From rsb@sac.sfbay.sun.com Tue Apr 7 19:03:36 2009 Received: from sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail3mpk.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.52]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3823aax020181 for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 19:03:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n3823Zpu012249; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 19:03:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KHR0010JF1Z2700@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 20:03:35 -0600 (MDT) Received: from dm-sfbay-02.sfbay.sun.com ([129.146.11.31]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KHR00JEWF1ZFBC0@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 20:03:35 -0600 (MDT) Received: from sac.sfbay.sun.com (sac.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.226.132]) by dm-sfbay-02.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n3823Zdn053155; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 19:03:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sac.sfbay.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3823Xw3020175; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 19:03:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from rsb@localhost) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/Submit) id n3823Xgg020171; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 21:03:33 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 21:03:33 -0500 (CDT) From: Rich.Brown@sun.com Subject: CIFS Client Commands Update [PSARC/2009/226 Self Review] To: PSARC-ext@sun.com Cc: Gordon.Ross.Sun.COM@sac.sfbay.sun.com Message-id: <200904080203.n3823Xgg020171@sac.sfbay.sun.com> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 Status: RO Content-Length: 2012 I'm sponsoring the following for Gordon Ross. This is an update to an approved case. I believe this change qualifies for self-review and I've marked it Approved Automatic. If anyone disagrees, please let me know and I'll promote this to a fast-track. The requested binding is PATCH which matches the binding approved for the original case. Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems 1. Introduction 1.1. Project/Component Working Name: CIFS Client Commands Update 1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier: Author: Gordon Ross 1.3 Date of This Document: 07 April, 2009 4. Technical Description PSARC 2005/695 "CIFS Client on Solaris" (approved on 13 Sept 2007) introduced a new filesystem type: smbfs. Since then the project team realized that several smbfs-specific commands were not included in the original case: dfshare_smbfs, share_smbfs, and unshare_smbfs. The lack of an smbfs-specific dfshares program causes the dfshares(1m) command to exit with a failure code which causes regression tests to fail. (See CR 6670499 for details.) The smbfs-specific programs share and unshare are being included for completeness and conformity with autofs, cachefs, etc. This case corrects that oversight and adds the following commands: /usr/lib/fs/smbfs/dfshares dfshares_smbfs simply returns an exit code of 0 /usr/lib/fs/smbfs/share share_smbfs prints "smbfs share is not supported" and returns an exit code of 1 /usr/lib/fs/smbfs/unshare unshare_smbfs prints "smbfs unshare is not supported" and returns an exit code of 1 Just as there are no share_{fstype}.1m, unshare_{fstype}.1m, and dfshares_{fstype}.1m manual pages for autofs and cachefs, there are also no corresponding manual pages needed for smbfs. 6. Resources and Schedule 6.4. Steering Committee requested information 6.4.1. Consolidation C-team Name: ON 6.5. ARC review type: Automatic 6.6. ARC Exposure: open From Rich.Brown@sun.com Tue Apr 7 19:13:42 2009 Received: from sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail2sca.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.234]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n382DgMT020988 for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 19:13:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n382Df5J007736 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 19:13:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KHR00G0PFISIF00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 07 Apr 2009 19:13:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brmea-mail-4.sun.com ([192.18.98.36]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KHR00G0GFISHQ00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 07 Apr 2009 19:13:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-amer-09.sun.com ([192.18.109.79]) by brmea-mail-4.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n382DeoV011488 for ; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 02:13:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-5.01 64bit (built Feb 19 2009)) id <0KHR00600FCXVF00@mail-amer.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 07 Apr 2009 20:13:40 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [129.147.9.65] ([unknown] [129.147.9.65]) by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-5.01 64bit (built Feb 19 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KHR009G6FIQFN00@mail-amer.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@sun.com); Tue, 07 Apr 2009 20:13:40 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 21:13:38 -0500 From: Rich Brown Subject: Re: CIFS Client Commands Update [PSARC/2009/226 Self Review] In-reply-to: <200904080203.n3823Xgg020171@sac.sfbay.sun.com> Sender: Rich.Brown@sun.com To: PSARC-ext@sun.com Cc: Gordon.Ross@sun.com Message-id: <49DC0852.7040701@Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200904080203.n3823Xgg020171@sac.sfbay.sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080807) Status: RO Content-Length: 2243 I mistyped Gordon's address. This corrects my mistake. Rich On 04/07/09 21:03, Rich.Brown@Sun.COM wrote: > I'm sponsoring the following for Gordon Ross. This is an update to an > approved case. > > I believe this change qualifies for self-review and I've marked it > Approved Automatic. If anyone disagrees, please let me know and I'll > promote this to a fast-track. > > The requested binding is PATCH which matches the binding approved for > the original case. > > > Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI > This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems > 1. Introduction > 1.1. Project/Component Working Name: > CIFS Client Commands Update > 1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier: > Author: Gordon Ross > 1.3 Date of This Document: > 07 April, 2009 > 4. Technical Description > > PSARC 2005/695 "CIFS Client on Solaris" (approved on 13 Sept 2007) > introduced a new filesystem type: smbfs. Since then the project team > realized that several smbfs-specific commands were not included in the > original case: dfshare_smbfs, share_smbfs, and unshare_smbfs. > > The lack of an smbfs-specific dfshares program causes the dfshares(1m) > command to exit with a failure code which causes regression tests to > fail. (See CR 6670499 for details.) The smbfs-specific programs share > and unshare are being included for completeness and conformity with > autofs, cachefs, etc. > > This case corrects that oversight and adds the following commands: > > /usr/lib/fs/smbfs/dfshares > > dfshares_smbfs simply returns an exit code of 0 > > /usr/lib/fs/smbfs/share > > share_smbfs prints "smbfs share is not supported" > and returns an exit code of 1 > > /usr/lib/fs/smbfs/unshare > > unshare_smbfs prints "smbfs unshare is not supported" > and returns an exit code of 1 > > Just as there are no share_{fstype}.1m, unshare_{fstype}.1m, and > dfshares_{fstype}.1m manual pages for autofs and cachefs, there are > also no corresponding manual pages needed for smbfs. > > 6. Resources and Schedule > 6.4. Steering Committee requested information > 6.4.1. Consolidation C-team Name: > ON > 6.5. ARC review type: Automatic > 6.6. ARC Exposure: open > > From carlsonj@phorcys.east.sun.com Thu Apr 9 05:26:21 2009 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n39CQKOD025439 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 05:26:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n39CQ9jh014801; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 20:26:17 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KHU0060F2JR7U00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 05:26:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phorcys.east.sun.com ([129.148.174.143]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KHU005E02JQTT00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 05:26:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phorcys.east.sun.com (phorcys.local [127.0.0.1]) by phorcys.east.sun.com (8.14.3+Sun/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n39CPmIU006926; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 08:25:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from carlsonj@localhost) by phorcys.east.sun.com (8.14.3+Sun/8.14.3/Submit) id n39CPm3A006923; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 08:25:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 08:25:48 -0400 From: James Carlson Subject: Re: CIFS Client Commands Update [PSARC/2009/226 Self Review] In-reply-to: <200904080203.n3823Xgg020171@sac.sfbay.sun.com> To: Rich.Brown@sun.com Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com, Gordon.Ross.Sun.COM@sac.sfbay.sun.com Message-id: <18909.59724.691359.865948@gargle.gargle.HOWL> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: VM 7.01 under Emacs 21.3.1 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200904080203.n3823Xgg020171@sac.sfbay.sun.com> Status: RO Content-Length: 450 Rich.Brown@Sun.COM writes: > I believe this change qualifies for self-review and I've marked it > Approved Automatic. If anyone disagrees, please let me know and I'll > promote this to a fast-track. Seems simple enough. +1 -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677