From jw137282@sac.sfbay.sun.com Fri Mar 6 12:16:00 2009 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n26KG0KV020732 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:16:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n26KFvJN004629; Fri, 6 Mar 2009 13:15:59 -0700 (MST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KG300K13PMLPR00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:15:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from dm-sfbay-01.sfbay.sun.com ([129.145.155.118]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KG300AB7PMLKLE0@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:15:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from sac.sfbay.sun.com (sac.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.226.132]) by dm-sfbay-01.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n26KFtiP034104; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:15:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from sac.sfbay.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n26KFsUk020727; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:15:54 -0800 (PST) Received: (from jw137282@localhost) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/Submit) id n26KFs3u020723; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:15:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:15:54 -0800 (PST) From: James Walker Subject: bwm-ng [PSARC/2009/160 FastTrack timeout 03/13/2009] To: PSARC-ext@sun.com Cc: Caijian.Guo@sun.com Message-id: <200903062015.n26KFs3u020723@sac.sfbay.sun.com> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 Status: RO Content-Length: 12517 I'm sponsoring this familiarity case for Caijian Guo. The requested release binding is minor. The man page has been posted in the materials directory. Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems 1. Introduction 1.1. Project/Component Working Name: bwm-ng 1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier: Author: Caijian Guo 1.3 Date of This Document: 06 March, 2009 4. Technical Description Bwm-ng Check List 1.0 Project Information 1.1 Name of project/component bmw-ng 1.2 Author of document Caijian.Guo@Sun.COM 2.0 Project Summary 2.1 Project Description bwm-ng is a small and simple console-based live network and disk io bandwidth monitor. It listens to network and disk io and displays current throughput. Features: supports both IPv4 and IPv6 unlimited number of interfaces/devices supported interfaces/devices are added or removed dynamically from list white-/blacklist of interfaces/devices output of KB/s, Kb/s, packets, errors, average, max and total sum output in curses, plain console, CSV or HTML configfile 2.2 Release binding What is is the release binding? (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/release-taxonomy/) [ ] Major [*] Minor [ ] Patch or Micro [ ] Unknown -- ARC review required 2.3 Type of project Is this case a Linux Familiarity project? [*] Yes [ ] No 2.4 Originating Community 2.4.1 Community Name bwm-ng[1] 2.4.2 Community Involvement Indicate Sun's involvement in the community [ ] Maintainer [ ] Contributor [*] Monitoring Will the project team work with the upstream community to resolve architectural issues of interest to Sun? [*] Yes [ ] No - briefly explain Will we or are we forking from the community? [ ] Yes - ARC review required prior to forking [*] No 3.0 Technical Description 3.1 Installation & Sharable 3.1.1S Solaris Installation - section only required for Solaris Software (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/install-locations/ for details) Does this project follow the Install Locations best practice? [*] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required Does this project install into /usr under [sbin|bin|lib|include|man|share]? [*] Yes [ ] No or N/A Does this project install into /opt? [ ] Yes - explain below [*] No or N/A Does this project install into a different directory structure? [ ] Yes - ARC review required [*] No or N/A Do any of the components of this project conflict with anything under /usr? (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/2007/047/ for details) [ ] Yes - explain below [*] No If conflicts exist then will this project install under /usr/gnu? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required [*] N/A Is this project installing into /usr/sfw? [ ] Yes - ARC review required [*] No 3.1.1W Windows Installation - section only required for Windows Software (see http://sac.sfbay/WSARC/2002/494 for details) Does this project install software into a :\Program Files\Sun\ or :\Sun\ directory? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required Does the project use the Windows registry? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required Does the project use HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Sun Microsystems\\ for the registry key? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required Is the project's stored location HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Sun Microsystems\\\Path? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required 3.1.2 Share and Sharable Does the module include any components that are used or shared by other projects? [ ] Yes [*] No If yes are these components packaged to be shared with the other FOSS? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required [*] N/A Are these components already in the Solaris WOS? [ ] Yes [*] No - continue with next section (section 3.2) If yes are these newer versions being delivered? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required If yes are the newer versions replacing the existing versions? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required 3.2 Exported Libraries Are libraries being delivered by this project? [ ] Yes [*] No - continue with next section (section 3.3) Are 64-bit versions of the libraries being delivered? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required Are static versions of the libraries being delivered? [ ] Yes - ARC review required [ ] No 3.3 Services and the /etc Directory (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/SMF-policy/) Does the project integrate anything into /etc/init.d or /etc/rc?.d? [ ] Yes - ARC review required [*] No Does the project integrate any new entries into /etc/inittab or /etc/inetd.conf? [ ] Yes - ARC review required [*] No Does the project integrate any private non-public files into /etc/default or /etc/ configuration files? [ ] Yes - ARC review required [*] No Does the service manifests method context grant rights above that of the noaccess user and basic privilege set? [ ] Yes - ARC review required [*] No 3.4 Security 3.4.1 Secure By Default (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/secure-by-default/ for details) (see http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/NITS-policy/ for details) (see parts of http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/SMF-policy/ for addtional details) Are there any network services provided by this project? [ ] Yes [*] No - continue with the next section (section 3.4.2) Are network services enabled by default? [ ] Yes - ARC review required [ ] No [ ] N/A Are network services automatically enabled by the project during installation? [ ] Yes - ARC review required [ ] No [ ] N/A Are inbound network communications denied by default? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required [ ] N/A Is inbound data checked to prevent content-based attacks? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required [ ] N/A Is the outbound receiver authenticated? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required [ ] N/A Is the receiver authenticated prior to receiving any sensitive outbound communication? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required [ ] N/A 3.4.2 Authorization (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/bestpractices/rbac-intro/ and http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/bestpractices/rbac-profiles/ and http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/bestpractices/rbac-profiles/ for details) Are there any setuid/setgid privileged binaries in the project? [ ] Yes - ARC review required [*] No - continue with next section (section 3.4.3) If yes then are the setuid/setgid privileges handled by the use of roles? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required 3.4.3 Auditing (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/audit-policy/ for details) (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/2003/397 for details) Does this component contain administrative or security enforcing software? [ ] Yes - ARC review required [*] No - continue to next section (section 3.4.4) (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/2003/397 for details) Do the components create audit logs detailing what took place including what event took place, who was involved, when the event took place? [ ] Yes - ARC contract and Audit project team review required [ ] No - ARC review required 3.4.4 Authentication (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/PAM/) Do the components contain any authentication code? [ ] Yes [*] No - continue to next section (section 3.4.5) If yes do the components use PAM (plugable authentication modules) for authentication? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required If yes is a single PAM session maintained during authentication? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required If yes are the components sufficiently privileged to allow the requested operations (authentication, password change, process credential manipulation, audit state initialization)? [ ] Yes - briefly describe below [ ] No - ARC review required 3.4.5 Passwords (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/bestpractices/passwords-cli/ and http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/bestpractices/passwords-files/ for details) Do any of the components for the project deal with passwords? [ ] Yes [*] No - continue to next section (section 3.4.6) If yes are these passwords entered via the CLI or environment? [ ] Yes - ARC review required [ ] No Are passwords stored within the file system for the component? [ ] Yes [ ] No - continue to next section (section 3.4.6) If yes are the permissions on the file such to protect exposing the password(s)? [ ] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required 3.4.6 General Security Questions (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/bestpractices/security-questions/ for details) Are there any network protocols used by this project? [*] Yes [ ] No - continue with the next section (section 3.5) Do the components use standard network protocols? [*] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required Do network services for the project make decisions based upon user, host or service identities? [ ] Yes - explain below [*] No [ ] N/A Do the components make use of secret information during authentication and/or authorization? [ ] Yes - explain below [*] No [ ] N/A 3.5 Networking Do the components access the network? [*] Yes [ ] No - continue with the next section (section 3.6) If yes do the components support IPv6? [*] Yes [ ] No - ARC review required 3.6 Core Solaris Components Do the components of this project compete with or duplicate core Solaris components? [ ] Yes - ARC review required [*] No Examples of Core Solaris Components include but are not limited to: Secure By Default Authorizations PAM -- Plugable Authentication Module Privilege PRM -- Process Rights Management -- Privilege Audit xVm -- Virtualization zones / Solaris Containers PRM -- Process Rights Management RBAC -- Role Based Access Control TX / Trusted Extensions ZFS SMF -- Service Management Facility FMA -- Fault Management Architecture SCF -- Smart Card Facility IPsec 4.0 Interfaces 4.1 Exported Interfaces Interface Name Classification Comments --------------------------- ------------------- ---------------------- SUNWbwm-ng Uncommitted Package /usr/bin/bwm-ng Uncommitted Executable binary file 4.2 Imported Interfaces Interface Name Classification Comments --------------------------- -------------------- --------------------- ncurses Committed LSARC/2008/524 Notes bwm-ng is compile such that it is not dependent on libstatgrab. Appendix A - References [1] http://www.gropp.org/?id=projects&sub=bwm-ng OSR ID# 10971 RFE ID# 6810966 6. Resources and Schedule 6.4. Steering Committee requested information 6.4.1. Consolidation C-team Name: SFW 6.5. ARC review type: FastTrack 6.6. ARC Exposure: open From carlsonj@phorcys.east.sun.com Fri Mar 6 12:44:59 2009 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n26Kiwxn022555 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:44:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n26Kitf3019524; Fri, 6 Mar 2009 20:44:56 GMT Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KG300M05QYVGJ00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:44:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from phorcys.east.sun.com ([129.148.174.143]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KG300M7GQYU8000@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:44:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from phorcys.east.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phorcys.east.sun.com (8.14.3+Sun/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n26Kil2d013271; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:44:47 -0500 (EST) Received: (from carlsonj@localhost) by phorcys.east.sun.com (8.14.3+Sun/8.14.3/Submit) id n26KilYl013268; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:44:47 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:44:47 -0500 From: James Carlson Subject: Re: bwm-ng [PSARC/2009/160 FastTrack timeout 03/13/2009] In-reply-to: <200903062015.n26KFs3u020723@sac.sfbay.sun.com> To: James Walker Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com, Caijian.Guo@sun.com Message-id: <18865.35647.496783.59654@gargle.gargle.HOWL> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: VM 7.01 under Emacs 21.3.1 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200903062015.n26KFs3u020723@sac.sfbay.sun.com> Status: RO Content-Length: 601 James Walker writes: > bwm-ng is a small and simple console-based live network and disk io > bandwidth monitor. It listens to network and disk io and displays > current throughput. [...] > bwm-ng is compile such that it is not dependent on libstatgrab. Assuming that change mean that the application lacks any of its "normal" functionality, I'll give this +1. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 From carlsonj@phorcys.east.sun.com Fri Mar 6 12:51:38 2009 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n26Kpcxe023214 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:51:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n26KpZPT024430; Fri, 6 Mar 2009 13:51:35 -0700 (MST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KG300011R9Z2Q00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 13:51:35 -0700 (MST) Received: from phorcys.east.sun.com ([129.148.174.143]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KG300DQAR9YBK80@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 13:51:34 -0700 (MST) Received: from phorcys.east.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phorcys.east.sun.com (8.14.3+Sun/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n26KpRFX013320; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:51:27 -0500 (EST) Received: (from carlsonj@localhost) by phorcys.east.sun.com (8.14.3+Sun/8.14.3/Submit) id n26KpRpS013317; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:51:27 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:51:27 -0500 From: James Carlson Subject: Re: bwm-ng [PSARC/2009/160 FastTrack timeout 03/13/2009] In-reply-to: <18865.35647.496783.59654@gargle.gargle.HOWL> To: James Walker , PSARC-ext@sun.com, Caijian.Guo@sun.com Message-id: <18865.36047.119607.854339@gargle.gargle.HOWL> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: VM 7.01 under Emacs 21.3.1 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200903062015.n26KFs3u020723@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <18865.35647.496783.59654@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Status: RO Content-Length: 682 James Carlson writes: > James Walker writes: > > bwm-ng is a small and simple console-based live network and disk io > > bandwidth monitor. It listens to network and disk io and displays > > current throughput. > [...] > > bwm-ng is compile such that it is not dependent on libstatgrab. > > Assuming that change mean that the application lacks any of its > "normal" functionality, I'll give this +1. I meant "doesn't lack," obviously. :-/ -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 From James.Walker@Sun.COM Fri Mar 6 13:49:13 2009 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n26LnCFJ026687 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2009 13:49:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n26LnAfj016802 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Sat, 7 Mar 2009 05:49:11 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KG30050PTXXQ500@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Fri, 06 Mar 2009 14:49:09 -0700 (MST) Received: from brmea-mail-4.sun.com ([192.18.98.36]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KG300DAMTXWBKE0@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Fri, 06 Mar 2009 14:49:08 -0700 (MST) Received: from fe-amer-10.sun.com ([192.18.109.80]) by brmea-mail-4.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n26Ln8MS028531 for ; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 21:49:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-3.01 64bit (built Dec 23 2008)) id <0KG300I00R63X600@mail-amer.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Fri, 06 Mar 2009 14:49:08 -0700 (MST) Received: from [172.20.25.153] ([unknown] [172.20.25.153]) by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-3.01 64bit (built Dec 23 2008)) with ESMTPSA id <0KG300EMKTXT4D10@mail-amer.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Fri, 06 Mar 2009 14:49:06 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 14:51:39 -0700 From: Jim Walker Subject: Re: bwm-ng [PSARC/2009/160 FastTrack timeout 03/13/2009] In-reply-to: <18865.36047.119607.854339@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Sender: James.Walker@Sun.COM To: James Carlson Cc: PSARC-ext@Sun.COM, Caijian.Guo@Sun.COM Reply-to: James.Walker@Sun.COM Message-id: <49B19AEB.4030303@sun.com> Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc. MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200903062015.n26KFs3u020723@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <18865.35647.496783.59654@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <18865.36047.119607.854339@gargle.gargle.HOWL> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080728) Status: RO Content-Length: 388 James Carlson wrote: >>> bwm-ng is compile such that it is not dependent on libstatgrab. >> Assuming that change mean that the application lacks any of its >> "normal" functionality, I'll give this +1. > > I meant "doesn't lack," obviously. :-/ Right. It does fine using only kstat. Cheers, Jim -- Jim Walker, http://blogs.sun.com/jwalker Sun Microsystems, Broomfield, Colorado From carlsonj@phorcys.east.sun.com Fri Mar 6 14:00:01 2009 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n26M00XX026815 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2009 14:00:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n26Lxw5P063535; Fri, 6 Mar 2009 14:59:58 -0700 (MST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KG300607UFVS700@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 14:59:55 -0700 (MST) Received: from phorcys.east.sun.com ([129.148.174.143]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KG3006NYUFV1900@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 14:59:55 -0700 (MST) Received: from phorcys.east.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phorcys.east.sun.com (8.14.3+Sun/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n26LxnQ5013612; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:59:49 -0500 (EST) Received: (from carlsonj@localhost) by phorcys.east.sun.com (8.14.3+Sun/8.14.3/Submit) id n26Lxn8Q013609; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:59:49 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:59:49 -0500 From: James Carlson Subject: Re: bwm-ng [PSARC/2009/160 FastTrack timeout 03/13/2009] In-reply-to: <49B19AEB.4030303@sun.com> To: James.Walker@sun.com Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com, Caijian.Guo@sun.com Message-id: <18865.40149.246193.686112@gargle.gargle.HOWL> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: VM 7.01 under Emacs 21.3.1 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200903062015.n26KFs3u020723@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <18865.35647.496783.59654@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <18865.36047.119607.854339@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <49B19AEB.4030303@sun.com> Status: RO Content-Length: 572 Jim Walker writes: > James Carlson wrote: > >>> bwm-ng is compile such that it is not dependent on libstatgrab. > >> Assuming that change mean that the application lacks any of its > >> "normal" functionality, I'll give this +1. > > > > I meant "doesn't lack," obviously. :-/ > > Right. It does fine using only kstat. Sounds goodl; thanks. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 From Caijian.Guo@Sun.COM Sun Mar 8 22:57:13 2009 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n295vCCC017920 for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2009 22:57:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n295vBBp024343 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 05:57:12 GMT Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KG800K035VB9S00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Sun, 08 Mar 2009 23:57:11 -0600 (MDT) Received: from sineb-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.19.7]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KG800EJE5VA7N50@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Sun, 08 Mar 2009 23:57:11 -0600 (MDT) Received: from fe-apac-05.sun.com (fe-apac-05.sun.com [192.18.19.176] (may be forged)) by sineb-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n295v9ld024139 for ; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 05:57:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-apac.sun.com by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-3.01 64bit (built Dec 23 2008)) id <0KG800E005N0QC00@mail-apac.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Mon, 09 Mar 2009 13:57:09 +0800 (SGT) Received: from [129.158.219.87] ([unknown] [129.158.219.87]) by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-3.01 64bit (built Dec 23 2008)) with ESMTPSA id <0KG800J1O5V4GM10@mail-apac.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Mon, 09 Mar 2009 13:57:09 +0800 (SGT) Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 13:56:27 +0800 From: caijian guo - Sun Microsystems - Beijing China Subject: Re: bwm-ng [PSARC/2009/160 FastTrack timeout 03/13/2009] In-reply-to: <18865.40149.246193.686112@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Sender: Caijian.Guo@Sun.COM To: James Carlson Cc: James.Walker@Sun.COM, PSARC-ext@Sun.COM Message-id: <49B4AF8B.50102@Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_PZFOXNspee+bA9S23gOmeg)" X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200903062015.n26KFs3u020723@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <18865.35647.496783.59654@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <18865.36047.119607.854339@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <49B19AEB.4030303@sun.com> <18865.40149.246193.686112@gargle.gargle.HOWL> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080422) Status: RO Content-Length: 2543 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_PZFOXNspee+bA9S23gOmeg) Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Comments : Since we have kstat, there is no need to use "libstatgrab", I have tested it and have done lots of experiments . It works well using only "kstat", The application does not lack any of its normal functionality, the output is the same. The functionality is the same. Caijian ? 2009?03?07? 05:59, James Carlson ??: > Jim Walker writes: > >> James Carlson wrote: >> >>>>> bwm-ng is compile such that it is not dependent on libstatgrab. >>>>> >>>> Assuming that change mean that the application lacks any of its >>>> "normal" functionality, I'll give this +1. >>>> >>> I meant "doesn't lack," obviously. :-/ >>> >> Right. It does fine using only kstat. >> > > Sounds goodl; thanks. > > --Boundary_(ID_PZFOXNspee+bA9S23gOmeg) Content-type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Comments :
Since we have kstat, there is no need to use "libstatgrab", I have tested it and have done lots of experiments . It works well using only "kstat",
 The application does not lack any of its normal functionality, the output is the same. The functionality is the same.


Caijian


于 2009年03月07日 05:59, James Carlson 写道: 
Jim Walker writes:
  
James Carlson wrote:
    
    bwm-ng is compile such that it is not dependent on libstatgrab.
          
Assuming that change mean that the application lacks any of its
"normal" functionality, I'll give this +1.
        
I meant "doesn't lack," obviously.  :-/
      
Right. It does fine using only kstat.
    

Sounds goodl; thanks.

--Boundary_(ID_PZFOXNspee+bA9S23gOmeg)-- From Kais.Belgaied@sun.com Wed Mar 11 16:22:23 2009 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2BNMMOf017473 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:22:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n2BNMF1G029596; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 23:22:18 GMT Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KGD00I0M7L5LK00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:22:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jurassic-x4600.sfbay.sun.com ([129.146.17.63]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KGD00FXS7L4SP30@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:22:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [129.146.11.145] (sr1-jurassic-02.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.145]) by jurassic-x4600.sfbay.sun.com (8.14.3+Sun/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2BNMC9p955485; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:22:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:22:15 -0700 From: Kais Belgaied Subject: Re: bwm-ng [PSARC/2009/160 FastTrack timeout 03/13/2009] In-reply-to: <49B4AF8B.50102@Sun.COM> To: caijian guo - Sun Microsystems - Beijing China Cc: James Carlson , James.Walker@sun.com, PSARC-ext@sun.com Reply-to: Kais.Belgaied@sun.com Message-id: <49B847A7.9080802@Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_7R/venEtQrPLRhSmQi4ijg)" X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200903062015.n26KFs3u020723@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <18865.35647.496783.59654@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <18865.36047.119607.854339@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <49B19AEB.4030303@sun.com> <18865.40149.246193.686112@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <49B4AF8B.50102@Sun.COM> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080807) Status: RO Content-Length: 3527 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_7R/venEtQrPLRhSmQi4ijg) Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT For networking devices, is the command expected to display the stats of the physical links (the list reported by dladm show-phys) or the network links (the list reported by dladm show-link) ? The lists may differ on Solaris when vnics or link aggregations are present. Kais. On 03/08/09 22:56, caijian guo - Sun Microsystems - Beijing China wrote: > Comments : > Since we have kstat, there is no need to use "libstatgrab", I have > tested it and have done lots of experiments . It works well using only > "kstat", > The application does not lack any of its normal functionality, the > output is the same. The functionality is the same. > > > Caijian > > > ? 2009?03?07? 05:59, James Carlson ??: >> Jim Walker writes: >> >>> James Carlson wrote: >>> >>>>>> bwm-ng is compile such that it is not dependent on libstatgrab. >>>>>> >>>>> Assuming that change mean that the application lacks any of its >>>>> "normal" functionality, I'll give this +1. >>>>> >>>> I meant "doesn't lack," obviously. :-/ >>>> >>> Right. It does fine using only kstat. >>> >> >> Sounds goodl; thanks. >> >> > --Boundary_(ID_7R/venEtQrPLRhSmQi4ijg) Content-type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT For networking devices, is the command expected to display the stats of the physical links
(the list reported by dladm show-phys) or the network links (the list reported by dladm show-link) ?
The lists may differ on Solaris when vnics or link aggregations are present.

    Kais.

On 03/08/09 22:56, caijian guo - Sun Microsystems - Beijing China wrote:
Comments :
Since we have kstat, there is no need to use "libstatgrab", I have tested it and have done lots of experiments . It works well using only "kstat",
 The application does not lack any of its normal functionality, the output is the same. The functionality is the same.


Caijian


于 2009年03月07日 05:59, James Carlson 写道: 
Jim Walker writes:
  
James Carlson wrote:
    
    bwm-ng is compile such that it is not dependent on libstatgrab.
          
Assuming that change mean that the application lacks any of its
"normal" functionality, I'll give this +1.
        
I meant "doesn't lack," obviously.  :-/
      
Right. It does fine using only kstat.
    

Sounds goodl; thanks.


--Boundary_(ID_7R/venEtQrPLRhSmQi4ijg)-- From Caijian.Guo@Sun.COM Thu Mar 12 00:06:17 2009 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2C76Gcn029187 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:06:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n2C75rcK008327 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:06:15 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KGD00403T2C1800@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Thu, 12 Mar 2009 01:06:12 -0600 (MDT) Received: from sineb-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.19.6]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KGD0016FT2AKI40@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Thu, 12 Mar 2009 01:06:12 -0600 (MDT) Received: from fe-apac-06.sun.com (fe-apac-06.sun.com [192.18.19.177] (may be forged)) by sineb-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n2C76Apg025045 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 07:06:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-apac.sun.com by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-3.01 64bit (built Dec 23 2008)) id <0KGD00700T1I4C00@mail-apac.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@Sun.COM (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.COM); Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:06:10 +0800 (SGT) Received: from [129.158.219.87] ([unknown] [129.158.219.87]) by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-3.01 64bit (built Dec 23 2008)) with ESMTPSA id <0KGD00FWET29H460@mail-apac.sun.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:06:10 +0800 (SGT) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:05:31 +0800 From: caijian guo - Sun Microsystems - Beijing China Subject: Re: bwm-ng [PSARC/2009/160 FastTrack timeout 03/13/2009] In-reply-to: <49B847A7.9080802@Sun.COM> Sender: Caijian.Guo@Sun.COM To: Kais.Belgaied@Sun.COM Cc: James.D.Carlson@Sun.COM, James.Walker@Sun.COM, PSARC-ext@Sun.COM Message-id: <49B8B43B.2060103@Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_rHsgbTmmWsAtNEQ6Au84ww)" X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200903062015.n26KFs3u020723@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <18865.35647.496783.59654@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <18865.36047.119607.854339@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <49B19AEB.4030303@sun.com> <18865.40149.246193.686112@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <49B4AF8B.50102@Sun.COM> <49B847A7.9080802@Sun.COM> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080422) Status: RO Content-Length: 4978 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_rHsgbTmmWsAtNEQ6Au84ww) Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Kais, I have tested that : Besides physical links, bwm-ng does be able to display the statistics of vnic , aggregation and vnic over aggregation. I used netperf to test. the throughput displayed by bwm-ng is the same as netperf. I tested it like so: # dladm create-vnic -l e1000g3 vnic1 # dladm create-aggr -l e1000g1 -l e1000g2 -L active aggr1 # dladm create-vnic -l aggr1 vnic2 # bwm-ng -I e1000g3 # bwm-ng -I vnic1 # bwm-ng -I vnic2 # bwm-ng -I aggr1 # bwm-ng Caijian ? 2009?03?12? 07:22, Kais Belgaied ??: > For networking devices, is the command expected to display the stats > of the physical links > (the list reported by dladm show-phys) or the network links (the list > reported by dladm show-link) ? > The lists may differ on Solaris when vnics or link aggregations are > present. > > Kais. > > On 03/08/09 22:56, caijian guo - Sun Microsystems - Beijing China wrote: >> Comments : >> Since we have kstat, there is no need to use "libstatgrab", I have >> tested it and have done lots of experiments . It works well using >> only "kstat", >> The application does not lack any of its normal functionality, the >> output is the same. The functionality is the same. >> >> >> Caijian >> >> >> ? 2009?03?07? 05:59, James Carlson ??: >>> Jim Walker writes: >>> >>>> James Carlson wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> bwm-ng is compile such that it is not dependent on libstatgrab. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Assuming that change mean that the application lacks any of its >>>>>> "normal" functionality, I'll give this +1. >>>>>> >>>>> I meant "doesn't lack," obviously. :-/ >>>>> >>>> Right. It does fine using only kstat. >>>> >>> >>> Sounds goodl; thanks. >>> >>> >> > --Boundary_(ID_rHsgbTmmWsAtNEQ6Au84ww) Content-type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Kais,

   I have tested that :
  Besides physical links, bwm-ng does be able to display the statistics of vnic , aggregation and vnic over aggregation.
  I used netperf to test. the throughput displayed by bwm-ng is the same as netperf.
I tested it like so:
# dladm create-vnic -l e1000g3 vnic1
# dladm create-aggr -l e1000g1 -l e1000g2 -L active aggr1
# dladm create-vnic -l aggr1 vnic2
# bwm-ng -I e1000g3
# bwm-ng -I vnic1
# bwm-ng -I vnic2
# bwm-ng -I aggr1
# bwm-ng


Caijian

于 2009年03月12日 07:22, Kais Belgaied 写道:
For networking devices, is the command expected to display the stats of the physical links
(the list reported by dladm show-phys) or the network links (the list reported by dladm show-link) ?
The lists may differ on Solaris when vnics or link aggregations are present.

    Kais.

On 03/08/09 22:56, caijian guo - Sun Microsystems - Beijing China wrote:
Comments :
Since we have kstat, there is no need to use "libstatgrab", I have tested it and have done lots of experiments . It works well using only "kstat",
 The application does not lack any of its normal functionality, the output is the same. The functionality is the same.


Caijian


于 2009年03月07日 05:59, James Carlson 写道: 
Jim Walker writes:
  
James Carlson wrote:
    
    bwm-ng is compile such that it is not dependent on libstatgrab.
          
Assuming that change mean that the application lacks any of its
"normal" functionality, I'll give this +1.
        
I meant "doesn't lack," obviously.  :-/
      
Right. It does fine using only kstat.
    

Sounds goodl; thanks.



--Boundary_(ID_rHsgbTmmWsAtNEQ6Au84ww)-- From Kais.Belgaied@sun.com Thu Mar 12 13:44:00 2009 Received: from sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail2sca.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.234]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2CKhx1D016996 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:44:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n2CKhpCx018987; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:43:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KGE00C6VUX6Z900@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:43:54 -0600 (MDT) Received: from jurassic-x4600.sfbay.sun.com ([129.146.17.63]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KGE00AJWUX3EO40@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:43:51 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [129.146.11.145] (sr1-jurassic-02.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.145]) by jurassic-x4600.sfbay.sun.com (8.14.3+Sun/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2CKhka2458750; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:43:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:43:50 -0700 From: Kais Belgaied Subject: Re: bwm-ng [PSARC/2009/160 FastTrack timeout 03/13/2009] In-reply-to: <49B8B43B.2060103@Sun.COM> To: caijian guo - Sun Microsystems - Beijing China Cc: James.D.Carlson@sun.com, James.Walker@sun.com, PSARC-ext@sun.com Reply-to: Kais.Belgaied@sun.com Message-id: <49B97406.4010603@Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_qD6yiDv3zvovLssJ0AKthw)" X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200903062015.n26KFs3u020723@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <18865.35647.496783.59654@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <18865.36047.119607.854339@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <49B19AEB.4030303@sun.com> <18865.40149.246193.686112@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <49B4AF8B.50102@Sun.COM> <49B847A7.9080802@Sun.COM> <49B8B43B.2060103@Sun.COM> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080807) Status: RO Content-Length: 3284 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_qD6yiDv3zvovLssJ0AKthw) Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Caijian, I guess you're saying that bwm-ng shows statistics about physical links. only. In that case how come the output of bwm-ng -I e1000g3 came out empty? Kais On 03/12/09 00:05, caijian guo - Sun Microsystems - Beijing China wrote: > Kais, > > I have tested that : > Besides physical links, bwm-ng does be able to display the > statistics of vnic , aggregation and vnic over aggregation. > I used netperf to test. the throughput displayed by bwm-ng is the > same as netperf. > I tested it like so: > # dladm create-vnic -l e1000g3 vnic1 > # dladm create-aggr -l e1000g1 -l e1000g2 -L active aggr1 > # dladm create-vnic -l aggr1 vnic2 > # bwm-ng -I e1000g3 > # bwm-ng -I vnic1 > # bwm-ng -I vnic2 > # bwm-ng -I aggr1 > # bwm-ng > > > Caijian > > ? 2009?03?12? 07:22, Kais Belgaied ??: >> For networking devices, is the command expected to display the stats >> of the physical links >> (the list reported by dladm show-phys) or the network links (the list >> reported by dladm show-link) ? >> The lists may differ on Solaris when vnics or link aggregations are >> present. >> >> Kais. --Boundary_(ID_qD6yiDv3zvovLssJ0AKthw) Content-type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Caijian,

I guess you're saying that bwm-ng shows statistics about physical links.
only.
In that case how come the output of bwm-ng -I e1000g3 came out empty?

    Kais


On 03/12/09 00:05, caijian guo - Sun Microsystems - Beijing China wrote:
Kais,

   I have tested that :
  Besides physical links, bwm-ng does be able to display the statistics of vnic , aggregation and vnic over aggregation.
  I used netperf to test. the throughput displayed by bwm-ng is the same as netperf.
I tested it like so:
# dladm create-vnic -l e1000g3 vnic1
# dladm create-aggr -l e1000g1 -l e1000g2 -L active aggr1
# dladm create-vnic -l aggr1 vnic2
# bwm-ng -I e1000g3
# bwm-ng -I vnic1
# bwm-ng -I vnic2
# bwm-ng -I aggr1
# bwm-ng


Caijian

于 2009年03月12日 07:22, Kais Belgaied 写道:
For networking devices, is the command expected to display the stats of the physical links
(the list reported by dladm show-phys) or the network links (the list reported by dladm show-link) ?
The lists may differ on Solaris when vnics or link aggregations are present.

    Kais.

--Boundary_(ID_qD6yiDv3zvovLssJ0AKthw)-- From Caijian.Guo@Sun.COM Thu Mar 12 19:43:05 2009 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2D2h57L029744 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:43:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n2D2h4TD021654 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 02:43:04 GMT Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KGF00D13BJQRU00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:43:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sineb-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.19.6]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KGF00LY0BJO9S90@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:43:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-apac-05.sun.com (fe-apac-05.sun.com [192.18.19.176] (may be forged)) by sineb-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n2D2h0Do011382 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 02:43:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-apac.sun.com by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-5.01 64bit (built Feb 19 2009)) id <0KGF00300BCWS000@mail-apac.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:43:00 +0800 (SGT) Received: from [129.158.219.87] ([unknown] [129.158.219.87]) by mail-apac.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-5.01 64bit (built Feb 19 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KGF009EXBJNX070@mail-apac.sun.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:43:00 +0800 (SGT) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:42:19 +0800 From: caijian guo - Sun Microsystems - Beijing China Subject: Re: bwm-ng [PSARC/2009/160 FastTrack timeout 03/13/2009] In-reply-to: <49B97406.4010603@Sun.COM> Sender: Caijian.Guo@Sun.COM To: Kais.Belgaied@Sun.COM Cc: James.D.Carlson@Sun.COM, James.Walker@Sun.COM, PSARC-ext@Sun.COM Message-id: <49B9C80B.9010505@Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_FtBOvfAU46O0EtMel9Pbjw)" X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200903062015.n26KFs3u020723@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <18865.35647.496783.59654@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <18865.36047.119607.854339@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <49B19AEB.4030303@sun.com> <18865.40149.246193.686112@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <49B4AF8B.50102@Sun.COM> <49B847A7.9080802@Sun.COM> <49B8B43B.2060103@Sun.COM> <49B97406.4010603@Sun.COM> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080422) Status: RO Content-Length: 4799 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_FtBOvfAU46O0EtMel9Pbjw) Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Kais, you misunderstood me. I meant that (1) bwm-ng can show statistics of physical links (2) bwm-ng can also show statistics of vnic , aggregation and vnic over aggregation . the outputs were not empty . the outputs were "curses" format (like "dladm show-link -S"), so I could not copy the results to this email. You can try it too, my bwm-ng x86 executable file is available at : /net/ns-x4200-22.sfbay/var/tmp/pkg/proto/root_i386/usr/bin/bwm-ng Caijian ? 2009?03?13? 04:43, Kais Belgaied ??: > > Caijian, > > I guess you're saying that bwm-ng shows statistics about physical links. > only. > In that case how come the output of bwm-ng -I e1000g3 came out empty? > > Kais > > > On 03/12/09 00:05, caijian guo - Sun Microsystems - Beijing China wrote: >> Kais, >> >> I have tested that : >> Besides physical links, bwm-ng does be able to display the >> statistics of vnic , aggregation and vnic over aggregation. >> I used netperf to test. the throughput displayed by bwm-ng is the >> same as netperf. >> I tested it like so: >> # dladm create-vnic -l e1000g3 vnic1 >> # dladm create-aggr -l e1000g1 -l e1000g2 -L active aggr1 >> # dladm create-vnic -l aggr1 vnic2 >> # bwm-ng -I e1000g3 >> # bwm-ng -I vnic1 >> # bwm-ng -I vnic2 >> # bwm-ng -I aggr1 >> # bwm-ng >> >> >> Caijian >> >> ? 2009?03?12? 07:22, Kais Belgaied ??: >>> For networking devices, is the command expected to display the stats >>> of the physical links >>> (the list reported by dladm show-phys) or the network links (the >>> list reported by dladm show-link) ? >>> The lists may differ on Solaris when vnics or link aggregations are >>> present. >>> >>> Kais. > --Boundary_(ID_FtBOvfAU46O0EtMel9Pbjw) Content-type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Kais,

    you  misunderstood me.
    I meant that
    (1) bwm-ng  can show statistics of  physical links
    (2)  bwm-ng can  also show  statistics  of  vnic  ,  aggregation and vnic over aggregation .

the outputs were not empty . the outputs were "curses" format (like "dladm show-link -S"), so I could not copy the results to this email.

You can try it too, my  bwm-ng x86 executable file is available at :
/net/ns-x4200-22.sfbay/var/tmp/pkg/proto/root_i386/usr/bin/bwm-ng

Caijian


于 2009年03月13日 04:43, Kais Belgaied 写道:

Caijian,

I guess you're saying that bwm-ng shows statistics about physical links.
only.
In that case how come the output of bwm-ng -I e1000g3 came out empty?

    Kais


On 03/12/09 00:05, caijian guo - Sun Microsystems - Beijing China wrote:
Kais,

   I have tested that :
  Besides physical links, bwm-ng does be able to display the statistics of vnic , aggregation and vnic over aggregation.
  I used netperf to test. the throughput displayed by bwm-ng is the same as netperf.
I tested it like so:
# dladm create-vnic -l e1000g3 vnic1
# dladm create-aggr -l e1000g1 -l e1000g2 -L active aggr1
# dladm create-vnic -l aggr1 vnic2
# bwm-ng -I e1000g3
# bwm-ng -I vnic1
# bwm-ng -I vnic2
# bwm-ng -I aggr1
# bwm-ng


Caijian

于 2009年03月12日 07:22, Kais Belgaied 写道:
For networking devices, is the command expected to display the stats of the physical links
(the list reported by dladm show-phys) or the network links (the list reported by dladm show-link) ?
The lists may differ on Solaris when vnics or link aggregations are present.

    Kais.


--Boundary_(ID_FtBOvfAU46O0EtMel9Pbjw)-- From Kais.Belgaied@sun.com Tue Mar 17 16:14:33 2009 Received: from sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail2sca.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.234]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2HNEXNB021702 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:14:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n2HNEUxZ019568; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:14:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KGO00H07B85CC00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:14:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jurassic-x4600.sfbay.sun.com ([129.146.17.59]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KGO00CA9B84Y350@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:14:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [129.146.11.145] (sr1-jurassic-02.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.145]) by jurassic-x4600.sfbay.sun.com (8.14.3+Sun/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2HNESTY201327; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:14:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:14:28 -0700 From: Kais Belgaied Subject: Re: bwm-ng [PSARC/2009/160 FastTrack timeout 03/13/2009] In-reply-to: <49B9C80B.9010505@Sun.COM> To: caijian guo - Sun Microsystems - Beijing China Cc: James.D.Carlson@sun.com, James.Walker@sun.com, PSARC-ext@sun.com Reply-to: Kais.Belgaied@sun.com Message-id: <49C02ED4.9060509@Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_16WNnGv6ttR3uQCyz4mOIg)" X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200903062015.n26KFs3u020723@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <18865.35647.496783.59654@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <18865.36047.119607.854339@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <49B19AEB.4030303@sun.com> <18865.40149.246193.686112@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <49B4AF8B.50102@Sun.COM> <49B847A7.9080802@Sun.COM> <49B8B43B.2060103@Sun.COM> <49B97406.4010603@Sun.COM> <49B9C80B.9010505@Sun.COM> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080807) Status: RO Content-Length: 2162 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_16WNnGv6ttR3uQCyz4mOIg) Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT OK. +1 (in case it is needed) Kais. On 03/12/09 19:42, caijian guo - Sun Microsystems - Beijing China wrote: > Kais, > > you misunderstood me. > I meant that > (1) bwm-ng can show statistics of physical links > (2) bwm-ng can also show statistics of vnic , aggregation > and vnic over aggregation . > > the outputs were not empty . the outputs were "curses" format (like > "dladm show-link -S"), so I could not copy the results to this email. > > You can try it too, my bwm-ng x86 executable file is available at : > /net/ns-x4200-22.sfbay/var/tmp/pkg/proto/root_i386/usr/bin/bwm-ng > > Caijian > --Boundary_(ID_16WNnGv6ttR3uQCyz4mOIg) Content-type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT OK.

+1 (in case it is needed)

    Kais.

On 03/12/09 19:42, caijian guo - Sun Microsystems - Beijing China wrote:
Kais,

    you  misunderstood me.
    I meant that
    (1) bwm-ng  can show statistics of  physical links
    (2)  bwm-ng can  also show  statistics  of  vnic  ,  aggregation and vnic over aggregation .

the outputs were not empty . the outputs were "curses" format (like "dladm show-link -S"), so I could not copy the results to this email.

You can try it too, my  bwm-ng x86 executable file is available at :
/net/ns-x4200-22.sfbay/var/tmp/pkg/proto/root_i386/usr/bin/bwm-ng

Caijian


--Boundary_(ID_16WNnGv6ttR3uQCyz4mOIg)-- From James.Walker@sun.com Tue Mar 24 10:51:50 2009 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2OHpnbm016685 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:51:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n2OHpiwj003006 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:51:49 GMT Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KH000E19UXX9W00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:51:33 -0600 (MDT) Received: from brmea-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.98.43]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KH0009M2UXWIB50@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:51:32 -0600 (MDT) Received: from fe-amer-10.sun.com ([192.18.109.80]) by brmea-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n2OHpWUX012204 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:51:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-5.01 64bit (built Feb 19 2009)) id <0KH000000UMAJ500@mail-amer.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:51:32 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [172.20.25.153] ([unknown] [172.20.25.153]) by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-5.01 64bit (built Feb 19 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KH000JZ6UXE9P50@mail-amer.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:51:15 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:55:57 -0600 From: Jim Walker Subject: Re: bwm-ng [PSARC/2009/160 FastTrack timeout 03/13/2009] In-reply-to: <200903062015.n26KFs3u020723@sac.sfbay.sun.com> Sender: James.Walker@sun.com To: PSARC-ext@sun.com Cc: Caijian.Guo@sun.com Reply-to: James.Walker@sun.com Message-id: <49C91EAD.6040905@sun.com> Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc. MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200903062015.n26KFs3u020723@sac.sfbay.sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080728) Status: RO Content-Length: 108 This case received two +1s and the timeout has expired. I am marking the case closed approved. Cheers, Jim