From alanc@sac.sfbay.sun.com Fri Oct 30 13:37:38 2009 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9UKbbb6017686; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:37:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n9UKbVZm022012; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:37:37 GMT Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KSC0091ZHAOMI00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:37:36 -0600 (MDT) Received: from dm-sfbay-01.sfbay.sun.com ([129.145.155.118]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KSC0086EHAN2810@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:37:35 -0600 (MDT) Received: from sac.sfbay.sun.com (sac.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.226.132]) by dm-sfbay-01.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.4) with ESMTP id n9UKbZax008454; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:37:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sac.sfbay.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9UKbY0U017681; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:37:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from alanc@localhost) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/Submit) id n9UKbXra017677; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:37:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:37:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan Coopersmith Subject: TigerVNC 1.0 [PSARC/2009/592 FastTrack timeout 11/06/2009] To: PSARC-ext@sun.com Cc: LSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <200910302037.n9UKbXra017677@sac.sfbay.sun.com> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 Status: RO Content-Length: 3981 I am sponsoring this case for myself and have set the timeout for a week from today, next Friday, November 6. The case is submitted to PSARC and cc'ed to LSARC since this updates PSARC 2007/545 for Xvnc and LSARC 2007/625 for vncviewer. The release binding is set to patch as there are no incompatible changes, but there are no plans for patch/update delivery at this time. -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith@sun.com Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems 1. Introduction 1.1. Project/Component Working Name: TigerVNC 1.0 1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier: Author: Alan Coopersmith 1.3 Date of This Document: 30 October, 2009 4. Technical Description This project replaces the VNC implementation used for Xvnc & vncviewer, moving from the RealVNC open source release provided by RealVNC, Inc. to the TigerVNC community-maintained fork. RealVNC has quietly cut back on new open source releases of their software, with just two minor security fixes released since 2005. The TigerVNC community project was formed by the maintainers of several open source distros, who had to independently maintain the changes needed to make RealVNC work with current Xorg releases (RealVNC's source releases still only support XFree86 4.x), and developers from the TightVNC and TurboVNC variants, which provided enhancements over the original RealVNC sources. TigerVNC maintains compatibility with the core Remote Frame Buffer (RFB) protocol used by all VNC implementations, while supporting several extensions that RealVNC has not adopted, for better compression & security. The specification of the protocol, with these extensions, is provided in the case materials as rfbproto.html. Several command line options have been added to the commands, including both new functionality, and variants of the existing "colour" options with the "u" removed for American spelling habits. No incompatible changes are made. The case materials include diffs of the man pages for reference. This project also provides a new command, x0vncserver, which connects to a running X server and exports its display over the RFB protocol to VNC clients. The vncserver command is modified by this project to start a GNOME session by default, instead of a simple twm & xterm session. Users with existing $HOME/.vnc/xstartup scripts will not be affected by this change. The GNOME session will be started by running /etc/gdm/Xsession if it is found, otherwise, falling back to running /usr/dt/config/Xsession.jds. If neither of those are not found, then the default startup will fallback to the twm & xterm session. Imported interfaces: -------------------- /usr/bin/ssh Stable PSARC 2001/212 /usr/bin/vncconfig Volatile PSARC 2007/545 /usr/bin/vncpasswd Volatile PSARC 2007/545 /usr/bin/vncserver Volatile PSARC 2007/545 /usr/X11/bin/Xvnc Volatile PSARC 2007/545 /usr/bin/vncviewer Committed LSARC 2007/625 vncviewer : Committed LSARC 2007/625 All other vncviewer options Volatile LSARC 2007/625 /etc/gdm/Xsession Uncommitted LSARC 2003/261, LSARC 2009/433 /usr/dt/config/Xsession.jds Stable LSARC 2004/713, LSARC 2006/161 Exported interfaces: -------------------- New vncviewer options: Volatile vncviewer.txt -DesktopSize, -LowColorLevel, -via, -PreferredEncoding Tight /usr/X11/bin/Xvnc Obsolete PSARC 2009/482 /usr/bin/Xvnc Volatile /usr/bin/x0vncserver Volatile References: 1. http://www.tigervnc.com/ 2. The RFB Protocol - rfbproto.html 3. TigerVNC man pages: Xvnc.txt, vncconfig.txt, vncpasswd.txt, vncserver.txt vncviewer.txt, x0vncserver.txt 6. Resources and Schedule 6.4. Steering Committee requested information 6.4.1. Consolidation C-team Name: X Consolidation / Desktop C-Team 6.5. ARC review type: FastTrack 6.6. ARC Exposure: open From alanc@sac.sfbay.sun.com Fri Oct 30 13:37:38 2009 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9UKbbb6017686; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:37:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n9UKbVZm022012; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:37:37 GMT Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KSC0091ZHAOMI00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:37:36 -0600 (MDT) Received: from dm-sfbay-01.sfbay.sun.com ([129.145.155.118]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KSC0086EHAN2810@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:37:35 -0600 (MDT) Received: from sac.sfbay.sun.com (sac.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.226.132]) by dm-sfbay-01.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.4) with ESMTP id n9UKbZax008454; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:37:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sac.sfbay.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9UKbY0U017681; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:37:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from alanc@localhost) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/Submit) id n9UKbXra017677; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:37:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:37:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan Coopersmith Subject: TigerVNC 1.0 [PSARC/2009/592 FastTrack timeout 11/06/2009] To: PSARC-ext@sun.com Cc: LSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <200910302037.n9UKbXra017677@sac.sfbay.sun.com> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 Status: RO Content-Length: 3981 I am sponsoring this case for myself and have set the timeout for a week from today, next Friday, November 6. The case is submitted to PSARC and cc'ed to LSARC since this updates PSARC 2007/545 for Xvnc and LSARC 2007/625 for vncviewer. The release binding is set to patch as there are no incompatible changes, but there are no plans for patch/update delivery at this time. -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith@sun.com Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems 1. Introduction 1.1. Project/Component Working Name: TigerVNC 1.0 1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier: Author: Alan Coopersmith 1.3 Date of This Document: 30 October, 2009 4. Technical Description This project replaces the VNC implementation used for Xvnc & vncviewer, moving from the RealVNC open source release provided by RealVNC, Inc. to the TigerVNC community-maintained fork. RealVNC has quietly cut back on new open source releases of their software, with just two minor security fixes released since 2005. The TigerVNC community project was formed by the maintainers of several open source distros, who had to independently maintain the changes needed to make RealVNC work with current Xorg releases (RealVNC's source releases still only support XFree86 4.x), and developers from the TightVNC and TurboVNC variants, which provided enhancements over the original RealVNC sources. TigerVNC maintains compatibility with the core Remote Frame Buffer (RFB) protocol used by all VNC implementations, while supporting several extensions that RealVNC has not adopted, for better compression & security. The specification of the protocol, with these extensions, is provided in the case materials as rfbproto.html. Several command line options have been added to the commands, including both new functionality, and variants of the existing "colour" options with the "u" removed for American spelling habits. No incompatible changes are made. The case materials include diffs of the man pages for reference. This project also provides a new command, x0vncserver, which connects to a running X server and exports its display over the RFB protocol to VNC clients. The vncserver command is modified by this project to start a GNOME session by default, instead of a simple twm & xterm session. Users with existing $HOME/.vnc/xstartup scripts will not be affected by this change. The GNOME session will be started by running /etc/gdm/Xsession if it is found, otherwise, falling back to running /usr/dt/config/Xsession.jds. If neither of those are not found, then the default startup will fallback to the twm & xterm session. Imported interfaces: -------------------- /usr/bin/ssh Stable PSARC 2001/212 /usr/bin/vncconfig Volatile PSARC 2007/545 /usr/bin/vncpasswd Volatile PSARC 2007/545 /usr/bin/vncserver Volatile PSARC 2007/545 /usr/X11/bin/Xvnc Volatile PSARC 2007/545 /usr/bin/vncviewer Committed LSARC 2007/625 vncviewer : Committed LSARC 2007/625 All other vncviewer options Volatile LSARC 2007/625 /etc/gdm/Xsession Uncommitted LSARC 2003/261, LSARC 2009/433 /usr/dt/config/Xsession.jds Stable LSARC 2004/713, LSARC 2006/161 Exported interfaces: -------------------- New vncviewer options: Volatile vncviewer.txt -DesktopSize, -LowColorLevel, -via, -PreferredEncoding Tight /usr/X11/bin/Xvnc Obsolete PSARC 2009/482 /usr/bin/Xvnc Volatile /usr/bin/x0vncserver Volatile References: 1. http://www.tigervnc.com/ 2. The RFB Protocol - rfbproto.html 3. TigerVNC man pages: Xvnc.txt, vncconfig.txt, vncpasswd.txt, vncserver.txt vncviewer.txt, x0vncserver.txt 6. Resources and Schedule 6.4. Steering Committee requested information 6.4.1. Consolidation C-team Name: X Consolidation / Desktop C-Team 6.5. ARC review type: FastTrack 6.6. ARC Exposure: open From carlsonj@workingcode.com Fri Oct 30 13:46:22 2009 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9UKkLXH017913; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:46:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n9UKkJsI027693; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:46:19 GMT Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KSC00209HP79H00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:46:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sca-ea-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.43.24]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KSC00DFUHP5I3C0@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:46:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay11i.sun.com (ip121.net129179-4.block1.us.syntegra.com [129.179.4.121]) by sca-ea-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n9UKkHJI019575; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:46:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mmp11es.mmp.us.syntegra.com ([160.41.208.11] [160.41.208.11]) by relay11i.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-5450673; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:46:17 +0000 (Z) Received: from relay14i.sun.com (relay14i.sun.com [129.179.4.124]) by mmp11es.mmp.us.syntegra.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-40199475; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:46:17 +0000 (Z) Received: from carlson.workingcode.com ([75.150.68.97] [75.150.68.97]) by relay1i.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-7757148; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:46:17 +0000 (Z) Received: from [75.150.68.97] (carlson [75.150.68.97]) (authenticated bits=0) by carlson.workingcode.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n9UKkFkT006880 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:46:16 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:46:15 -0400 From: James Carlson Subject: Re: TigerVNC 1.0 [PSARC/2009/592 FastTrack timeout 11/06/2009] In-reply-to: <200910302037.n9UKbXra017677@sac.sfbay.sun.com> To: Alan Coopersmith Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com, LSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <4AEB5097.8040903@workingcode.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-DCC-dcc1.aftenposten.no-Metrics: carlson 1215; Body=3 Fuz1=3 Fuz2=3 References: <200910302037.n9UKbXra017677@sac.sfbay.sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090818) Status: RO Content-Length: 784 Alan Coopersmith wrote: > TigerVNC maintains compatibility with the core Remote Frame Buffer (RFB) > protocol used by all VNC implementations, while supporting several > extensions that RealVNC has not adopted, for better compression & security. > The specification of the protocol, with these extensions, is provided in > the case materials as rfbproto.html. Dumb off-topic non-architectural question, but this fast-track just reminded me: does this update also fix the core dumps that happen on v6-enabled machines? I have to type "vncviewer 127.1:1" instead of "localhost:1" or just ":1", because the v6 "::1" causes vncviewer to drop core. If so, then the update is a really welcome addition. ;-} -- James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W From carlsonj@workingcode.com Fri Oct 30 13:46:22 2009 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9UKkLXH017913; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:46:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n9UKkJsI027693; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:46:19 GMT Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KSC00209HP79H00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:46:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sca-ea-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.43.24]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KSC00DFUHP5I3C0@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:46:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay11i.sun.com (ip121.net129179-4.block1.us.syntegra.com [129.179.4.121]) by sca-ea-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n9UKkHJI019575; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:46:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mmp11es.mmp.us.syntegra.com ([160.41.208.11] [160.41.208.11]) by relay11i.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-5450673; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:46:17 +0000 (Z) Received: from relay14i.sun.com (relay14i.sun.com [129.179.4.124]) by mmp11es.mmp.us.syntegra.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-40199475; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:46:17 +0000 (Z) Received: from carlson.workingcode.com ([75.150.68.97] [75.150.68.97]) by relay1i.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-7757148; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:46:17 +0000 (Z) Received: from [75.150.68.97] (carlson [75.150.68.97]) (authenticated bits=0) by carlson.workingcode.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n9UKkFkT006880 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:46:16 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:46:15 -0400 From: James Carlson Subject: Re: TigerVNC 1.0 [PSARC/2009/592 FastTrack timeout 11/06/2009] In-reply-to: <200910302037.n9UKbXra017677@sac.sfbay.sun.com> To: Alan Coopersmith Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com, LSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <4AEB5097.8040903@workingcode.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-DCC-dcc1.aftenposten.no-Metrics: carlson 1215; Body=3 Fuz1=3 Fuz2=3 References: <200910302037.n9UKbXra017677@sac.sfbay.sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090818) Status: RO Content-Length: 784 Alan Coopersmith wrote: > TigerVNC maintains compatibility with the core Remote Frame Buffer (RFB) > protocol used by all VNC implementations, while supporting several > extensions that RealVNC has not adopted, for better compression & security. > The specification of the protocol, with these extensions, is provided in > the case materials as rfbproto.html. Dumb off-topic non-architectural question, but this fast-track just reminded me: does this update also fix the core dumps that happen on v6-enabled machines? I have to type "vncviewer 127.1:1" instead of "localhost:1" or just ":1", because the v6 "::1" causes vncviewer to drop core. If so, then the update is a really welcome addition. ;-} -- James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W From Alan.Coopersmith@Sun.COM Fri Oct 30 14:07:26 2009 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9UL7PfW018666; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:07:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n9UL78KG024898; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 05:07:24 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KSC00405IOBZA00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:07:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sca-es-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.43.132]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KSC00D9TIOAI9F0@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:07:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n9UL7Ml9013752; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:07:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-09.sun.com by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) id <0KSC00B00IFX5E00@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:07:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [129.145.155.53] ([unknown] [129.145.155.53]) by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KSC00ET4IO96S70@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:07:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:07:21 -0700 From: Alan Coopersmith Subject: Re: TigerVNC 1.0 [PSARC/2009/592 FastTrack timeout 11/06/2009] In-reply-to: <4AEB5097.8040903@workingcode.com> Sender: Alan.Coopersmith@Sun.COM To: James Carlson Cc: PSARC-ext@Sun.COM, LSARC-ext@Sun.COM Message-id: <4AEB5589.4040701@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 References: <200910302037.n9UKbXra017677@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <4AEB5097.8040903@workingcode.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090720) Status: RO Content-Length: 1173 James Carlson wrote: > Dumb off-topic non-architectural question, but this fast-track just > reminded me: does this update also fix the core dumps that happen on > v6-enabled machines? I have to type "vncviewer 127.1:1" instead of > "localhost:1" or just ":1", because the v6 "::1" causes vncviewer to > drop core. > > If so, then the update is a really welcome addition. ;-} I'm not seeing core dumps when trying that with either the old or new versions of vncviewer, nor do I see any bug reports in bugster under solaris/xserver/vnc matching that description. We can take that discussion offline to see if we can figure out what's going on with that bug. This update does not fix the limitation that while vncviewer is capable of connecting to a RFB server over IPv6, the Xvnc server only listens for incoming connections on IPv4. That's a limitation that needs to be fixed upstream. (The vncviewer IPv6 support was originally a Fedora addition to RealVNC we picked up, and which the Fedora maintainer has integrated into TigerVNC upstream now.) -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith@sun.com Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering From Alan.Coopersmith@Sun.COM Fri Oct 30 14:07:26 2009 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9UL7PfW018666; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:07:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n9UL78KG024898; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 05:07:24 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KSC00405IOBZA00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:07:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sca-es-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.43.132]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KSC00D9TIOAI9F0@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:07:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n9UL7Ml9013752; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:07:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-09.sun.com by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) id <0KSC00B00IFX5E00@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:07:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [129.145.155.53] ([unknown] [129.145.155.53]) by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KSC00ET4IO96S70@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:07:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:07:21 -0700 From: Alan Coopersmith Subject: Re: TigerVNC 1.0 [PSARC/2009/592 FastTrack timeout 11/06/2009] In-reply-to: <4AEB5097.8040903@workingcode.com> Sender: Alan.Coopersmith@Sun.COM To: James Carlson Cc: PSARC-ext@Sun.COM, LSARC-ext@Sun.COM Message-id: <4AEB5589.4040701@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 References: <200910302037.n9UKbXra017677@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <4AEB5097.8040903@workingcode.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090720) Status: RO Content-Length: 1173 James Carlson wrote: > Dumb off-topic non-architectural question, but this fast-track just > reminded me: does this update also fix the core dumps that happen on > v6-enabled machines? I have to type "vncviewer 127.1:1" instead of > "localhost:1" or just ":1", because the v6 "::1" causes vncviewer to > drop core. > > If so, then the update is a really welcome addition. ;-} I'm not seeing core dumps when trying that with either the old or new versions of vncviewer, nor do I see any bug reports in bugster under solaris/xserver/vnc matching that description. We can take that discussion offline to see if we can figure out what's going on with that bug. This update does not fix the limitation that while vncviewer is capable of connecting to a RFB server over IPv6, the Xvnc server only listens for incoming connections on IPv4. That's a limitation that needs to be fixed upstream. (The vncviewer IPv6 support was originally a Fedora addition to RealVNC we picked up, and which the Fedora maintainer has integrated into TigerVNC upstream now.) -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith@sun.com Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering From carlsonj@workingcode.com Fri Oct 30 14:35:12 2009 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9ULZBqE019438; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:35:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n9ULZBN7009489; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:35:11 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KSC00E01JYMCM00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:35:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sca-ea-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.43.25]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KSC009G2JYMJN70@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:35:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay42i.sun.com ([192.5.209.72]) by sca-ea-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n9ULQGf6005504; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:35:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mms49es.mms.us.syntegra.com ([160.41.221.232] [160.41.221.232]) by relay42i.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-2539146; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:35:09 +0000 (Z) Received: from relay45i.sun.com (relay45i.sun.com [192.5.209.94]) by mms49es.mms.us.syntegra.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-30243686; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:35:09 +0000 (Z) Received: from carlson.workingcode.com ([75.150.68.97] [75.150.68.97]) by relay4i.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-7781754; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:35:09 +0000 (Z) Received: from [75.150.68.97] (carlson [75.150.68.97]) (authenticated bits=0) by carlson.workingcode.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n9ULZ78b013939 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:35:08 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:35:07 -0400 From: James Carlson Subject: Re: TigerVNC 1.0 [PSARC/2009/592 FastTrack timeout 11/06/2009] In-reply-to: <4AEB5589.4040701@sun.com> To: Alan Coopersmith Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com, LSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <4AEB5C0B.80609@workingcode.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-DCC-sonic.net-Metrics: carlson 1117; Body=3 Fuz1=3 Fuz2=3 X-Antispam: No, score=-0.2/5.0, scanned in 0.134sec at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smf-spamd v1.3.1 - http://smfs.sf.net/ References: <200910302037.n9UKbXra017677@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <4AEB5097.8040903@workingcode.com> <4AEB5589.4040701@sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090818) Status: RO Content-Length: 1490 Alan Coopersmith wrote: > James Carlson wrote: >> Dumb off-topic non-architectural question, but this fast-track just >> reminded me: does this update also fix the core dumps that happen on >> v6-enabled machines? I have to type "vncviewer 127.1:1" instead of >> "localhost:1" or just ":1", because the v6 "::1" causes vncviewer to >> drop core. >> >> If so, then the update is a really welcome addition. ;-} > > I'm not seeing core dumps when trying that with either the old or new > versions of vncviewer, nor do I see any bug reports in bugster under > solaris/xserver/vnc matching that description. We can take that > discussion offline to see if we can figure out what's going on with > that bug. It was such an obvious problem that I thought it must have been seen by someone else. I guess I should be more diligent about reporting problems. Anyway, I've reported it now: http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=12366 > This update does not fix the limitation that while vncviewer is > capable of connecting to a RFB server over IPv6, the Xvnc server only > listens for incoming connections on IPv4. That's a limitation that > needs to be fixed upstream. (The vncviewer IPv6 support was > originally a Fedora addition to RealVNC we picked up, and which the > Fedora maintainer has integrated into TigerVNC upstream now.) OK. Is there a project team working on those upstream issues? -- James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W From carlsonj@workingcode.com Fri Oct 30 14:35:12 2009 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9ULZBqE019438; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:35:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n9ULZBN7009489; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:35:11 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KSC00E01JYMCM00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:35:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sca-ea-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.43.25]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KSC009G2JYMJN70@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:35:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay42i.sun.com ([192.5.209.72]) by sca-ea-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n9ULQGf6005504; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:35:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mms49es.mms.us.syntegra.com ([160.41.221.232] [160.41.221.232]) by relay42i.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-2539146; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:35:09 +0000 (Z) Received: from relay45i.sun.com (relay45i.sun.com [192.5.209.94]) by mms49es.mms.us.syntegra.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-30243686; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:35:09 +0000 (Z) Received: from carlson.workingcode.com ([75.150.68.97] [75.150.68.97]) by relay4i.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-7781754; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:35:09 +0000 (Z) Received: from [75.150.68.97] (carlson [75.150.68.97]) (authenticated bits=0) by carlson.workingcode.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n9ULZ78b013939 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:35:08 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:35:07 -0400 From: James Carlson Subject: Re: TigerVNC 1.0 [PSARC/2009/592 FastTrack timeout 11/06/2009] In-reply-to: <4AEB5589.4040701@sun.com> To: Alan Coopersmith Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com, LSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <4AEB5C0B.80609@workingcode.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-DCC-sonic.net-Metrics: carlson 1117; Body=3 Fuz1=3 Fuz2=3 X-Antispam: No, score=-0.2/5.0, scanned in 0.134sec at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smf-spamd v1.3.1 - http://smfs.sf.net/ References: <200910302037.n9UKbXra017677@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <4AEB5097.8040903@workingcode.com> <4AEB5589.4040701@sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090818) Status: RO Content-Length: 1490 Alan Coopersmith wrote: > James Carlson wrote: >> Dumb off-topic non-architectural question, but this fast-track just >> reminded me: does this update also fix the core dumps that happen on >> v6-enabled machines? I have to type "vncviewer 127.1:1" instead of >> "localhost:1" or just ":1", because the v6 "::1" causes vncviewer to >> drop core. >> >> If so, then the update is a really welcome addition. ;-} > > I'm not seeing core dumps when trying that with either the old or new > versions of vncviewer, nor do I see any bug reports in bugster under > solaris/xserver/vnc matching that description. We can take that > discussion offline to see if we can figure out what's going on with > that bug. It was such an obvious problem that I thought it must have been seen by someone else. I guess I should be more diligent about reporting problems. Anyway, I've reported it now: http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=12366 > This update does not fix the limitation that while vncviewer is > capable of connecting to a RFB server over IPv6, the Xvnc server only > listens for incoming connections on IPv4. That's a limitation that > needs to be fixed upstream. (The vncviewer IPv6 support was > originally a Fedora addition to RealVNC we picked up, and which the > Fedora maintainer has integrated into TigerVNC upstream now.) OK. Is there a project team working on those upstream issues? -- James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W From Alan.Coopersmith@sun.com Fri Oct 30 14:44:02 2009 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9ULi029019754; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:44:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n9ULhtCC004653; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:43:59 GMT Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KSC00G0HKD9DW00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:43:57 -0600 (MDT) Received: from sca-es-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.43.132]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KSC008UKKD82E80@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:43:57 -0600 (MDT) Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n9ULhuUT017341; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:43:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-09.sun.com by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) id <0KSC00400K72JE00@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:43:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [129.145.155.53] ([unknown] [129.145.155.53]) by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KSC00MHEKD8SM20@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:43:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:43:56 -0700 From: Alan Coopersmith Subject: Re: TigerVNC 1.0 [PSARC/2009/592 FastTrack timeout 11/06/2009] In-reply-to: <4AEB5C0B.80609@workingcode.com> Sender: Alan.Coopersmith@sun.com To: James Carlson Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com, LSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <4AEB5E1C.4020204@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 References: <200910302037.n9UKbXra017677@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <4AEB5097.8040903@workingcode.com> <4AEB5589.4040701@sun.com> <4AEB5C0B.80609@workingcode.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090720) Status: RO Content-Length: 895 James Carlson wrote: >> This update does not fix the limitation that while vncviewer is >> capable of connecting to a RFB server over IPv6, the Xvnc server only >> listens for incoming connections on IPv4. That's a limitation that >> needs to be fixed upstream. (The vncviewer IPv6 support was >> originally a Fedora addition to RealVNC we picked up, and which the >> Fedora maintainer has integrated into TigerVNC upstream now.) > > OK. Is there a project team working on those upstream issues? Not at Sun. I haven't checked if the upstream community is working on them. (The VNC project team at Sun is mostly me a couple hours a year doing updates, and other engineers occasionally doing a bug fix here and there. This is not a high priority project by any means.) -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith@sun.com Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering From Alan.Coopersmith@sun.com Fri Oct 30 14:44:02 2009 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9ULi029019754; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:44:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n9ULhtCC004653; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:43:59 GMT Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KSC00G0HKD9DW00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:43:57 -0600 (MDT) Received: from sca-es-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.43.132]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KSC008UKKD82E80@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:43:57 -0600 (MDT) Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n9ULhuUT017341; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:43:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-09.sun.com by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) id <0KSC00400K72JE00@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:43:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [129.145.155.53] ([unknown] [129.145.155.53]) by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KSC00MHEKD8SM20@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:43:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:43:56 -0700 From: Alan Coopersmith Subject: Re: TigerVNC 1.0 [PSARC/2009/592 FastTrack timeout 11/06/2009] In-reply-to: <4AEB5C0B.80609@workingcode.com> Sender: Alan.Coopersmith@sun.com To: James Carlson Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com, LSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <4AEB5E1C.4020204@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 References: <200910302037.n9UKbXra017677@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <4AEB5097.8040903@workingcode.com> <4AEB5589.4040701@sun.com> <4AEB5C0B.80609@workingcode.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090720) Status: RO Content-Length: 895 James Carlson wrote: >> This update does not fix the limitation that while vncviewer is >> capable of connecting to a RFB server over IPv6, the Xvnc server only >> listens for incoming connections on IPv4. That's a limitation that >> needs to be fixed upstream. (The vncviewer IPv6 support was >> originally a Fedora addition to RealVNC we picked up, and which the >> Fedora maintainer has integrated into TigerVNC upstream now.) > > OK. Is there a project team working on those upstream issues? Not at Sun. I haven't checked if the upstream community is working on them. (The VNC project team at Sun is mostly me a couple hours a year doing updates, and other engineers occasionally doing a bug fix here and there. This is not a high priority project by any means.) -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith@sun.com Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering From gdamore@sun.com Fri Oct 30 15:27:23 2009 Received: from sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail2sca.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.234]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9UMRNvZ022105; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:27:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.4) with ESMTP id n9UMRNLE015476; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:27:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KSC00F01MDNF100@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:27:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sca-es-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.43.132]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KSC0096BMDMJX30@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:27:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-sfbay-10.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n9UMRMFX020999; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:27:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-10.sun.com by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) id <0KSC00700M6CCY00@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:27:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.251.11] ([unknown] [76.93.15.33]) by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KSC00B82MDMJ500@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:27:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:27:22 -0700 From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: Re: TigerVNC 1.0 [PSARC/2009/592 FastTrack timeout 11/06/2009] In-reply-to: <200910302037.n9UKbXra017677@sac.sfbay.sun.com> Sender: Garrett.Damore@sun.com To: Alan Coopersmith Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com, LSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <4AEB684A.40103@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200910302037.n9UKbXra017677@sac.sfbay.sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090909) Status: RO Content-Length: 4374 Alan Coopersmith wrote: > I am sponsoring this case for myself and have set the timeout for a week > from today, next Friday, November 6. The case is submitted to PSARC and > cc'ed to LSARC since this updates PSARC 2007/545 for Xvnc and LSARC 2007/625 > for vncviewer. The release binding is set to patch as there are no > incompatible changes, but there are no plans for patch/update delivery at > this time. > > -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith@sun.com > Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering > > Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI > This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems > 1. Introduction > 1.1. Project/Component Working Name: > TigerVNC 1.0 > 1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier: > Author: Alan Coopersmith > 1.3 Date of This Document: > 30 October, 2009 > 4. Technical Description > > This project replaces the VNC implementation used for Xvnc & vncviewer, > moving from the RealVNC open source release provided by RealVNC, Inc. to > the TigerVNC community-maintained fork. RealVNC has quietly cut back on > new open source releases of their software, with just two minor security > fixes released since 2005. The TigerVNC community project was formed by > the maintainers of several open source distros, who had to independently > maintain the changes needed to make RealVNC work with current Xorg releases > (RealVNC's source releases still only support XFree86 4.x), and developers > from the TightVNC and TurboVNC variants, which provided enhancements over the > original RealVNC sources. > > TigerVNC maintains compatibility with the core Remote Frame Buffer (RFB) > protocol used by all VNC implementations, while supporting several > extensions that RealVNC has not adopted, for better compression & security. > The specification of the protocol, with these extensions, is provided in > the case materials as rfbproto.html. > I don't see that file. Specifically I want to make sure that the extensions won't have any negative effect for interoperability with older clients or older servers. - Garrett > Several command line options have been added to the commands, including > both new functionality, and variants of the existing "colour" options > with the "u" removed for American spelling habits. No incompatible changes > are made. The case materials include diffs of the man pages for reference. > > This project also provides a new command, x0vncserver, which connects to a > running X server and exports its display over the RFB protocol to VNC clients. > > The vncserver command is modified by this project to start a GNOME session > by default, instead of a simple twm & xterm session. Users with existing > $HOME/.vnc/xstartup scripts will not be affected by this change. The GNOME > session will be started by running /etc/gdm/Xsession if it is found, > otherwise, falling back to running /usr/dt/config/Xsession.jds. > If neither of those are not found, then the default startup will fallback to > the twm & xterm session. > > > Imported interfaces: > -------------------- > /usr/bin/ssh Stable PSARC 2001/212 > > /usr/bin/vncconfig Volatile PSARC 2007/545 > /usr/bin/vncpasswd Volatile PSARC 2007/545 > /usr/bin/vncserver Volatile PSARC 2007/545 > /usr/X11/bin/Xvnc Volatile PSARC 2007/545 > > /usr/bin/vncviewer Committed LSARC 2007/625 > vncviewer : Committed LSARC 2007/625 > All other vncviewer options Volatile LSARC 2007/625 > > /etc/gdm/Xsession Uncommitted LSARC 2003/261, > LSARC 2009/433 > /usr/dt/config/Xsession.jds Stable LSARC 2004/713, > LSARC 2006/161 > > > Exported interfaces: > -------------------- > New vncviewer options: Volatile vncviewer.txt > -DesktopSize, -LowColorLevel, -via, > -PreferredEncoding Tight > > /usr/X11/bin/Xvnc Obsolete PSARC 2009/482 > /usr/bin/Xvnc Volatile > /usr/bin/x0vncserver Volatile > > References: > 1. http://www.tigervnc.com/ > 2. The RFB Protocol - rfbproto.html > 3. TigerVNC man pages: Xvnc.txt, vncconfig.txt, vncpasswd.txt, vncserver.txt > vncviewer.txt, x0vncserver.txt > > 6. Resources and Schedule > 6.4. Steering Committee requested information > 6.4.1. Consolidation C-team Name: > X Consolidation / Desktop C-Team > 6.5. ARC review type: FastTrack > 6.6. ARC Exposure: open > > From gdamore@sun.com Fri Oct 30 15:27:23 2009 Received: from sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail2sca.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.234]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9UMRNvZ022105; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:27:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.4) with ESMTP id n9UMRNLE015476; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:27:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KSC00F01MDNF100@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:27:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sca-es-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.43.132]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KSC0096BMDMJX30@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:27:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-sfbay-10.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n9UMRMFX020999; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:27:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-10.sun.com by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) id <0KSC00700M6CCY00@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:27:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.251.11] ([unknown] [76.93.15.33]) by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KSC00B82MDMJ500@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:27:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:27:22 -0700 From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: Re: TigerVNC 1.0 [PSARC/2009/592 FastTrack timeout 11/06/2009] In-reply-to: <200910302037.n9UKbXra017677@sac.sfbay.sun.com> Sender: Garrett.Damore@sun.com To: Alan Coopersmith Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com, LSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <4AEB684A.40103@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200910302037.n9UKbXra017677@sac.sfbay.sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090909) Status: RO Content-Length: 4374 Alan Coopersmith wrote: > I am sponsoring this case for myself and have set the timeout for a week > from today, next Friday, November 6. The case is submitted to PSARC and > cc'ed to LSARC since this updates PSARC 2007/545 for Xvnc and LSARC 2007/625 > for vncviewer. The release binding is set to patch as there are no > incompatible changes, but there are no plans for patch/update delivery at > this time. > > -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith@sun.com > Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering > > Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI > This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems > 1. Introduction > 1.1. Project/Component Working Name: > TigerVNC 1.0 > 1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier: > Author: Alan Coopersmith > 1.3 Date of This Document: > 30 October, 2009 > 4. Technical Description > > This project replaces the VNC implementation used for Xvnc & vncviewer, > moving from the RealVNC open source release provided by RealVNC, Inc. to > the TigerVNC community-maintained fork. RealVNC has quietly cut back on > new open source releases of their software, with just two minor security > fixes released since 2005. The TigerVNC community project was formed by > the maintainers of several open source distros, who had to independently > maintain the changes needed to make RealVNC work with current Xorg releases > (RealVNC's source releases still only support XFree86 4.x), and developers > from the TightVNC and TurboVNC variants, which provided enhancements over the > original RealVNC sources. > > TigerVNC maintains compatibility with the core Remote Frame Buffer (RFB) > protocol used by all VNC implementations, while supporting several > extensions that RealVNC has not adopted, for better compression & security. > The specification of the protocol, with these extensions, is provided in > the case materials as rfbproto.html. > I don't see that file. Specifically I want to make sure that the extensions won't have any negative effect for interoperability with older clients or older servers. - Garrett > Several command line options have been added to the commands, including > both new functionality, and variants of the existing "colour" options > with the "u" removed for American spelling habits. No incompatible changes > are made. The case materials include diffs of the man pages for reference. > > This project also provides a new command, x0vncserver, which connects to a > running X server and exports its display over the RFB protocol to VNC clients. > > The vncserver command is modified by this project to start a GNOME session > by default, instead of a simple twm & xterm session. Users with existing > $HOME/.vnc/xstartup scripts will not be affected by this change. The GNOME > session will be started by running /etc/gdm/Xsession if it is found, > otherwise, falling back to running /usr/dt/config/Xsession.jds. > If neither of those are not found, then the default startup will fallback to > the twm & xterm session. > > > Imported interfaces: > -------------------- > /usr/bin/ssh Stable PSARC 2001/212 > > /usr/bin/vncconfig Volatile PSARC 2007/545 > /usr/bin/vncpasswd Volatile PSARC 2007/545 > /usr/bin/vncserver Volatile PSARC 2007/545 > /usr/X11/bin/Xvnc Volatile PSARC 2007/545 > > /usr/bin/vncviewer Committed LSARC 2007/625 > vncviewer : Committed LSARC 2007/625 > All other vncviewer options Volatile LSARC 2007/625 > > /etc/gdm/Xsession Uncommitted LSARC 2003/261, > LSARC 2009/433 > /usr/dt/config/Xsession.jds Stable LSARC 2004/713, > LSARC 2006/161 > > > Exported interfaces: > -------------------- > New vncviewer options: Volatile vncviewer.txt > -DesktopSize, -LowColorLevel, -via, > -PreferredEncoding Tight > > /usr/X11/bin/Xvnc Obsolete PSARC 2009/482 > /usr/bin/Xvnc Volatile > /usr/bin/x0vncserver Volatile > > References: > 1. http://www.tigervnc.com/ > 2. The RFB Protocol - rfbproto.html > 3. TigerVNC man pages: Xvnc.txt, vncconfig.txt, vncpasswd.txt, vncserver.txt > vncviewer.txt, x0vncserver.txt > > 6. Resources and Schedule > 6.4. Steering Committee requested information > 6.4.1. Consolidation C-team Name: > X Consolidation / Desktop C-Team > 6.5. ARC review type: FastTrack > 6.6. ARC Exposure: open > > From alan.coopersmith@sun.com Fri Oct 30 15:34:12 2009 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9UMYA8v022446; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:34:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n9UMY667004845; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:34:09 GMT Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KSC00L07MOVKF00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:34:07 -0600 (MDT) Received: from sca-es-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.43.133]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KSC008IXMOV2H90@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:34:07 -0600 (MDT) Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n9UMY6Jr001463; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:34:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-09.sun.com by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) id <0KSC00300MFX1700@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:34:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [129.145.155.53] ([unknown] [129.145.155.53]) by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KSC0072UMOUE400@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:34:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:34:06 -0700 From: Alan Coopersmith Subject: Re: TigerVNC 1.0 [PSARC/2009/592 FastTrack timeout 11/06/2009] In-reply-to: <4AEB684A.40103@sun.com> Sender: alan.coopersmith@sun.com To: "Garrett D'Amore" Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com, LSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <4AEB69DE.3070004@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 References: <200910302037.n9UKbXra017677@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <4AEB684A.40103@sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090720) Status: RO Content-Length: 429 Garrett D'Amore wrote: >> The specification of the protocol, with these extensions, is provided in >> the case materials as rfbproto.html. > > I don't see that file. Whoops, forgot to copy it in - it's there now, in both plain text & html (It's just a dump of the current copy from http://www.tigervnc.com/ .) -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith@sun.com Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering From alan.coopersmith@sun.com Fri Oct 30 15:34:12 2009 Received: from sunmail5.uk.sun.com (sunmail5.UK.Sun.COM [129.156.85.165]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9UMYA8v022446; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:34:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (brm-avmta-1.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.4.11]) by sunmail5.uk.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n9UMY667004845; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:34:09 GMT Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KSC00L07MOVKF00@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:34:07 -0600 (MDT) Received: from sca-es-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.43.133]) by brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KSC008IXMOV2H90@brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:34:07 -0600 (MDT) Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n9UMY6Jr001463; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:34:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-09.sun.com by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) id <0KSC00300MFX1700@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:34:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [129.145.155.53] ([unknown] [129.145.155.53]) by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KSC0072UMOUE400@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:34:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:34:06 -0700 From: Alan Coopersmith Subject: Re: TigerVNC 1.0 [PSARC/2009/592 FastTrack timeout 11/06/2009] In-reply-to: <4AEB684A.40103@sun.com> Sender: alan.coopersmith@sun.com To: "Garrett D'Amore" Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com, LSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <4AEB69DE.3070004@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 References: <200910302037.n9UKbXra017677@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <4AEB684A.40103@sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090720) Status: RO Content-Length: 429 Garrett D'Amore wrote: >> The specification of the protocol, with these extensions, is provided in >> the case materials as rfbproto.html. > > I don't see that file. Whoops, forgot to copy it in - it's there now, in both plain text & html (It's just a dump of the current copy from http://www.tigervnc.com/ .) -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith@sun.com Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering From gdamore@sun.com Fri Oct 30 15:41:41 2009 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9UMfd6f022737; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:41:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n9UMfYh5013172; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 06:41:38 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KSC00H03N1CGI00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:41:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sca-es-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.43.133]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KSC00985N1CJP50@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:41:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n9UMfa6n001959; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:41:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-09.sun.com by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) id <0KSC00A00MVBGO00@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:41:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.251.11] ([unknown] [76.93.15.33]) by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KSC007W9N1CE410@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:41:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:41:35 -0700 From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: Re: TigerVNC 1.0 [PSARC/2009/592 FastTrack timeout 11/06/2009] In-reply-to: <4AEB69DE.3070004@sun.com> Sender: Garrett.Damore@sun.com To: Alan Coopersmith Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com, LSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <4AEB6B9F.5060603@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200910302037.n9UKbXra017677@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <4AEB684A.40103@sun.com> <4AEB69DE.3070004@sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090909) Status: RO Content-Length: 631 Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Garrett D'Amore wrote: > >>> The specification of the protocol, with these extensions, is provided in >>> the case materials as rfbproto.html. >>> >> I don't see that file. >> > > Whoops, forgot to copy it in - it's there now, in both plain text & html > (It's just a dump of the current copy from http://www.tigervnc.com/ .) > > Thanks. It looks like there is a reasonable handshake where the client requests extensions, and if the server doesn't support them they are ignored. Conversely, an older client will never request a newer extension. So I'm happy. +1. - Garrett From gdamore@sun.com Fri Oct 30 15:41:41 2009 Received: from sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (sunmail4.Singapore.Sun.COM [129.158.71.19]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9UMfd6f022737; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:41:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM (nwk-avmta-1.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.11.74]) by sunmail4.singapore.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id n9UMfYh5013172; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 06:41:38 +0800 (SGT) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KSC00H03N1CGI00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:41:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sca-es-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.43.133]) by nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KSC00985N1CJP50@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:41:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n9UMfa6n001959; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:41:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-09.sun.com by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) id <0KSC00A00MVBGO00@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:41:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.251.11] ([unknown] [76.93.15.33]) by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KSC007W9N1CE410@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:41:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:41:35 -0700 From: "Garrett D'Amore" Subject: Re: TigerVNC 1.0 [PSARC/2009/592 FastTrack timeout 11/06/2009] In-reply-to: <4AEB69DE.3070004@sun.com> Sender: Garrett.Damore@sun.com To: Alan Coopersmith Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com, LSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <4AEB6B9F.5060603@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 References: <200910302037.n9UKbXra017677@sac.sfbay.sun.com> <4AEB684A.40103@sun.com> <4AEB69DE.3070004@sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090909) Status: RO Content-Length: 631 Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Garrett D'Amore wrote: > >>> The specification of the protocol, with these extensions, is provided in >>> the case materials as rfbproto.html. >>> >> I don't see that file. >> > > Whoops, forgot to copy it in - it's there now, in both plain text & html > (It's just a dump of the current copy from http://www.tigervnc.com/ .) > > Thanks. It looks like there is a reasonable handshake where the client requests extensions, and if the server doesn't support them they are ignored. Conversely, an older client will never request a newer extension. So I'm happy. +1. - Garrett From Alan.Coopersmith@sun.com Wed Nov 4 10:17:33 2009 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nA4IHWQP008865; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:17:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id nA4IHUvH004286; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:17:32 -0700 (MST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KSL00K07K58JI00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:17:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from sca-es-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.43.132]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KSL00HCKK57VG90@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:17:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id nA4IHVQL009525; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:17:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-09.sun.com by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) id <0KSL00D00IXPL300@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com>; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:17:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from [129.145.155.53] ([unknown] [129.145.155.53]) by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KSL00B2KK56P0I0@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com>; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:17:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:17:30 -0800 From: Alan Coopersmith Subject: Re: TigerVNC 1.0 [PSARC/2009/592 FastTrack timeout 11/06/2009] In-reply-to: <200910302037.n9UKbXra017677@sac.sfbay.sun.com> Sender: Alan.Coopersmith@sun.com To: Alan Coopersmith Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com, LSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <4AF1C53A.5060102@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 References: <200910302037.n9UKbXra017677@sac.sfbay.sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090720) Status: RO Content-Length: 307 Alan Coopersmith wrote: > I am sponsoring this case for myself and have set the timeout for a week > from today, next Friday, November 6. This case was approved today during PSARC business. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith@sun.com Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering From Alan.Coopersmith@sun.com Wed Nov 4 10:17:33 2009 Received: from newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (newsunmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.62.245]) by sac.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nA4IHWQP008865; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:17:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (nwk-avmta-2.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.155.6]) by newsunmail1brm.central.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id nA4IHUvH004286; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:17:32 -0700 (MST) Received: from pmxchannel-daemon.nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) id <0KSL00K07K58JI00@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:17:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from sca-es-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.43.132]) by nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0KSL00HCKK57VG90@nwk-avmta-2.sfbay.sun.com>; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:17:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id nA4IHVQL009525; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:17:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-09.sun.com by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) id <0KSL00D00IXPL300@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com>; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:17:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from [129.145.155.53] ([unknown] [129.145.155.53]) by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KSL00B2KK56P0I0@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com>; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:17:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:17:30 -0800 From: Alan Coopersmith Subject: Re: TigerVNC 1.0 [PSARC/2009/592 FastTrack timeout 11/06/2009] In-reply-to: <200910302037.n9UKbXra017677@sac.sfbay.sun.com> Sender: Alan.Coopersmith@sun.com To: Alan Coopersmith Cc: PSARC-ext@sun.com, LSARC-ext@sun.com Message-id: <4AF1C53A.5060102@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.4.1.325704 X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 References: <200910302037.n9UKbXra017677@sac.sfbay.sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090720) Status: RO Content-Length: 307 Alan Coopersmith wrote: > I am sponsoring this case for myself and have set the timeout for a week > from today, next Friday, November 6. This case was approved today during PSARC business. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith@sun.com Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering