From Thu Jan 8 17:16:50 2009 Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 17:16:50 -0800 (PST) From: Postmaster Subject: Message from mail server Content-Length: 95 Mime-Version: 1.0 Status: RO X-IMAP: 1231463810 12 Delete. This is a system message. --END+PSEUDO-- From jw137282@sac.sfbay.sun.com Sun Dec 14 14:57:20 2008 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBEMvJ3p020633 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:57:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id mBEMv8eV028067; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 22:57:18 GMT Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KBW00M012FFG100@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:57:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from dm-sfbay-01.sfbay.sun.com ([129.145.155.118]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KBW00DXE2FFR740@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:57:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from sac.sfbay.sun.com (new-sac.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.175.65]) by dm-sfbay-01.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id mBEMvE0k046469; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:57:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from sac.sfbay.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBEMvCb1020627; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:57:12 -0800 (PST) Received: (from jw137282@localhost) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/Submit) id mBEMvCQm020623; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:57:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:57:12 -0800 (PST) From: James Walker Subject: patchutils [PSARC/2008/770 FastTrack timeout 12/22/2008] To: PSARC-ext@sun.com Cc: jason.li@sun.com Message-id: <200812142257.mBEMvCQm020623@sac.sfbay.sun.com> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 Content-Length: 14477 Status: RO X-Status: $$$$ X-UID: 0000000001 I'm sponsoring this case for Jason Li, the timeout is set to expire next Monday December 22, 2008. The requested release binding is minor. Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase %I% %G% SMI This information is Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems 1. Introduction 1.1. Project/Component Working Name: patchutils 1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier: Author: Jason Li 1.3 Date of This Document: 14 December, 2008 4. Technical Description Patchutils Check List 1.0 Project Information 1.1 Name of project/component patchutils 1.2 Author of document Jason.Li@Sun.COM 2.0 Project Summary 2.1 Project Description Patchutils is a small collection of programs that operate on patch files. Interdiff generates an incremental patch from two patches against a common source. For example, if you have applied a pre-patch to a source tree, and wish to apply another pre-patch (which is against the same original source tree), you can use interdiff to generate the patch that you need to apply. You can also use this to review changes between two pre-patches. Combinediff generates a single patch from two incremental patches, allowing you to merge patches together. The resulting patch file only alters each file once. Filterdiff will select the portions of a patch file that apply to files matching (or, alternatively, not matching) a shell wildcard. Fixcvsdiff is for correcting the output of 'cvs diff'. Rediff corrects hand-edited patches, by comparing the original patch with the modified one and adjusting the offsets and counts. Lsdiff displays a short listing of affected files in a patch file, along with (optionally) the line numbers of the start of each patch. Splitdiff separates out patches from a patch file so that each new patch file only alters any given file once. In this way, a file containing several incremental patches can be split into individual incremental patches. Grepdiff displays a list of the files modified by a patch where the patch contains a given regular expression. Recountdiff fixes up counts and offsets in a unified diff. Unwrapdiff fixes word-wrapped unified diffs. patchutils-0.3.0 will be integrated into the SFW consolidation as part of this proposal, and will be installed as SUNWpatchutils. 2.2 Release binding What is is the release binding? (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/release-taxonomy/) [ ] Major [*] Minor [ ] Patch or Micro [ ] Unknown -- ARC review required 2.3 Type of project Is this case a Linux Familiarity project? [*] Yes [ ] No 2.4 Originating Community 2.4.1 Community Name cyberelk - Tim Waugh [1] 2.4.2 Community Involvement Indicate Sun's involvement in the community [ ] Maintainer [ ] Contributor [*] Monitoring Will the project team work with the upstream community to resolve architectural issues of interest to Sun? [*] Yes [ ] No - briefly explain Will we or are we forking from the community? [ ] Yes - ARC review required prior to forking [*] No 3.0 Technical Description 3.1 Installation & Sharable 3.1.1S Solaris Installation - section only required for Solaris Software (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/install-locations/ for details) Does this project follow the Install Locations best practice? [*] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required Does this project install into /usr under [sbin|bin|lib|include|man|share]? [*] Yes [ ] No or N/A Does this project install into /opt? [ ] Yes - explain below [*] No or N/A Does this project install into a different directory structure? [ ] Yes - ARC review required [*] No or N/A Do any of the components of this project conflict with anything under /usr? (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/2007/047/ for details) [ ] Yes - explain below [*] No If conflicts exist then will this project install under /usr/gnu? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required [*] N/A Is this project installing into /usr/sfw? [ ] Yes - ARC review required [*] No 3.1.1W Windows Installation - section only required for Windows Software (see http://sac.sfbay/WSARC/2002/494 for details) Does this project install software into a :\Program Files\Sun\ or :\Sun\ directory? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required Does the project use the Windows registry? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required Does the project use HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Sun Microsystems\\ for the registry key? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required Is the project's stored location HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Sun Microsystems\\\Path? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required 3.1.2 Share and Sharable Does the module include any components that are used or shared by other projects? [ ] Yes [*] No If yes are these components packaged to be shared with the other FOSS? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required [*] N/A Are these components already in the Solaris WOS? [ ] Yes [*] No - continue with next section (section 3.2) If yes are these newer versions being delivered? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required If yes are the newer versions replacing the existing versions? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required 3.2 Exported Libraries Are libraries being delivered by this project? [ ] Yes [*] No - continue with next section (section 3.3) Are 64-bit versions of the libraries being delivered? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required Are static versions of the libraries being delivered? [ ] Yes - ARC review required [ ] No 3.3 Services and the /etc Directory (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/SMF-policy/) Does the project integrate anything into /etc/init.d or /etc/rc?.d? [ ] Yes - ARC review required [*] No Does the project integrate any new entries into /etc/inittab or /etc/inetd.conf? [ ] Yes - ARC review required [*] No Does the project integrate any private non-public files into /etc/default or /etc/ configuration files? [ ] Yes - ARC review required [*] No Does the service manifests method context grant rights above that of the noaccess user and basic privilege set? [ ] Yes - ARC review required [*] No 3.4 Security 3.4.1 Secure By Default (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/secure-by-default/ for details) (see http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/NITS-policy/ for details) (see parts of http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/SMF-policy/ for addtional details) Are there any network services provided by this project? [ ] Yes [*] No - continue with the next section (section 3.4.2) Are network services enabled by default? [ ] Yes - ARC review required [ ] No [ ] N/A Are network services automatically enabled by the project during installation? [ ] Yes - ARC review required [ ] No [ ] N/A Are inbound network communications denied by default? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required [ ] N/A Is inbound data checked to prevent content-based attacks? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required [ ] N/A Is the outbound receiver authenticated? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required [ ] N/A Is the receiver authenticated prior to receiving any sensitive outbound communication? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required [ ] N/A 3.4.2 Authorization (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/bestpractices/rbac-intro/ and http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/bestpractices/rbac-profiles/ and http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/bestpractices/rbac-profiles/ for details) Are there any setuid/setgid privileged binaries in the project? [ ] Yes - ARC review required [*] No - continue with next section (section 3.4.3) If yes then are the setuid/setgid privileges handled by the use of roles? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required 3.4.3 Auditing (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/audit-policy/ for details) (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/2003/397 for details) Does this component contain administrative or security enforcing software? [ ] Yes - ARC review required [*] No - continue to next section (section 3.4.4) (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/2003/397 for details) Do the components create audit logs detailing what took place including what event took place, who was involved, when the event took place? [ ] Yes - ARC contract and Audit project team review required [*] No - ARC review required 3.4.4 Authentication (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/PAM/) Do the components contain any authentication code? [ ] Yes [*] No - continue to next section (section 3.4.5) If yes do the components use PAM (plugable authentication modules) for authentication? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required If yes is a single PAM session maintained during authentication? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required If yes are the components sufficiently privileged to allow the requested operations (authentication, password change, process credential manipulation, audit state initialization)? [ ] Yes - briefly describe below [ ] No - ARC review required 3.4.5 Passwords (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/bestpractices/passwords-cli/ and http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/bestpractices/passwords-files/ for details) Do any of the components for the project deal with passwords? [ ] Yes [*] No - continue to next section (section 3.4.6) If yes are these passwords entered via the CLI or environment? [ ] Yes - ARC review required [ ] No Are passwords stored within the file system for the component? [ ] Yes [ ] No - continue to next section (section 3.4.6) If yes are the permissions on the file such to protect exposing the password(s)? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required 3.4.6 General Security Questions (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/bestpractices/security-questions/ for details) Are there any network protocols used by this project? [ ] Yes [*] No - continue with the next section (section 3.5) Do the components use standard network protocols? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required Do network services for the project make decisions based upon user, host or service identities? [ ] Yes - explain below [ ] No [ ] N/A Do the components make use of secret information during authentication and/or authorization? [ ] Yes - explain below [ ] No [ ] N/A 3.5 Networking Do the components access the network? [ ] Yes [*] No - continue with the next section (section 3.6) If yes do the components support IPv6? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required 3.6 Core Solaris Components Do the components of this project compete with or duplicate core Solaris components? [ ] Yes - ARC review required [*] No Examples of Core Solaris Components include but are not limited to: Secure By Default Authorizations PAM -- Plugable Authentication Module Privilege PRM -- Process Rights Management -- Privilege Audit xVm -- Virtualization zones / Solaris Containers PRM -- Process Rights Management RBAC -- Role Based Access Control TX / Trusted Extensions ZFS SMF -- Service Management Facility FMA -- Fault Management Architecture SCF -- Smart Card Facility IPsec 4.0 Interfaces 4.1 Exported Interfaces Interface Name Classification Comments --------------------------- ------------------- --------------------------- SUNWpatchutils Uncommitted Package /usr/bin/filterdiff Uncommitted Executable binary file /usr/bin/interdiff Uncommitted Executable binary file /usr/bin/rediff Uncommitted Executable binary file /usr/bin/lsdiff Uncommitted Symbol link to filterdiff /usr/bin/grepdiff Uncommitted Symbol link to filterdiff /usr/bin/combinediff Uncommitted Symbol link to interdiff /usr/bin/flipdiff Uncommitted Symbol link to interdiff /usr/bin/dehtmldiff Uncommitted Perl script /usr/bin/editdiff Uncommitted Perl script /usr/bin/espdiff Uncommitted Perl script /usr/bin/fixcvsdiff Uncommitted Perl script /usr/bin/recountdiff Uncommitted Perl script /usr/bin/splitdiff Uncommitted Perl script /usr/bin/unwrapdiff Uncommitted Perl script 4.2 Imported Interfaces Interface Name Classification Comments --------------------------- -------------------- -------------------------- SUNWbash Volatile Package SUNWperl584core Uncommitted Package Appendix A - References [1] http://cyberelk.net/tim/patchutils OSR ID# 10611 RFE ID# 6775972 6. Resources and Schedule 6.4. Steering Committee requested information 6.4.1. Consolidation C-team Name: SFW 6.5. ARC review type: FastTrack 6.6. ARC Exposure: open From danek.duvall@sun.com Sun Dec 14 16:28:10 2008 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBF0S99x007817 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:28:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id mBF0Rhie028253 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:28:07 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KBW00B036MTPB00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:28:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from dm-sfbay-01.sfbay.sun.com ([129.145.155.118]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KBW00DOT6MTR8E0@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:28:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from mumak.SFBay.Sun.COM (mumak.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.229.4]) by dm-sfbay-01.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id mBF0S3SI028886; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:28:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from mumak.SFBay.Sun.COM (mumak [127.0.0.1]) by mumak.SFBay.Sun.COM (8.14.3+Sun/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mBF0TclH027591; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:29:38 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dduvall@localhost) by mumak.SFBay.Sun.COM (8.14.3+Sun/8.14.3/Submit) id mBF0Tcnp027590; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:29:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:29:33 -0800 From: Danek Duvall Subject: Re: patchutils [PSARC/2008/770 FastTrack timeout 12/22/2008] In-reply-to: <200812142257.mBEMvCQm020623@sac.sfbay.sun.com> To: James Walker Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com, jason.li@sun.com Message-id: <20081215002933.GB25343@mumak.SFBay.Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200812142257.mBEMvCQm020623@sac.sfbay.sun.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-27) Content-Length: 367 Status: RO X-Status: $$$$ X-UID: 0000000002 > 4.2 Imported Interfaces > > Interface Name Classification Comments > --------------------------- -------------------- -------------------------- > SUNWbash Volatile Package You don't mention in the exported interface table that any of the executables are bash scripts -- is there some other reason you're depending on bash? +1 Danek From gdamore@sun.com Sun Dec 14 16:53:29 2008 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBF0rSg5007982 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:53:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id mBF0rHSa003276 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:53:27 GMT Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KBW00F037SZ9P00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.Com); Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:53:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from sca-es-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.43.133]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KBW00C687SZAL10@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.Com); Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:53:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id mBF0rNWO005952 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:53:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-09.sun.com by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0KBW00C017M78E00@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> (original mail from gdamore@sun.com) for PSARC-ext@Sun.Com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.Com); Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:53:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.7.251.172] by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0KBW005U17SY0SA0@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com>; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:53:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:45:45 -0800 From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: Re: patchutils [PSARC/2008/770 FastTrack timeout 12/22/2008] In-reply-to: <200812142257.mBEMvCQm020623@sac.sfbay.sun.com> Sender: Garrett.Damore@sun.com To: James Walker Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com, Jason.Li@sun.com Message-id: <4945A8B9.3030400@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200812142257.mBEMvCQm020623@sac.sfbay.sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080616) Content-Length: 15624 Status: RO X-Status: $$$$ X-UID: 0000000003 +1 on architectural content -- architecturally this case is pretty obvious. This looks like another case of just packaging all FOSS software on the planet up into IPS/OpenSolaris. But as an ARC member, I guess it is no longer our position to argue on the "merit" of including a piece of software or not. -- Garrett James Walker wrote: > I'm sponsoring this case for Jason Li, the timeout is set to expire next > Monday December 22, 2008. The requested release binding is minor. > > Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase %I% %G% SMI > This information is Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems > 1. Introduction > 1.1. Project/Component Working Name: > patchutils > 1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier: > Author: Jason Li > 1.3 Date of This Document: > 14 December, 2008 > 4. Technical Description > Patchutils Check List > 1.0 Project Information > 1.1 Name of project/component > patchutils > > 1.2 Author of document > Jason.Li@Sun.COM > > 2.0 Project Summary > 2.1 Project Description > Patchutils is a small collection of programs that operate on patch files. > > Interdiff generates an incremental patch from two patches against a common > source. For example, if you have applied a pre-patch to a source tree, and > wish to apply another pre-patch (which is against the same original source > tree), you can use interdiff to generate the patch that you need to apply. > You can also use this to review changes between two pre-patches. > > Combinediff generates a single patch from two incremental patches, allowing > you to merge patches together. The resulting patch file only alters each > file once. > > Filterdiff will select the portions of a patch file that apply to files > matching (or, alternatively, not matching) a shell wildcard. > > Fixcvsdiff is for correcting the output of 'cvs diff'. > > Rediff corrects hand-edited patches, by comparing the original patch with > the modified one and adjusting the offsets and counts. > > Lsdiff displays a short listing of affected files in a patch file, along > with (optionally) the line numbers of the start of each patch. > > Splitdiff separates out patches from a patch file so that each new patch > file only alters any given file once. In this way, a file containing several > incremental patches can be split into individual incremental patches. > > Grepdiff displays a list of the files modified by a patch where the patch > contains a given regular expression. > > Recountdiff fixes up counts and offsets in a unified diff. > > Unwrapdiff fixes word-wrapped unified diffs. > > patchutils-0.3.0 will be integrated into the SFW consolidation as part of > this proposal, and will be installed as SUNWpatchutils. > > 2.2 Release binding > What is is the release binding? > (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/release-taxonomy/) > [ ] Major > [*] Minor > [ ] Patch or Micro > [ ] Unknown -- ARC review required > > 2.3 Type of project > Is this case a Linux Familiarity project? > [*] Yes > [ ] No > > 2.4 Originating Community > 2.4.1 Community Name > cyberelk - Tim Waugh [1] > > 2.4.2 Community Involvement > Indicate Sun's involvement in the community > [ ] Maintainer > [ ] Contributor > [*] Monitoring > > Will the project team work with the upstream community to resolve > architectural issues of interest to Sun? > [*] Yes > [ ] No - briefly explain > > Will we or are we forking from the community? > [ ] Yes - ARC review required prior to forking > [*] No > > 3.0 Technical Description > 3.1 Installation & Sharable > 3.1.1S Solaris Installation - section only required for Solaris Software > (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/install-locations/ for details) > Does this project follow the Install Locations best practice? > [*] Yes > [ ] No - ARC review required > > Does this project install into /usr under [sbin|bin|lib|include|man|share]? > [*] Yes > [ ] No or N/A > > Does this project install into /opt? > [ ] Yes - explain below > [*] No or N/A > > Does this project install into a different directory structure? > [ ] Yes - ARC review required > [*] No or N/A > > Do any of the components of this project conflict with anything under /usr? > (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/2007/047/ for details) > [ ] Yes - explain below > [*] No > > If conflicts exist then will this project install under /usr/gnu? > [ ] Yes > [ ] No - ARC review required > [*] N/A > > Is this project installing into /usr/sfw? > [ ] Yes - ARC review required > [*] No > > 3.1.1W Windows Installation - section only required for Windows Software > (see http://sac.sfbay/WSARC/2002/494 for details) > Does this project install software into a > :\Program Files\Sun\ or :\Sun\ > directory? > [ ] Yes > [ ] No - ARC review required > > Does the project use the Windows registry? > [ ] Yes > [ ] No - ARC review required > > Does the project use > HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Sun Microsystems\\ > for the registry key? > [ ] Yes > [ ] No - ARC review required > > Is the project's stored location > HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Sun Microsystems\\\Path? > [ ] Yes > [ ] No - ARC review required > > 3.1.2 Share and Sharable > Does the module include any components that are used or shared by > other projects? > [ ] Yes > [*] No > > If yes are these components packaged to be shared with the other FOSS? > [ ] Yes > [ ] No - ARC review required > [*] N/A > > Are these components already in the Solaris WOS? > [ ] Yes > [*] No - continue with next section (section 3.2) > > If yes are these newer versions being delivered? > [ ] Yes > [ ] No - ARC review required > > If yes are the newer versions replacing the existing versions? > [ ] Yes > [ ] No - ARC review required > > 3.2 Exported Libraries > Are libraries being delivered by this project? > [ ] Yes > [*] No - continue with next section (section 3.3) > > Are 64-bit versions of the libraries being delivered? > [ ] Yes > [ ] No - ARC review required > > Are static versions of the libraries being delivered? > [ ] Yes - ARC review required > [ ] No > > 3.3 Services and the /etc Directory > (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/SMF-policy/) > Does the project integrate anything into /etc/init.d or /etc/rc?.d? > [ ] Yes - ARC review required > [*] No > > Does the project integrate any new entries into /etc/inittab or > /etc/inetd.conf? > [ ] Yes - ARC review required > [*] No > > Does the project integrate any private non-public files into /etc/default > or /etc/ configuration files? > [ ] Yes - ARC review required > [*] No > > Does the service manifests method context grant rights above that > of the noaccess user and basic privilege set? > [ ] Yes - ARC review required > [*] No > > 3.4 Security > 3.4.1 Secure By Default > (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/secure-by-default/ for details) > (see http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/NITS-policy/ for details) > (see parts of http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/SMF-policy/ for > addtional details) > Are there any network services provided by this project? > [ ] Yes > [*] No - continue with the next section (section 3.4.2) > > Are network services enabled by default? > [ ] Yes - ARC review required > [ ] No > [ ] N/A > > Are network services automatically enabled by the project during installation? > [ ] Yes - ARC review required > [ ] No > [ ] N/A > > Are inbound network communications denied by default? > [ ] Yes > [ ] No - ARC review required > [ ] N/A > > Is inbound data checked to prevent content-based attacks? > [ ] Yes > [ ] No - ARC review required > [ ] N/A > > Is the outbound receiver authenticated? > [ ] Yes > [ ] No - ARC review required > [ ] N/A > > Is the receiver authenticated prior to receiving any sensitive outbound communication? > [ ] Yes > [ ] No - ARC review required > [ ] N/A > > 3.4.2 Authorization > (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/bestpractices/rbac-intro/ and > http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/bestpractices/rbac-profiles/ and > http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/bestpractices/rbac-profiles/ > for details) > Are there any setuid/setgid privileged binaries in the project? > [ ] Yes - ARC review required > [*] No - continue with next section (section 3.4.3) > > If yes then are the setuid/setgid privileges handled by the use of roles? > [ ] Yes > [ ] No - ARC review required > > 3.4.3 Auditing > (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/audit-policy/ for details) > (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/2003/397 for details) > Does this component contain administrative or security enforcing software? > [ ] Yes - ARC review required > [*] No - continue to next section (section 3.4.4) > > (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/2003/397 for details) > Do the components create audit logs detailing what took place including what event > took place, who was involved, when the event took place? > [ ] Yes - ARC contract and Audit project team review required > [*] No - ARC review required > > > 3.4.4 Authentication > (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/PAM/) > Do the components contain any authentication code? > [ ] Yes > [*] No - continue to next section (section 3.4.5) > > If yes do the components use PAM (plugable authentication modules) for authentication? > [ ] Yes > [ ] No - ARC review required > > If yes is a single PAM session maintained during authentication? > [ ] Yes > [ ] No - ARC review required > > If yes are the components sufficiently privileged to allow the requested > operations (authentication, password change, process credential manipulation, > audit state initialization)? > [ ] Yes - briefly describe below > [ ] No - ARC review required > > 3.4.5 Passwords > (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/bestpractices/passwords-cli/ and > http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/bestpractices/passwords-files/ for details) > Do any of the components for the project deal with passwords? > [ ] Yes > [*] No - continue to next section (section 3.4.6) > > If yes are these passwords entered via the CLI or environment? > [ ] Yes - ARC review required > [ ] No > > Are passwords stored within the file system for the component? > [ ] Yes > [ ] No - continue to next section (section 3.4.6) > > If yes are the permissions on the file such to protect exposing the password(s)? > [ ] Yes > [ ] No - ARC review required > > 3.4.6 General Security Questions > (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/bestpractices/security-questions/ for details) > Are there any network protocols used by this project? > [ ] Yes > [*] No - continue with the next section (section 3.5) > > Do the components use standard network protocols? > [ ] Yes > [ ] No - ARC review required > > Do network services for the project make decisions based upon user, host or > service identities? > [ ] Yes - explain below > [ ] No > [ ] N/A > > Do the components make use of secret information during authentication and/or > authorization? > [ ] Yes - explain below > [ ] No > [ ] N/A > > 3.5 Networking > Do the components access the network? > [ ] Yes > [*] No - continue with the next section (section 3.6) > > If yes do the components support IPv6? > [ ] Yes > [ ] No - ARC review required > > 3.6 Core Solaris Components > Do the components of this project compete with or duplicate core > Solaris components? > [ ] Yes - ARC review required > [*] No > > Examples of Core Solaris Components include but are not limited to: > > Secure By Default > Authorizations > PAM -- Plugable Authentication Module > Privilege > PRM -- Process Rights Management -- Privilege > Audit > xVm -- Virtualization > zones / Solaris Containers > PRM -- Process Rights Management > RBAC -- Role Based Access Control > TX / Trusted Extensions > ZFS > SMF -- Service Management Facility > FMA -- Fault Management Architecture > SCF -- Smart Card Facility > IPsec > > 4.0 Interfaces > 4.1 Exported Interfaces > > Interface Name Classification Comments > --------------------------- ------------------- --------------------------- > SUNWpatchutils Uncommitted Package > /usr/bin/filterdiff Uncommitted Executable binary file > /usr/bin/interdiff Uncommitted Executable binary file > /usr/bin/rediff Uncommitted Executable binary file > /usr/bin/lsdiff Uncommitted Symbol link to filterdiff > /usr/bin/grepdiff Uncommitted Symbol link to filterdiff > /usr/bin/combinediff Uncommitted Symbol link to interdiff > /usr/bin/flipdiff Uncommitted Symbol link to interdiff > /usr/bin/dehtmldiff Uncommitted Perl script > /usr/bin/editdiff Uncommitted Perl script > /usr/bin/espdiff Uncommitted Perl script > /usr/bin/fixcvsdiff Uncommitted Perl script > /usr/bin/recountdiff Uncommitted Perl script > /usr/bin/splitdiff Uncommitted Perl script > /usr/bin/unwrapdiff Uncommitted Perl script > > 4.2 Imported Interfaces > > Interface Name Classification Comments > --------------------------- -------------------- -------------------------- > SUNWbash Volatile Package > SUNWperl584core Uncommitted Package > > Appendix A - References > [1] http://cyberelk.net/tim/patchutils > > OSR ID# 10611 > RFE ID# 6775972 > > 6. Resources and Schedule > 6.4. Steering Committee requested information > 6.4.1. Consolidation C-team Name: > SFW > 6.5. ARC review type: FastTrack > 6.6. ARC Exposure: open > > From James.Walker@sun.com Sun Dec 14 17:55:02 2008 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBF1t1mD009113 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 17:55:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id mBF1sxYd044267 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 18:55:01 -0700 (MST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KBW0000FANNXX00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Sun, 14 Dec 2008 17:54:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from brmea-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.98.43]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KBW00CKMANMAT40@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Sun, 14 Dec 2008 17:54:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from fe-amer-09.sun.com ([192.18.109.79]) by brmea-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id mBF1swKY025785 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 01:54:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0KBW00L01AJZD900@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from James.Walker@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Sun, 14 Dec 2008 18:54:58 -0700 (MST) Received: from jim-walkers-macbook-pro.local ([129.150.33.41]) by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0KBW0060RANEQLK0@mail-amer.sun.com>; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 18:54:57 -0700 (MST) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 18:54:50 -0700 From: Jim Walker Subject: Re: patchutils [PSARC/2008/770 FastTrack timeout 12/22/2008] In-reply-to: <20081215002933.GB25343@mumak.SFBay.Sun.COM> Sender: James.Walker@sun.com To: Danek Duvall Cc: James Walker , PSARC-ext@sun.com, Jason.Li@sun.com Reply-to: James.Walker@sun.com Message-id: <4945B8EA.7020804@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200812142257.mBEMvCQm020623@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <20081215002933.GB25343@mumak.SFBay.Sun.COM> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Macintosh/20081105) Content-Length: 700 Status: RO X-Status: $$$$ X-UID: 0000000004 Danek Duvall wrote: >> 4.2 Imported Interfaces >> >> Interface Name Classification Comments >> --------------------------- -------------------- -------------------------- >> SUNWbash Volatile Package > > You don't mention in the exported interface table that any of the > executables are bash scripts -- is there some other reason you're depending > on bash? > > +1 > Good catch. I updated proposal.txt in the case directory to read: /usr/bin/dehtmldiff Uncommitted Bash script /usr/bin/editdiff Uncommitted Bash script /usr/bin/espdiff Uncommitted Bash script Cheers, Jim From piochjennifer@googlemail.com Mon Dec 15 08:13:00 2008 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBFGCxsI026008 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:13:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id mBFGCtTS012940; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:12:56 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KBX00005EDJ1Y00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:12:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from brmea-mail-4.sun.com ([192.18.98.36]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KBX00IJ4EDI8Y70@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:12:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay13i.sun.com (ip123.net129179-4.block1.us.syntegra.com [129.179.4.123]) by brmea-mail-4.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id mBFG2vGu001247; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:12:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mmp14es.mmp.us.syntegra.com ([160.41.208.14] [160.41.208.14]) by relay13i.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-671852; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:12:54 +0000 (Z) Received: from relay13i.sun.com (relay13i.sun.com [129.179.4.123]) by mmp14es.mmp.us.syntegra.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-74171; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:12:53 +0000 (Z) Received: from yx-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.44.154] [74.125.44.154]) by relay1i.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-5737764; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:12:53 +0000 (Z) Received: by yx-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 3so1187902yxi.68 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:12:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.151.141.8 with SMTP id t8mr2325286ybn.131.1229357573582; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:12:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.151.135.4 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:12:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:12:53 +0100 From: Jennifer Pioch Subject: Re: patchutils [PSARC/2008/770 FastTrack timeout 12/22/2008] In-reply-to: <20081215002933.GB25343@mumak.SFBay.Sun.COM> To: Danek Duvall Cc: James Walker , PSARC-ext@sun.com, jason.li@sun.com Message-id: <67079b830812150812r7236fb1doefe5832cb215a310@mail.gmail.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=G68PbhHTUaWEFwnVct54qFYx8U2ZiW6xIjnL/k69/Pw=; b=TafBclSJXJOUNIfAjjzyrz2lQLJGjoiDtdGQyAz7rXkxzNl5X+0uXLnf5E9ZwIJoss HeFz6wG5ze8PTjthjAZgcGU0u2eTJKyVaWzrPNcDDyHLJmZHL14K8mOVr1jh9wM3WfEw +Ceraw8uvpmR1eOCTZkK5EglG4rqruU4eEf1g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=oYmNyCCJkm1IUujR4WyPvf/6q9JD1G2CePu7q6BNJPg20r5oFVEkFWZ/lJIrrIqxck eZSOsdYNSHhXApmQEK8jph3t1P8GRcTinDHtJPRou2hGWoNXPVxMKUgvTqa1fZ6LmJJz I3BTYCOzvYUR+eT8ccw51/ZW41kc00kdrq9Ww= X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Antispam: No, score=0.0/5.0, scanned in 0.128sec at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smf-spamd v1.3.1 - http://smfs.sf.net/ References: <200812142257.mBEMvCQm020623@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <20081215002933.GB25343@mumak.SFBay.Sun.COM> Content-Length: 584 Status: RO X-Status: $$$$ X-UID: 0000000005 On 12/15/08, Danek Duvall wrote: > > 4.2 Imported Interfaces > > > > Interface Name Classification Comments > > --------------------------- -------------------- -------------------------- > > SUNWbash Volatile Package > > > You don't mention in the exported interface table that any of the > executables are bash scripts -- is there some other reason you're depending > on bash? > > +1 There is no need to use bash, the scripts should work with ksh93. Jenny -- Jennifer Pioch, Uni Frankfurt From piochjennifer@googlemail.com Mon Dec 15 08:13:56 2008 Received: from sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail3mpk.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.52]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBFGDu9A026362 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:13:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id mBFGDofq016123; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:13:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KBX0000PEF55U00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:13:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from brmea-mail-4.sun.com ([192.18.98.36]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KBX00IRTEF28Y70@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:13:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay14i.sun.com (ip124.net129179-4.block1.us.syntegra.com [129.179.4.124]) by brmea-mail-4.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id mBFG8bGv004862; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:13:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mmp14es.mmp.us.syntegra.com ([160.41.208.14] [160.41.208.14]) by relay14i.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-598603; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:13:49 +0000 (Z) Received: from relay15i.sun.com (relay15i.sun.com [129.179.4.125]) by mmp14es.mmp.us.syntegra.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-75177; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:13:49 +0000 (Z) Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.170.189] [64.233.170.189]) by relay1ib.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-2642684; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:13:49 +0000 (Z) Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id j36so3026768rne.6 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:13:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.151.102.16 with SMTP id e16mr12925031ybm.129.1229357629190; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:13:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.151.135.4 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:13:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:13:49 +0100 From: Jennifer Pioch Subject: Re: patchutils [PSARC/2008/770 FastTrack timeout 12/22/2008] In-reply-to: <4945B8EA.7020804@sun.com> To: James.Walker@sun.com Cc: Danek Duvall , PSARC-ext@sun.com, jason.li@sun.com, James Walker Message-id: <67079b830812150813s2cdf87f2gbb77c913d79e6bba@mail.gmail.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=zRdBWcP4zs/ibaAM1vL9FhaZCypq84WLgjHK/pBEUEc=; b=OcFtgJa2k32W4QsOrgjNMUwdDCSKVwZ/6Lt3piOyAOX5P55jRQPY5UWBStvi1njs9e CBN+T8db+biC1Ts0h6cs3kqC0TIflcbP2RYZo9QvR0QuLClX9ID6E4WNy/TJDeOQW8Dq 405xFTbX0NLLbL+Pi74UjVywMp3sEHOoGLNz8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=qH8bbWUJ4R3SAXLHH2K/OAo5GLUOI+80iAtflvLfGpJVWwLI0MS/Tvj4Drr3h/GOFQ Zi2VzTUgTrUKU3wWCSH4Mj5Azn03/pkEQEkC9k6E+xrtrNA6Li84X+gsiA8VyOUulkYg lY0s0I5H3Ci0G0Tsa9SqhwCXO/uvcl4d/CD20= X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Antispam: No, score=0.0/5.0, scanned in 0.065sec at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smf-spamd v1.3.1 - http://smfs.sf.net/ References: <200812142257.mBEMvCQm020623@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <20081215002933.GB25343@mumak.SFBay.Sun.COM> <4945B8EA.7020804@sun.com> Content-Length: 971 Status: RO X-Status: $$$$ X-UID: 0000000006 On 12/15/08, Jim Walker wrote: > Danek Duvall wrote: > >> 4.2 Imported Interfaces > >> > >> Interface Name Classification Comments > >> --------------------------- -------------------- -------------------------- > >> SUNWbash Volatile Package > > > > You don't mention in the exported interface table that any of the > > executables are bash scripts -- is there some other reason you're depending > > on bash? > > > > +1 > > > > > Good catch. > > I updated proposal.txt in the case directory to read: > > /usr/bin/dehtmldiff Uncommitted Bash script > /usr/bin/editdiff Uncommitted Bash script > /usr/bin/espdiff Uncommitted Bash script How do you deal with bash4? bash4 is not fully backwards compatible to bash3 and will break these scripts. Jenny -- Jennifer Pioch, Uni Frankfurt From casper@holland.sun.com Mon Dec 15 08:23:16 2008 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBFGNFBo026660 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:23:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id mBFGNEfn019197 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@Sun.COM>; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:23:15 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KBX00E2NEUPHP00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:23:13 -0700 (MST) Received: from dm-holland-02.uk.sun.com ([129.156.101.225]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KBX00LCMEUM64A0@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:23:11 -0700 (MST) Received: from holland (room101.Holland.Sun.COM [10.16.117.40]) by dm-holland-02.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id mBFGN2Uw049796; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:23:02 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:23:02 +0100 From: Casper.Dik@sun.com Subject: Re: patchutils [PSARC/2008/770 FastTrack timeout 12/22/2008] In-reply-to: <67079b830812150812r7236fb1doefe5832cb215a310@mail.gmail.com> Sender: casper@holland.sun.com To: Jennifer Pioch Cc: Danek Duvall , James Walker , PSARC-ext@sun.com, Jason.Li@sun.com Message-id: <200812151623.mBFGN2Uw049796@dm-holland-02.uk.sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200812142257.mBEMvCQm020623@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <20081215002933.GB25343@mumak.SFBay.Sun.COM> <67079b830812150812r7236fb1doefe5832cb215a310@mail.gmail.com> Content-Length: 908 Status: RO X-Status: $$$$ X-UID: 0000000007 >On 12/15/08, Danek Duvall wrote: >> > 4.2 Imported Interfaces >> > >> > Interface Name Classification Comments >> > --------------------------- -------------------- -------------------------- >> > SUNWbash Volatile Package >> >> >> You don't mention in the exported interface table that any of the >> executables are bash scripts -- is there some other reason you're depending >> on bash? >> >> +1 > >There is no need to use bash, the scripts should work with ksh93. And it would be better to use bash; if only because of some fatal bugs in bash. The worst offending bug probably only happens when you are unfortunately to have to use bash as your interactive shell: sleep 10; rm -rf / Now type "^C". (Yes, you are saved by "rm" in Solaris, but I've steered clear of bash since I've learned this) Casper From bart.smaalders@sun.com Mon Dec 15 10:58:57 2008 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBFIwuDR001708 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:58:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id mBFIwdIY015112; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 02:58:53 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KBX0054TM24U100@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:58:52 -0700 (MST) Received: from zion.sfbay.sun.com ([129.146.17.75]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KBX00JNEM23R870@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:58:51 -0700 (MST) Received: from [129.146.228.109] (cyber.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.228.109]) by zion.sfbay.sun.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.2) with ESMTP id mBFIpLGk004217; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:51:21 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:51:21 -0800 From: Bart Smaalders Subject: Re: patchutils [PSARC/2008/770 FastTrack timeout 12/22/2008] In-reply-to: <200812151623.mBFGN2Uw049796@dm-holland-02.uk.sun.com> To: Casper.Dik@sun.com, Jennifer Pioch Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <4946A729.6000304@Sun.COM> Organization: Sun Microsystems MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200812142257.mBEMvCQm020623@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <20081215002933.GB25343@mumak.SFBay.Sun.COM> <67079b830812150812r7236fb1doefe5832cb215a310@mail.gmail.com> <200812151623.mBFGN2Uw049796@dm-holland-02.uk.sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20081023) Content-Length: 1390 Status: RO X-Status: $$$$ X-UID: 0000000008 Casper.Dik@sun.com wrote: >> On 12/15/08, Danek Duvall wrote: >>>> 4.2 Imported Interfaces >>> > >>> > Interface Name Classification Comments >>> > --------------------------- -------------------- -------------------------- >>> > SUNWbash Volatile Package >>> >>> >>> You don't mention in the exported interface table that any of the >>> executables are bash scripts -- is there some other reason you're depending >>> on bash? >>> >>> +1 >> There is no need to use bash, the scripts should work with ksh93. > > > And it would be better to use bash; if only because of some fatal bugs in > bash. The worst offending bug probably only happens when you are > unfortunately to have to use bash as your interactive shell: > > sleep 10; rm -rf / > > > Now type "^C". (Yes, you are saved by "rm" in Solaris, but I've steered > clear of bash since I've learned this) > > Casper > Perhaps we could stay on track and send suggested changes to the upstream maintainers in the form of patches, rather than raising issues here. I like Python a lot better than Perl, but I'm not going object to someone integrating ExifTool. - Bart -- Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance barts@cyber.eng.sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/barts "You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird." From iszczesniak@gmail.com Tue Dec 16 02:17:28 2008 Received: from sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail3mpk.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.52]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBGAHSjP001672 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 02:17:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id mBGAHQA5006791; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 02:17:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KBY005BHSL16700@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 02:17:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from brmea-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.98.43]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KBY00LC8SJZ1U50@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 02:16:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay13i.sun.com (ip123.net129179-4.block1.us.syntegra.com [129.179.4.123]) by brmea-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id mBGABjMJ011756; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:16:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mmp12es.mmp.us.syntegra.com ([160.41.208.12] [160.41.208.12]) by relay13i.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-736883; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:16:46 +0000 (Z) Received: from relay13i.sun.com (relay13i.sun.com [129.179.4.123]) by mmp12es.mmp.us.syntegra.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-24342207; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:16:46 +0000 (Z) Received: from mail-bw0-f20.google.com ([209.85.218.20] [209.85.218.20]) by relay1ib.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-7939977; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:16:46 +0000 (Z) Received: by mail-bw0-f20.google.com with SMTP id 13so10128841bwz.8 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 02:16:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.181.145.6 with SMTP id x6mr2904422bkn.25.1229422605597; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 02:16:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.181.156.5 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 02:16:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:16:45 +0100 From: "I. Szczesniak" Subject: Re: patchutils [PSARC/2008/770 FastTrack timeout 12/22/2008] In-reply-to: <4946A729.6000304@Sun.COM> To: Bart Smaalders Cc: Casper.Dik@sun.com, Jennifer Pioch , PSARC-ext@sun.com, Shells discussion Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=enieJK1K09uivEj7aNrCTBXC7gy2T0YDM25CWyqt2ls=; b=KFxd4chFsSN+gosMptJ5qDbHpj+D/9WMg8OgXUGEwrjQdht2EqyimE7xXtXpawpByO Zn4aLEZr53OPFWj9n3jx6OIXr2J8FcSChB5GpbXwj9Hwpmenwv6QP+AA37rPDvJKATOn rJH0x2WlcSiCGmy8khIquCCEc5HvmBEcIorLU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=nQVus7nA0qAm0IKmnwwGo0QBs/xiq3VDaj+z4A3YqiO9o8JL+v5myYxp/jyXkWjrIo CuE+TzzeAKFXqZu4f+i304E88fM2Oi5mJYEKU4GQ9M7t1ftw/Rvvzya4OaXW+wnN/rJc eCFBZm0RWFZKw2Q/WPpLZ5OIYUiJprz2VrZ+Y= X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Antispam: No, score=-2.6/5.0, scanned in 0.070sec at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smf-spamd v1.3.1 - http://smfs.sf.net/ References: <200812142257.mBEMvCQm020623@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <20081215002933.GB25343@mumak.SFBay.Sun.COM> <67079b830812150812r7236fb1doefe5832cb215a310@mail.gmail.com> <200812151623.mBFGN2Uw049796@dm-holland-02.uk.sun.com> <4946A729.6000304@Sun.COM> Content-Length: 2016 Status: RO X-Status: $$$$ X-UID: 0000000009 FYI: The upstream authors confirmed that the scripts work with any POSIX-conforming shell. No explicit bash syntax is used. IMO from a PSARC pov its not a matter of which shell is better, its a matter of which shell interface is being imported and that's certainly not SUNWbash, its /usr/xpg4/bin/sh Irek On 12/15/08, Bart Smaalders wrote: > Casper.Dik@sun.com wrote: > >> On 12/15/08, Danek Duvall wrote: > >>>> 4.2 Imported Interfaces > >>> > > >>> > Interface Name Classification Comments > >>> > --------------------------- -------------------- -------------------------- > >>> > SUNWbash Volatile Package > >>> > >>> > >>> You don't mention in the exported interface table that any of the > >>> executables are bash scripts -- is there some other reason you're depending > >>> on bash? > >>> > >>> +1 > >> There is no need to use bash, the scripts should work with ksh93. > > > > > > And it would be better to use bash; if only because of some fatal bugs in > > bash. The worst offending bug probably only happens when you are > > unfortunately to have to use bash as your interactive shell: > > > > sleep 10; rm -rf / > > > > > > Now type "^C". (Yes, you are saved by "rm" in Solaris, but I've steered > > clear of bash since I've learned this) > > > > Casper > > > > > Perhaps we could stay on track and send suggested changes to the > upstream maintainers in the form of patches, rather than raising > issues here. I like Python a lot better than Perl, but I'm not going > object to someone integrating ExifTool. > > - Bart > > > > -- > Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance > barts@cyber.eng.sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/barts > "You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird." > > _______________________________________________ > opensolaris-arc mailing list > opensolaris-arc@opensolaris.org > From James.Walker@sun.com Wed Dec 17 01:18:59 2008 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBH9IwnJ008452 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:18:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id mBH9Csrk009189 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 09:18:57 GMT Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KC000C03KJJQ400@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:18:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from brmea-mail-4.sun.com ([192.18.98.36]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KC000144KJIBTA0@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:18:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from fe-amer-09.sun.com ([192.18.109.79]) by brmea-mail-4.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id mBH9IsoX005017 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 09:18:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0KC000201KEZXU00@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from James.Walker@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 17 Dec 2008 02:18:54 -0700 (MST) Received: from c-24-8-61-165.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([129.150.32.229]) by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0KC0001X1KJHF4E0@mail-amer.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 17 Dec 2008 02:18:54 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 02:18:53 -0700 From: Jim Walker Subject: Re: patchutils [PSARC/2008/770 FastTrack timeout 12/22/2008] In-reply-to: Sender: James.Walker@sun.com To: "I. Szczesniak" Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com, Shells discussion , Jason Li Reply-to: James.Walker@sun.com Message-id: <4948C3FD.60809@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200812142257.mBEMvCQm020623@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <20081215002933.GB25343@mumak.SFBay.Sun.COM> <67079b830812150812r7236fb1doefe5832cb215a310@mail.gmail.com> <200812151623.mBFGN2Uw049796@dm-holland-02.uk.sun.com> <4946A729.6000304@Sun.COM> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Macintosh/20081105) Content-Length: 1179 Status: RO X-Status: $$$$ X-UID: 0000000010 I. Szczesniak wrote: > FYI: The upstream authors confirmed that the scripts work with any > POSIX-conforming shell. No explicit bash syntax is used. > > IMO from a PSARC pov its not a matter of which shell is better, its a > matter of which shell interface is being imported and that's certainly > not SUNWbash, its /usr/xpg4/bin/sh > Irek, Thanks for the research. dehtmldiff is a shell script, while editdiff and espdiff are bash scripts, so from an PSARC pov it would look something like this: ... /usr/bin/dehtmldiff Uncommitted Shell script /usr/bin/editdiff Uncommitted Bash script /usr/bin/espdiff Uncommitted Bash script ... 4.2 Imported Interfaces Interface Name Classification Comments ------------------------------ -------------- --------------- /usr/bin/bash Volatile SUNWbash /usr/perl5/5.8.4/bin/perl5.8.4 Uncommitted SUNWperl584core /usr/xpg4/bin/sh SUNWxcu4 BTW. Anyone know the classification for SUNWxcu4? Cheers, Jim From carlsonj@phorcys.east.sun.com Wed Dec 17 05:54:12 2008 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBHDsCOv028315 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 05:54:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id mBHDs3er025480; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:54:09 -0700 (MST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KC00042NXA8OF00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 05:54:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from phorcys.east.sun.com ([129.148.174.143]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KC0003Y9XA6A240@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 05:54:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from phorcys.east.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phorcys.east.sun.com (8.14.3+Sun/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mBHDd7RC013992; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 08:39:07 -0500 (EST) Received: (from carlsonj@localhost) by phorcys.east.sun.com (8.14.3+Sun/8.14.3/Submit) id mBHDd6wn013989; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 08:39:06 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 08:39:06 -0500 From: James Carlson Subject: Re: patchutils [PSARC/2008/770 FastTrack timeout 12/22/2008] In-reply-to: <4948C3FD.60809@sun.com> To: James.Walker@sun.com Cc: "I. Szczesniak" , PSARC-ext@sun.com, Shells discussion , Jason Li Message-id: <18761.250.978994.447480@gargle.gargle.HOWL> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: VM 7.01 under Emacs 21.3.1 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200812142257.mBEMvCQm020623@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <20081215002933.GB25343@mumak.SFBay.Sun.COM> <67079b830812150812r7236fb1doefe5832cb215a310@mail.gmail.com> <200812151623.mBFGN2Uw049796@dm-holland-02.uk.sun.com> <4946A729.6000304@Sun.COM> <4948C3FD.60809@sun.com> Content-Length: 585 Status: RO X-Status: $$$$ X-UID: 0000000011 Jim Walker writes: > /usr/xpg4/bin/sh SUNWxcu4 > > > BTW. Anyone know the classification for SUNWxcu4? It's "Committed". It's set by a standard. (Depending on that seems a little odd to me, when ksh93 or regular old ksh ought to do, but I suppose it's up to the project team, and not really an architectural issue.) -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 From James.Walker@sun.com Wed Dec 17 10:51:38 2008 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBHIpcqJ009762 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:51:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id mBHIpb21030427 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:51:38 -0700 (MST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KC100G05B20HF00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:51:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from brmea-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.98.43]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KC100HKFB20KJE0@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:51:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from fe-amer-10.sun.com ([192.18.109.80]) by brmea-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id mBHIpaBW011099 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:51:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0KC100301AY9AY00@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from James.Walker@Sun.COM) for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:51:36 -0700 (MST) Received: from jim-walkers-macbook-pro.local ([129.150.36.202]) by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0KC10010CB1VZUH0@mail-amer.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:51:31 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:51:31 -0700 From: Jim Walker Subject: Re: patchutils [PSARC/2008/770 FastTrack timeout 12/22/2008] In-reply-to: <18761.250.978994.447480@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Sender: James.Walker@sun.com To: PSARC-ext@sun.com Cc: Jason Li Reply-to: James.Walker@sun.com Message-id: <49494A33.8070502@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200812142257.mBEMvCQm020623@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <20081215002933.GB25343@mumak.SFBay.Sun.COM> <67079b830812150812r7236fb1doefe5832cb215a310@mail.gmail.com> <200812151623.mBFGN2Uw049796@dm-holland-02.uk.sun.com> <4946A729.6000304@Sun.COM> <4948C3FD.60809@sun.com> <18761.250.978994.447480@gargle.gargle.HOWL> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Macintosh/20081105) Content-Length: 89 Status: RO X-Status: $$$$ X-UID: 0000000012 This case was approved at today's PSARC meeting. I've updated the IAM file. Cheers, Jim