From blu@sac.sfbay.sun.com Wed Jul 1 11:23:45 2009 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n61INiXd014769 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:23:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n61INcAY013806; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 19:23:43 +0100 (BST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KM4009058FH3S00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:23:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dm-sfbay-02.sfbay.sun.com ([129.146.11.31]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KM400BCX8FGM8C0@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:23:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sac.sfbay.sun.com (sac.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.226.132]) by dm-sfbay-02.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n61INeSZ040015; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:23:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sac.sfbay.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n61INdXX014764; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:23:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from blu@localhost) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/Submit) id n61INdW0014760; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:23:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:23:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Brian Utterback Subject: Reject IPv6 route header type 0 [PSARC/2009/376 Self Review] To: PSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <200907011823.n61INdW0014760@sac.sfbay.sun.com> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 Status: RO Content-Length: 968 I am submitting this case as closed-automatic with self-review. If anyone disagrees, please speak up. Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems 1. Introduction 1.1. Project/Component Working Name: Reject IPv6 route header type 0 1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier: Author: Brian Utterback 1.3 Date of This Document: 01 July, 2009 4. Technical Description RFC 5095 deprecated routing header type 0 because of security reasons. This actually leaves no routing header types as valid. Because we continue to process these route headers, we are failing the IPv6 certification tests. This project proposes to remove the processing of route header type 0 and treat it as we do all other unknown types. 6. Resources and Schedule 6.4. Steering Committee requested information 6.4.1. Consolidation C-team Name: ON 6.5. ARC review type: Automatic 6.6. ARC Exposure: open From Garrett.Damore@Sun.COM Wed Jul 1 17:15:19 2009 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n620FIUL024851 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 17:15:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n620EY3a017039 for <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:PSARC-ext@sun.com>; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 01:15:17 +0100 (BST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KM400C05OPF0L00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.Com); Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:15:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sca-es-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.43.132]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KM4002Y2OPFNUE0@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM> for PSARC-ext@sun.com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.Com); Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:15:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-sfbay-10.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n620FFJJ009242 for ; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:15:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-10.sun.com by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 64bit (built Apr 16 2009)) id <0KM400D00ONH2B00@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com> for PSARC-ext@Sun.Com (ORCPT PSARC-ext@Sun.Com); Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:15:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [129.153.2.5] ([unknown] [129.153.2.5]) by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 64bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KM4007LQOPFAH30@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com>; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:15:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:15:15 -0700 From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: Re: Reject IPv6 route header type 0 [PSARC/2009/376 Self Review] In-reply-to: <200907011823.n61INdW0014760@sac.sfbay.sun.com> Sender: Garrett.Damore@Sun.COM To: Brian Utterback Cc: PSARC-ext@Sun.COM Message-id: <4A4BFC13.10300@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200907011823.n61INdW0014760@sac.sfbay.sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090110) Status: RO Content-Length: 1086 On 07/01/09 11:23, Brian Utterback wrote: > I am submitting this case as closed-automatic with self-review. If anyone disagrees, > please speak up. > +1. - Garrett > Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI > This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems > 1. Introduction > 1.1. Project/Component Working Name: > Reject IPv6 route header type 0 > 1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier: > Author: Brian Utterback > 1.3 Date of This Document: > 01 July, 2009 > 4. Technical Description > RFC 5095 deprecated routing header type 0 because of security reasons. This actually leaves no > routing header types as valid. Because we continue to process these route headers, we are > failing the IPv6 certification tests. This project proposes to remove the processing of > route header type 0 and treat it as we do all other unknown types. > > 6. Resources and Schedule > 6.4. Steering Committee requested information > 6.4.1. Consolidation C-team Name: > ON > 6.5. ARC review type: Automatic > 6.6. ARC Exposure: open > >