webrev at: > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/webrev > > You can find fast track file at: > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/pen_fasttrack.txt > > You can find man pages at: > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/man/man1/pen.1.txt > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/man/man1/mergelogs.1.txt > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/man/man1/penctl.1.txt > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/man/man1/penlog.1.txt > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/man/man1/penlogd.1.txt > > You can find ssl contract at: > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/contract-20.txt > > Thank you! > > -----Original Message----- > From: Darren J Moffat > Sent: 08/08/08 16:50 > >> John Plocher wrote: >>> Darren J Moffat wrote: >>>> You wouldn't use a : in the instance name it would look like this: >>>> >>>> svc:/network/pen:default >>>> May have nothing configured >>>> svc:/network/pen:http80 >>>> pen/listen_port = 80 >>>> svc:/network/pen:http8080 >>>> pen/listen_port = 8080 >>>> >>>> All instances in this case would have the same start/stop methods but >>>> would be able to have different properties. >>> I *think* Huafeng was asking "what specific SMF instances >>> need to be instantiated and delivered by this project?" >> Originally I wasn't suggesting any be delivered other than the >> unconfigured default. >> >> However the project team appears to have agreed to deliver a very useful >> http on port 80 instance as pen:http. A good addition IMO. >> >>> Your examples seem to be more of the "If you set things >>> up correctly, then the user/admin can simply and easily >>> extend the setup to fit their needs". >>> IMO, the man page for the pen program needs to document >>> exactly how one would make and use these "clones". >> That is what I asked for originally, documentation in the man page >> showing how to configure new instances. >> >> > -- Best regards, Jia --Boundary_(ID_VRSPffhkz2bZNjYjMTZ8vw) Content-type: text/plain; name=pen_fasttrack.txt Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline; filename=pen_fasttrack.txt Summary ======= Pen[1] is a tool designed to do load balance for "simple" tcp based protocols such as http or smtp. It allows several servers to appear as one to the outside and automatically detects servers that are down and distributes clients among the available servers. This gives high availability and scalable performance. pen-0.17.2 will be integrated into the SFW consolidation as part of this proposal, and will be installed as SUNWpen. This project requests a minor release binding. Discussion ========== In OpenSolaris, the public interface to start and stop pen will be SMF and the service will be named: svc:/network/loadbalancer/pen It is a multiple instance service. Multiple pen processes can be executed separately at the same time in one machine. A http load balancer service instance is shipped as an example. Users can also create their own instances following the SMF framework. The default instance is: svc:/network/loadbalancer/pen:default The example instance for http load balancer is: svc:/network/loadbalancer/pen:http In order to start pen by SMF, two SMF properties must be set: pen/listenport and pen/servers Other properties can be set optionally. Each SMF property has a corresponding command line option. These properties are explained in the "SMF PROPERTIES" section of the pen(1) manual page. Users can easily change these properties and start pen with different configurations. Note that users can still start pen from command line for other purposes which are not supported by the SMF service (eg., foreground or debug mode). Dependencies ============ OpenSSL (snv_84 version 0.9.8a) Interfaces ========== Exported Interfaces Classification Comment ------------------- -------------- ------- SUNWpen Uncommitted Package /usr/bin/pen Uncommitted Command /usr/bin/mergelogs Uncommitted Command /usr/bin/penctl Uncommitted Command /usr/bin/penlog Uncommitted Command /usr/bin/penlogd Uncommitted Command /usr/share/doc/pen/ Uncommitted Pen documents Imported Interfaces ------------------- NAME STABILITY NOTES OpenSSL External/Volatile PSARC/2003/500 Reference Documents =================== [1] http://siag.nu/pen RFE ID# 6674372 for pen --Boundary_(ID_VRSPffhkz2bZNjYjMTZ8vw)-- From John.Fischer@sun.com Wed Aug 13 11:23:28 2008 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m7DINSsS011615 for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:23:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m7DINRiD038155 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:23:28 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K5J00B0HXR4S300@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:23:28 -0600 (MDT) Received: from brmea-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.98.43]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K5J002MEXR37K70@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:23:27 -0600 (MDT) Received: from fe-amer-10.sun.com ([192.18.109.80]) by brmea-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m7DINREG021674 for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 18:23:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K5J00901VX2RP00@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from John.Fischer@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:23:27 -0600 (MDT) Received: from 129.145.154.66 ([129.145.154.66]) by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K5J000B4XQ6TM10@mail-amer.sun.com>; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:22:56 -0600 (MDT) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:22:54 -0700 From: John Fischer Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] In-reply-to: <48A2C3B0.5090408@Sun.com> Sender: John.Fischer@sun.com To: Jia.Ni@sun.com Cc: John Fischer , Darren J Moffat , John Plocher , Huafeng Lu , Jim Walker , Kacheong.Poon@sun.com, psarc-ext@sun.com Reply-to: John.Fischer@sun.com Message-id: <1218651774.61628.67.camel@sr1-umpk-16> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6.301 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <483609CC.4070603@sun.com> <48369D65.4010005@Sun.COM> <483A5DB8.5030909@Sun.com> <48456293.4020905@Sun.COM> <1217867748.7738.5.camel@sr1-umpk-16> <48982BFC.40909@Sun.COM> <4899291D.9070703@Sun.com> <48996B3A.3050709@Sun.COM> <48998BD8.6040206@Sun.com> <4899A21F.5020302@Sun.COM> <489A7CBE.4070006@sun.com> <489AAED1.9090907@Sun.COM> <489AB373.2080601@sun.com> <489AB62F.2070603@Sun.COM> <489B19F3.7000503@Sun.Com> <489C08E7.8090802@Sun.COM> <48A2AAF4.7010901@Sun.com> <48A2C3B0.5090408@Sun.com> Status: RO Content-Length: 6880 All, I have updated the case directory with the latest specification from Jia. I am still working on the signatures for the contract. Thanks, John On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 04:21, Jia Ni wrote: > Sorry! > I make a mistake in the last update. I forget to change the SMF service > location from: > svc:/network/pen > to > svc:/network/loadbalancer/pen > Thanks very much for Kacheong's reminding. > > Here is the new update: > Changing the service location under "loadbalancer" subcategory. > Changing the pen service into a multiple instance service; > Adding a new "pen:http" instance; > Updating pen(1) manpage and fasttrack material. > > So John Fischer and Jim Walker, could you please help us update the PSARC > proposal use this attach file? > Thanks! > > You can also find these at opensolaris site: > webrev: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/webrev > fast track: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/pen_fasttrack.txt > man pages: > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/man/man1/pen.1.txt > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/man/man1/mergelogs.1.txt > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/man/man1/penctl.1.txt > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/man/man1/penlog.1.txt > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/man/man1/penlogd.1.txt > ssl contract: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/contract-20.txt > > Thank you! > -----Original Message----- > From: Kacheong Poon > Sent: 08/13/08 17:52 > > > Jia Ni wrote: > >> Hi John Fischer and Jim Walker, > >> > >> Could you please help us update the PSARC proposal? The attach file is > >> the new proposal draft. > > > > > > The FRMI is still not svc:/network/loadbalancer/pen:... > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jia Ni > Sent: 08/13/08 17:35 > > > Hi John Fischer and Jim Walker, > > > > Could you please help us update the PSARC proposal? The attach file is the new > > proposal draft. > > > > Thank you! > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > Huafeng and I have spent some time and update the 'pen' porting project again. > > We mainly focus on: > > Changing the pen service into a multiple instance service; > > Adding a new "pen:http" instance; > > Updating pen(1) manpage and fasttrack material. > > > > You can find the entire changes for pen project at opensolaris site: > > You can find webrev at: > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/webrev > > > > You can find fast track file at: > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/pen_fasttrack.txt > > > > You can find man pages at: > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/man/man1/pen.1.txt > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/man/man1/mergelogs.1.txt > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/man/man1/penctl.1.txt > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/man/man1/penlog.1.txt > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/man/man1/penlogd.1.txt > > > > You can find ssl contract at: > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~nijia/pen/contract-20.txt > > > > Thank you! > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Darren J Moffat > > Sent: 08/08/08 16:50 > > > >> John Plocher wrote: > >>> Darren J Moffat wrote: > >>>> You wouldn't use a : in the instance name it would look like this: > >>>> > >>>> svc:/network/pen:default > >>>> May have nothing configured > >>>> svc:/network/pen:http80 > >>>> pen/listen_port = 80 > >>>> svc:/network/pen:http8080 > >>>> pen/listen_port = 8080 > >>>> > >>>> All instances in this case would have the same start/stop methods but > >>>> would be able to have different properties. > >>> I *think* Huafeng was asking "what specific SMF instances > >>> need to be instantiated and delivered by this project?" > >> Originally I wasn't suggesting any be delivered other than the > >> unconfigured default. > >> > >> However the project team appears to have agreed to deliver a very useful > >> http on port 80 instance as pen:http. A good addition IMO. > >> > >>> Your examples seem to be more of the "If you set things > >>> up correctly, then the user/admin can simply and easily > >>> extend the setup to fit their needs". > >>> IMO, the man page for the pen program needs to document > >>> exactly how one would make and use these "clones". > >> That is what I asked for originally, documentation in the man page > >> showing how to configure new instances. > >> > >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > Jia > > ______________________________________________________________________ > Summary > ======= > Pen[1] is a tool designed to do load balance for "simple" tcp based > protocols such as http or smtp. > > It allows several servers to appear as one to the outside and > automatically detects servers that are down and distributes clients > among the available servers. This gives high availability and scalable > performance. > > pen-0.17.2 will be integrated into the SFW consolidation as part of this > proposal, and will be installed as SUNWpen. > > This project requests a minor release binding. > > Discussion > ========== > > In OpenSolaris, the public interface to start and stop pen will be SMF > and the service will be named: > > svc:/network/loadbalancer/pen > > It is a multiple instance service. Multiple pen processes can be > executed separately at the same time in one machine. A http load > balancer service instance is shipped as an example. Users can also > create their own instances following the SMF framework. > > The default instance is: > > svc:/network/loadbalancer/pen:default > > The example instance for http load balancer is: > > svc:/network/loadbalancer/pen:http > > In order to start pen by SMF, two SMF properties must be set: > > pen/listenport and pen/servers > > Other properties can be set optionally. Each SMF property has a > corresponding command line option. These properties are explained in > the "SMF PROPERTIES" section of the pen(1) manual page. Users can > easily change these properties and start pen with different > configurations. > > Note that users can still start pen from command line for other > purposes which are not supported by the SMF service (eg., foreground > or debug mode). > > Dependencies > ============ > > OpenSSL (snv_84 version 0.9.8a) > > Interfaces > ========== > > Exported Interfaces Classification Comment > ------------------- -------------- ------- > SUNWpen Uncommitted Package > /usr/bin/pen Uncommitted Command > /usr/bin/mergelogs Uncommitted Command > /usr/bin/penctl Uncommitted Command > /usr/bin/penlog Uncommitted Command > /usr/bin/penlogd Uncommitted Command > /usr/share/doc/pen/ Uncommitted Pen documents > > Imported Interfaces > ------------------- > NAME STABILITY NOTES > OpenSSL External/Volatile PSARC/2003/500 > > Reference Documents > =================== > [1] http://siag.nu/pen > > RFE ID# 6674372 for pen From John.Fischer@sun.com Fri Aug 29 10:26:57 2008 Received: from sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail3mpk.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.52]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m7THQuQA009865 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:26:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m7THQuiF029084 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:26:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K6D00L09HSUW800@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:26:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brmea-mail-3.sun.com ([192.18.98.34]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K6D00DIAHSTX750@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:26:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-amer-09.sun.com ([192.18.109.79]) by brmea-mail-3.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m7THQqAi020336 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:26:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K6D00M01HBMRI00@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from John.Fischer@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:26:52 -0600 (MDT) Received: from 129.145.154.66 ([129.145.154.66]) by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K6D0040LHSPUJ40@mail-amer.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:26:52 -0600 (MDT) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:26:49 -0700 From: John Fischer Subject: [Fwd: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008]] Sender: John.Fischer@sun.com To: PSARC-ext@sun.com Cc: John.Fischer@sun.com, Huafeng.Lv@sun.com, James.Walker@sun.com, Jia.Ni@sun.com Reply-to: John.Fischer@sun.com Message-id: <1220030808.60555.19.camel@sr1-umpk-16> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6.301 Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Boundary_(ID_cZ70n7YkgWpgVoB6j8uN3w)" X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 Status: RO Content-Length: 2992 --Boundary_(ID_cZ70n7YkgWpgVoB6j8uN3w) Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT All, Darren Moffat had a few issues with this project. The spec has been updated and Darren (see attached) is happy with this final specification. Unless I hear otherwise I will be closing out this fast track on Tuesday, September 2nd, 2008. Thanks, John --Boundary_(ID_cZ70n7YkgWpgVoB6j8uN3w) Content-type: message/rfc822 Content-description: Forwarded message - Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] Return-path: Received: from fe-emea-10.sun.com ([192.18.6.120]) by sfbay3-mail1.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTP id <0K5U00CGCEHE9OD0@sfbay3-mail1.sfbay.sun.com> for John.Fischer@Sun.COM; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 03:00:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-emea-10.sun.com by fe-emea-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K5U00M01DYJWQ00@fe-emea-10.sun.com> (original mail from Darren.Moffat@Sun.COM) for John.Fischer@Sun.COM (ORCPT John.Fischer@Sun.COM); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:00:50 +0100 (BST) Received: from [129.156.173.21] by fe-emea-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K5U00MD1EH1PWC0@fe-emea-10.sun.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:00:39 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:00:37 +0100 From: Darren J Moffat Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] In-reply-to: <48A9C365.1080203@sun.com> Sender: Darren.Moffat@Sun.COM To: James.Walker@Sun.COM Cc: Jia.Ni@Sun.COM, John.Fischer@Sun.COM, John Plocher , Huafeng Lu , Kacheong.Poon@Sun.COM Message-id: <48AA99C5.2030809@Sun.COM> X-Envelope-from: John.Fischer@Sun.COM X-Envelope-to: PSARC-ext <@smarthost.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <200805222315.m4MNFYWQ013391@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <483609CC.4070603@sun.com> <48369D65.4010005@Sun.COM> <483A5DB8.5030909@Sun.com> <48456293.4020905@Sun.COM> <1217867748.7738.5.camel@sr1-umpk-16> <48982BFC.40909@Sun.COM> <4899291D.9070703@Sun.com> <48996B3A.3050709@Sun.COM> <48998BD8.6040206@Sun.com> <4899A21F.5020302@Sun.COM> <489A7CBE.4070006@sun.com> <489AAED1.9090907@Sun.COM> <489AB373.2080601@sun.com> <489AB62F.2070603@Sun.COM> <489B19F3.7000503@Sun.Com> <489C08E7.8090802@Sun.COM> <48A2AAF4.7010901@Sun.com> <48A2C3B0.5090408@Sun.com> <48A9C365.1080203@sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080630) Original-recipient: rfc822;John.Fischer@Sun.COM Jim Walker wrote: > (off main psarc list) > > Thanks Jia. > > Darren, > > I think this resolves the final issue. If so, I would like > to see if we can get this case approved this week. I'm happy with the final spec. -- Darren J Moffat --Boundary_(ID_cZ70n7YkgWpgVoB6j8uN3w)-- From John.Fischer@sun.com Tue Sep 2 16:34:31 2008 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m82NYUCa025167 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 16:34:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m82NYQwU021000; Wed, 3 Sep 2008 00:34:29 +0100 (BST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K6L0050JDHEM100@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 17:34:26 -0600 (MDT) Received: from brmea-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.98.43]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K6L00K5CDHE17C0@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 17:34:26 -0600 (MDT) Received: from fe-amer-09.sun.com ([192.18.109.79]) by brmea-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m82NYPDA027658; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:34:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K6L00901D7H4K00@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from John.Fischer@Sun.COM); Tue, 02 Sep 2008 17:34:25 -0600 (MDT) Received: from 129.145.154.66 ([129.145.154.66]) by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K6L00DGNDHAET00@mail-amer.sun.com>; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 17:34:23 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:34:22 -0700 From: John Fischer Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008]] In-reply-to: <1220030808.60555.19.camel@sr1-umpk-16> Sender: John.Fischer@sun.com To: PSARC-ext@sun.com Cc: John Fischer , Huafeng.Lv@sun.com, James.Walker@sun.com, Jia.Ni@sun.com Reply-to: John.Fischer@sun.com Message-id: <1220398461.42222.2.camel@sr1-umpk-16> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6.301 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <1220030808.60555.19.camel@sr1-umpk-16> Status: RO Content-Length: 1077 All, I am closing this fast track as approved. Thanks, John On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 10:26, John Fischer wrote: > All, > > Darren Moffat had a few issues with this project. > The spec has been updated and Darren (see attached) > is happy with this final specification. > > Unless I hear otherwise I will be closing out this > fast track on Tuesday, September 2nd, 2008. > > Thanks, > > John > > ______________________________________________________________________ > From: Darren J Moffat > To: James.Walker@Sun.COM > Cc: Jia.Ni@Sun.COM, John.Fischer@Sun.COM, John Plocher , Huafeng Lu , Kacheong.Poon@Sun.COM > Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] > Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:00:37 +0100 > > Jim Walker wrote: > > (off main psarc list) > > > > Thanks Jia. > > > > Darren, > > > > I think this resolves the final issue. If so, I would like > > to see if we can get this case approved this week. > > I'm happy with the final spec. > > -- > Darren J Moffat From Huafeng.Lv@sun.com Tue Sep 2 18:36:10 2008 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m831a962028672 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 18:36:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id m831a6H1003978; Wed, 3 Sep 2008 02:36:08 +0100 (BST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0K6L00J0HJ46OH00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:36:06 -0600 (MDT) Received: from gmp-eb-inf-2.sun.com ([192.18.6.24]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0K6L0087MJ45EHA0@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:36:06 -0600 (MDT) Received: from fe-emea-09.sun.com (gmp-eb-lb-1-fe3.eu.sun.com [192.18.6.10]) by gmp-eb-inf-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m831a5Jm010237; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 01:36:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-emea-09.sun.com by fe-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K6L00501IXHWD00@fe-emea-09.sun.com> (original mail from Huafeng.Lv@Sun.COM); Wed, 03 Sep 2008 02:36:05 +0100 (BST) Received: from [129.158.215.196] by fe-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K6L00LBMJ427AE0@fe-emea-09.sun.com>; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 02:36:05 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 09:35:03 +0800 From: Huafeng Lu Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008]] In-reply-to: <1220398461.42222.2.camel@sr1-umpk-16> Sender: Huafeng.Lv@sun.com To: John.Fischer@sun.com Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com, James.Walker@sun.com, Jia.Ni@sun.com Message-id: <48BDE9C7.9070705@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <1220030808.60555.19.camel@sr1-umpk-16> <1220398461.42222.2.camel@sr1-umpk-16> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071119) Status: RO Content-Length: 1158 John Fischer д: > All, > > I am closing this fast track as approved. Great! And thanks John. :) > > Thanks, > > John > > On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 10:26, John Fischer wrote: >> All, >> >> Darren Moffat had a few issues with this project. >> The spec has been updated and Darren (see attached) >> is happy with this final specification. >> >> Unless I hear otherwise I will be closing out this >> fast track on Tuesday, September 2nd, 2008. >> >> Thanks, >> >> John >> >> ______________________________________________________________________ >> From: Darren J Moffat >> To: James.Walker@Sun.COM >> Cc: Jia.Ni@Sun.COM, John.Fischer@Sun.COM, John Plocher , Huafeng Lu , Kacheong.Poon@Sun.COM >> Subject: Re: pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008] >> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:00:37 +0100 >> >> Jim Walker wrote: >>> (off main psarc list) >>> >>> Thanks Jia. >>> >>> Darren, >>> >>> I think this resolves the final issue. If so, I would like >>> to see if we can get this case approved this week. >> I'm happy with the final spec. >> >> -- >> Darren J Moffat > From John.Fischer@sun.com Wed Apr 22 15:22:31 2009 Received: from sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail3mpk.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.52]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3MMMURs024822 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:22:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n3MMMSdn004601 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:22:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KII0000VWTFVP00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:22:27 -0600 (MDT) Received: from brmea-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.98.31]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KII002XUWTE4KB0@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:22:26 -0600 (MDT) Received: from fe-amer-09.sun.com ([192.18.109.79]) by brmea-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n3MMMQ4n021826 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:22:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-5.01 64bit (built Feb 19 2009)) id <0KII00K00WI7UT00@mail-amer.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:22:26 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [192.168.10.4] ([unknown] [76.20.56.47]) by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-5.01 64bit (built Feb 19 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KII00FZ4WTDFMI0@mail-amer.sun.com>; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:22:25 -0600 (MDT) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:21:22 -0700 From: John Fischer Subject: pen load balancer - PSARC/2008/339 Sender: John.Fischer@sun.com To: PSARC-ext@sun.com Cc: Shuang.Mi@sun.com, Norm.Jacobs@sun.com, Fred.Thornborrow@sun.com, Jim Walker Reply-to: John.Fischer@sun.com Message-id: <49EF9862.8050700@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090323) Status: RO Content-Length: 1888 PSARC, This case was approved on May 29th, 2008. It originally proposed to include pen-0.17.2. The project team is proposing to use pen-0.18.0 instead and is including an SMF service method and manifest within a SUNWpenr package all declared Uncommitted. The diffs between what they are now proposing from the previous proposal is below. The new proposal is attached and included in the case directory. If anyone has any issues please raise them before Friday, April 24th, 2009 COB PST. We can either extend the timer or file a new case if you like. Thanks, John *** proposal.txt.orig3 Wed Aug 13 10:05:28 2008 --- proposal.txt Wed Apr 22 15:11:31 2009 *************** *** 8,15 **** among the available servers. This gives high availability and scalable performance. ! pen-0.17.2 will be integrated into the SFW consolidation as part of this ! proposal, and will be installed as SUNWpen. This project requests a minor release binding. --- 8,15 ---- among the available servers. This gives high availability and scalable performance. ! pen-0.18.0 will be integrated into the SFW consolidation as part of this ! proposal, and will be installed as SUNWpen and SUNWpenr. This project requests a minor release binding. *************** *** 66,71 **** --- 66,76 ---- /usr/bin/penlogd Uncommitted Command /usr/share/doc/pen/ Uncommitted Pen documents + SUNWpenr Uncommitted Package (Root) + /lib/svc/method/pen Uncommitted Service Method + /var/svc/manifest/network/loadbalancer/pen.xml + Uncommitted Service Manifest + Imported Interfaces ------------------- NAME STABILITY NOTES From Mark.Carlson@sun.com Wed Apr 22 15:27:43 2009 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3MMRh0W024903 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:27:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n3MMRgqP039490 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:27:43 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KII0010DX25EU00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:27:41 -0600 (MDT) Received: from brmea-mail-4.sun.com ([192.18.98.36]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KII00202X2349C0@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:27:39 -0600 (MDT) Received: from fe-amer-10.sun.com ([192.18.109.80]) by brmea-mail-4.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n3MMRd3S002802 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:27:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-5.01 64bit (built Feb 19 2009)) id <0KII00000VOAGF00@mail-amer.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:27:39 -0600 (MDT) Received: from Macintosh-335.local ([unknown] [129.150.35.120]) by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-5.01 64bit (built Feb 19 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KII009MJX1ZZGA0@mail-amer.sun.com>; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:27:35 -0600 (MDT) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:27:35 -0600 From: "Mark A. Carlson" Subject: Re: pen load balancer - PSARC/2008/339 In-reply-to: <49EF9862.8050700@sun.com> Sender: Mark.Carlson@sun.com To: John.Fischer@sun.com Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com, Norm.Jacobs@sun.com, Fred.Thornborrow@sun.com Message-id: <49EF99D7.9000905@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_PqJ6yn1EQiBXB4i6TUAQeg)" X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <49EF9862.8050700@sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Macintosh/20090302) Status: RO Content-Length: 7724 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_PqJ6yn1EQiBXB4i6TUAQeg) Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT +1 -- mark John Fischer wrote: > PSARC, > > This case was approved on May 29th, 2008. It originally proposed to > include pen-0.17.2. The project team is proposing to use pen-0.18.0 > instead and is including an SMF service method and manifest within a > SUNWpenr package all declared Uncommitted. The diffs between what > they are now proposing from the previous proposal is below. The new > proposal is attached and included in the case directory. > > If anyone has any issues please raise them before Friday, April 24th, > 2009 COB PST. We can either extend the timer or file a new case if > you like. > > Thanks, > > John > > *** proposal.txt.orig3 Wed Aug 13 10:05:28 2008 > --- proposal.txt Wed Apr 22 15:11:31 2009 > *************** > *** 8,15 **** > among the available servers. This gives high availability and > scalable > performance. > > ! pen-0.17.2 will be integrated into the SFW consolidation as > part of this > ! proposal, and will be installed as SUNWpen. > > This project requests a minor release binding. > > --- 8,15 ---- > among the available servers. This gives high availability and > scalable > performance. > > ! pen-0.18.0 will be integrated into the SFW consolidation as > part of this > ! proposal, and will be installed as SUNWpen and SUNWpenr. > > This project requests a minor release binding. > > *************** > *** 66,71 **** > --- 66,76 ---- > /usr/bin/penlogd Uncommitted Command > /usr/share/doc/pen/ Uncommitted Pen documents > > + SUNWpenr Uncommitted Package (Root) > + /lib/svc/method/pen Uncommitted Service Method > + /var/svc/manifest/network/loadbalancer/pen.xml > + Uncommitted Service Manifest > + > Imported Interfaces > ------------------- > NAME STABILITY NOTES > _______________________________________________ > opensolaris-arc mailing list > opensolaris-arc@opensolaris.org -- * Mark A. Carlson * Sr. Architect *Systems Group* Phone x69559 / 303-223-6139 Email Mark.Carlson@Sun.COM --Boundary_(ID_PqJ6yn1EQiBXB4i6TUAQeg) Content-type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT +1

-- mark

John Fischer wrote:
PSARC,

This case was approved on May 29th, 2008.  It originally proposed to
include pen-0.17.2.  The project team is proposing to use pen-0.18.0
instead and is including an SMF service method and manifest within a
SUNWpenr package all declared Uncommitted.  The diffs between what
they are now proposing from the previous proposal is below.  The new
proposal is attached and included in the case directory.

If anyone has any issues please raise them before Friday, April 24th,
2009 COB PST.  We can either extend the timer or file a new case if
you like.

Thanks,

John

*** proposal.txt.orig3  Wed Aug 13 10:05:28 2008
--- proposal.txt        Wed Apr 22 15:11:31 2009
***************
*** 8,15 ****
        among the available servers. This gives high availability and scalable
        performance.

!       pen-0.17.2 will be integrated into the SFW consolidation as part of this
!       proposal, and will be installed as SUNWpen.

        This project requests a minor release binding.

--- 8,15 ----
        among the available servers. This gives high availability and scalable
        performance.

!       pen-0.18.0 will be integrated into the SFW consolidation as part of this
!       proposal, and will be installed as SUNWpen and SUNWpenr.

        This project requests a minor release binding.

***************
*** 66,71 ****
--- 66,76 ----
        /usr/bin/penlogd                Uncommitted     Command
        /usr/share/doc/pen/             Uncommitted     Pen documents

+         SUNWpenr                      Uncommitted     Package (Root)
+       /lib/svc/method/pen             Uncommitted     Service Method
+       /var/svc/manifest/network/loadbalancer/pen.xml
+                                       Uncommitted     Service Manifest
+
        Imported Interfaces
        -------------------
        NAME            STABILITY               NOTES
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-arc mailing list
opensolaris-arc@opensolaris.org

--
Mark A. Carlson
Sr. Architect

Systems Group
Phone x69559 / 303-223-6139
Email Mark.Carlson@Sun.COM

--Boundary_(ID_PqJ6yn1EQiBXB4i6TUAQeg)--