IAM ====== Name: iSCSI Boot Submitter: jack.meng@sun.com Owner: Mark Carlson Intern: Dean Roehrich Interest: iscsi-boot-iteam@sun.com Status: inception scheduled 07/16/2008 Exposure: open Comment: SUMMARY ======= This project is to enable Solaris to boot off iSCSI luns via regular network adapters. Different approaches, iBFT/OBP, are adopted to implement this feature on x86/sparc platforms. This case supersedes PSARC/2007/450, iSCSI Software boot. ISSUES ====== gcs-1) I'm not sure I understand what the case boundaries are. In particular, does this case depend on aonther case to deliver firmware modified to understand iSCSI, does it deliver such modifications itself, or am I missing something that renders the question moot? ANSWER: On the SPARC side, firmware will be built. There is a dependency on this firmware project. OBP Project team to submit a one pager for this project that poses a dependency. gcs-2) Along those same lines, this case says it supercedes 2007/450. Did that case ever actually deliver anything? ANSWER: Did not deliver anything. Make sure functional spec list & previous issues file is complete. kb-01 IS the iSCSI boot of Xen virtual machines in this project's scope? ANSWER: Out of intended scope because it can already be done. Note this in the materials. kb-02 Not clear about the direction on the dependency on the Solaris automated installer. ANSWER: Once delivered, the automated installer will want to take advantage of features provided. Note this dependency in case material and spec. kb-03 Need more details about the intended twistes to the TCP/IP stack and sockfs for supporting polled I/O ANSWER: There was a conversation around this related to previous case. ... What is good enough for diskless booting is good enough for iSCSI. Project team needs to answer: Does the iSCSI Booting support change the situation for dump support resulting from a diskless crash. Project Team answer is No changes. gcs-3 Q: Where doese the CAP implementation live? Does it have to be in the firmware. A: Yes. x86 side - No impact. SPARC side - Yes / Another case dependency THE NEXT STEP ============= -Work with the case owners on the issues above -Draft opinion and updated spec is enough for voting on this case. This is per judgement of case owner. -Schedule business vote for this case.